Katja Schmidt

Bone turnover markers as predictive tools for skeletal complications in men with metastatic prostate cancer treated with zoledronic acid.

Bone turnover markers are helpful to diagnose bone metastases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of these markers in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases before and during the treatment with zoledronic acid as predictive and monitoring tools of skeletal‐related events (SRE).

Rapid and sustained influence of intravenous zoledronic Acid on course of pain and analgesics consumption in patients with cancer with bone metastases: a multicenter open-label study over 1 year.

BACKGROUND Bone metastases might lead to severe bone pain, pathologic fractures, and hypercalcemia. Osteolytic destruction is caused by the activation of osteoclasts by release of tumor-derived stimulating factors. Bisphosphonates are known to inhibit osteoclast function and, therefore, to alleviate the adverse effects of tumor-induced bone resorption. PATIENTS AND METHODS We investigated the effects of zoledronic acid on bone pain and use of analgesic medication in 604 patients with cancer with bone metastases in an openlabel multicenter study over 1 year. Patients were treated with a maximum of 12 infusions (4 mg) every 3 or 4 weeks. RESULTS During treatment, the mean visual analog score value for pain (mm) decreased by 13.9 +/- 32.3 from 37.1 +/- 28.2 to 23.3 +/- 24.2 (P < .0001, t test, intent-to-treat population, n = 410) and the mean analgesic score decreased by 0.56 +/- 1.42 from 1.84 +/- 1.53 to 1.28 +/- 1.63 (P < .0001, t test). A statistically significant reduction in visual analog score pain could be observed within 1 week after initiation of treatment. Application of zoledronic acid was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION Treatment with zoledronic acid in patients with cancer with bone metastases in a broad range of tumor types provides substantial benefit in terms of pain relief.

Interest in Integrative Medicine Among Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer Patients in the EvAluate-TM Study

Background. Breast cancer patients often use complementary and alternative medicine, but few prospectively collected data on the topic are available specifically for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. A large prospective study was therefore conducted within a noninterventional study in order to identify the characteristics of patients interested in integrative medicine. Methods. The EvAluate-TM study is a prospective, multicenter noninterventional study in which treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole was evaluated in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive primary breast cancer. Between 2008 and 2009, 5045 postmenopausal patients were enrolled at 339 certified breast centers in Germany. As part of the data collection process, patients were asked at the baseline about their interest in and information needs relating to integrative medicine. Results. Of the 5045 patients recruited, 3411 responded to the questionnaire on integrative medicine and took part in the analysis, 1583 patients expressed an interest in integrative medicine, and 1828 patients declared no interest. Relevant predictors of interest in integrative medicine were age, body mass index, tumor size, previous chemotherapy, and use of concomitant medications for other medical conditions. Interest in integrative medicine declined highly significantly (P < .001) with age (<50 years, 74.1%; 50-60 years, 54.1%; >65 years, 38.0%). Patients in favor of integrative medicine were significantly less satisfied with the information received about individual treatments and antihormonal therapy. Patients with interest in integrative medicine were more often interested in rehabilitation and fitness, nutritional counseling, and additional support from self-help organizations. These women were mostly interested in receiving information about their disease and integrative medicine from a physician, rather than from other sources. Conclusions. This study shows that a considerable proportion of postmenopausal breast cancer patients are interested in integrative medicine. Information about integrative medicine should therefore be provided as part of patient care for this group. It was found that receiving concomitant medication for other medical conditions is one of the main predictors for women not being interested in integrative medicine. This group of patients may need special attention and individualized information about integrative medicine. Additionally, most patients were interested in obtaining the relevant information from their doctor.

Factors Influencing Decision-Making for or against Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients in the EvAluate-TM Study

Background: Decision-making for or against neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer does not follow any clear guidelines, and some patients may unnecessarily undergo chemotherapy and be exposed to the associated toxicity. The aim of this study was to identify the patient population for whom this issue may bear relevance. Methods: Patients being treated with letrozole in the prospective multicenter noninterventional EvAluate-TM study were recruited. The percentage of patients receiving chemotherapy and factors associated with chemotherapy administration were identified. Results: In all, 3,924 (37.4%) patients received chemotherapy before treatment with letrozole. Of these, 293 (20%) underwent neoadjuvant therapy. Younger age was predictive for both adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy. Overall, decisions in favor of administering chemotherapy are more likely to be made in patients with a higher body mass index (BMI), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is administered at a higher rate in women with a lower BMI. Concomitant medication influenced the overall decision-making regarding chemotherapy, irrespective of whether it was given on a neoadjuvant or adjuvant basis. Conclusion: There is an ongoing debate as to whether all of the many patients who receive chemotherapy actually benefit from it. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is frequently administered in this patient population, and this should encourage further research to resolve current clinical and research issues.