Keith S. Novak

Mars Science Laboratory thermal control architecture

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL 1 ) mission to land a large rover on Mars is being planned for Launch in 2009. As currently conceived, the rover would use a Multimission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) to generate about 110 W of electrical power for use in the rover and the science payload. Usage of an MMRTG allows for a large amount of nearly constant electrical power to be generated day and night for all seasons (year around) and latitudes. This offers a large advantage over solar arrays. The MMRTG by its nature dissipates about 2000 W of waste heat. The basic architecture of the thermal system utilizes this waste heat on the surface of Mars to maintain the rovers temperatures within their limits under all conditions. In addition, during cruise, this waste heat needs to be dissipated safely to protect sensitive components in the spacecraft and the rover. Mechanically pumped fluid loops 2 are used to both harness the MMRTG heat during surface operations as well as reject it to space during cruise. This paper will describe the basic architecture of the thermal control system, the challenges and the methods used to overcome them by the use of an innovative architecture to maximize the use of heritage from past projects while meeting the requirements for the design.

Development of a Thermal Control Architecture for the Mars Exploration Rovers

In May and June of 2003, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will launch two roving science vehicles on their way to Mars. They will land on Mars in January and February of 2004 and carry out 90‐Sol missions. This paper addresses the thermal design architecture of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) developed for Mars surface operations. The surface atmosphere temperature on Mars can vary from 0°C in the heat of the day to −100°C in the early morning, prior to sunrise. Heater usage at night must be minimized in order to conserve battery energy. The desire to minimize nighttime heater energy led to a design in which all temperature sensitive electronics and the battery were placed inside a well‐insulated (carbon‐opacified aerogel lined) Warm Electronics Box (WEB). In addition, radioisotope heater units (RHU’s, non‐electric heat sources) were mounted on the battery and electronics inside the WEB. During the Martian day, the electronics inside the WEB dissipate a large amount of energy (ove...

Mars Science Laboratory Rover System Thermal Test

On November 26, 2011, NASA launched a large (900 kg) rover as part of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission to Mars. The MSL rover is scheduled to land on Mars on August 5, 2012. Prior to launch, the Rover was successfully operated in simulated mission extreme environments during a 16-day long Rover System Thermal Test (STT). This paper describes the MSL Rover STT, test planning, test execution, test results, thermal model correlation and flight predictions. The rover was tested in the JPL 25-Foot Diameter Space Simulator Facility at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). The Rover operated in simulated Cruise (vacuum) and Mars Surface environments (8 Torr nitrogen gas) with mission extreme hot and cold boundary conditions. A Xenon lamp solar simulator was used to impose simulated solar loads on the rover during a bounding hot case and during a simulated Mars diurnal test case. All thermal hardware was exercised and performed nominally. The Rover Heat Rejection System, a liquid-phase fluid loop used to transport heat in and out of the electronics boxes inside the rover chassis, performed better than predicted. Steady state and transient data were collected to allow correlation of analytical thermal models. These thermal models were subsequently used to predict rover thermal performance for the MSL Gale Crater landing site. Models predict that critical hardware temperatures will be maintained within allowable flight limits over the entire 669 Sol surface mission.

Mars Exploration Rover Surface Mission Flight Thermal Performance

NASA launched two rovers in June and July of 2003 as a part of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) project. MER-A (Spirit) landed on Mars in Gusev Crater at 15 degrees South latitude and 175 degrees East longitude on January 4, 2004 (Squyres, et al., Dec. 2004). MER-B (Opportunity) landed on Mars in Terra Meridiani at 2 degrees South latitude and 354 degrees East longitude on January 25, 2004 (Squyres, et al., Aug. 2004). Both rovers have well exceeded their design lifetime (90 Sols) by more than a factor of 5. Spirit and Opportunity are still healthy and continue to execute their roving science missions at the time of this writing. This paper discusses rover flight thermal performance during the surface missions of both vehicles, covering roughly the time from the MER-A landing in late Southern Summer (aereocentric longitude, Ls = 328, Sol 1A) through the Southern Winter solstice (Ls = 90, Sol 255A) to nearly Southern Vernal equinox (Ls = 160 , Sol 398A).

CO2 Insulation for Thermal Control of the Mars Science Laboratory

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is sending a large (>850 kg) rover as part of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission to Mars in 2011. The rovers primary power source is a Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) that generates roughly 2000 W of heat, which is converted to approximately 110 W of electrical power for use by the rover electronics, science instruments, and mechanism-actuators. The large rover size and extreme thermal environments (cold and hot) for which the rover is designed for led to a sophisticated thermal control system to keep it within allowable temperature limits. The pre-existing Martian atmosphere of low thermal conductivity CO2 gas (8 Torr) is used to thermally protect the rover and its components from the extremely cold Martian environment (temperatures as low as -130 deg C). Conventional vacuum based insulation like Multi Layer Insulation (MLI) is not effective in a gaseous atmosphere, so engineered gaps between the warm rover internal components and the cold rover external structure were employed to implement this thermal isolation. Large gaps would lead to more thermal isolation, but would also require more of the precious volume available within the rover. Therefore, a balance of the degree of thermal isolation achieved vs. the volume of rover utilized is required to reach an acceptable design. The temperature differences between the controlled components and the rover structure vary from location to location so each gap has to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to arrive at an optimal thickness. For every configuration and temperature difference, there is a critical thickness below which the heat transfer mechanism is dominated by simple gaseous thermal conduction. For larger gaps, the mechanism is dominated by natural convection. In general, convection leads to a poorer level of thermal isolation as compared to conduction. All these considerations play important roles in the optimization process. A three-step process was utilized to design this insulation. The first step is to come up with a simple, textbook based, closed-form equation assessment of gap thickness vs. resultant thermal isolation achieved. The second step is a more sophisticated numerical assessment using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software to investigate the effect of complicated geometries and temperature contours along them to arrive at the effective thermal isolation in a CO2 atmosphere. The third step is to test samples of representative geometries in a CO2 filled chamber to measure the thermal isolation achieved. The results of these assessments along with the consistency checks across these methods leads to the formulation of design-guidelines for gap implementation within the rover geometry. Finally, based on the geometric and functional constraints within the real rover system, a detailed design that accommodates all these factors is arrived at. This paper will describe in detail this entire process, the results of these assessments and the final design that was implemented.

Overview of the Mars Science Laboratory Cruise Phase System Thermal Vacuum Test

This paper contains an overview of the test program undertaken to validate the thermal design and workmanship integrity of the Mars Science Laboratory spacecraft in its cruise configuration. The MSL spacecraft was environmentally tested in a large thermal vacuum chamber capable of simulating the relevant thermal boundary conditions of deep space. Two spacecraft thermal balances were achieved in test: one for a simulated near Earth cruise environment (hot case), the other for a simulated near Mars cruise environment (cold case). The Mars Science Laboratory cruise phase system thermal vacuum test successfully validated and verified the design and implementation of the Cruise Heat Rejection System— a mechanically-pumped fluid loop used to extract waste heat from the entry, descent, and landing and surface exploration subsystems. Additionally, the cold case thermal performance of the entry propulsion systems and hot case thermal performance of the spacecraft solar arrays were directly validated.

Mars Exploration Rover: Thermal Design is a System Engineering Activity

The Mars Exploration Rovers (MER), were launched in June and July of 2003, respectively, and successfully landed on Mars in early and late January of 2004, respectively. The flight system architecture implemented many successful features of the Mars Pathfinder (MPF) system: A cruise stage that transported an entry vehicle that housed the Lander, which in turn, used airbags to cushion the Rover during the landing event. The initial thermal design approach focused on adopting the MPF design wherever possible, and then concentrating on the totally new Rover thermal design. Despite a fundamentally sound approach, there were several salient lessons learned. Some were due to differences from MPF, while others were caused by other means. These lessons sent a clear message: thermal design continues to be a system engineering activity. In each major flight system assembly, there were excellent examples of this recurring theme. From the cruise stage, the cascading impact of a propulsion fill and drain valve thermal design change after system level test is described. In addition, we present the interesting resolution of the sun sensor head thermal design (bare metal versus white paint). The final implementation went against best thermal engineering practices. For the entry vehicle consisting of the aeroshell and equipment mounted to it, an inertial measurement unit mounted on a shock-isolation fixture presented a particularly difficult design challenge. We initially believed that its operating time would be limited due to its relatively low mass and high power dissipation. We conclude with the evolution of the Rover actuator thermal design where the single-string warm-up heaters were employed. In this instance, fault protection requirements drove the final thermal design implementation, and in the case of Opportunity, proved to be critical for meeting primary mission lifetime.

Thermal Design and Flight Experience of the Mars Exploration Rover Spacecraft Computer-Controlled, Propulsion Line Heaters

As part of the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) project, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) launched two rovers in June and July of 2003 and successfully landed both of them on Mars in January of 2004. The cruise stage of each spacecraft (S/C) housed most of the hardware needed to complete the cruise from Earth to Mars, including the propulsion system. Propulsion lines brought hydrazine propellant from tanks under the cruise stage to attitude-control thrusters located on the periphery of the cruise stage. Hydrazine will freeze in the propellant lines if it reaches temperatures below 1.7°C. Thermal control of the propulsion lines was a mission critical function of the thermal subsystem; a frozen propellant line could have resulted in loss of attitude control and complete loss of the S/C. The MER cruise stage thermal design employed a computer-controlled thermostatic heater system to keep the propellant lines within their allowable flight temperature limits (17°C to 50°C). The MER propellant line thermal design differed from previous propellant line heater designs in that the line heaters were placed only in areas of highest potential heat loss (not along the entire length of the lines) and that computer-controlled thermostats were used instead of mechanical thermostats. Computer-controlled thermostats enabled setpoint flexibility; adjustments to setpoints were made after solar thermal vacuum testing and during flight. This paper covers the design, thermal testing and flight experiences with the computer-controlled thermostats on the propulsion line heaters. Flight experience revealed heater control behavior with propellant loaded into the system and during thruster firings that was not observable during system level testing. Explanations of flight behavior, lessons learned and suggestions for improvement of the propellant line heater design are presented in this paper.

Thermal Performance of the Mars Science Laboratory Rover During Mars Surface Operations

On November 26, 2011, NASA launched a large (900 kg) rover as part of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission to Mars. Eight months later, on August 5, 2012, the MSL rover (Curiosity) successfully touched down on the surface of Mars. As of the writing of this paper, the rover had completed over 200 Sols of Mars surface operations in the Gale Crater landing site (4.5 deg S latitude). This paper describes the thermal performance of the MSL Rover during the early part of its two Earth-0.year (670 Sols) prime surface mission. Curiosity landed in Gale Crater during early Spring (Ls=151) in the Southern Hemisphere of Mars. This paper discusses the thermal performance of the rover from landing day (Sol 0) through Summer Solstice (Sol 197) and out to Sol 204. The rover surface thermal design performance was very close to pre-landing predictions. The very successful thermal design allowed a high level of operational power dissipation immediately after landing without overheating and required a minimal amount of survival heating. Early morning operations of cameras and actuators were aided by successful heating activities. MSL rover surface operations thermal experiences are discussed in this paper. Conclusions about the rover surface operations thermal performance are also presented.

In-Flight Performance of the Mars Science Laboratory Spacecraft Cruise Phase Thermal Control Systems

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission will land a robotic rover on the surface of Mars for a two-year exploration mission. During the deep space transit from Earth to Mars, the rover will reside in a compact and static mechanical assembly stack called the Cruise phase configuration. While the majority of the Mars entry, descent, landing and surface-specific hardware subsystems are dormant during the nine-month transit from Earth to Mars, all of the spacecraft’s thermal control systems are utilized to maintain hardware within allowable temperature limits. Of these systems, a mechanically-pumped fluid loop runs throughout each of the main spacecraft stages and is used to both reject spacecraft waste heat loads and provide survival heating to components. A second fluid loop located within the rover is used to thermally control the surface avionics and science instrument suite. Additionally, a large number of electrical film heaters are employed throughout the spacecraft to provide survival heating to individual spacecraft components. This paper presents a description of the various MSL cruise phase thermal control systems and reviews their in-flight performance over the first six months of the mission.