Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Keith Nolop is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Keith Nolop.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2011

Improved Survival with Vemurafenib in Melanoma with BRAF V600E Mutation

Paul B. Chapman; Axel Hauschild; Caroline Robert; John B. A. G. Haanen; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; James Larkin; Reinhard Dummer; Claus Garbe; Alessandro Testori; Michele Maio; David W. Hogg; Paul Lorigan; Celeste Lebbe; Thomas Jouary; Dirk Schadendorf; Antoni Ribas; Jeffrey A. Sosman; John M. Kirkwood; B. Dréno; Keith Nolop; Jiang Li; Betty Nelson; Jeannie Hou; Richard J. Lee; Keith T. Flaherty; Grant A. McArthur

BACKGROUND Phase 1 and 2 clinical trials of the BRAF kinase inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032) have shown response rates of more than 50% in patients with metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. METHODS We conducted a phase 3 randomized clinical trial comparing vemurafenib with dacarbazine in 675 patients with previously untreated, metastatic melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary end points were rates of overall and progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the response rate, response duration, and safety. A final analysis was planned after 196 deaths and an interim analysis after 98 deaths. RESULTS At 6 months, overall survival was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78 to 89) in the vemurafenib group and 64% (95% CI, 56 to 73) in the dacarbazine group. In the interim analysis for overall survival and final analysis for progression-free survival, vemurafenib was associated with a relative reduction of 63% in the risk of death and of 74% in the risk of either death or disease progression, as compared with dacarbazine (P<0.001 for both comparisons). After review of the interim analysis by an independent data and safety monitoring board, crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib was recommended. Response rates were 48% for vemurafenib and 5% for dacarbazine. Common adverse events associated with vemurafenib were arthralgia, rash, fatigue, alopecia, keratoacanthoma or squamous-cell carcinoma, photosensitivity, nausea, and diarrhea; 38% of patients required dose modification because of toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS Vemurafenib produced improved rates of overall and progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated melanoma with the BRAF V600E mutation. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche; BRIM-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01006980.).


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2010

Inhibition of Mutated, Activated BRAF in Metastatic Melanoma

Keith T. Flaherty; Igor Puzanov; Kevin B. Kim; Antoni Ribas; Grant A. McArthur; Jeffrey A. Sosman; Peter J. O'Dwyer; Richard J. Lee; Joseph F. Grippo; Keith Nolop; Paul B. Chapman

BACKGROUND The identification of somatic mutations in the gene encoding the serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF) in the majority of melanomas offers an opportunity to test oncogene-targeted therapy for this disease. METHODS We conducted a multicenter, phase 1, dose-escalation trial of PLX4032 (also known as RG7204), an orally available inhibitor of mutated BRAF, followed by an extension phase involving the maximum dose that could be administered without adverse effects (the recommended phase 2 dose). Patients received PLX4032 twice daily until they had disease progression. Pharmacokinetic analysis and tumor-response assessments were conducted in all patients. In selected patients, tumor biopsy was performed before and during treatment to validate BRAF inhibition. RESULTS A total of 55 patients (49 of whom had melanoma) were enrolled in the dose-escalation phase, and 32 additional patients with metastatic melanoma who had BRAF with the V600E mutation were enrolled in the extension phase. The recommended phase 2 dose was 960 mg twice daily, with increases in the dose limited by grade 2 or 3 rash, fatigue, and arthralgia. In the dose-escalation cohort, among the 16 patients with melanoma whose tumors carried the V600E BRAF mutation and who were receiving 240 mg or more of PLX4032 twice daily, 10 had a partial response and 1 had a complete response. Among the 32 patients in the extension cohort, 24 had a partial response and 2 had a complete response. The estimated median progression-free survival among all patients was more than 7 months. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of metastatic melanoma with PLX4032 in patients with tumors that carry the V600E BRAF mutation resulted in complete or partial tumor regression in the majority of patients. (Funded by Plexxikon and Roche Pharmaceuticals.)


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Survival in BRAF V600–Mutant Advanced Melanoma Treated with Vemurafenib

Jeffrey A. Sosman; Kevin B. Kim; Lynn M. Schuchter; Rene Gonzalez; Anna C. Pavlick; Jeffrey S. Weber; Grant A. McArthur; Thomas E. Hutson; Stergios J. Moschos; Keith T. Flaherty; Peter Hersey; Richard F. Kefford; Donald P. Lawrence; Igor Puzanov; Karl D. Lewis; Ravi K. Amaravadi; Bartosz Chmielowski; H. Jeffrey Lawrence; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Jiang Li; Keith Nolop; Richard J. Lee; Andrew K. Joe; Antoni Ribas

BACKGROUND Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor activating (V600) mutations in the serine-threonine protein kinase B-RAF (BRAF). The oral BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032) frequently produced tumor regressions in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma in a phase 1 trial and improved overall survival in a phase 3 trial. METHODS We designed a multicenter phase 2 trial of vemurafenib in patients with previously treated BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma to investigate the efficacy of vemurafenib with respect to overall response rate (percentage of treated patients with a tumor response), duration of response, and overall survival. The primary end point was the overall response rate as ascertained by the independent review committee; overall survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS A total of 132 patients had a median follow-up of 12.9 months (range, 0.6 to 20.1). The confirmed overall response rate was 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44 to 62; 6% with a complete response and 47% with a partial response), the median duration of response was 6.7 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6), and the median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.1). Primary progression was observed in only 14% of patients. Some patients had a response after receiving vemurafenib for more than 6 months. The median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 18.3). The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 arthralgia, rash, photosensitivity, fatigue, and alopecia. Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas (the majority, keratoacanthoma type) were diagnosed in 26% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Vemurafenib induces clinical responses in more than half of patients with previously treated BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma. In this study with a long follow-up, the median overall survival was approximately 16 months. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00949702.).


Nature | 2010

Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF -mutant melanoma

Gideon Bollag; Peter Hirth; James H. Tsai; Jiazhong Zhang; Prabha N. Ibrahim; Hanna Cho; Wayne Spevak; Chao Zhang; Ying Zhang; Gaston Habets; Elizabeth A. Burton; Bernice Wong; Garson Tsang; Brian L. West; Ben Powell; Rafe Shellooe; Adhirai Marimuthu; Hoa Nguyen; Kam Y. J. Zhang; Dean R. Artis; Joseph Schlessinger; Fei Su; Brian Higgins; Raman Mahadevan Iyer; Kurt D'Andrea; Astrid Koehler; Michael Stumm; Paul S. Lin; Richard J. Lee; Joseph F. Grippo

B-RAF is the most frequently mutated protein kinase in human cancers. The finding that oncogenic mutations in BRAF are common in melanoma, followed by the demonstration that these tumours are dependent on the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, offered hope that inhibition of B-RAF kinase activity could benefit melanoma patients. Herein, we describe the structure-guided discovery of PLX4032 (RG7204), a potent inhibitor of oncogenic B-RAF kinase activity. Preclinical experiments demonstrated that PLX4032 selectively blocked the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in BRAF mutant cells and caused regression of BRAF mutant xenografts. Toxicology studies confirmed a wide safety margin consistent with the high degree of selectivity, enabling Phase 1 clinical trials using a crystalline formulation of PLX4032 (ref. 5). In a subset of melanoma patients, pathway inhibition was monitored in paired biopsy specimens collected before treatment initiation and following two weeks of treatment. This analysis revealed substantial inhibition of ERK phosphorylation, yet clinical evaluation did not show tumour regressions. At higher drug exposures afforded by a new amorphous drug formulation, greater than 80% inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in the tumours of patients correlated with clinical response. Indeed, the Phase 1 clinical data revealed a remarkably high 81% response rate in metastatic melanoma patients treated at an oral dose of 960 mg twice daily. These data demonstrate that BRAF-mutant melanomas are highly dependent on B-RAF kinase activity.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors.

Fei Su; Amaya Viros; Carla Milagre; Kerstin Trunzer; Gideon Bollag; Olivia Spleiss; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Xiangju Kong; Richard C. Koya; Keith T. Flaherty; Paul B. Chapman; Min Jung Kim; Robert Hayward; Matthew Martin; Hong Yang; Qiongqing Wang; Holly Hilton; Julie S. Hang; Johannes Noe; Maryou B. Lambros; Felipe C. Geyer; Nathalie Dhomen; Ion Niculescu-Duvaz; Alfonso Zambon; Dan Niculescu-Duvaz; Natasha Preece; Lidia Robert; Nicholas Otte; Stephen Mok; Damien Kee

BACKGROUND Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas are common findings in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. METHODS We performed a molecular analysis to identify oncogenic mutations (HRAS, KRAS, NRAS, CDKN2A, and TP53) in the lesions from patients treated with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. An analysis of an independent validation set and functional studies with BRAF inhibitors in the presence of the prevalent RAS mutation was also performed. RESULTS Among 21 tumor samples, 13 had RAS mutations (12 in HRAS). In a validation set of 14 samples, 8 had RAS mutations (4 in HRAS). Thus, 60% (21 of 35) of the specimens harbored RAS mutations, the most prevalent being HRAS Q61L. Increased proliferation of HRAS Q61L-mutant cell lines exposed to vemurafenib was associated with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-pathway signaling and activation of ERK-mediated transcription. In a mouse model of HRAS Q61L-mediated skin carcinogenesis, the vemurafenib analogue PLX4720 was not an initiator or a promoter of carcinogenesis but accelerated growth of the lesions harboring HRAS mutations, and this growth was blocked by concomitant treatment with a MEK inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS Mutations in RAS, particularly HRAS, are frequent in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas and keratoacanthomas that develop in patients treated with vemurafenib. The molecular mechanism is consistent with the paradoxical activation of MAPK signaling and leads to accelerated growth of these lesions. (Funded by Hoffmann-La Roche and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00405587, NCT00949702, NCT01001299, and NCT01006980.).


Nature Reviews Drug Discovery | 2012

Vemurafenib: the first drug approved for BRAF -mutant cancer

Gideon Bollag; James H. Tsai; Jiazhong Zhang; Chao Zhang; Prabha N. Ibrahim; Keith Nolop; Peter Hirth

The identification of driver oncogenes has provided important targets for drugs that can change the landscape of cancer therapies. One such example is the BRAF oncogene, which is found in about half of all melanomas as well as several other cancers. As a druggable kinase, oncogenic BRAF has become a crucial target of small-molecule drug discovery efforts. Following a rapid clinical development path, vemurafenib (Zelboraf; Plexxikon/Roche) was approved for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma in the United States in August 2011 and the European Union in February 2012. This Review describes the underlying biology of BRAF, the technology used to identify vemurafenib and its clinical development milestones, along with future prospects based on lessons learned during its development.


Thyroid | 2013

Clinical responses to vemurafenib in patients with metastatic papillary thyroid cancer harboring BRAFV600E mutation

Kevin B. Kim; Maria E. Cabanillas; Alexander J. Lazar; Michelle D. Williams; Deborah L. Sanders; Joseph L. Ilagan; Keith Nolop; Richard J. Lee; Steven I. Sherman

BACKGROUND Clinical benefit from cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is disappointing, and effective therapeutic approaches for these patients are urgently needed. Because kinase-activating mutations in the BRAF proto-oncogene commonly occur in advanced PTC, and inhibition of BRAF(V600E) has shown promising clinical activity in melanoma, BRAF inhibitor therapy may be an effective strategy to treat metastatic PTC. METHODS The dose escalation portion of a first-in-human, phase I study of vemurafenib, a selective RAF inhibitor, included three patients with metastatic PTC harboring the BRAF(V600E) mutation. Vemurafenib was initially dosed at 240-360 mg twice a day, later escalated to 720 mg twice a day. Response evaluation was performed every 8 weeks per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). RESULTS Among the three patients, one had a confirmed partial response with reduction of pulmonary target lesions by 31%, and the duration of response was 7.6 months before the disease progressed in the lungs and the bones. The time to progression was 11.7 months. The other two patients had stable disease, and the time to progression was 13.2 and 11.4 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Vemurafenib appears to have a promising clinical activity in patients with metastatic PTC, and our data suggest that the BRAF(V600E) mutant kinase is a relevant target for therapy in this patient population. Further investigation of inhibitors of mutated BRAF kinase in patients with PTC in a phase II study is warranted.


Oncologist | 2013

Analysis of Dermatologic Events in Vemurafenib-Treated Patients With Melanoma

Mario E. Lacouture; Madeleine Duvic; Axel Hauschild; Victor G. Prieto; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Caroline C. Kim; Christopher J. McCormack; Patricia L. Myskowski; Olivia Spleiss; Kerstin Trunzer; Fei Su; Betty Nelson; Keith Nolop; Joseph F. Grippo; Richard J. Lee; Matthew J. Klimek; James L. Troy; Andrew K. Joe

BACKGROUND Vemurafenib has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced BRAF(V600E)-mutant melanoma. This report by the Vemurafenib Dermatology Working Group presents the characteristics of dermatologic adverse events (AEs) that occur in vemurafenib-treated patients, including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC). METHODS Dermatologic AEs were assessed from three ongoing trials of BRAF(V600E) mutation-positive advanced melanoma. Histologic central review and genetic characterization were completed for a subset of cuSCC lesions. RESULTS A total of 520 patients received vemurafenib. The most commonly reported AEs were dermatologic AEs, occurring in 92%-95% of patients. Rash was the most common AE (64%-75% of patients), and the most common types were rash not otherwise specified, erythema, maculopapular rash, and folliculitis. Rash development did not appear to correlate with tumor response. Photosensitivity occurred in 35%-63% of patients, and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) occurred in 8%-10% of patients. The severity of rash, photosensitivity, and PPE were mainly grade 1 or 2. In all, 19%-26% of patients developed cuSCC, mostly keratoacanthomas (KAs). The majority of patients with cuSCC continued therapy without dose reduction after resection. Genetic analysis of 29 cuSCC/KA samples demonstrated HRAS mutations in 41%. CONCLUSIONS Dermatologic AEs associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma were generally manageable with supportive care measures. Dose interruptions and/or reductions were required in <10% of patients.


Nature | 2015

RAF inhibitors that evade paradoxical MAPK pathway activation

Chao Zhang; Wayne Spevak; Ying Zhang; Elizabeth A. Burton; Yan Ma; Gaston Habets; Jiazhong Zhang; Jack Lin; Todd Ewing; Bernice Matusow; Garson Tsang; Adhirai Marimuthu; Hanna Cho; Guoxian Wu; Weiru Wang; Daniel Fong; Hoa Nguyen; Songyuan Shi; Patrick Womack; Marika Nespi; Rafe Shellooe; Heidi Carias; Ben Powell; Emily Light; Laura Sanftner; Jason Walters; James H. Tsai; Brian L. West; Gary Conard Visor; Hamid Rezaei

Oncogenic activation of BRAF fuels cancer growth by constitutively promoting RAS-independent mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway signalling. Accordingly, RAF inhibitors have brought substantially improved personalized treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, these targeted agents have also revealed an unexpected consequence: stimulated growth of certain cancers. Structurally diverse ATP-competitive RAF inhibitors can either inhibit or paradoxically activate the MAPK pathway, depending whether activation is by BRAF mutation or by an upstream event, such as RAS mutation or receptor tyrosine kinase activation. Here we have identified next-generation RAF inhibitors (dubbed ‘paradox breakers’) that suppress mutant BRAF cells without activating the MAPK pathway in cells bearing upstream activation. In cells that express the same HRAS mutation prevalent in squamous tumours from patients treated with RAF inhibitors, the first-generation RAF inhibitor vemurafenib stimulated in vitro and in vivo growth and induced expression of MAPK pathway response genes; by contrast the paradox breakers PLX7904 and PLX8394 had no effect. Paradox breakers also overcame several known mechanisms of resistance to first-generation RAF inhibitors. Dissociating MAPK pathway inhibition from paradoxical activation might yield both improved safety and more durable efficacy than first-generation RAF inhibitors, a concept currently undergoing human clinical evaluation with PLX8394.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2015

Structure-Guided Blockade of CSF1R Kinase in Tenosynovial Giant-Cell Tumor

William D. Tap; Zev A. Wainberg; Stephen P. Anthony; Prabha N. Ibrahim; Chao Zhang; John H. Healey; Bartosz Chmielowski; Arthur P. Staddon; Allen Lee Cohn; Geoffrey I. Shapiro; Vicki L. Keedy; Arun S. Singh; Igor Puzanov; Eunice L. Kwak; Andrew J. Wagner; Daniel D. Von Hoff; Glen J. Weiss; Ramesh K. Ramanathan; Jiazhong Zhang; Gaston Habets; Ying Zhang; Elizabeth A. Burton; Gary Conard Visor; Laura Sanftner; Paul Severson; Hoa Nguyen; Marie J. Kim; Adhirai Marimuthu; Garson Tsang; Rafe Shellooe

BACKGROUND Expression of the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) gene is elevated in most tenosynovial giant-cell tumors. This observation has led to the discovery and clinical development of therapy targeting the CSF1 receptor (CSF1R). METHODS Using x-ray co-crystallography to guide our drug-discovery research, we generated a potent, selective CSF1R inhibitor, PLX3397, that traps the kinase in the autoinhibited conformation. We then conducted a multicenter, phase 1 trial in two parts to analyze this compound. In the first part, we evaluated escalations in the dose of PLX3397 that was administered orally in patients with solid tumors (dose-escalation study). In the second part, we evaluated PLX3397 at the chosen phase 2 dose in an extension cohort of patients with tenosynovial giant-cell tumors (extension study). Pharmacokinetic and tumor responses in the enrolled patients were assessed, and CSF1 in situ hybridization was performed to confirm the mechanism of action of PLX3397 and that the pattern of CSF1 expression was consistent with the pathological features of tenosynovial giant-cell tumor. RESULTS A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation study, and an additional 23 patients were enrolled in the extension study. The chosen phase 2 dose of PLX3397 was 1000 mg per day. In the extension study, 12 patients with tenosynovial giant-cell tumors had a partial response and 7 patients had stable disease. Responses usually occurred within the first 4 months of treatment, and the median duration of response exceeded 8 months. The most common adverse events included fatigue, change in hair color, nausea, dysgeusia, and periorbital edema; adverse events rarely led to discontinuation of treatment. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of tenosynovial giant-cell tumors with PLX3397 resulted in a prolonged regression in tumor volume in most patients. (Funded by Plexxikon; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01004861.).

Collaboration


Dive into the Keith Nolop's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grant A. McArthur

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Igor Puzanov

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin B. Kim

California Pacific Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. A. Sosman

Loyola University Chicago

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antoni Ribas

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul B. Chapman

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge