Kelly McCants

Heart Transplant vs Left Ventricular Assist Device in Heart Transplant-Eligible Patients

BACKGROUND Patients listed for heart transplant have a prolonged wait time, with continued deterioration, poor quality of life, and 10% mortality. Although recent bridge to transplant (BTT) studies demonstrated 1-year survival similar to heart transplantation, doubt remains about overall effectiveness as a treatment strategy compared with waiting and implanting a left ventricular device (LVAD) only as a last resort. We evaluated 1-year outcome and effectiveness of LVAD vs heart transplantation. METHODS Patients on the heart transplantation list, either receiving an allograft or LVAD for BTT from January 2009 to December 2009 were evaluated. Of 43 patients treated, 1 received both LVAD and an allograft during same admission was removed from the analysis. All patients but one who received an allograft had prior LVAD. Descriptive and univariate (t test) statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curve were used for analyses. RESULTS LVAD for BTT was used in 29 patients (51.4±12.8 years, 6.9% women), and 13 (51.1±11.6 years, 15.38% women) underwent heart transplantation. Initial hospital length of stay was 17.5±14.4 days in BTT group and 14.3±4.6 days in heart transplant group (p=0.44) At 1 year, the total number of days spent in the hospital (operation and related complications), including index hospitalization was 11.6±14.3 days/100 days in BTT and 7.9±9.0 days/100 days in heart transplantation (p=0.38). A total of 41% BTT and 46% heart transplant patients had one readmission within 3 months of the index hospitalization. Infection was the most common cause of readmission in both groups. The 1-year survival was similar for both groups (no hospital death in either group; 3 late deaths in the BTT group). CONCLUSIONS One-year outcomes for patients eligible for heart transplantation were similar whether they received an allograft or LVAD for BTT. Heart transplant outcome for patients with LVAD were not adversely affected. Improving outcomes for patients treated with LVAD suggest that current decision models for patients eligible for heart transplantation may need to be reevaluated.

Hematologic Markers Better Predict Left Ventricular Assist Device Thrombosis than Echocardiographic or Pump Parameters

BACKGROUND Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) thrombosis is a life-threatening complication that remains a major clinical problem. Consensus diagnostic criteria do not exist. We investigated whether hematologic, echocardiographic, or pump parameters reliably change during LVAD thrombosis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 20 consecutive cases of continuous-flow LVAD thrombosis (Thoratec HeartMate II n = 16, HeartWare HVAD n = 4) was performed. Hematologic markers (lactate dehydrogenase, plasma-free hemoglobin, hemoglobin, creatinine), echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, aortic insufficiency, inflow-cannula velocity), and pump characteristics (speed, power, estimated flow, pulsatility index) were analyzed with one-way repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey post-test or paired Student t-tests. RESULTS Lactate dehydrogenase and plasma-free hemoglobin were significantly (p < 0.05) elevated at admission for LVAD thrombosis. Hemoglobin and creatinine were not significantly different at admission but changed significantly after admission. Left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic diameter, mitral regurgitation, aortic insufficiency, inflow-cannula velocity, LVAD speed, power consumption, estimated flow, and pulsatility index were not significantly different at admission for LVAD thrombosis. CONCLUSION Hematological markers of hemolysis, but not echocardiographic or pump parameters, reliably changed during LVAD thrombosis. Markers of hemolysis are the best early predictors of LVAD thrombosis.

Safety and Feasibility of Induction Immunosuppression When Driveline Infection Is an Indication for Cardiac Transplantation.

BACKGROUND There is a paucity of data on the use of induction immunosuppression in patients with active infections undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). We hypothesized that induction immunosuppression in patients with ventricular assist device (VAD) undergoing OHT with localized active driveline infection (DLI) does not lead to worse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed our database for bridge-to-transplant VAD patients who underwent OHT and received induction therapy. Patients were stratified into those with and without active DLI at the time of OHT and followed up till death or at least 30 months after OHT. Posttransplant length of stay (LOS), frequency of infections, and mortality were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients (30 males) with mean age of 57.5 ± 13 years with VAD underwent OHT during the study period. Twelve had active DLI. Mean follow-up was 46.4 ± 23.1 months. In the DLI versus non-DLI group, there was no difference in mortality (17 vs. 23%, p = NS), LOS (16.3 ± 5.4 vs. 17.2 ± 13.7, p = NS), postoperative renal function, incidence of hyperacute or late rejection or infection either in the first month (25 vs. 23%, p = NS) or during entire follow-up (92 vs. 88%, p = NS). No patient in the DLI group had infections attributable to the same organism responsible for pretransplant DLI. CONCLUSION In patients with active DLI, induction immunosuppression after OHT did not increase LOS, infections, or mortality after at least 30 months of follow-up and therefore it appears to be a safe and feasible therapeutic option.

ORTHOTOPIC HEART TRANSPLANTATION & PSEUDORESTRICTIVE LV FILLING PATTERN: A STUDY OF TRANSMITRAL DOPPLER FLOW / TISSUE DOPPLER IMAGING AND COMPARATIVE INVASIVE HEMODYNAMICS IN PATIENTS WITH ORTHOTOPIC HEART TRANSPLANTATION

Echo studies in heart transplant patients often show elevated early diastolic filling (E) velocities and an E/A ratio > 2. Whether this represents left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or it is a benign finding is yet to be ascertained. In a retrospective study we analyzed echocardiographic and

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome after Heart Transplantation: Diagnosis and Immunosuppressive Therapy

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, an infrequent neurotoxicity associated with the use of tacrolimus, was first described in 1996, as a reversible syndrome manifested by headache, altered mental function, seizures, and visual disturbances. We describe the case of a 37-year-old woman who developed neurologic symptoms consistent with encephalopathy after treatment with tacrolimus, which was prescribed to maintain immunosuppression after orthotopic heart transplantation. This report also discusses the imaging methods used in the diagnosis of posterior reversible encephalopathy and highlights the difficulty of maintaining immunosuppression and managing medication-related adverse effects, while taking into account the risk of acute rejection after transplantation.