Katja P. Wolffenbuttel

Tumor risk in disorders of sex development

Certain patients with disorders of sex development (DSD), who bear Y chromosome material in their karyotype, are at increased risk for the development of type II germ cell tumors (GCT), which arise from early fetal germ cells. DSD gonads frequently harbor immature germ cells which express early fetal germ cell markers. Some of them (e.g. OCT3/4 and NANOG) seem to be of pathogenetic relevance in GCT development providing cells with the ability of pluripotency, proliferation and apoptosis suppression. Also TSPY (testis-specific protein Y-encoded), the main candidate for the so-called gonadoblastoma locus on Y chromosome, is overexpressed in germ cells of DSD patients and possibly contributes to their survival and proliferation. Nowadays, the use of immunohistochemical methods is highly relevant in identifying DSD gonads at risk. The risk for GCT development varies. While the prevalence of GCT is 15% in patients with partial androgen insensitivity, it may reach more than 30% in patients with gonadal dysgenesis. Patients with complete androgen insensitivity and ovotesticular DSD develop malignancies in 0.8% and 2.6% of cases, respectively. However, these data may be biased for various reasons. To better estimate the risk in individual groups of DSD, further investigations on large patient series are needed.

FOXL2 and SOX9 as parameters of female and male gonadal differentiation in patients with various forms of disorders of sex development (DSD)

The transcription factors SOX9 and FOXL2 are required for male and female mammalian gonadal development. We have used specific antibodies to investigate the role of these key proteins in disorders of sex development (DSD), specifically inter‐sex states. In normal gonads, SOX9 was found to be restricted to the presence of (pre‐)Sertoli cells, while FOXL2 was found in granulosa cells, and in stromal cells interpreted as early ovarian stroma. Both proteins were found within a single patient, when testicular and ovarian development was present; and within the same gonad, when both differentiation lineages were identified, as in ovotesticular DSD (ie hermaphrodite). Especially SOX9 was informative to support the presence of early testicular development (ie seminiferous tubules), expected based on morphological criteria only. In a limited number of DSD cases, FOXL2 was found within reasonably well‐developed seminiferous tubules, but double staining demonstrated that it was never strongly co‐expressed with SOX9 in the same cell. All seminiferous tubules containing carcinoma in situ (CIS), the malignant counterpart of a primordial germ cell, ie the precursor of type II germ cell tumours of the testis, seminomas and non‐seminomas, showed the presence of SOX9 and not FOXL2. In contrast, gonadoblastomas (GBs), the precursor of the same type of cancer, in a dysgenetic gonad, showed expression of FOXL2 and no, or only very low, SOX9 expression. These findings indicate that gonadal differentiation, ie testicular or ovarian, determines the morphology of the precursor of type II germ cell tumours, CIS or GB, respectively. We show that in DSD patients, the formation of either ovarian or/and testicular development can be visualized using FOXL2 and SOX9 expression, respectively. In addition, it initiates a novel way to study the role of the supportive cells in the development of either CIS or GB. Copyright

Gonadal pathology and tumor risk in relation to clinical characteristics in patients with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism

CONTEXT Gonadectomy is avoided whenever possible in boys with 45,X/46,XY. However, no clinical markers are currently available to guide clinicians in predicting gonadal tumor risk or hormone production. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that gonadal histology and risk for development of a malignant germ cell tumor are reflected by the clinical presentation of a 45,X/46,XY individual. DESIGN The design of the study was the correlation of clinical data [external masculinization score (EMS), pubertal outcome] with pathology data (gonadal phenotype, tumor risk). SETTING This was a multicenter study involving two multidisciplinary disorder of sex development teams. PATIENTS Patients included genetically proven 45,X/46,XY (and variants) cases, of whom at least one gonadal biopsy or gonadectomy specimen was available, together with clinical details. INTERVENTIONS Patients (n = 48) were divided into three groups, based on the EMS. Gonadal histology and tumor risk were assessed on paraffin-embedded samples (n = 87) by morphology and immunohistochemistry on the basis of established criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Gonadal differentiation and tumor risk in the three clinical groups were measured. Clinical outcome in patients with at least one preserved gonad was also measured. RESULTS Tumor risk in the three groups was significantly related to the gonadal differentiation pattern (P < 0.001). In boys, hormone production was sufficient and was not predicted by the EMS. CONCLUSIONS The EMS reflects gonadal differentiation and tumor risk in patients with 45,X/46,XY. In boys, testosterone production is often sufficient, but strict follow-up is warranted because of malignancy risk, which appears inversely related to EMS. In girls, tumor risk is limited but gonads are not functional, making gonadectomy the most reasonable option.

Gonadal tumours and DSD

Disorders of sex development (DSD), previously referred to as intersex, has been recognised as one of the main risk factors for development of type II germ cell tumours (GCTs), that is, seminomas/dysgerminomas and non-seminomas (e.g., embryonal carcinoma, yolk sac tumour, choriocarcinoma and teratoma). Within the testis, this type of cancer is the most frequent malignancy in adolescent and young adult Caucasian males. Although these males are not known to have dysgenetic gonads, the similarities in the resulting tumours suggest a common aetiological mechanism(s),--genetically, environmentally or a combination of both. Within the group of DSD patients, being in fact congenital conditions, the risk of malignant transformation of germ cells is highly heterogeneous, depending on a number of parameters, some of which have only recently been identified. Understanding of these recent insights will stimulate further research, with the final aim to develop an informative clinical decision tree for DSD patients, which includes optimal (early) diagnosis without overtreatment, such as prophylactic gonadectomy in the case of a low tumour risk.

Isolated 17,20-Lyase Deficiency due to the Cytochrome b5 Mutation W27X

CONTEXT Cytochrome P450c17 (P450c17) is a bifunctional enzyme necessary for the production of glucocorticoids (17-hydroxylase activity) and sex steroids (17,20-lyase activity). Isolated 17,20-lyase deficiency is a rare condition characterized by a deficient production of androgens resulting in 46,XY disorders of sex development (DSD) while the production of glucocorticoids is intact. Several missense mutations in the CYP17A1 gene are known to cause this condition. Cytochrome b(5) (CytB5) is an important factor in 17,20-lyase activity, probably by acting as an allosteric factor. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the role of CytB5 in a patient with defective 17,20-lyase activity. SETTING We conducted the study in a pediatric outpatient clinic of a University Hospital. PATIENTS We studied a 46,XY DSD patient with 17,20-lyase deficiency without missense mutation in the CYP17A1 gene and his parents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We sequenced the CYB5 gene and measured steroid hormone levels. RESULTS Analysis of the CYB5 gene in our patient revealed a homozygous W27X mutation, leading to the formation of a premature stop codon; his parents were both heterozygous carriers of this mutation. This mutation results in the absence of residues E48 and E49 of CytB5, which are necessary for an intact 17,20-lyase activity. CONCLUSION We demonstrated 17,20-lyase deficiency due to an aberrant CytB5. Our findings thus provide evidence for an alternative etiology for this disorder.

Disorders of sex development: update on the genetic background, terminology and risk for the development of germ cell tumors

BackgroundConsiderable progress has been made on genetic mechanisms involved in disorders of sex development and on tumor formation in dysgenetic gonads. Clinical and psychological outcome of patients are, as far as evaluated, unsatisfactory at present. Guidelines are emerging in order to optimize long-term outcome in the future.Data sourcesThe information obtained in this review is based on recent original publications and on the experience of our multidisciplinary clinical and research group.ResultsThis review offers an update on our knowledge concerning gene mutations involving in disorders of sex development, on the renewed nomenclature and classification system, and on the mechanisms of tumor development in patients.ConclusionsThe consensus meeting on disorders of sex development has renewed our interest in clinical studies and long-term outcome of patients. Psychological research emphasizes the importance to consider male gender identity wherever possible in cases of severe undervirilization. Patient advocacy groups demand a more conservative approach regarding gonadectomy. Medical doctors, scientists and governmental instances are increasingly interested in the set-up of international research collaborations. As a consequence, it is expected that new guidelines for the optimal care of patients will be proposed in the coming years.

New insights into type II germ cell tumor pathogenesis based on studies of patients with various forms of disorders of sex development (DSD).

Disorders of sex development (DSD), previously known as intersex, refer to congenital conditions in which development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical. Patients with specific variants of this disorder have an elevated risk for the development of so-called type II germ cell cancers, i.e., the seminomatous and nonseminatous tumors, referred to as germ cell tumors (GCTs). Specifically DSD patients with gonadal dysgenesis or hypovirilization are at risk. A prerequisite for type II GCT formation is the presence of a specific part of the Y chromosome (referred to as the GBY region), with the TSPY gene being the most likely candidate. Also the octamer binding transcription factor OCT3/4 is consistently expressed in all type II GCTs with pluripotent potential, as well as in the precursor lesions carcinoma in situ (CIS) in case of a testis and gonadoblastoma (GB) in the DSD gonad. The actual risk for malignant transformation in individual DSD patients is hard to predict, because of confusing terminology referring to the different forms of DSD, and unclear criteria for identification of the presence of malignant germ cells, especially in young patients. This is specifically due to the phenomenon of delay of germ cell maturation, which might result in over diagnosis. This review will give novel insight into the pathogenesis of the type II GCTs through the study of patients with various forms of DSD for which the underlying molecular defect is known. To allow optimal understanding of the pathogenesis of this type of cancers, first normal gonadal development, especially regarding the germ cell lineage, will be discussed, after which type II GCTs will be introduced. Subsequently, the relationship between type II GCTs and DSD will be described, resulting in a number of new insights into the development of the precursor lesions of these tumors.

Gonadal Maldevelopment as Risk Factor for Germ Cell Cancer: Towards a Clinical Decision Model

CONTEXT A disturbed process of gonadal formation and maintenance may result in testicular dysgenesis syndrome or disorders of sex development (DSDs), with an increased germ cell cancer (GCC) risk. Early diagnosis and treatment requires the identification of relevant risk factors and initial pathologic stages. OBJECTIVE To evaluate current knowledge and novel insights regarding GCC risk in patients with DSDs, with the aim of providing a model for clinical use. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A Medline search was conducted to identify all original and review articles assessing the aetiology of GCC, GCC risk in DSD patients, new predictive markers related to GCC, and possible clinical scenarios related to GCC and DSDs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Embryonic development is controlled by orchestrated patterns of gene and subsequent protein expression. Knowledge of these networks is essential to understand the mechanisms of disturbed development including GCC formation. GCCs are subdivided into seminomas and nonseminomas, and they all arise from embryonic germ cells that have failed to mature appropriately. The precursor is known as carcinoma in situ (also referred to as testicular intratubular neoplasia and intratubular germ cell neoplasia unclassified) in a testicular microenvironment and gonadoblastoma in a dysgenetic/ovarian microenvironment. GCCs mimic embryonic development, resulting in the identification of diagnostic markers (eg, OCT3/4, SRY [sex determining region Y]-box 2 [SOX2], and [sex determining region Y]-box 17 [SOX17]). Novel insights indicate a subtle interplay of specific single nucleotide polymorphisms, environmental factors, and epigenetic aberrations in the aetiology of GCCs. A genvironmental model combining these factors is presented, proposed as a guideline for clinical management by an experienced multidisciplinary team. The goal is individualised treatment including preservation of gonadal function (if possible) and prevention of malignant transformation. CONCLUSIONS A hypothesis is presented in which combined interactions of epigenetic and environmental parameters affect embryonic gonadal development, resulting in delayed/blocked germ cell maturation that determines the risk for GCC formation. Current and future possibilities for early detection of GCCs in risk populations and follow-up in a clinical setting are discussed. PATIENT SUMMARY This review analyses current knowledge about the underlying networks that relate to the development of a germ cell cancer in the context of a disorder of sex development. A combined effect of epigenetic and environmental factors is identified in the pathogenesis, and a model is proposed to apply this knowledge to clinical practice.

Gonadal development and tumor formation at the crossroads of male and female sex determination

Malignant germ cell tumor (GCT) formation is a well-known complication in the management of patients with a disorder of sex development (DSD). DSDs are defined as congenital conditions in which development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical. DSD patients in whom the karyotype – at least at the gonadal level – contains (a part of) the Y chromosome are at increased risk for neoplastic transformation of germ cells, leading to the development of the so-called ‘type II germ cell tumors’. However, tumor risk in the various forms of DSD varies considerably between the different diagnostic groups. This contribution integrates our actual knowledge on the pathophysiology of tumor development in DSDs, recent findings on gonadal (mal)development in DSD patients, and possible correlations between the patient’s phenotype and his/her risk for germ cell tumor development.

Involvement of E-cadherin and β-catenin in germ cell tumours and in normal male fetal germ cell development

Intercellular contacts, mediated by E‐cadherin, are essential for germ cell migration and maturation. Furthermore, it has been suggested that decrease or loss of E‐cadherin correlates with tumour progression and invasive behaviour. β‐catenin is involved in a number of different processes, including cell–cell interaction when bound to cadherins, and determination of cell fate in pluripotent cells when activated via the Wnt signal‐transduction pathway. To shed more light on the role of these factors in normal fetal germ cell development and the pathogenesis of germ cell tumours (GCTs), the present study investigated the presence and localization of E‐cadherin and β‐catenin by immunohistochemistry. E‐cadherin was only weakly expressed in or absent from fetal germ cells of the second and third trimesters, and was not expressed in carcinoma in situ/intratubular germ cell neoplasia unclassified (CIS/ITGCNU) and gonadoblastoma, the precursor of an invasive GCT in dysgenetic gonads. In GCTs, it was generally not expressed in seminoma and dysgerminoma, but was found in the vast majority of non‐seminoma cells. β‐catenin was found in the cytoplasm of fetal germ cells at all gestational ages and in spermatogenesis in post‐pubertal testes. It was also present in CIS/ITGCNU and gonadoblastoma. Whereas seminomas and dysgerminoma were negative, non‐seminoma cells were frequently found to express β‐catenin. Expression of both factors therefore reflects the degree of differentiation of these tumours. No differences for either E‐cadherin or β‐catenin were observed between samples of tumours resistant or sensitive to chemotherapy, and E‐cadherin expression did not correlate with vascular invasion. E‐cadherin and β‐catenin therefore play a role in both normal and malignant germ cell development and differentiation that warrants further investigation, but they seem to be of limited value as predictive or prognostic factors in GCTs. Copyright