Kelly M. Greenhill
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kelly M. Greenhill.
Science | 2018
David Lazer; Matthew A. Baum; Yochai Benkler; Adam J. Berinsky; Kelly M. Greenhill; Filippo Menczer; Miriam J. Metzger; Brendan Nyhan; Gordon Pennycook; David Rothschild; Michael Schudson; Steven A. Sloman; Cass R. Sunstein; Emily A. Thorson; Duncan J. Watts; Jonathan L. Zittrain
Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort The rise of fake news highlights the erosion of long-standing institutional bulwarks against misinformation in the internet age. Concern over the problem is global. However, much remains unknown regarding the vulnerabilities of individuals, institutions, and society to manipulations by malicious actors. A new system of safeguards is needed. Below, we discuss extant social and computer science research regarding belief in fake news and the mechanisms by which it spreads. Fake news has a long history, but we focus on unanswered scientific questions raised by the proliferation of its most recent, politically oriented incarnation. Beyond selected references in the text, suggested further reading can be found in the supplementary materials.
Civil Wars | 2007
Kelly M. Greenhill; Paul Staniland
Counterinsurgency is one of the most important topics facing policymakers and scholars. Existing studies of counterinsurgency are very valuable, but sometimes adhere too strictly to sweeping dichotomies and paradigms. This article discusses ten specific mechanisms that lead counterinsurgent governments to squander their generally overwhelming power advantages. This mechanism-based approach can improve both policy and scholarly analysis.
European Law Journal | 2016
Kelly M. Greenhill
In 2015, over one million refugees and migrants arrived in Europe, laying bare the limitations of the EUs common border control and burden-sharing systems. This article examines consequences of the EUs disjoint, schizophrenic and, at times, hypocritical responses to what has become known as the European migration crisis. It explains how unilateral, national-level responses have made the EU as a whole particularly susceptible to a unique brand of coercive bargaining that relies on the threat (or actual generation) of mass population movements as a non-military instrument of state-level coercion. After outlining who employs this kind of foreign policy tool, to what ends, and under what circumstances, the article offers an illustration of this kind of coercion in action, by analyzing the March 2016 deal between the EU and Turkey. The article concludes with a discussion of broader consequences of the deal and implications both for the displaced and for the EU going forward.
International Migration | 2002
Kelly M. Greenhill
This paper presents a case study of the August 1994 Cuban balseros crisis, during which more than 35,000 fled the island and headed toward Florida in the span of a few weeks. It argues that Castro launched the crisis in an attempt to manipulate US fears of another Mariel, and in order to compel a shift in US policy, both on immigration and on a wider variety of issues. The paper further contends that from Castro’s perspective, this exercise in coercion proved a qualified success – his third such successful use of the Cuban people as an asymmetric political weapon against the US. In addition, the paper argues that Castro’s success was predicated on his ability to internationalize his own domestic crisis and transform it into an American domestic political and foreign policy crisis. Finally, it offers a novel explanation of how, why, and under what conditions, states and/or non–state actors may attempt to use refugees as coercive political weapons. Although dwarfed in size by the larger 1980 Mariel boatlift, the 1994 crisis is important for several reasons. First, despite its brevity, it had far reaching consequences for US–Cuban relations. Without warning or preamble, it catalyzed a shift in US policy vis–a–vis Cuban immigration that represented a radical departure from what it had been for the previous three decades. Second, it influenced US domestic politics on the national level, by expanding the scope and salience of the issue, and mobilizing not only Floridians, but also the larger public concerned about illegal immigration. Third, the crisis illustrated the potential potency of engineered migration as an asymmetric weapon of the weak. Finally, the brief, but significant, interactions of international and domestic actors in this case warrant examination because, although the 1994 crisis was limited, in its dynamics it resembles myriad other international refugee crises, large and small. Thus the case offers valuable lessons that may aid in dealing with future (real or threatened) crises.
Security Studies | 2001
Kelly M. Greenhill
HIS STATEMENT reflects a popular and widespread notion about the role that limited military force, frequently in the guise of an international rapid-reaction brigade, can play in forestalling or even preventing the outbreak of violence.2 Such notions are predicated on the conviction that the mere presence of a small number of foreign troops can have a chilling effect on current (or potential) combatants in many conflicts. Unfortunately, this belief often stems more from political imperatives and idealistic rationalizations of what ought to be possible than from a realistic net assessment of the operational realities troops face on the ground. In other words, before making claims about what the application of limited military force can accomplish in a
Archive | 2010
Peter Andreas; Kelly M. Greenhill
International Security | 2007
Kelly M. Greenhill; Solomon Major
Archive | 2010
Kelly M. Greenhill
Archive | 2010
Kelly M. Greenhill
International Studies Quarterly | 2017
Kelly M. Greenhill; Ben Oppenheim