Katsuhiko S. Murakami

Structural Mechanism for Rifampicin Inhibition of Bacterial RNA Polymerase

Rifampicin (Rif) is one of the most potent and broad spectrum antibiotics against bacterial pathogens and is a key component of anti-tuberculosis therapy, stemming from its inhibition of the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP). We determined the crystal structure of Thermus aquaticus core RNAP complexed with Rif. The inhibitor binds in a pocket of the RNAP beta subunit deep within the DNA/RNA channel, but more than 12 A away from the active site. The structure, combined with biochemical results, explains the effects of Rif on RNAP function and indicates that the inhibitor acts by directly blocking the path of the elongating RNA when the transcript becomes 2 to 3 nt in length.

Bacterial RNA polymerases: the wholo story

Recent structural and biophysical results have provided unprecedented insights into the structure and function of the bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme as it goes through the steps of transcription initiation. Comparisons with structural analyses of evolutionarily unrelated RNA polymerases reveal unexpected general features of the initiation process.

Recent functional insights into the role of (p)ppGpp in bacterial physiology

The alarmones guanosine tetraphosphate and guanosine pentaphosphate (collectively referred to as (p)ppGpp) are involved in regulating growth and several different stress responses in bacteria. In recent years, substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of (p)ppGpp metabolism and (p)ppGpp-mediated regulation. In this Review, we summarize these recent insights, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms governing the activity of the RelA/SpoT homologue (RSH) proteins, which are key players that regulate the cellular levels of (p)ppGpp. We also discuss the structural basis of transcriptional regulation by (p)ppGpp and the role of (p)ppGpp in GTP metabolism and in the emergence of bacterial persisters.

The X-ray crystal structure of RNA polymerase from Archaea

The transcription apparatus in Archaea can be described as a simplified version of its eukaryotic RNA polymerase (RNAP) II counterpart, comprising an RNAPII-like enzyme as well as two general transcription factors, the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the eukaryotic TFIIB orthologue TFB. It has been widely understood that precise comparisons of cellular RNAP crystal structures could reveal structural elements common to all enzymes and that these insights would be useful in analysing components of each enzyme that enable it to perform domain-specific gene expression. However, the structure of archaeal RNAP has been limited to individual subunits. Here we report the first crystal structure of the archaeal RNAP from Sulfolobus solfataricus at 3.4 Å resolution, completing the suite of multi-subunit RNAP structures from all three domains of life. We also report the high-resolution (at 1.76 Å) crystal structure of the D/L subcomplex of archaeal RNAP and provide the first experimental evidence of any RNAP possessing an iron–sulphur (Fe–S) cluster, which may play a structural role in a key subunit of RNAP assembly. The striking structural similarity between archaeal RNAP and eukaryotic RNAPII highlights the simpler archaeal RNAP as an ideal model system for dissecting the molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription.

RNA polymerase and transcription elongation factor Spt4/5 complex structure

Spt4/5 in archaea and eukaryote and its bacterial homolog NusG is the only elongation factor conserved in all three domains of life and plays many key roles in cotranscriptional regulation and in recruiting other factors to the elongating RNA polymerase. Here, we present the crystal structure of Spt4/5 as well as the structure of RNA polymerase-Spt4/5 complex using cryoelectron microscopy reconstruction and single particle analysis. The Spt4/5 binds in the middle of RNA polymerase claw and encloses the DNA, reminiscent of the DNA polymerase clamp and ring helicases. The transcription elongation complex model reveals that the Spt4/5 is an upstream DNA holder and contacts the nontemplate DNA in the transcription bubble. These structures reveal that the cellular RNA polymerases also use a strategy of encircling DNA to enhance its processivity as commonly observed for many nucleic acid processing enzymes including DNA polymerases and helicases.

Co-overexpression of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase subunits allows isolation and analysis of mutant enzymes lacking lineage-specific sequence insertions.

The study of mutant enzymes can reveal important details about the fundamental mechanism and regulation of RNA polymerase, the central enzyme of gene expression. However, such studies are complicated by the multisubunit structure of RNA polymerase and by its indispensability for cell growth. Previously, mutant RNA polymerases have been produced by in vitro assembly from isolated subunits or by in vivo assembly upon overexpression of a single mutant subunit. Both approaches can fail if the mutant subunit is toxic or incorrectly folded. Here we describe an alternative strategy, co-overexpression and in vivoassembly of RNA polymerase subunits, and apply this method to characterize the role of sequence insertions present in theEscherichia coli enzyme. We find that co-overexpression of its subunits allows assembly of an RNA polymerase lacking a 188-amino acid insertion in the β′ subunit. Based on experiments with this and other mutant E. coli enzymes with precisely excised sequence insertions, we report that the β′ sequence insertion and, to a lesser extent, an N-terminal β sequence insertion confer characteristic stability to the open initiation complex, frequency of abortive initiation, and pausing during transcript elongation relative to RNA polymerases, such as that from Bacillus subtilis, that lack the sequence insertions.

Differential regulation by ppGpp versus pppGpp in Escherichia coli

Both ppGpp and pppGpp are thought to function collectively as second messengers for many complex cellular responses to nutritional stress throughout biology. There are few indications that their regulatory effects might be different; however, this question has been largely unexplored for lack of an ability to experimentally manipulate the relative abundance of ppGpp and pppGpp. Here, we achieve preferential accumulation of either ppGpp or pppGpp with Escherichia coli strains through induction of different Streptococcal (p)ppGpp synthetase fragments. In addition, expression of E. coli GppA, a pppGpp 5′-gamma phosphate hydrolase that converts pppGpp to ppGpp, is manipulated to fine tune differential accumulation of ppGpp and pppGpp. In vivo and in vitro experiments show that pppGpp is less potent than ppGpp with respect to regulation of growth rate, RNA/DNA ratios, ribosomal RNA P1 promoter transcription inhibition, threonine operon promoter activation and RpoS induction. To provide further insights into regulation by (p)ppGpp, we have also determined crystal structures of E. coli RNA polymerase-σ70 holoenzyme with ppGpp and pppGpp. We find that both nucleotides bind to a site at the interface between β′ and ω subunits.

X-ray Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase σ70 Holoenzyme

Background: A crystal structure of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) has not been determined. Results: The σ1.1 and α subunit C-terminal domain structures have been determined in the context of an intact RNAP. Conclusion: σ1.1 localizes within the RNAP DNA-binding channel and must disengage from this site to form an open complex. Significance: This work enables future structure determination of bacterial RNAP mutants. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) is the most studied bacterial RNAP and has been used as the model RNAP for screening and evaluating potential RNAP-targeting antibiotics. However, the x-ray crystal structure of E. coli RNAP has been limited to individual domains. Here, I report the x-ray structure of the E. coli RNAP σ70 holoenzyme, which shows σ region 1.1 (σ1.1) and the α subunit C-terminal domain for the first time in the context of an intact RNAP. σ1.1 is positioned at the RNAP DNA-binding channel and completely blocks DNA entry to the RNAP active site. The structure reveals that σ1.1 contains a basic patch on its surface, which may play an important role in DNA interaction to facilitate open promoter complex formation. The α subunit C-terminal domain is positioned next to σ domain 4 with a fully stretched linker between the N- and C-terminal domains. E. coli RNAP crystals can be prepared from a convenient overexpression system, allowing further structural studies of bacterial RNAP mutants, including functionally deficient and antibiotic-resistant RNAPs.

Protein–Protein and Protein–DNA Interactions of σ70 Region 4 Involved in Transcription Activation by λcI

Abstract The cI protein of bacteriophage λ (λcI) activates transcription from promoter PRM through an acidic patch on the surface of its DNA-binding domain. Genetic evidence suggests that this acidic patch stimulates transcription from PRM through contact with the C-terminal domain (region 4) of the σ70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Here, we identify two basic residues in region 4 of σ70 that are critical for λcI-mediated activation of transcription from PRM. On the basis of structural modeling, we propose that one of these σ70 residues, K593, facilitates the interaction between λcI and region 4 of σ70 by inducing a bend in the DNA upstream of the −35 element, whereas the other, R588, interacts directly with a critical acidic residue within the activating patch of λcI. Residue R588 of σ70 has been shown to play an important role in promoter recognition; our findings suggest that the R588 side-chain has a dual function at PRM, facilitating the interaction of region 4 with the promoter −35 element and participating directly in the protein–protein interaction with λcI.

Structural basis of transcription initiation by bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme.

Background: Cellular RNA polymerases start transcription by de novo RNA priming. Results: Structures and biochemical studies of initially transcribing complexes elucidate the de novo transcription initiation and early stage of RNA transcription. Conclusion: 5′-end of RNA in the transcribing complex starts σ ejection from core enzyme. Significance: Insights from this study can be applicable to all cellular RNA polymerases. The bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme containing σ factor initiates transcription at specific promoter sites by de novo RNA priming, the first step of RNA synthesis where RNAP accepts two initiating ribonucleoside triphosphates (iNTPs) and performs the first phosphodiester bond formation. We present the structure of de novo transcription initiation complex that reveals unique contacts of the iNTPs bound at the transcription start site with the template DNA and also with RNAP and demonstrate the importance of these contacts for transcription initiation. To get further insight into the mechanism of RNA priming, we determined the structure of initially transcribing complex of RNAP holoenzyme with 6-mer RNA, obtained by in crystallo transcription approach. The structure highlights RNAP-RNA contacts that stabilize the short RNA transcript in the active site and demonstrates that the RNA 5′-end displaces σ region 3.2 from its position near the active site, which likely plays a key role in σ ejection during the initiation-to-elongation transition. Given the structural conservation of the RNAP active site, the mechanism of de novo RNA priming appears to be conserved in all cellular RNAPs.