Kedar S. Vaidya
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kedar S. Vaidya.
Cancer Research | 2009
Douglas R. Hurst; Mick D. Edmonds; Gary K. Scott; Christopher C. Benz; Kedar S. Vaidya; Danny R. Welch
Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) is a predominantly nuclear protein that differentially regulates expression of multiple genes, leading to suppression of metastasis without blocking orthotopic tumor growth in multiple human and murine cancer cells of diverse origins. We hypothesized that miR-146 may be involved in the ability of BRMS1 to supress metastasis because miR-146 expression is altered by BRMS1 and because BRMS1 and miR-146 are both associated with decreased signaling through the nuclear factor-kappaB pathway. BRMS1 significantly up-regulates miR-146a by 6- to 60-fold in metastatic MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-435 cells, respectively, and miR-146b by 40-fold in MDA-MB-435 as measured by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Transduction of miR-146a or miR-146b into MDA-MB-231 down-regulated expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, inhibited invasion and migration in vitro, and suppressed experimental lung metastasis by 69% and 84%, respectively (mean +/- SE: empty vector = 39 +/- 6, miR-146a = 12 +/- 1, miR-146b = 6 +/- 1). These results further support the recent notion that modulating the levels of miR-146a or miR-146b could have a therapeutic potential to suppress breast cancer metastasis.
The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology | 2008
Lewis J. Stafford; Kedar S. Vaidya; Danny R. Welch
The major problem for cancer patients is metastasis of the cancer from the primary tumor to secondary sites. Metastasis is the process by which tumor cells disseminate from the primary tumor, migrate through the basement membrane, survive in the circulatory system, invade into a secondary site, and start to proliferate. In the past, research had concentrated on the biology, taking more of a global view instead of a molecular view. More recently, the focus has been determining the molecular underpinnings, looking at genes that induce or inhibit metastasis. Metastasis suppressors, by definition, inhibit metastasis at any step of the metastatic cascade without blocking primary tumor growth. The expanding list of metastasis suppressors exist with every cellular compartment and have been shown to work by regulating signaling pathways that inhibit proliferation, cell migration and growth at the secondary site. Still, the biochemical basis of their inhibition is not completely known. Here we review the known metastasis suppressors and summarize the suspected mechanisms by which they inhibit metastasis.
American Journal of Pathology | 2008
Pushkar A. Phadke; Kedar S. Vaidya; Kevin T. Nash; Douglas R. Hurst; Danny R. Welch
Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) inhibits formation of macroscopic lung metastases in breast, ovary, and melanoma xenograft models. Because it is unclear which step(s) of the metastatic cascade are affected by BRMS1, the major aim of this study was to determine when and how BRMS1 acts to suppress metastasis. We also examined whether BRMS1 expression globally blocks metastasis or selectively inhibits metastatic outgrowths in specific tissues. Metastatic human breast carcinoma cell lines MDA-MB-231 and -435 expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP; 231 GFP and 435 GFP) and cell lines transduced with the BRMS1 gene (231 GFP-BRMS1 and 435 GFP-BRMS1) were injected into the left cardiac ventricle to achieve the widest possible cellular distribution, by minimizing first-pass clearance in the lungs. Compared with parental cells, BRMS1-expressing clones formed significantly fewer metastases in all organs tested. When cells were injected directly into the vasculature, fewer of the BRMS1-expressing cells reached lungs or bone compared with parental cells, suggesting that restoration of BRMS1 expression increased cell death during transit. Susceptibility to anoikis was verified in vitro by demonstrating decreased survival on poly-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-coated dishes. Most of the BRMS1-expressing cells reaching secondary sites failed to proliferate, suggesting that BRMS1 also inhibits colonization. Coupled with previous reports showing modest effects of BRMS1 on adhesion and invasion, our results indicate that BRMS1 inhibits metastases in multiple organs by blocking several steps in the metastatic cascade.
International Journal of Cancer | 2009
Mick D. Edmonds; Douglas R. Hurst; Kedar S. Vaidya; Lewis J. Stafford; Dongquan Chen; Danny R. Welch
Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) suppresses metastasis of multiple tumor types without blocking tumorigenesis. BRMS1 forms complexes with SIN3, histone deacetylases and selected transcription factors that modify metastasis‐associated gene expression (e.g., EGFR, OPN, PI4P5K1A, PLAU). microRNA (miRNA) are a recently discovered class of regulatory, noncoding RNA, some of which are involved in neoplastic progression. Based on these data, we hypothesized that BRMS1 may also exert some of its antimetastatic effects by regulating miRNA expression. MicroRNA arrays were done comparing small RNAs that were purified from metastatic MDA‐MB‐231 and MDA‐MB‐435 and their nonmetastatic BRMS1‐transfected counterparts. miRNA expression changed by BRMS1 were validated using SYBR Green RT‐PCR. BRMS1 decreased metastasis‐promoting (miR‐10b, ‐373 and ‐520c) miRNA, with corresponding reduction of their downstream targets (e.g., RhoC which is downstream of miR‐10b). Concurrently, BRMS1 increased expression of metastasis suppressing miRNA (miR‐146a, ‐146b and ‐335). Collectively, these data show that BRMS1 coordinately regulates expression of multiple metastasis‐associated miRNA and suggests that recruitment of BRMS1‐containing SIN3:HDAC complexes to, as yet undefined, miRNA promoters might be involved in the regulation of cancer metastasis.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2008
Kedar S. Vaidya; Sitaram Harihar; Pushkar A. Phadke; Lewis J. Stafford; Douglas R. Hurst; David G. Hicks; Graham Casey; Daryll B. DeWald; Danny R. Welch
That metastatic tumor cells grow in selective non-native environments suggests an ability to differentially respond to local microenvironments. BRMS1, like other metastasis suppressors, halts ectopic growth (metastasis) without blocking orthotopic tumor formation. BRMS1-expressing tumor cells reach secondary sites but do not colonize distant tissues, compelling the hypothesis that BRMS1 selectively restricts the ability of tumor cells to respond to exogenous regulators in different tissues. Here we report that BRMS1 expression in metastatic human breast cancer cells leads to a selective reduction in epidermal growth factor receptor expression and downstream (AKT) signaling. Signaling through another receptor tyrosine kinase, hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met), remains unaltered despite reduced levels of the signaling intermediate phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate. Interestingly, reduced downstream calcium signaling is observed following treatment with platelet-derived growth factor, consistent with decreased phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate. However, platelet-derived growth factor receptor expression is unaltered. Thus, BRMS1 differentially attenuates cellular responses to mitogenic signals, not only dependent upon the specific signal received, but at varying steps within the same signaling cascade. Specific modulation of signaling responses received from the microenvironment may ultimately dictate which environments are permissive/restrictive for tumor cell growth and provide insights into the biology underlying metastasis.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2008
Douglas R. Hurst; Yi Xie; Kedar S. Vaidya; Alka Mehta; Blake P. Moore; Mary Ann Accavitti-Loper; Rajeev S. Samant; Ritu Saxena; Alexandra Silveira; Danny R. Welch
The BRMS1 metastasis suppressor interacts with the protein AT-rich interactive domain 4A (ARID4A, RBBP1) as part of SIN3·histone deacetylase chromatin remodeling complexes. These transcriptional co-repressors regulate diverse cell phenotypes depending upon complex composition. To define BRMS1 complexes and their roles in metastasis suppression, we generated BRMS1 mutants (BRMS1mut) and mapped ARID4A interactions. BRMS1L174D disrupted direct interaction with ARID4A in yeast two-hybrid genetic screens but retained an indirect association with ARID4A in MDA-MB-231 and -435 human breast cancer cell lines by co-immunoprecipitation. Deletion of the first coiled-coil domain (BRMS1ΔCC1) did not disrupt direct interaction in yeast two-hybrid screens but did prevent association by co-immunoprecipitation. These results suggest altered complex composition with BRMS1mut. Although basal transcription repression was impaired and the pro-metastatic protein osteopontin was differentially down-regulated by BRMS1L174D and BRMS1ΔCC1, both down-regulated the epidermal growth factor receptor and suppressed metastasis in MDA-MB-231 and -435 breast cancer xenograft models. We conclude that BRMS1mut, which modifies the composition of a SIN3·histone deacetylase chromatin remodeling complex, leads to altered gene expression profiles. Because metastasis requires the coordinate expression of multiple genes, down-regulation of at least one important gene, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor, had the ability to suppress metastasis. Understanding which interactions are necessary for particular biochemical/cellular functions may prove important for future strategies targeting metastasis.
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia | 2007
Kedar S. Vaidya; Danny R. Welch
Metastasis remains the most deadly aspect of cancer and still evades direct treatment. Clinically and experimentally, primary tumor development and metastasis are distinct processes—locally growing tumors can progress without the development of metastases. The discovery of endogenous molecules that exclusively inhibit metastasis suggests that metastasis is an amenable therapeutic target. By definition, metastasis suppressors inhibit metastasis without inhibiting tumorigenicity and are thus distinct from tumor suppressors. As the biology underlying functional mechanisms of metastasis suppressors becomes clearer, it is evident that metastasis suppressors could be harnessed as direct drug targets, prognostic markers, and to understand the fundamental biology of the metastatic process. Metastasis suppressors vary widely in their cellular localization: they are found in every cellular compartment and some are secreted. In general, metastasis suppressors appear to regulate selectively how cells respond to exogenous signals, by affecting signaling cascades which regulate downstream gene expression. This review briefly summarizes current functional and biochemical data on metastasis suppressors implicated in breast cancer. We also present a schematic integrating known mechanisms for these metastasis suppressors highlighting potential targets for therapeutic intervention.
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis | 2011
Yeon-Jin Kwon; Douglas R. Hurst; Adam D. Steg; Kun Yuan; Kedar S. Vaidya; Danny R. Welch; Andra R. Frost
Gli1 is an established oncogene and its expression in Estrogen Receptor (ER) α negative and triple negative breast cancers is predictive of a poor prognosis; however, the biological functions regulated by Gli1 in breast cancer have not been extensively evaluated. Herein, Gli1 was over-expressed or down-regulated (by RNA interference and by expression of the repressor form of Gli3) in the ERα negative, human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315. Reduced expression of Gli1 in these two cell lines resulted in a decrease in migration and invasion. Gli1 over-expression increased the migration and invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells with a corresponding increase in expression of MMP-11. Silencing MMP-11 in MDA-MB-231 cells that over-expressed Gli1 abrogated the Gli1-induced enhancement of migration and invasion. Sustained suppression of Gli1 expression decreased growth of MDA-MB-231 in vitro by increasing apoptosis and decreasing proliferation. In addition, silencing of Gli1 reduced the numbers and sizes of pulmonary metastases of MDA-MB-231 in an in vivo experimental metastasis assay. In summary, Gli1 promotes the growth, survival, migration, invasion and metastasis of ERα negative breast cancer. Additionally, MMP-11 is up-regulated by Gli1 and mediates the migration and invasion induced by Gli1 in MDA-MB-231.
Cancer Research | 2010
Thomas M. Bodenstine; Kedar S. Vaidya; Aimen Ismail; Benjamin H. Beck; Leah M. Cook; Anne R. Diers; Aimee Landar; Danny R. Welch
Loss of gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) between cancer cells is a common characteristic of malignant transformation. This communication is mediated by connexin proteins that make up the functional units of gap junctions. Connexins are highly regulated at the protein level and phosphorylation events play a key role in their trafficking and degradation. The metastasis suppressor breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 (BRMS1) upregulates GJIC and decreases phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling. On the basis of these observations, we set out to determine whether there was a link between PI3K and GJIC in tumorigenic and metastatic cell lines. Treatment of cells with the well-known PI3K inhibitor LY294002, and its structural analogue LY303511, which does not inhibit PI3K, increased homotypic GJIC; however, we found the effect to be independent of PI3K/AKT inhibition. We show in multiple cancer cell lines of varying metastatic capability that GJIC can be restored without enforced expression of a connexin gene. In addition, while levels of connexin 43 remained unchanged, its relocalization from the cytosol to the plasma membrane was observed. Both LY294002 and LY303511 increased the activity of protein kinase A (PKA). Moreover, PKA blockade by the small molecule inhibitor H89 decreased the LY294002/LY303511-mediated increase in GJIC. Collectively, our findings show a connection between PKA activity and GJIC mediated by PI3K-independent mechanisms of LY294002 and LY303511. Manipulation of these signaling pathways could prove useful for antimetastatic therapy.
Cancer Letters | 2009
Alexandra Silveira; Douglas R. Hurst; Kedar S. Vaidya; Donald E. Ayer; Danny R. Welch
BRMS1 and SUDS3 are related members of SIN3-HDAC chromatin remodeling complexes. We hypothesized that they might have overlapping functions and that SUDS3 over-expression could compensate for BRMS1 deficiency. SUDS3 expression was ubiquitous in seven breast cell lines, regardless of metastatic potential. SUDS3 over-expression in BRMS1-non-expressing metastatic cells did not suppress metastasis, motility, osteopontin secretion, or EGF receptor expression, phenotypes associated with BRMS1-mediated metastasis suppression. This study demonstrates functional differences for BRMS1 family members and highlights how the composition of SIN3-HDAC (BRMS1/SUDS3) complexes uniquely affects protein expression and biological behaviors.