Keith T. Sowards

Monte Carlo dosimetric characterization of the IsoAid ADVANTAGE P103d brachytherapy source

For roughly 25 years, I125 and Pd103 sources have been used in the treatment of various malignant diseases such as prostate cancer. Various new sources have been marketed and produced to meet the demand for new sources to use in treatment. Recently, IsoAID LLC created the ADVANTAGE Pd103 source. Various dosimetric parameters must be determined to facilitate treatment planning using this source. Theoretical determination of dosimetric characteristics, dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function for this new source followed the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 43U1 recommendations. Theoretical calculations were performed in liquid water using the PTRAN Monte Carlo code version 7.44. The radial dose function of the new source was calculated in liquid water at distances up to 10.0 cm, and the anisotropy function, at distances ranging from 0.5 cm to 7.0 cm. The anisotropy factors and anisotropy constant were derived from the anisotropy function. The results in water indicate that the dose rate constant is 0.709±0.014 cGy•h−1•U−1 and that the anisotropy constant is 0.880±0.040. The dosimetric characteristics of this new source compare favorably with those of other commercially available Pd103 sources. PACS: 87.53.Jw

Computed tomography–planned interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced gynecologic cancer: Outcomes and dosimetric predictors of urinary toxicity

PURPOSE To identify dosimetric predictors of outcome and toxicity in patients receiving CT-planned interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for gynecologic cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients who received ISBT between 2009 and 2014 were reviewed. Demographic, disease specific, treatment, and toxicity data were collected. Logistic regression was used to model toxicity. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty was used to identify relevant predictors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the relation between dosimetric factors and urinary toxicity. RESULTS Seventy-three patients received ISBT (21 at time of cancer recurrence and 52 at the first presentation). Thirty-six patients had cervical cancer, 16 had vaginal cancer, 13 had uterine cancer, and 8 had vulvar cancer. ISBT was performed using both high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate 192Ir sources (27 low dose rate and 46 high dose rate). With a median followup of 12 months, Grade 3 vaginal, urinary, and rectal toxicity occurred in 17.8%, 15.1%, and 6.8% of patients, respectively. No patients experienced Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Dose to 0.1cc of urethra predicted for development of Grade 3 urinary toxicity (area under the curve of 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.66, 0.96). A 10% probability of a Grade 3 urinary toxicity associated with a dose of 23.1 equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (95% confidence interval: 9.51, 36.27 equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). CONCLUSIONS ISBT is a safe treatment for gynecologic malignancies. The dose to 0.1cc significantly predicts for severe urinary toxicity. Our data suggests that dose to a small urethral volume may be the most significant predictor of urinary toxicity in patients receiving ISBT for gynecologic cancer.

Acute toxicity and early cosmetic outcome in patients treated with multilumen balloon brachytherapy with skin spacing ≤ 7.0 millimeters

Purpose To review institutional experience treating patients who underwent breast conserving surgery and adjuvant accelerated partial breast irradiation with multilumen balloon brachytherapy (MLB) with close skin spacing (≤7 mm). Material and methods Since July 2009, 26 patients with skin spacing ≤ 7.0 mm were treated with breast-conserving therapy and adjuvant MLB brachytherapy. Patients were treated with either the Contura or MammoSite ML catheter to a total dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions. Patients were assessed for acute toxicity at the completion of treatment and 1-month post treatment. Cosmesis and late toxicity were assessed at three-month intervals thereafter. Results The median age of the patients was 56 years and median follow-up was 9 months. Sixteen patients had skin spacing of 5.0–7.0 mm, 10 with < 5.0 mm (median 5.8). The median percentage of the target (PTV_EVAL) receiving ≥ 95% of the prescription dose was 95.6%. The median volume of PTV_EVAL receiving ≥ 200% of the prescription dose was 6.1 cc. The maximum skin dose was 118.2% (median). The most commonly observed acute toxicity was grade 1-2 dermatitis (65.4%). The rate of post-treatment seroma and infection was 38.5% and 3.8%, respectively. Excellent/good cosmetic outcomes seen at the time of last follow-up was 92.3%. Conclusions MLB brachytherapy is safe and feasible in patients with close skin spacing, with acute toxicity and early cosmesis similar to other published series. These devices may broaden the application of balloon brachytherapy in patients previously excluded from this treatment based on anatomy.

Impact of interfraction seroma collection on breast brachytherapy dosimetry - a mathematical model.

Purpose Balloon brachytherapy is a widely accepted modality for delivery of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Our hypothesis was that inter-fraction seroma collection around the balloon surface would have an adverse effect on dosimetry of the target. Material and methods This is a dosimetric re-planning study using two volumetric models (30 cc and 45 cc) in a Contura® multi-lumen balloon (MLB) catheter. In a previously treated patient, two customized baseline plans were generated using multiple channels of the Contura® catheter prescribed to the Planning Target Volume Evaluation (PTV_Eval). Symmetric expansions of 1.0 mm (0-9 mm) increments around the balloon surface were performed to simulate a “Virtual Seroma” (VS) accumulation for both balloon volumes and plans were obtained for each expansion using Eclipse Brachyvision™. An analysis of these plans was then performed to evaluate the effect of seroma accumulation on dosimetric parameters of V100 and V90. Results 20 plans were generated and analyzed (10 plans for each balloon volume), representing VS of 6.0-66.0 cc. There was a commensurate decrease in the dose delivered to the PTV_Eval V100 and V90 (as defined by the original treatment plan) with increasing VS accumulation leading to a sub-optimal coverage of the PTV_Eval. For 30 cc MLB catheter, V100 decreased by 1.4% and V90 decreased by 0.9% for every 1 cc of VS. For 45cc MLB catheter, V100 decreased by 1.3% and V90 decreased by 1.15% for every 1.0 cc accumulation of VS. Conclusions Balloon catheter-tissue adherence ensures daily dose delivery to the planned PTV_Eval. Accumulation of seroma, hematoma or air between HDR fractions can significantly impact PTV_Eval dosimetry. Vacuum-port aspiration prior to delivery of each fraction, if available, should be considered to minimize the risk of geographic under dosing.

Interfraction accumulation of seroma during accelerated partial breast irradiation: Preliminary results of a prospective study

PURPOSE To quantify and characterize the process of seroma accumulation during accelerated partial breast irradiation using multicatheter balloon brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-two patients were treated using the Contura Multilumen brachytherapy catheter to a dose of 34Gy in 10 fractions over 5 treatment days. Serial aspirations of the vacuum port of the catheter were performed at the time of CT simulation and before each treatment. Volume and characteristics of fluid drawn were recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate various factors predictive of seroma formation. RESULTS Median patient age was 59.5 years, body mass index was 31, and volume of surgical specimen was 62.4cm(3). Median time from breast conservation surgery to placement of Contura catheter was 18.5 days. Pericatheter seroma, typically scant with a median volume of 0.75mL, was noted in 91% of patients at CT simulation. A total of 203 aspirations were performed with a median-aspirated seroma volume of 4.05mL. There was no significant correlation between the volume of seroma and histology (invasive vs. in situ), quadrant of location, body mass index, reexcision or reoperation, days from breast conservation surgery to balloon placement, or the volume of specimen removed. Radiation treatment factors, including balloon volume, balloon to skin distance, and planning target volume evaluation, also did not correlate with aspirated seroma. CONCLUSIONS Interfraction seroma accumulation has a variable pattern of development with no discernible predictors of occurrence. Routine pretreatment aspirations via vacuum port may potentially improve dosimetric reproducibility for a minority of patients.

Evaluation of the dose distribution for prostate implants using various 125I and 103Pd sources.

Recently, several different models of 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources have been introduced in order to meet the increasing demand for prostate seed implants. These sources have different internal structures; hence, their TG-43 dosimetric parameters are not the same. In this study, the effects of the dosimetric differences among the sources on their clinical applications were evaluated. The quantitative and qualitative evaluations were performed by comparisons of dose distributions and dose volume histograms of prostate implants calculated for various designs of 125I and 103Pd sources. These comparisons were made for an identical implant scheme with the same number of seeds for each source. The results were compared with the Amersham model 6711 seed for 125I and the Theragenics model 200 seed for 103Pd using the same implant scheme.

Negative effect of seroma on breast balloon brachytherapy dosimetry

PURPOSE Balloon brachytherapy is commonly used to deliver Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI). Seroma interference is a relatively common phenomenon during APBI. The negative effect of seroma accumulation on the planning target volume evaluation (PTV_Eval) coverage is not well understood. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a dosimetric replanning study on 10 patients with evidence of seroma collection at time of initial computed tomographic simulation around the catheter. Total dose was 34 Gy given at 3.4 Gy twice a day over 5 treatment days. A total of 20 plans were generated, 10 plans without accounting for and 10 after subtracting the seroma. We then compared the changes seen in PTV_Eval between plans as a factor of the seroma volume. RESULTS Median age was 62 years (51-83). Histology was invasive in 7/10 cases and in situ in 3/10. Median balloon to skin distance was 8.5 mm (3-14). Median balloon volume was 39 cc (30-104). Median seroma volume was 3.34 cc (1.13-13.71). For every 1 cc of accumulated seroma the percentage of PTV_Eval coverage by the 90% isodose line (V90) was found to decrease by 2.45% (P < .0001; confidence interval [CI], 1.87-3.03) and coverage by the 100% isodose line (V100) was decreased by 1.11% (P < .0001; CI, 0.81-1.41). Fifty percent (5/10) of previously acceptable plans with seroma not accounted for failed to meet the V90 ≥90% requirement after subtracting the seroma. CONCLUSIONS Accumulation of seroma was associated with a considerable negative impact on PTV_Eval dosimetry with a greater impact on V90 compared with the V100. Clinicians must be careful in detecting and accounting for such accumulation in treatment plans to prevent underdosing of the at risk target breast tissue.

Investigation of a source model for a new electronic brachytherapy tandem by film measurement

Abstract Purpose To investigate the accuracy of a vendor‐supplied source model for a new Xoft Axxent 0‐degree titanium tandem by film measurement. Methods We measured the anisotropy factors at varying distances and angles from the tandem in water using radiochromic film (Gafchromic EBT3) and an Epson Perfection v750 desktop flatbed scanner (US Epson, Long Beach, CA). A 0‐degree tandem was placed vertically in a water phantom. Four pieces of film, each at varying depths, were positioned orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the tandem for azimuthal anisotropy measurements. Polar anisotropy measurements were taken with the film aligned parallel to the tandem. An absolute dose calibration for the film was verified with a PTW 34013 Soft X‐Ray Chamber. The film measurements were analyzed using different color channels. The measured polar anisotropy for varying source positions was compared to the vendors data. Azimuthal anisotropy was measured as a function of the radius and angle, and normalized to the mean value over all angles at the specified radius. Results The azimuthal anisotropy of the tandem and source was found to be consistent for different positions along the tandems longitudinal axis and at varying distances from the tandem. Absolute dose using a calibrated parallel plate chamber showed agreement to within 2% of expected TPS values. The custom tandem, which has a thicker tip than the wall, was attenuating the 50 kV photons more than expected, at the angles where the photons had more wall material to traverse. This discrepancy was verified at different distances from the tandem and with different measurement techniques. As distance increased, anisotropy values had better agreement. Conclusions We quantified the agreement between the measured and provided anisotropy factors for a new Xoft Axxent 0‐degree titanium tandem. Radiochromic film response at low kV energy was also investigated. Our results showed that vendor‐supplied TG‐43 values were appropriate for clinical use at majority of the angles. A rigorous quality assurance method for new electronic brachytherapy sources and applicators, along with complete knowledge of all dosimetric measuring tools, should be implemented for all parts of the verification and commissioning process.

Evaluation of the dose distribution for prostate implants using various and sources

Recently, several different models of 125I and 103Pd brachytherapy sources have been introduced in order to meet the increasing demand for prostate seed implants. These sources have different internal structures; hence, their TG-43 dosimetric parameters are not the same. In this study, the effects of the dosimetric differences among the sources on their clinical applications were evaluated. The quantitative and qualitative evaluations were performed by comparisons of dose distributions and dose volume histograms of prostate implants calculated for various designs of 125I and 103Pd sources. These comparisons were made for an identical implant scheme with the same number of seeds for each source. The results were compared with the Amersham model 6711 seed for 125I and the Theragenics model 200 seed for 103Pd using the same implant scheme.