Kelly Gilmore
University of Washington
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kelly Gilmore.
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health | 2016
Andrea J. Hoopes; Kym R. Ahrens; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Wren L. Haaland; Anne-Marie Amies Oelschlager; Sarah Prager
Background: A key strategy to reduce unintended adolescent pregnancies is to expand access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, including intrauterine devices and subdermal contraceptive implants. LARC services can be provided to adolescents in school-based health and other primary care settings, yet limited knowledge and negative attitudes about LARC methods may influence adolescents’ utilization of these methods. This study aimed to evaluate correlates of knowledge and acceptability of LARC methods among adolescent women at a school-based health center (SBHC). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, female patients receiving care at 2 SBHCs in Seattle, Washington completed an electronic survey about sexual and reproductive health. Primary outcomes were (1) LARC knowledge as measured by percentage correct of 10 true-false questions and (2) LARC acceptability as measured by participants reporting either liking the idea of having an intrauterine device (IUD)/subdermal implant or currently using one. Results: A total of 102 students diverse in race/ethnicity and socioeconomic backgrounds completed the survey (mean age 16.2 years, range 14.4-19.1 years). Approximately half reported a lifetime history of vaginal sex. Greater LARC knowledge was associated with white race (regression coefficient [coef] = 26.8; 95% CI 13.3-40.4; P < .001), history of vaginal intercourse (coef = 29.9; 95% CI 17.1-42.7; P < .001), and current/prior LARC use (coef = 22.8; 95% CI 6.5-40.0; P = .007). Older age was associated with lower IUD acceptability (odds ratio = 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.94; P = .029) while history of intercourse was associated with greater implant acceptability (odds ratio 5.66, 95% CI 1.46-22.0; P = .012). Discussion: Adolescent women in this SBHC setting had variable knowledge and acceptability of LARC. A history of vaginal intercourse was the strongest predictor of LARC acceptability. Our findings suggest a need for LARC counseling and education strategies, particularly for young women from diverse cultural backgrounds and those with less sexual experience.
Journal of Adolescent Health | 2015
Kelly Gilmore; Andrea J. Hoopes; Janet Cady; Anne Marie Amies Oelschlager; Sarah Prager; Ann Vander Stoep
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation of a program that provides long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services within school-based health centers (SBHCs) and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation as reported by SBHC clinicians and administrators, public health officials, and community partners. METHODS We conducted 14 semistructured interviews with key informants involved in the implementation of LARC services. Key informants included SBHC clinicians and administrators, public health officials, and community partners. We used a content analysis approach to analyze interview transcripts for themes. We explored barriers to and facilitators of LARC service delivery across and within key informant groups. RESULTS The most cited barriers across key informant groups were as follows: perceived lack of provider procedural skills and bias and negative attitudes about LARC methods. The most common facilitators identified across groups were as follows: clear communication strategies, contraceptive counseling practice changes, provider trainings, and stakeholder engagement. Two additional barriers emerged in specific key informant groups. Technical and logistical barriers to LARC service delivery were cited heavily by SBHC administrative staff, community partners, and public health officials. Expense and billing was a major barrier to SBHC administrative staff. CONCLUSIONS LARC counseling and procedural services can be implemented in an SBHC setting to promote access to effective contraceptive options for adolescent women.
BMJ | 2018
Kelly Gilmore; Alison Ojanen-Goldsmith; Lisa S. Callegari; Emily M. Godfrey
Background The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is a contraceptive method that can cause irregular bleeding and cramping during the first 6 months of use. Expected side effects are common reasons given for LNG-IUS device discontinuation within 12 months of use. Anticipatory counselling regarding expected LNG-IUS side effects may reduce method discontinuation and improve patient satisfaction. Educational videos could improve anticipatory counselling for LNG-IUS users; however, none have been developed. This article describes the process of developing an anticipatory counselling video with input from women in the first 6 months of LNG-IUS use and from family planning (FP) experts. Methods We used a participatory, iterative process to develop an anticipatory counselling video about the first 6 months of LNG-IUS use. We developed a preliminary draft using evidence from the published literature. We sought feedback from 11 FP experts and 49 LNG-IUS users to revise the script before creating the final video. Results FP experts suggested balancing negative with positive information and using colloquial language. LNG-IUS users requested more detailed information on the LNG-IUS mechanism of action and expected side effects in the form of statistics, infographic animations, testimonials from LNG-IUS users, and technical as opposed to colloquial language. The final video is 6 min in length and features seven LNG-IUS users, three physicians, and infographic animations. Conclusion Including input from FP experts and LNG-IUS users in the development process resulted in a 6-min anticipatory counselling video that will be piloted among patients on the day of their LNG-IUS insertion.
Archive | 2017
Bud Nicola; Amy Hagopian; A. Althauser; Katy J. L. Bell; Stephen Bezruchka; T. Bostock; T.M. Busch Isaksen; Susan E. Buskin; F.A. Connell; John Gale; Michelle M. Garrison; Kelly Gilmore; Jennifer Hagedorn; Ariel Hart; Jsani Henry; Peter House; Chris Hurley; Aaron Katz; A. Gita Krishnaswamy; Hendrika Meischke; Lena Nachand; Brett Niessen; Ian Painter; Sarah Ross-Viles; Afomeia Tesfai; John A. Thompson; Wayne Turnberg; Jude Van Buren; Ann Vander Stoep
Contraception | 2017
Em Godfrey; Kelly Gilmore; L Benson
Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology | 2016
Lyndsey Benson; Kelly Gilmore; Elizabeth Micks; Sarah Prager
Journal of Adolescent Health | 2016
Andrea J. Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Kym R. Ahrens
Journal of Adolescent Health | 2015
Andrea J. Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Kym R. Ahrens
Contraception | 2015
Andrea J. Hoopes; K. Ahrens; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; W. Haaland; A.-M. Amies-Oelschlager; Sarah Prager
/data/revues/10833188/v28i2/S1083318815000686/ | 2015
Andrea J. Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Kym R. Ahrens