Kelli Cole

Post-Transplant High-Dose Cyclophosphamide for the Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Cyclophosphamides lack of hematopoietic stem cell toxicity and its unique effects on the immune system have prompted several investigators to explore its potential for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplants, post-transplant cyclophosphamide together with standard prophylaxis reduces the incidence of GVHD to acceptable rates without the need for T cell depletion. In matched related and unrelated donor settings, cyclophosphamide alone has produced encouraging results. In particular, the low incidence of chronic GVHD is noteworthy. Here, we present a review of the current understanding of the mechanism of action of post-transplant cyclophosphamide and summarize the clinical data on its use for the prevention of GVHD.

Short Course of Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention after Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Is Feasible and Yields Favorable Results: A Phase I Study.

An effective graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) preventative approach that preserves the graft-versus-tumor effect after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains elusive. Standard GVHD prophylactic regimens suppress T cells indiscriminately and are suboptimal. Conversely, post-transplantation high-dose cyclophosphamide selectively destroys proliferating alloreactive T cells, allows the expansion of regulatory T cells, and induces long-lasting clonal deletion of intrathymic antihost T cells. It has been successfully used to prevent GVHD after allogeneic HSCT. Bortezomib has antitumor activity on a variety of hematological malignancies and exhibits a number of favorable immunomodulatory effects that include inhibition of dendritic cells. Therefore, an approach that combines post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and bortezomib seems attractive. Herein, we report the results of a phase I study examining the feasibility and safety of high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in combination with bortezomib in patients undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood HSCT from matched siblings or unrelated donors after reduced-intensity conditioning. Cyclophosphamide was given at a fixed dose (50 mg/kg on days +3 and +4). Bortezomib dose was started at .7 mg/m2, escalated up to 1.3 mg/m2, and was administered on days 0 and +3. Patients receiving grafts from unrelated donors also received rabbit antithymocyte globulin. The combination was well tolerated and allowed prompt engraftment in all patients. The incidences of acute GVHD grades II to IV and grades III and IV were 20% and 6.7%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 9.1 months (range, 4.3 to 26.7), treatment-related mortality was 13.5% with predicted 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival of 55.7% and 68%, respectively. The study suggests that the combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and bortezomib is feasible and may offer an effective and practical GVHD prophylactic regimen. The combination, therefore, merits further examination.

Calcineurin and mTOR Inhibitor–Free Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Bortezomib Combination for Graft-versus-Host Disease Prevention after Peripheral Blood Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Phase I/II Study

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) hampers the utility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTC) and bortezomib for the prevention of GVHD. Patients undergoing peripheral blood AHSCT for hematological malignancies after reduced-intensity conditioning with grafts from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors were enrolled in a phase I/II clinical trial. Patients received a fixed dose of PTC and an increasing dose of bortezomib in 3 cohorts, from .7 to 1 and then to 1.3 mg/m2, administered 6 hours after graft infusion and 72 hours thereafter, during phase I. The study was then extended at the higher dose in phase II for a total of 28 patients. No graft failure and no unexpected grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicities were encountered. The median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 16 and 27 days, respectively. Day +100 treatment-related mortality was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], .2% to 15.7%). The cumulative incidences of grades II to IV and grades III and IV acute GVHD were 35.9% (95% CI, 18.6% to 53.6%) and 11.7% (95% CI, 2.8% to 27.5%), respectively. The incidence of chronic GVHD was 27% (95% CI, 11.4% to 45.3%). Progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD and relapse-free survival rates were 50% (95% CI, 30.6% to 66.6%), 50.8% (95% CI, 30.1% to 68.2%), and 37.7% (95% CI, 20.1% to 55.3%), respectively. Immune reconstitution, measured by CD3, CD4, and CD8 recovery, was prompt. The combination of PTC and bortezomib for the prevention of GVHD is feasible, safe, and yields promising results. The combination warrants further examination in a multi-institutional trial.

Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide and Ixazomib Combination Rescues Mice Subjected to Experimental Graft-versus-Host Disease and Is Superior to Either Agent Alone

Lapses in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) warrant novel approaches. Such approaches include, among others, the use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTC) and proteasome inhibitors. Although PTC alone consistently produces low rates of chronic GVHD, the incidence of acute GVHD remains significant. Inversely, prolonged post-transplantation administration of proteasome inhibitors carries a risk of paradoxical aggravation of GVHD. We examined whether the combination of cyclophosphamide and ixazomib addresses the limitations of each of these agents when used alone to prevent GVHD in mice subjected to allogeneic HSCT across MHC barriers. We chose ixazomib, an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor, because of its favorable physiochemical characteristics. The combination of cyclophosphamide and ixazomib improved overall survival of mice in comparison to an untreated control group and to groups receiving either cyclophosphamide alone or ixazomib alone. Furthermore, cyclophosphamide prevented the surge of IL-1β, GVHD aggravation, and sudden death associated with prolonged administration of ixazomib after HSCT. Finally, we demonstrated that although ixazomib was administered before cyclophosphamide, it did not impair the preferential depletion of proliferating as opposed to resting donor T cells. Our data suggest that the combination of cyclophosphamide and ixazomib for the prevention of GVHD after allogeneic HSCT is promising and merits further investigation in clinical trials.