Katja Ott

Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction by Metabolic Imaging

PURPOSE Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with gastroesophageal cancer is hampered by the lack of reliable predictors of tumor response. This study evaluates whether positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) may predict response early in the course of therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty consecutive patients with locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction were studied by FDG-PET at baseline and 14 days after initiation of cisplatin-based polychemotherapy. Clinical response (reduction of tumor length and wall thickness by > 50%) was evaluated after 3 months of therapy using endoscopy and standard imaging techniques. Patients with potentially resectable tumors underwent surgery, and tumor regression was assessed histopathologically. RESULTS The reduction of tumor FDG uptake (mean +/- 1 SD) after 14 days of therapy was significantly different between responding (-54% +/- 17%) and nonresponding tumors (-15% +/- 21%). Optimal differentiation was achieved by a cutoff value of 35% reduction of initial FDG uptake. Applying this cutoff value as a criterion for a metabolic response predicted clinical response with a sensitivity and specificity of 93% (14 of 15 patients) and 95% (21 of 22), respectively. Histopathologically complete or subtotal tumor regression was achieved in 53% (eight of 15) of the patients with a metabolic response but only in 5% (one of 22) of the patients without a metabolic response. Patients without a metabolic response were also characterized by significantly shorter time to progression/recurrence (P =.01) and shorter overall survival (P =.04). CONCLUSION PET imaging may differentiate responding and nonresponding tumors early in the course of therapy. By avoiding ineffective and potentially harmful treatment, this may markedly facilitate the use of preoperative therapy, especially in patients with potentially resectable tumors.

PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial

BACKGROUND In patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG), early metabolic response defined by 18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET ([(18)F]FDG-PET) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is predictive of histopathological response and survival. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a PET-response-guided treatment algorithm and its potential effect on prognosis. METHODS Between May 27, 2002, and Aug 4, 2005, 119 patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of AEG type 1 (distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma) or type 2 (gastric cardia adenocarcinoma) were recruited into this prospective, single-centre study. All patients were assigned to 2 weeks of platinum and fluorouracil-based induction chemotherapy (evaluation period). Those with decreases in tumour glucose standard uptake values (SUVs), predefined as decreases of 35% or more at the end of the evaluation period and measured by PET, were defined as metabolic responders. Responders continued to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy of folinic acid and fluorouracil plus cisplatin, or folinic acid and fluorouracil plus cisplatin and paclitaxel, or folinic acid and fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin for 12 weeks and then proceeded to surgery. Metabolic non-responders discontinued chemotherapy after the 2-week evaluation period and proceeded to surgery. The primary endpoint was median overall survival of metabolic responders and non-responders. Secondary endpoints were median event-free survival, postoperative complications and mortality, number of residual tumour-free (R0) resections, and histopathological responses. This study has been registered in the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT) as trial 2007-003356-11. FINDINGS 110 patients were evaluable for metabolic responses. 54 of these patients had metabolic responses (ie, decrease of 35% or more in tumour glucose SUV) after 2 weeks of induction chemotherapy, corresponding to a response of 49% (95% CI 39-59). 104 patients had tumour resection (50 in the responder group and 54 in the non-responder group). After a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR 1.7-3.0), median overall survival was not reached in metabolic responders, whereas median overall survival was 25.8 months (19.4-32.2) in non-responders (HR 2.13 [1.14-3.99, p=0.015). Median event-free survival was 29.7 months (95% CI 23.6-35.7) in metabolic responders and 14.1 months (7.5-20.6) in non-responders (hazard ratio [HR] 2.18 [1.32-3.62], p=0.002). Major histological remissions (<10% residual tumour) were noted in 29 of 50 metabolic responders (58% [95% CI 48-67]), but no histological response was noted in metabolic non-responders. INTERPRETATION This study confirmed prospectively the usefulness of early metabolic response evaluation, and shows the feasibility of a PET-guided treatment algorithm. These findings might enable tailoring of multimodal treatment in accordance with individual tumour biology in future randomised trials.

Metabolic Imaging Predicts Response, Survival, and Recurrence in Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction

PURPOSE A previous study suggested that measurement of therapy-induced changes in tumor glucose metabolism by positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analog [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) allows to select patients most likely to benefit from preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). The aim of this study was to prospectively validate these findings by using an a priori definition of metabolic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-five patients with locally advanced AEGs were included. Tumor glucose utilization was quantitatively assessed by FDG-PET before chemotherapy and 14 days after initiation of therapy. Patients were classified as metabolic responders when the metabolic activity of the primary tumor had decreased by more than 35% at the time of the second PET. RESULTS Metabolic responders showed a high histopathologic response rate (44%) with a 3-year survival rate of 70%. In contrast, prognosis was poor for metabolic nonresponders with a histopathologic response rate of 5% (P = .001) and a 3-year survival rate of 35% (P = .01). A multivariate analysis (covariates: ypT-, ypN-category, histopathologic response) demonstrated that metabolic response was the only factor predicting recurrence (P = .018) in the subgroup of completely resected (R0) patients. CONCLUSION This study prospectively demonstrates that changes in tumor metabolic activity during chemotherapy predict response, prognosis, and recurrence. These data provide the basis for clinical trials in which preoperative treatment is changed for patients without a metabolic response early in the course of therapy. PET-guided induction therapy may even be applicable to earlier tumor stages because surgery is only minimally delayed in nonresponding patients.

Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown some success in the treatment of gastric carcinoma, but objective parameters for measuring its effects are lacking. The authors performed the current study to determine which histomorphologic features are correlated with patient prognosis after chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Compared With Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Cancer of the Stomach and Cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Randomized Trial 40954

PURPOSE Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer benefit from combined pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, although fewer than 50% could receive postoperative chemotherapy. We examined the value of purely preoperative chemotherapy in a phase III trial with strict preoperative staging and surgical resection guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (AEG II and III) were randomly assigned to preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery or to surgery alone. To detect with 80% power an improvement in median survival from 17 months with surgery alone to 24 months with neoadjuvant, 282 events were required. RESULTS This trial was stopped for poor accrual after 144 patients were randomly assigned (72:72); 52.8% patients had tumors located in the proximal third of the stomach, including AEG type II and III. The International Union Against Cancer R0 resection rate was 81.9% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared with 66.7% with surgery alone (P = .036). The surgery-only group had more lymph node metastases than the neoadjuvant group (76.5% v 61.4%; P = .018). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant arm (27.1% v 16.2%; P = .09). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years and 67 deaths, a survival benefit could not be shown (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35; P = .466). CONCLUSION This trial showed a significantly increased R0 resection rate but failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. Possible explanations are low statistical power, a high rate of proximal gastric cancer including AEG and/or a better outcome than expected after radical surgery alone due to the high quality of surgery with resections of regional lymph nodes outside the perigastic area (celiac trunc, hepatic ligament, lymph node at a. lienalis; D2).

Prediction of Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Gastric Carcinoma by Metabolic Imaging: Results of a Prospective Trial

PURPOSE We prospectively evaluated the predictive value of therapy-induced reduction of tumor glucose use for subsequent response and patient survival in patients with gastric cancer treated by preoperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-four consecutive patients with locally advanced gastric carcinomas were studied by positron emission tomography with the glucose analog fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) at baseline and 14 days after initiation of cisplatin-based polychemotherapy. On the basis of a previous study, a reduction of tumor FDG uptake by more than 35% was used as a criterion for a metabolic response. The metabolic response in FDG-PET was correlated with histopathologic response after completion of therapy (< 10% viable tumor cells in the resected specimen) and patient survival. RESULTS Thirty-five (80%) of the 44 tumors were visualized with sufficient contrast for quantitative analysis (two of 19 intestinal and seven of 25 nonintestinal tumors showed only low FDG uptake). In the 35 assessable patients, PET imaging after 14 days of therapy correctly predicted histopathologic response after 3 months of therapy in 10 (77%) of 13 responders and 19 (86%) of 22 nonresponders. Median overall survival for patients with a metabolic response has not been reached (2-year survival rate, 90%); for patients without a metabolic response, median survival was only 18.9 months (2-year survival rate, 25%; P =.002) CONCLUSION This study prospectively demonstrates that in patients with gastric cancer, response to preoperative chemotherapy can be predicted by FDG-PET early during the course of therapy. By avoiding the morbidity and costs of ineffective therapy, FDG-PET imaging may markedly facilitate the use of preoperative chemotherapy.

Diffuse type gastric and lobular breast carcinoma in a familial gastric cancer patient with an E-cadherin germline mutation.

E-Cadherin alterations have been reported frequently in sporadic diffuse type gastric and lobular breast carcinomas. Germline mutations of this gene have been identified recently in several gastric cancer families. We analyzed seven patients with a family history of the disease who had diffuse type gastric cancer diagnosed before the age of 45 for germline mutations in CDH1, the gene encoding the E-cadherin protein. We identified a frameshift mutation in exon 3 in one patient with a strong family history of gastric cancer. The same germline mutation was found in the patients mother, who had metachronous development of lobular breast and diffuse type gastric carcinomas. Immunohistochemistry for E-cadherin protein expression revealed an abnormal staining pattern in both of these tumors, suggesting complete inactivation of the cell adhesion molecule. Thus, our finding suggests that besides diffuse type gastric cancer, lobular breast carcinomas may be associated with germline CDH1 mutations.

Early Metabolic Response Evaluation by Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Allows In vivo Testing of Chemosensitivity in Gastric Cancer: Long-term Results of a Prospective Study

Purpose: We prospectively evaluated the predictive value of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) for in vivo testing of chemosensitivity in locally advanced gastric cancer using an a priori definition of metabolic response (a decrease of >35% of the standard uptake value). The goal of the study was the definition of biologically different groups of patients prior to or early during induction therapy, with special emphasis on FDG non–avid tumors. Experimental Design: Based on our data, which was published in 2003, at least 36 patients with metabolic response or FDG non–avid tumors had to be recruited for an analysis of the group of FDG non–avid tumors with sufficient statistical power. Seventy-one patients (32 metabolic nonresponders, 17 metabolic responders, and 22 patients with FDG non–avid tumors) underwent FDG-PET at baseline. In FDG-avid tumors, FDG-PET was repeated 14 days after the initiation of chemotherapy. Results: Metabolic responders (17 of 49) showed a high histopathologic response rate (69%) and a favorable prognosis (median survival not reached), whereas metabolic nonresponders (32 of 49) had a poor prognosis (median survival, 24.1 months) and showed a histopathologic response in 17%. The histopathologic response rate (24%) for FDG-PET non–avid patients showed no significant difference compared with FDG-avid nonresponders (P = 0.72). Survival of FDG non–avid patients was 36.7 months (not significantly different from FDG-avid nonresponders, 24.1 months, P = 0.46). Conclusion: In locally advanced gastric cancer, three different metabolic groups exist. Response and survival was predicted by PET in FDG-avid tumors. Metabolic response assessment was not possible in FDG non–avid tumors; however, due to unfavorable outcome, therapy modification might also be considered in FDG non–avid tumors.

(18)F-FDG PET-guided salvage neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction : the MUNICON II trial

Previous studies demonstrated that chemotherapy-induced changes in tumor glucose metabolism measured with 18F-FDG PET identify patients who benefit from preoperative chemotherapy and those who do not. The prognosis for chemotherapy metabolic nonresponders is poorer than for metabolic responders. Therefore, we initiated this prospective trial to improve the clinical outcome of metabolic nonresponders using a salvage neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Methods: Fifty-six patients with locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction were included. Tumor glucose uptake was assessed by 18F-FDG PET before chemotherapy and 14 d after initiation of chemotherapy. PET nonresponders received salvage neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, whereas metabolic responders received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for 3 mo before surgery. Results: Thirty-three patients were metabolic responders, and 23 were nonresponders. Resection was performed on 54 patients. R0 resection rate was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66%–91%) in metabolic responders and 70% (95% CI, 49%–84%) in metabolic nonresponders (P = 0.51). Major histologic remissions were observed in 12 metabolic responders (36%; 95% CI, 22%–53%) and 6 nonresponders (26%; 95% CI, 13%–46%). One-year progression-free rate was 74% ± 8% in PET responders and 57% ± 10% in metabolic nonresponders (log rank test, P = 0.035). One-year overall survival was comparable between the groups (∼80%), and 2-y overall survival was estimated to be 71% ± 8% in metabolic responders and 42% ± 11% in PET nonresponders (hazard ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 0.87–4.24; P = 0.10). Conclusion: This prospective study showed the feasibility of a PET-guided treatment algorithm. However, by comparing the groups of nonresponding patients in the current trial and the previous published MUNICON (Metabolic response evalUatioN for Individualisation of neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Esophageal and esophagogastric adeNocarcinoma) I trial, increased histopathologic response was observed after salvage radiochemotherapy, but the primary endpoint of the study to increase the R0 resection rate was not met. The prognosis of the subgroup of PET nonresponders remains poor, indicating their different tumor biology.

Imaging Gastric Cancer with PET and the Radiotracers 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG: A Comparative Analysis

In this pilot study, we evaluated 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET for the detection of gastric cancer and compared the diagnostic accuracy with that of 18F-FDG PET. Methods: Forty-five patients (31 male and 14 female) with histologically proven locally advanced gastric cancer underwent attenuation-corrected whole-body 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT (low-dose CT). 18F-FLT emission images were acquired on a full-ring PET scanner 45 min after the injection of 270–340 MBq of 18F-FLT. 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed 60 min after the injection of 300–370 MBq of 18F-FDG. Mean standardized uptake values for 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG were calculated using circular ROIs (diameter, 1.5 cm) in the primary tumor manifestation site, in a reference segment of the liver, and in the bone marrow and were compared on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Results: According to the Lauren classification, 15 tumors (33%) were of the intestinal subtype and 30 (67%) of the nonintestinal subtype. 18F-FLT PET images showed high contrast for the primary tumor and proliferating bone marrow. In all patients (45/45), focal 18F-FLT uptake could be detected in the primary tumor. In contrast, 14 primary tumors were negative for 18F-FDG uptake, with lesional 18F-FDG uptake lower than or similar to background activity. The mean standardized uptake value for 18F-FLT in malignant primaries was 6.0 ± 2.5 (range, 2.4–12.7). In the subgroup of 18F-FDG–positive patients, the mean value for 18F-FDG was 8.4 ± 4.1 (range, 3.8/19.0), versus 6.8 ± 2.6 for 18F-FLT (Wilcoxon test: P = 0.03). Comparison of mean 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake in tumors with signet ring cells revealed no statistically significant difference between the tracers (6.2 ± 2.1 for 18F-FLT vs. 6.4 ± 2.8 for 18F-FDG; Wilcoxon test: P = 0.94). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that imaging gastric cancer with the proliferation marker 18F-FLT is feasible. 18F-FLT PET was more sensitive than 18F-FDG PET, especially in tumors frequently presenting without or with low 18F-FDG uptake, and may improve early evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment.