Keith Vincent
AeA
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Keith Vincent.
Journal of The Air & Waste Management Association | 2011
Charles Chemel; Ranjeet S. Sokhi; Anthony J. Dore; Paul Sutton; Keith Vincent; Stephen J. Griffiths; Garry D. Hayman; Raymond D. Wright; Matthew Baggaley; Stephen Hallsworth; H. Douglas Prain; Bernard Fisher
ABSTRACT Contributions of the emissions from a U.K. regulated fossil-fuel power station to regional air pollution and deposition are estimated using four air quality modeling systems for the year 2003. The modeling systems vary in complexity and emphasis in the way they treat atmospheric and chemical processes, and include the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system in its versions 4.6 and 4.7, a nested modeling system that combines long- and short-range impacts (referred to as TRACK-ADMS [Trajectory Model with Atmospheric Chemical Kinetics–Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling System]), and the Fine Resolution Atmospheric Multi-pollutant Exchange (FRAME) model. An evaluation of the baseline calculations against U.K. monitoring network data is performed. The CMAQ modeling system version 4.6 data set is selected as the reference data set for the model footprint comparison. The annual mean air concentration and total deposition footprints are summarized for each modeling system. The footprints of the power station emissions can account for a significant fraction of the local impacts for some species (e.g., more than 50% for SO2 air concentration and non-sea-salt sulfur deposition close to the source) for 2003. The spatial correlation and the coefficient of variation of the root mean square error (CVRMSE) are calculated between each model footprint and that calculated by the CMAQ modeling system version 4.6. The correlation coefficient quantifies model agreement in terms of spatial patterns, and the CVRMSE measures the magnitude of the difference between model footprints. Possible reasons for the differences between model results are discussed. Finally, implications and recommendations for the regulatory assessment of the impact of major industrial sources using regional air quality modeling systems are discussed in the light of results from this case study. IMPLICATIONS Modeling tools are required to assess the contribution of industrial sources to ambient levels of air pollution, acid deposition, and eutrophication. This study evaluates the performance characteristics of regional air quality modeling systems in predicting contributions of the emissions from a U.K. regulated fossil-fuel power station to regional air pollution and deposition. It contrasts acid deposition modeling approaches used in the United Kingdom and demonstrates the sensitivity of the modeling systems to large emission changes. This work suggests considering an ensemble average of model calculations to provide an estimate of the uncertainty associated with an industrial source footprint.
Archive | 2011
Bernard Fisher; Charles Chemel; Xavier Vazhappilly Francis; Rong-Ming Hu; Ranjeet S. Sokhi; Garry D. Hayman; Keith Vincent; Tony Dore; Stephen J. Griffiths; Paul Sutton; Ray D. Wright
A model evaluation has been undertaken by considering a diagnostic evaluation of the distance dependent structure of a single source footprint.
Atmospheric Environment | 2010
Charles Chemel; Ranjeet S. Sokhi; Ye Yu; Garry D. Hayman; Keith Vincent; Anthony J. Dore; Y.S. Tang; H.D. Prain; Bernard Fisher
Archive | 2001
Peter Coleman; Tony Bush; Chris Conolly; Sarah Irons; Tim P Murrells; Keith Vincent; John Watterson
Archive | 2007
D. Fowler; Neil Cape; Ron Smith; E. Nemitz; Mark A. Sutton; Tony Dore; Mhairi Coyle; Alan Crossley; Robert Storeton-West; Jennifer Muller; Gavin Phillips; R. Thomas; Massimo Vieno; Sim Tang; D. Famulari; Marsailidh Twigg; Bill Bealey; David Benham; Garry D. Hayman; H. Lawrence; Keith Vincent; Hilde Fagerli; David Simpson
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2017
Y.S. Tang; Christine F. Braban; U. Dragosits; Anthony J. Dore; I. Simmons; Netty van Dijk; Janet Poskitt; Gloria Dos Santos Pereira; Patrick Keenan; C. Conolly; Keith Vincent; R.I. Smith; Mathew R. Heal; Mark A. Sutton
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Marsailidh Twigg; Evgenia Ilyinskaya; Sonya Beccaceci; David Green; Matthew R. Jones; Ben Langford; Sarah R. Leeson; J. Lingard; Gloria M. Pereira; Heather Carter; J. Poskitt; Andreas Richter; Stuart Ritchie; I. Simmons; Ron Smith; Y. Sim Tang; Netty van Dijk; Keith Vincent; E. Nemitz; Massimo Vieno; Christine F. Braban
Archive | 2015
Bernard Fisher; Charles Chemel; Ranjeet S. Sokhi; Xavier Vazhappilly Francis; Keith Vincent; Anthony J. Dore; Stephen J. Griffiths; Paul Sutton; Raymond D. Wright
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Y. Sim Tang; Christine F. Braban; U. Dragosits; I. Simmons; D. Leaver; Netty van Dijk; Janet Poskitt; Sarah Thacker; M. Patel; Heather Carter; M. Glória Pereira; Patrick Keenan; Alan J. Lawlor; C. Conolly; Keith Vincent; Mathew R. Heal; Mark A. Sutton
Archive | 2014
Christine F. Braban; Y.S. Tang; Marsailidh Twigg; Mhairi Coyle; John Kentisbeer; Sarah R. Leeson; Chiara Di Marco; E. Nemitz; Bill Bealey; D. Leaver; Janet Poskitt; Ian D. Leith; Liz Beith; Sarah Thacker; I. Simmons; Netty van Dijk; Patrick Keenan; Gloria Dos Santos Pereira; Mark A. Sutton; Christopher Conolly; Keith Vincent; J. Lingard; Martin Davies; Denise Knight; Stuart Ritchie; Steve Telling; Brian Donovan