Keiko Murase

Basal-like subtype and BRCA1 dysfunction in breast cancers.

Basal-like breast cancers are characterized by their unique expression profile, with the frequent loss of BRCA1, caused by such mechanisms as promoter methylation and the overexpression of high-mobility group proteins of the A type 1 or inhibitor of differentiation 4. Clinicopathologically, basal-like cancers are estrogen receptor-, progesterone receptor-, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-negative; they are of high grade and have a poor prognosis. The fundamental similarity between BRCA1-mutated and basal-like cancers indicates that disruption of BRCA1 may be an essential common initial pathogenic event. Furthermore, p53 mutation and EGFR overexpression occur similarly in BRCA1-mutated and basal-like cancers; these shared alterations provide very important information for understanding not only the genetic and epigenetic carcinogenic pathways in these tumors but also therapeutic strategies. Despite the limited available clinical data about response to chemotherapy, anthracycline-based chemotherapy seems to be effective in a distinct subset of basal-like cancers. Both disrupted BRCA1 and overexpressed topoisomerase II-α possibly found in basal-like cancers are speculated to be associated with their increased sensitivity to anthracyclines. If these tumors respond to this chemotherapy, a favorable prognosis might be expected; however, in patients who do not respond, the prognosis is poor. Currently, the sensitivity of basal-like cancers to taxanes is not clear, but considering that these tumors have disrupted mitotic checkpoint function, a poor response may be suggested. On the basis of in vitro studies, BRCA1-disrupted basal-like cancers may be sensitive to DNA-damaging agents including platinum-based compounds, topoisomerase I and II inhibitors, and alkylating agents. In future, new therapeutic approaches for patients with basal-like cancers that are unlikely to respond to chemotherapy should focus on molecules that are involved in the pathogenic pathways of this disease.

Mechanisms of estrogen receptor-α upregulation in breast cancers.

The most critical step for initiation and progression of estrogen receptor-α (ERα)-positive breast cancers is thought to be upregulation of ERα expression. There are several factors involved in this mechanism, i.e., increased promoter activity of the ERα gene (ESR1) at the transcriptional level, ESR1 gene amplification, and diminished degradation of ERα protein through ubiquitination and proteasomal pathways. Mediating these factors, ERα protein levels seem to be controlled, although the details of the mechanism remain to be clarified. In addition, for upregulation of estrogen signaling, functional changes in its action in cancer cells originating from normal epithelial cells, i.e., estrogen stimulation, which then leads to proliferation of ERα-positive cancer cells, has been recognized, but this action has not been observed in normal epithelial cells. These alterations are therefore likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of ERα-positive breast cancers.

High Ki-67 Expression and Low Progesterone Receptor Expression Could Independently Lead to a Worse Prognosis for Postmenopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

UNLABELLED We examined the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) expression in immunohistochemical-based luminal subtypes defined by Ki-67 expression, taking menopausal status into consideration. The study included 327 surgically removed estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancers. High Ki-67 expression (> 15%) and low PgR expression (£ 20%) were significant independent factors resulting in worse distant relapse-free survival. This association was observed in postmenopausalwomen but not in premenopausal women. BACKGROUND Accurate classification of luminal A and luminal B characteristics of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer is considered clinically important for determining effective adjuvant treatment. Although Ki-67 expression has been identified as an essential constituent for this classification, the role of progesterone receptor (PgR) expression has yet to be fully elucidated. Because PgR expression is influenced by the estrogen milieu, we examined the prognostic significance of PgR expression in immunohistochemical (IHC)-based luminal subtypes defined by Ki-67 expression, taking menopausal status into consideration. MATERIALS AND METHODS We examined 327 surgically removed ER(+) and HER2(-) breast cancer specimens. ER, PgR, and Ki67 expression was determined IHC for semiquantitative measurement. We used 1%, 20%, and 15% as the cutoff value for ER, PgR, and Ki-67, respectively. RESULTS Breast cancer with low PgR (≤ 20%) expression was significantly associated with postmenopausal status, a large tumor size, and low ER expression. The low PgR expression subset had significantly worse distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) than the high PgR expression subset (P = .0067). This association was observed consistently in postmenopausal women but not in the premenopausal women. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high Ki-67 expression (hazard ratio [HR], 3.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-10.58; P = .003) and low PgR expression (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.08-6.40; P = .038) were significant independent factors affecting DRFS. CONCLUSION Low PgR expression was independently associated with a poorer prognosis for ER(+) and HER2(-) breast cancer. Determination of PgR expression combined with that of Ki-67 could thus improve the accuracy of IHC-based classification of luminal A and luminal B breast cancer, especially for postmenopausal women.

Prediction of hormone sensitivity for breast cancers

The classic action that leads to transcriptional activation of estrogen response genes mediated through estrogen receptors (ER) and the estrogen complex plays a pivotal role in the development of ER-positive breast cancers. In addition to this pathway, non-classic action and non-genomic action, both estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent genomic actions have also been found to contribute to ER-positive tumor growth. Although the details of these mechanisms are not well known, participation of the growth factor signaling pathway is likely to be the most significant factor for acquisition of resistance to hormonal therapy. This resistance is mediated not only directly through cell growth promotion by growth factor signaling, but also through enhancement of alternative ER signaling pathways in addition to classic action. The reason why tamoxifen-insensitive ER-positive breast cancers respond to aromatase inhibitors may be explained, at least in part, by the different estrogen-related signaling pathways in which aromatase inhibitors may block estrogen signaling. In this paper we discuss the molecular mechanisms for resistance to hormonal therapy based on an understanding of estrogen signaling pathways.

Activation of mTOR/S6K But Not MAPK Pathways Might Be Associated With High Ki-67, ER+, and HER2− Breast Cancer

UNLABELLED We determined the activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways in 108 cases of estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer with high and low Ki-67 expression. The expression levels of Ki-67, p53, phosphorylated MAPK (pMAPK), and protein S6 (pS6; downstream molecule of PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin/S6 kinase pathway) were determined immunohistochemically. pS6 positivity, but not pMAPK positivity, was significantly associated with the high Ki-67 expression subset. BACKGROUND Evaluation of luminal A and luminal B characteristics of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer is considered important. Although the phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways are thought to be involved in the luminal B subtype, the details of their contribution to breast cancer remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS We determined the activation of these pathways (phosphorylated MAPK [pMAPK] and protein S6 [pS6; a downstream molecule of PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)/S6 kinase (S6K)]) in 108 ER(+), HER2(-) breast cancer cases with high and low Ki-67 expression. The ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki-67, p53 expression levels were also determined immunohistochemically. The cutoff value for Ki-67 was set at 15%. RESULTS A significantly greater percentage of cancer cases with high Ki-67 expression showed pS6 positivity than did those with low Ki-67 expression (53.2% vs. 19.7%; P = .0003). No significant differences were found between the cases with high and low expression levels were detected for p53 (23.4% vs. 11.5%; P = .12) or pMAPK (36.2% vs. 34.4%; P = .85) positivity. Multivariate analysis showed that pS6 positivity (odds ratio 5.16, 95% confidence interval 1.95-13.63; P = .0009), nuclear grade 2 and 3, and low PgR expression (≤ 20%) were independently associated with the high Ki-67 subset. CONCLUSION From our findings, we have concluded that the pS6 expression level is associated with the characteristics of breast cancer with high Ki-67 expression. Because these associations were observed, irrespective of menopausal status, the biologic difference seems to be less affected by estrogen signaling than by activation of S6 protein, especially in terms of proliferation. Our findings have also indicated that targeting the mTOR/S6K pathway might be a useful strategy for the treatment of ER(+)/HER2(-) breast cancer with high Ki-67 expression.

Abstract P2-05-27: Baseline serum CA15-3 levels are associated with prognosis for breast cancer patients with non-complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background: It has been well demonstrated that patients who achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) had a favorable prognosis compared with patients who did not (non-pCR). Even though pCR was not attained, reduction in tumor volume after chemotherapy may be associated with improved prognosis for a certain number of patients. However, the association between residual tumor volume and prognosis is not necessarily consistent. In order to identify substitute markers for breast cancer patients with non-pCR after NAC, we investigated the impact of serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA15-3) at baseline as well as post-NAC. Patients and Methods: Ninety-six breast cancer patients treated with NAC and operated on at the Hyogo College of Medicine were recruited for this study. Serum CEA and CA15-3 were measured prior to chemotherapy as well as at completion of pre-operative treatment. The optimal cutoff points for CEA (1.55ng/m, normal range: Results: pCR and non-pCR was attained by 21 and 75 patients, respectively. For the non-pCR patients, serum CEA levels at baseline were classified into high (n=35) and low (n=38) and serum CA15-3 levels at baseline into high (n=31) and low (n=43). RFS of non-pCR patients with high serum CA15-3 levels was significantly worse than of those with low levels (3-year RFS: 0.47 vs 0.93; p=0.0009). RFS for patients with high and low serum levels of CA15-3 after NAC was also significantly different (p=0.037). As for CEA, no significant association with RFS was observed either at baseline or post-NAC. Univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size and baseline CA15-3 were significant prognostic factors for RFS. Multivariate analysis showed that both tumor size (hazard ratio (HR): 3.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21-12.35, p=0.023) and baseline CA15-3 (HR: 13.51, 95% CI: 1.74-105.08, p=0.013) were significant and independent risk factors for relapse. As for lymph node metastasis, tumor grade, residual tumor size and pre- and post-NAC Ki67 expression levels of patients with non-pCR showed no significant association with RFS. Conclusion and discussion: High levels of serum CA15-3 at baseline constituted a significantly worse prognosis for breast cancer patients with non-pCR. Tumor size at baseline but not residual size and baseline CA15-3 seems to suitable as a substitute for prediction of outcome for patients with non-pCR. Our findings suggest that these markers may be useful for identifying patients with poor prognosis who may be candidates for additional adjuvant treatment. Citation Format: Fujimoto Y, Imamura M, Higuchi T, Nishimukai A, Yanai A, Miyagawa Y, Murase K, Takatsuka Y, Miyoshi Y. Baseline serum CA15-3 levels are associated with prognosis for breast cancer patients with non-complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-27.

Abstract P2-08-24: High levels of serum C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type 1 collagen at baseline are associated with poor prognosis for breast cancer patients

Background: It has been demonstrated that adjuvant treatment using bisphosphonate may reduce recurrence among breast cancer patients. However, these improved prognoses of patients are reportedly limited to breast cancers of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and postmenopausal women. Although the mechanisms of the effects of bisphosphonate remain unknown, this finding seems to represent support for the hypothesis that suppression of bone resorption by bisphosphonate results in favorable prognoses at least for patients in this subset. In order to determine the prognostic significance of bone resorption in breast cancer patients, we investigated these markers c-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (1CTP) and N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX). Patients and Methods: 469 breast cancer patients were recruited who were operated on Hyogo College of Medicine and histologically confirmed to have invasive carcinoma. Serum 1CTP and NTX were measured preoperatively with the two-antibody radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods, respectively, and blood samples were obtained before treatment from patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves were applied and optimal cutoff values were set at 3.6ng/ml for 1CTP, and 10.55nmolBCE/L premenopausal and 14.05nmolBCE/L postmenopausal for NTX. The relationships between these bone turnover markers and various clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated with the chi square or Fisher9s exact test. The log-rank test was used to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) in Kaplan-Meier plots. Associations of RFS were assessed with a Cox proportional-hazards model based on the results of univariate and multivariate analyses. Differences were considered statistically significant if p Results: There were significantly more 1CTP-high patients among postmenopausal women and RFS of 1CTP-high patients was significantly worse than that of 1CTP-low patients (5-year RFS: 0.65 vs 0.86; p=0.0002). Similarly, NTX-high patients were significantly associated with postmenopausal status, but there was no significant association between NTX-high worse RFS (p=0.0976). Multivariate analysis of tumor size, lymph node metastasis and nuclear grade identified 1CTP (hazard ratio: 2.04, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-3.68; p=0.018) as a significant independent prognostic factor. Subset analyses of 1CTP showed that prognosis was consistently worse recognized for postmenopausal (p=0.0002), but not premenopausal (p=0.37) patients. Furthermore, prognosis for 1CTP-high patients was worse for the estrogen receptor (ER)-positive subset (p=0.0005) but not for the ER-negative subset (p=0.22). Conclusion and discussion: High levels of serum bone resorption markers at baseline were identified as significant unfavorable prognostic factors for breast cancer patients. The prognostic significance of 1CTP seems to be prominent for postmenopausal patients with ER-positive breast cancers. These findings suggest the use of bone-modifying agents as an adjuvant therapy may be beneficial for breast cancer patients, especially for patients with high serum levels of 1CTP. Citation Format: Imamura M, Nishimikai A, Yanai A, Miyagawa Y, Higuchi T, Ozawa H, Murase K, Takatsuka Y, Miyoshi Y. High levels of serum C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type 1 collagen at baseline are associated with poor prognosis for breast cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-24.

Abstract P6-16-01: Differences in patterns of change of bone turnover markers during treatment with bone-modifying agents of breast cancer patients with bone metastases

Background: Bone-modifying agents have demonstrated their efficacy for treatment by suppressing osteoclast function. The activity of bone-modifying agents can be monitored by means of bone resorption markers such as c-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen (1CTP) and N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) as well as bone forming marker bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP). In contrast to these markers which indirectly indicate bone turnover, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (Tracp-5b) has been established as a direct marker showing osteoclast number and activity. The aim of this study was to identify the relative significance of these bone turnover markers as indicators of treatment efficacy induced by bone-modifying agents for breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Patients and Methods: For this study, 52 breast cancer patients with bone metastases treated with bone-modifying agents were recruited. Zoledronic acid and denosumab were administered as bone-modifying agents to 36 and 22 patients, respectively (for 6 patients, denosumab was used after zoledronic acid). Serum Tracp-5b, 1CTP, NTX and BAP were measured with, respectively, the EIA (enzyme immunoassay), RIA (two-antibody radioimmunoassay), ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) and CLEIA (chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay) method. Blood samples were obtained pretreatment and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. Changes in these bone turnover markers were statistically analyzed with Friedman9s test, and correlation between serum markers and clinicopathological factors was calculated with Mann-Whitney9s test. Results: Serum tracp-5b decreased significantly after treatment (p Conclusion and discussion: Although baseline values of the bone turnover markers Tracp-5b, NTX and BAP decreased significantly after treatment with bone-modifying agents, the pattern of reduction for these three markers varied. Tracp-5b appears to reflect efficacy of bone-modifying agents most quickly and sensitively, possibly due to its direct link to the number and activity of osteoclasts. These findings may prove usefulness of Tracp-5b when considering the efficacy of various bone-modifying agents in clinical practice. Citation Format: Higuchi T, Nishimukai A, Yanai A, Miyagawa Y, Murase K, Imamura M, Ozawa H, Takatsuka Y, Miyoshi Y. Differences in patterns of change of bone turnover markers during treatment with bone-modifying agents of breast cancer patients with bone metastases. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-16-01.