Kelly T. Hughes

Coupling of Flagellar Gene Expression to Flagellar Assembly in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli

SUMMARY How do organisms assess the degree of completion of a large structure, especially an extracellular structure such as a flagellum? Bacteria can do this. Mutants that lack key components needed early in assembly fail to express proteins that would normally be added at later assembly stages. In some cases, the regulatory circuitry is able to sense completion of structures beyond the cell surface, such as completion of the external hook structure. In Salmonella and Escherichia coli, regulation occurs at both transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. One transcriptional regulatory mechanism involves a regulatory protein, FlgM, that escapes from the cell (and thus can no longer act) through a complete flagellum and is held inside when the structure has not reached a later stage of completion. FlgM prevents late flagellar gene transcription by binding the flagellum-specific transcription factor ς28. FlgM is itself regulated in response to the assembly of an incomplete flagellum known as the hook-basal body intermediate structure. Upon completion of the hook-basal body structure, FlgM is exported through this structure out of the cell. Inhibition of ς28-dependent transcription is relieved, and genes required for the later assembly stages are expressed, allowing completion of the flagellar organelle. Distinct posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms occur in response to assembly of the flagellar type III secretion apparatus and of ring structures in the peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharide layers. The entire flagellar regulatory pathway is regulated in response to environmental cues. Cell cycle control and flagellar development are codependent. We discuss how all these levels of regulation ensure efficient assembly of the flagellum in response to environmental stimuli.

Coordinating assembly of a bacterial macromolecular machine

The assembly of large and complex organelles, such as the bacterial flagellum, poses the formidable problem of coupling temporal gene expression to specific stages of the organelle-assembly process. The discovery that levels of the bacterial flagellar regulatory protein FlgM are controlled by its secretion from the cell in response to the completion of an intermediate flagellar structure (the hook–basal body) was only the first of several discoveries of unique mechanisms that coordinate flagellar gene expression with assembly. In this Review, we discuss this mechanism, together with others that also coordinate gene regulation and flagellar assembly in Gram-negative bacteria.

Regulation of flagellar assembly.

Research on the molecular mechanism of bacterial flagellar assembly has been an ongoing study that spans three decades. Early work showed that regulation of flagellar gene transcription was coupled to the assembly process. Recent advances in the understanding of the regulation of flagellar assembly have shown that translational and post-translational regulation also plays a significant role in flagellar assembly. In both Salmonella and Caulobacter crescentus, translational regulation influences the secretion of the anti-sigma(28) factor FlgM and the flagellin fljK, respectively. Post-translational regulatory mechanisms also control the length of the hook and the ability of the type III secretion system to discriminate between middle and late secretion substrates. The flagellum provides a model system for understanding how gene regulation functions to ensure the efficient assembly of a complex structure and fundamental mechanisms common to all type III secretion systems.

Energy source of flagellar type III secretion

Bacterial flagella contain a specialized secretion apparatus that functions to deliver the protein subunits that form the filament and other structures to outside the membrane. This apparatus is related to the injectisome used by many gram-negative pathogens and symbionts to transfer effector proteins into host cells; in both systems this export mechanism is termed ‘type III’ secretion. The flagellar secretion apparatus comprises a membrane-embedded complex of about five proteins, and soluble factors, which include export-dedicated chaperones and an ATPase, FliI, that was thought to provide the energy for export. Here we show that flagellar secretion in Salmonella enterica requires the proton motive force (PMF) and does not require ATP hydrolysis by FliI. The export of several flagellar export substrates was prevented by treatment with the protonophore CCCP, with no accompanying decrease in cellular ATP levels. Weak swarming motility and rare flagella were observed in a mutant deleted for FliI and for the non-flagellar type-III secretion ATPases InvJ and SsaN. These findings show that the flagellar secretion apparatus functions as a proton-driven protein exporter and that ATP hydrolysis is not essential for type III secretion.

Completion of the hook–basal body complex of the Salmonella typhimurium flagellum is coupled to FlgM secretion and fliC transcription

The flhDC operon of Salmonella typhimurium is the master control operon required for the expression of the entire flagellar regulon. The flagellar master operon was placed under the tetracycline‐inducible promoter PtetA using the T‐POP transposon. Cells containing this construct are motile in the presence of tetracycline and non‐motile without inducer present. No flagella were visible under the electron microscope when cells were grown without inducer. The class 1, class 2 and class 3 promoters of the flagellar regulon are temporally regulated. After addition of tetracycline, the class 1 flhDC operon was transcribed immediately. Transcription of flgM (which is transcribed from both class 2 and class 3 promoters) began 15 min after induction. At 20 min after induction, the class 2 fliA promoter became active and intracellular FliA protein levels increased; at 30 min after induction, the class 3 fliC promoter was activated. Induction of fliC gene expression coincides with the appearance of FlgM anti‐sigma factor in the growth medium. This also coincides with the completion of hook–basal body structures. Rolling cells first appeared 35 min after induction, and excess hook protein (FlgE) was also found in the growth medium at this time. At 45 min after induction, nascent flagellar filaments became visible in electron micrographs and over 40% of the cells exhibited some swimming behaviour. Multiple flagella assemble and grow on individual cells after induction of the master operon. These results confirm that the flagellar regulatory hierarchy of S. typhimurium is temporally regulated after induction. Both FlgM secretion and class 3 gene expression occur upon completion of the hook–basal body structure.

Bacterial chemoreceptor arrays are hexagonally packed trimers of receptor dimers networked by rings of kinase and coupling proteins

Chemoreceptor arrays are supramolecular transmembrane machines of unknown structure that allow bacteria to sense their surroundings and respond by chemotaxis. We have combined X-ray crystallography of purified proteins with electron cryotomography of native arrays inside cells to reveal the arrangement of the component transmembrane receptors, histidine kinases (CheA) and CheW coupling proteins. Trimers of receptor dimers lie at the vertices of a hexagonal lattice in a “two-facing-two” configuration surrounding a ring of alternating CheA regulatory domains (P5) and CheW couplers. Whereas the CheA kinase domains (P4) project downward below the ring, the CheA dimerization domains (P3) link neighboring rings to form an extended, stable array. This highly interconnected protein architecture underlies the remarkable sensitivity and cooperative nature of transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis.

Bacterial Nanomachines: The Flagellum and Type III Injectisome

The bacterial flagellum and the virulence-associated injectisome are complex, structurally related nanomachines that bacteria use for locomotion or the translocation of virulence factors into eukaryotic host cells. The assembly of both structures and the transfer of extracellular proteins is mediated by a unique, multicomponent transport apparatus, the type III secretion system. Here, we discuss the significant progress that has been made in recent years in the visualization and functional characterization of many components of the type III secretion system, the structure of the bacterial flagellum, and the injectisome complex.

Identification of New Flagellar Genes of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium

RNA levels of flagellar genes in eight different genetic backgrounds were compared to that of the wild type by DNA microarray analysis. Cluster analysis identified new, potential flagellar genes, three putative methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, STM3138 (McpA), STM3152 (McpB), and STM3216(McpC), and a CheV homolog, STM2314, in Salmonella, that are not found in Escherichia coli. Isolation and characterization of Mud-lac insertions in cheV, mcpB, mcpC, and the previously uncharacterized aer locus of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium revealed them to be controlled by sigma28-dependent flagellar class 3 promoters. In addition, the srfABC operon previously isolated as an SsrB-regulated operon clustered with the flagellar class 2 operon and was determined to be under FlhDC control. The previously unclassified fliB gene, encoding flagellin methylase, clustered as a class 2 gene, which was verified using reporter fusions, and the fliB transcriptional start site was identified by primer extension analysis. RNA levels of all flagellar genes were elevated in flgM or fliT null strains. RNA levels of class 3 flagellar genes were elevated in a fliS null strain, while deletion of the fliY, fliZ, or flk gene did not affect flagellar RNA levels relative to those of the wild type. The cafA (RNase G) and yhjH genes clustered with flagellar class 3 transcribed genes. Null alleles in cheV, mcpA, mcpB, mcpC, and srfB did not affect motility, while deletion of yhjH did result in reduced motility compared to that of the wild type.

Translation/Secretion Coupling by Type III Secretion Systems

Type III secretion systems mediate export of virulence proteins and flagellar assembly subunits in Gram-negative bacteria. Chaperones specific to each class of secreted protein are believed to prevent degradation of the secreted substrates. We show that an additional role of chaperones may be to regulate translation of secreted proteins. We show that the chaperone FIgN is required for translation of the flgM gene transcribed from one mRNA transcript (a flagellar class 3 transcript), but not from another (a flagellar class 2 transcript). FIgM translated from the class 3 transcript is primarily secreted whereas FIgM translated from the class 2 transcript is primarily retained in the cytoplasm. These results suggest FIgM and other type III secretion substrates possess both mRNA and amino acid secretion signals, and supports a new role for type III chaperones in translation/secretion coupling.

The role of anti-sigma factors in gene regulation

Despite the isolation of an anti‐sigma factor over 20 years ago, it is only recently that the concept of an anti‐sigma factor emerged as a general mechanism of transcriptional regulation in prokaryotic systems. Anti‐sigma factors bind to sigma factors and inhibit their transcriptional activity. Studies on the mechanism of action of anti‐sigma factors has shed new light on the regulation of gene expression in bacteria, as the anti‐sigma factors add another layer to transcriptional control via negative regulation. Their cellular roles are as diverse as FlgM of Salmonella typhimurium, which can be exported to sense the structural state of the flagellar organelle, to SpollAB of Bacillus subtilis participating in the switch from one cell type to another during the process of sporulation. Additionally, the bacteriophage T4 uses an anti‐sigma factor to sabotage the Escherichia coli E·σ70 RNA polymerase in order to direct exclusive transcription of its own genes. Cross‐linking., co‐immuno‐precipitations, and co‐purification indicate that the anti‐sigma factors directly interact with their corresponding sigma factor to negatively regulate transcription. in B. subtilis, anti anti‐sigma factors regulate anti‐sigma factors by preventing an anti‐sigma factor from interacting with its cognate sigma factor, thereby allowing transcription to occur.