Katsuhide Kurokawa

Are all mouthguards the same and safe to use? Part 2. The influence of anterior occlusion against a direct impact on maxillary incisors.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence anterior occlusion, of mouthguards, has on protecting against a direct collision to the maxillary anterior teeth. In other words, the support mandibular dentition has when wearing a mouthguard. Two types of mouthguards were used for this study, one with an appropriate anterior occlusion or a mouthguard with positive anterior occlusion (MGAO+) and another which was a single-layer mouthguard lacking the same occlusion or a mouthguard with negative anterior occlusion (MGAO-) but with the same thickness on the buccal side. The instruments used for testing were a pendulum-type impact device with two interchangeable impact objects (a steel ball and a baseball), with a plastic jaw model having artificial teeth. Four testing conditions were observed: one with the jaw open without a mouthguard (Open NoMG), the second with the jaw clenching (loaded with 30 kg weight) without a mouthguard (Clench. NoMG), the third with the jaw clenching with MGAO- (Clench. MGAO-) and the last with the jaw clenching with MGAO+ (Clench. MGAO+). The results are as follows: both types of mouthguards showed the effects in reducing the distortion of the teeth. However, the effect was significantly obvious (steel ball = about 57% shock absorption ability, baseball = about 26%) in the mouthguard with anterior occlusion or support by lower dentition through mouthguard (Clench. MGAO+) than Clench. MGAO-. Thus, the influence of anterior occlusion of mouthguards or the support of mandibular dentition through wearing a mouthguard (MGAO+) is indispensable in reducing the impact force and tooth distortion. The results of this research should further contribute to the establishment of guidelines for safer mouthguards.

Effect of experimental horizontal mandibular deviation on dynamic balance

PURPOSE There are two aspects of human balance: static balance and dynamic balance. However, to the authors knowledge, no studies have investigated how changes in the stomatognathic system influence dynamic balance. This aim of this study was to determine the effect of horizontal mandibular deviation on stability of upright posture on an unstable platform in order to clarify the relationship between the stomatognathic system and the dynamic balance. METHODS Fifteen healthy adult participants were selected. To determine the effect of changes in the stomatognathic system on dynamic balance, three experimental conditions were established: a resting mandibular position, a position in which experimental horizontal mandibular deviation was maintained by a splint, and a mandibular rest position maintained by a splint. Each participant was instructed to stand in a natural upright posture on an unstable board, and resulting variation in angle of the board was then measured. Measurements were taken 15 times under each condition. RESULTS Variation in angle of inclination of the board as dynamic balance was the largest in the splint-maintained deviated mandibular position. CONCLUSION Horizontal deviation in mandibular position interfered with stability of upright posture on an unstable platform, suggesting that changes in the stomatognathic system affect dynamic balance.

Easy fabrication of a new type of mouthguard incorporating a hard insert and space and offering improved shock absorption ability

The positive effects of wearing a mouthguard have been indicated in various epidemiological surveys and experiments, and their usage appears to be increasing in many sports. However, many preventable sports-related dental injuries still occur even with the use of a conventional mouthguard. We have developed a mouthguard (the Hard & Space mouthguard) with sufficient injury prevention ability (more than 95% shock absorption ability against impact with a steel ball carrying 15.2 kg m(2) S(-2) potential energy) and ease of clinical application. This mouthguard consists of an outer and an inner EVA layer and a middle layer of acrylic resin (hard insert), with a space to prevent contact between the inner surface of the mouthguard and the buccal surfaces of the maxillary front teeth or teeth already weakened through prior damage or treatment. The purpose of this article is to describe the method by which the Hard & Space mouthguard may easily be fabricated. We believe that this new type of mouthguard has the potential to reduce sports-related dental injuries.