Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kelly E. Ormond is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kelly E. Ormond.


Genetics in Medicine | 2013

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing

Robert C. Green; Jonathan S. Berg; Wayne W. Grody; Sarah S. Kalia; Bruce R. Korf; Christa Lese Martin; Amy L. McGuire; Robert L. Nussbaum; Kelly E. Ormond; Heidi L. Rehm; Michael S. Watson; Marc S. Williams; Leslie G. Biesecker

In clinical exome and genome sequencing, there is a potential for the recognition and reporting of incidental or secondary findings unrelated to the indication for ordering the sequencing but of medical value for patient care. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recently published a policy statement on clinical sequencing that emphasized the importance of alerting the patient to the possibility of such results in pretest patient discussions, clinical testing, and reporting of results. The ACMG appointed a Working Group on Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing to make recommendations about responsible management of incidental findings when patients undergo exome or genome sequencing. This Working Group conducted a year-long consensus process, including an open forum at the 2012 Annual Meeting and review by outside experts, and produced recommendations that have been approved by the ACMG Board. Specific and detailed recommendations, and the background and rationale for these recommendations, are described herein. The ACMG recommends that laboratories performing clinical sequencing seek and report mutations of the specified classes or types in the genes listed here. This evaluation and reporting should be performed for all clinical germline (constitutional) exome and genome sequencing, including the “normal” of tumor-normal subtractive analyses in all subjects, irrespective of age but excluding fetal samples. We recognize that there are insufficient data on penetrance and clinical utility to fully support these recommendations, and we encourage the creation of an ongoing process for updating these recommendations at least annually as further data are collected.Genet Med 2013:15(7):565–574


The Lancet | 2010

Clinical assessment incorporating a personal genome

Euan A. Ashley; Atul J. Butte; Matthew T. Wheeler; Rong Chen; Teri E. Klein; Frederick E. Dewey; Joel T. Dudley; Kelly E. Ormond; Aleksandra Pavlovic; Alexander A. Morgan; Dmitry Pushkarev; Norma F. Neff; Louanne Hudgins; Li Gong; Laura M. Hodges; Dorit S. Berlin; Caroline F. Thorn; Joan M. Hebert; Mark Woon; Hersh Sagreiya; Ryan Whaley; Joshua W. Knowles; Michael F. Chou; Joseph V. Thakuria; Abraham M. Rosenbaum; Alexander Wait Zaranek; George M. Church; Henry T. Greely; Stephen R. Quake; Russ B. Altman

BACKGROUND The cost of genomic information has fallen steeply, but the clinical translation of genetic risk estimates remains unclear. We aimed to undertake an integrated analysis of a complete human genome in a clinical context. METHODS We assessed a patient with a family history of vascular disease and early sudden death. Clinical assessment included analysis of this patients full genome sequence, risk prediction for coronary artery disease, screening for causes of sudden cardiac death, and genetic counselling. Genetic analysis included the development of novel methods for the integration of whole genome and clinical risk. Disease and risk analysis focused on prediction of genetic risk of variants associated with mendelian disease, recognised drug responses, and pathogenicity for novel variants. We queried disease-specific mutation databases and pharmacogenomics databases to identify genes and mutations with known associations with disease and drug response. We estimated post-test probabilities of disease by applying likelihood ratios derived from integration of multiple common variants to age-appropriate and sex-appropriate pre-test probabilities. We also accounted for gene-environment interactions and conditionally dependent risks. FINDINGS Analysis of 2.6 million single nucleotide polymorphisms and 752 copy number variations showed increased genetic risk for myocardial infarction, type 2 diabetes, and some cancers. We discovered rare variants in three genes that are clinically associated with sudden cardiac death-TMEM43, DSP, and MYBPC3. A variant in LPA was consistent with a family history of coronary artery disease. The patient had a heterozygous null mutation in CYP2C19 suggesting probable clopidogrel resistance, several variants associated with a positive response to lipid-lowering therapy, and variants in CYP4F2 and VKORC1 that suggest he might have a low initial dosing requirement for warfarin. Many variants of uncertain importance were reported. INTERPRETATION Although challenges remain, our results suggest that whole-genome sequencing can yield useful and clinically relevant information for individual patients. FUNDING National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Heart, Lung And Blood Institute; National Human Genome Research Institute; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; National Library of Medicine, Lucile Packard Foundation for Childrens Health; Hewlett Packard Foundation; Breetwor Family Foundation.


American Journal of Human Genetics | 2015

Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents

Jeffrey R. Botkin; John W. Belmont; Jonathan S. Berg; Benjamin E. Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A. Holm; Howard P. Levy; Kelly E. Ormond; Howard M. Saal; Nancy B. Spinner; Benjamin S. Wilfond; Joseph D. McInerney

In 1995, the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) jointly published a statement on genetic testing in children and adolescents. In the past 20 years, much has changed in the field of genetics, including the development of powerful new technologies, new data from genetic research on children and adolescents, and substantial clinical experience. This statement represents current opinion by the ASHG on the ethical, legal, and social issues concerning genetic testing in children. These recommendations are relevant to families, clinicians, and investigators. After a brief review of the 1995 statement and major changes in genetic technologies in recent years, this statement offers points to consider on a broad range of test technologies and their applications in clinical medicine and research. Recommendations are also made for record and communication issues in this domain and for professional education.


JAMA | 2014

Clinical Interpretation and Implications of Whole-Genome Sequencing

Frederick E. Dewey; Megan E. Grove; Cuiping Pan; Benjamin A. Goldstein; Jonathan A. Bernstein; Hassan Chaib; Jason D. Merker; Rachel L. Goldfeder; Gregory M. Enns; Sean P. David; Neda Pakdaman; Kelly E. Ormond; Colleen Caleshu; Kerry Kingham; Teri E. Klein; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Kenneth Sakamoto; Matthew T. Wheeler; Atul J. Butte; James M. Ford; Linda M. Boxer; John P. A. Ioannidis; Alan C. Yeung; Russ B. Altman; Themistocles L. Assimes; Michael Snyder; Euan A. Ashley; Thomas Quertermous

IMPORTANCE Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly applied in clinical medicine and is expected to uncover clinically significant findings regardless of sequencing indication. OBJECTIVES To examine coverage and concordance of clinically relevant genetic variation provided by WGS technologies; to quantitate inherited disease risk and pharmacogenomic findings in WGS data and resources required for their discovery and interpretation; and to evaluate clinical action prompted by WGS findings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An exploratory study of 12 adult participants recruited at Stanford University Medical Center who underwent WGS between November 2011 and March 2012. A multidisciplinary team reviewed all potentially reportable genetic findings. Five physicians proposed initial clinical follow-up based on the genetic findings. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Genome coverage and sequencing platform concordance in different categories of genetic disease risk, person-hours spent curating candidate disease-risk variants, interpretation agreement between trained curators and disease genetics databases, burden of inherited disease risk and pharmacogenomic findings, and burden and interrater agreement of proposed clinical follow-up. RESULTS Depending on sequencing platform, 10% to 19% of inherited disease genes were not covered to accepted standards for single nucleotide variant discovery. Genotype concordance was high for previously described single nucleotide genetic variants (99%-100%) but low for small insertion/deletion variants (53%-59%). Curation of 90 to 127 genetic variants in each participant required a median of 54 minutes (range, 5-223 minutes) per genetic variant, resulted in moderate classification agreement between professionals (Gross κ, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.64), and reclassified 69% of genetic variants cataloged as disease causing in mutation databases to variants of uncertain or lesser significance. Two to 6 personal disease-risk findings were discovered in each participant, including 1 frameshift deletion in the BRCA1 gene implicated in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Physician review of sequencing findings prompted consideration of a median of 1 to 3 initial diagnostic tests and referrals per participant, with fair interrater agreement about the suitability of WGS findings for clinical follow-up (Fleiss κ, 0.24; P < 001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this exploratory study of 12 volunteer adults, the use of WGS was associated with incomplete coverage of inherited disease genes, low reproducibility of detection of genetic variation with the highest potential clinical effects, and uncertainty about clinically reportable findings. In certain cases, WGS will identify clinically actionable genetic variants warranting early medical intervention. These issues should be considered when determining the role of WGS in clinical medicine.


Genetics in Medicine | 2017

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

Sarah S. Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J. Bale; Wendy K. Chung; Christine M. Eng; James P. Evans; Gail E. Herman; Sophia B. Hufnagel; Teri E. Klein; Bruce R. Korf; Kent D. McKelvey; Kelly E. Ormond; C. Sue Richards; Christopher N. Vlangos; Michael S. Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David T. Miller

Disclaimer: These recommendations are designed primarily as an educational resource for medical geneticists and other healthcare providers to help them provide quality medical services. Adherence to these recommendations is completely voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These recommendations should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the clinician should apply his or her own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstances presented by the individual patient or specimen. Clinicians are encouraged to document the reasons for the use of a particular procedure or test, whether or not it is in conformance with this statement. Clinicians also are advised to take notice of the date this statement was adopted and to consider other medical and scientific information that becomes available after that date. It also would be prudent to consider whether intellectual property interests may restrict the performance of certain tests and other procedures.To promote standardized reporting of actionable information from clinical genomic sequencing, in 2013, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) published a minimum list of genes to be reported as incidental or secondary findings. The goal was to identify and manage risks for selected highly penetrant genetic disorders through established interventions aimed at preventing or significantly reducing morbidity and mortality. The ACMG subsequently established the Secondary Findings Maintenance Working Group to develop a process for curating and updating the list over time. We describe here the new process for accepting and evaluating nominations for updates to the secondary findings list. We also report outcomes from six nominations received in the initial 15 months after the process was implemented. Applying the new process while upholding the core principles of the original policy statement resulted in the addition of four genes and removal of one gene; one gene did not meet criteria for inclusion. The updated secondary findings minimum list includes 59 medically actionable genes recommended for return in clinical genomic sequencing. We discuss future areas of focus, encourage continued input from the medical community, and call for research on the impact of returning genomic secondary findings.Genet Med 19 2, 249–255.


The Lancet | 2010

Challenges in the clinical application of whole-genome sequencing

Kelly E. Ormond; Matthew T. Wheeler; Louanne Hudgins; Teri E. Klein; Atul J. Butte; Russ B. Altman; Euan A. Ashley; Henry T. Greely

Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (E A Ashley MRCP, M T Wheeler MD), Department of Medicine (Prof R B Altman MD), Department of Bioengineering (Prof R B Altman), Division of Medical Genetics (Prof L Hudgins MD), Department of Pediatrics (A J Butte MD), and Department of Genetics (T E Klein PhD, K E Ormond MSc, Prof R B Altman), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; and Center for Law and Biosciences, Stanford University School of Law, Stanford, CA, USA (Prof H T Greely JD)


Journal of Genetic Counseling | 2013

Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis: the Position of the National Society of Genetic Counselors

Patricia Devers; Amy Cronister; Kelly E. Ormond; Flavia Facio; Campbell K. Brasington; Pamela Flodman

The 1997 discovery of free fetal DNA in maternal plasma launched clinical researchers’ efforts to establish a reliable method for non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal genetic conditions. Various methods, including, but not limited to, massively parallel sequencing (MPS) and selective analysis of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma, have recently been developed as highly sensitive and specific noninvasive screening tools for common fetal chromosome aneuploidies. Incorporating these new noninvasive technologies into clinical practice will impact the current prenatal screening paradigm for fetal aneuploidy, in which genetic counseling plays an integral role. The National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) currently supports Noninvasive Prenatal Testing/Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis (NIPT/NIPD) as an option for patients whose pregnancies are considered to be at an increased risk for certain chromosome abnormalities. NSGC urges that NIPT/NIPD only be offered in the context of informed consent, education, and counseling by a qualified provider, such as a certified genetic counselor. Patients whose NIPT/NIPD results are abnormal, or who have other factors suggestive of a chromosome abnormality, should receive genetic counseling and be given the option of standard confirmatory diagnostic testing.


Prenatal Diagnosis | 2011

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake

Reana Tischler; Louanne Hudgins; Yair J. Blumenfeld; Henry T. Greely; Kelly E. Ormond

To investigate pregnant womens level of future interest in noninvasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) and what factors might affect expected uptake of this testing.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2015

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.

Wybo Dondorp; Guido de Wert; Yvonne Bombard; Diana W. Bianchi; Carsten Bergmann; Pascal Borry; Lyn S. Chitty; Florence Fellmann; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Lidewij Henneman; Heidi Carmen Howard; Anneke Lucassen; Kelly E. Ormond; Borut Peterlin; Dragica Radojkovic; Wolf Rogowski; Maria Soller; Aad Tibben; Lisbeth Tranebjærg; Martina C. Cornel

This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.


PLOS Genetics | 2011

Phased Whole-Genome Genetic Risk in a Family Quartet Using a Major Allele Reference Sequence

Frederick E. Dewey; Rong Chen; Sergio Cordero; Kelly E. Ormond; Colleen Caleshu; Konrad J. Karczewski; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Matthew T. Wheeler; Joel T. Dudley; Jake K. Byrnes; Omar E. Cornejo; Joshua W. Knowles; Mark Woon; Li Gong; Caroline F. Thorn; Joan M. Hebert; Emidio Capriotti; Sean P. David; Aleksandra Pavlovic; Anne West; Joseph V. Thakuria; Madeleine Ball; Alexander Wait Zaranek; Heidi L. Rehm; George M. Church; John West; Carlos Bustamante; Michael Snyder; Russ B. Altman; Teri E. Klein

Whole-genome sequencing harbors unprecedented potential for characterization of individual and family genetic variation. Here, we develop a novel synthetic human reference sequence that is ethnically concordant and use it for the analysis of genomes from a nuclear family with history of familial thrombophilia. We demonstrate that the use of the major allele reference sequence results in improved genotype accuracy for disease-associated variant loci. We infer recombination sites to the lowest median resolution demonstrated to date (<1,000 base pairs). We use family inheritance state analysis to control sequencing error and inform family-wide haplotype phasing, allowing quantification of genome-wide compound heterozygosity. We develop a sequence-based methodology for Human Leukocyte Antigen typing that contributes to disease risk prediction. Finally, we advance methods for analysis of disease and pharmacogenomic risk across the coding and non-coding genome that incorporate phased variant data. We show these methods are capable of identifying multigenic risk for inherited thrombophilia and informing the appropriate pharmacological therapy. These ethnicity-specific, family-based approaches to interpretation of genetic variation are emblematic of the next generation of genetic risk assessment using whole-genome sequencing.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kelly E. Ormond's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge