Katy Dewitte

The ionized fraction of serum total magnesium in hemodialysis patients: is it really lower than in healthy subjects?

AIM OF THE STUDY Based on data in the literature, it remains unclear whether the ionized fraction of serum total magnesium (Mg) is lower in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to healthy subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS The ionized fraction of serum total Mg was investigated in 49 HD patients, pre- and post-dialysis, and compared to 30 healthy controls. The quality of the analytical performance of the Mg measurements has been emphasized by applying a reference method and/or rigorous internal quality control (IQC). In addition, the ionized fraction of serum total calcium (Ca) was measured in both populations, because the results for Mg should be related to those of Ca. RESULTS In HD patients, the ionized fraction of serum total Mg was on average 65% (pre-dialysis 64.2% and post-dialysis 66.2%). In healthy controls, the ionized fraction was 64.9%. When the analytical variability was taken into account, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between pre- and post-dialysis samples and controls. For Ca, an ionized fraction of 55.3% was found in HD patients, which was not significantly different from the fraction obtained in the control group (55.7%). CONCLUSION The present study demonstrates that, compared to healthy controls, the ionized fraction of serum total Mg is not different in hemodialysis patients.

pH dependency of serum ionised calcium

Measurement by ion selective electrode showed that the pH dependency of serum ionised calcium is better described by an inversely S-shaped third-degree function than by the conventionally used logarithmic function.

Evaluation of intrinsic and routine quality of serum total magnesium measurement.

We investigated the intrinsic (as delivered by the manufacturer) and routine quality of four systems for measurement of serum total magnesium (t-Mg(2+)) by method comparison with an ion chromatography reference method. The results of the study were interpreted on the basis of analytical quality specifications derived from the biological variation of t-Mg(2+), expanded by the analytical uncertainty of the reference measurements. This resulted in limits for systematic error of 2.1% and for total error of 4.3%. The study demonstrated that those limits were challenging for all routine systems. Most of them met the total error criterium just borderline and one showed a considerable systematic error (-5.2%). Concerning the measurement quality in the routine laboratories, the study showed that many were unable to preserve the intrinsic quality of the respective manufacturer. Consequently, loss of system performance in the routine laboratory mostly led to violation of the analytical specifications. Most strikingly, the study revealed enormous quality differences between routine laboratories. This indicates that, still, many routine laboratories do not make adequate use of currently available internal and external quality control tools. Moreover, some laboratories considerably expanded the high end of the reference interval, thereby reducing the diagnostic potential of t-Mg(2+).