Kenji Ueshima

The prognostic value of exercise capacity: A review of the literature

While there is still much debate in the literature regarding the specific MET levels at which there are differences in survival, the following points have become clear with the growing body of reports in the literature. Exercise capacity seems to be an independent predictor of mortality, and when it is combined with other clinical, exercise, or angiographic data, it becomes very powerful in this regard. This relates to both overall mortality and to that from cardiovascular disease. There is still a need for the establishment of mortality data related to MET levels adjusted for age and activity status. A low exercise capacity of less than 6 METs indicates a higher mortality group, probably regardless of the underlying extent of coronary disease or left ventricular function. Analysis of the CASS data has indicated that these patients benefit from coronary artery bypass surgery with respect to survival. An exercise capacity of greater than 10 METs designates an excellent survival group, again despite the extent of coronary artery disease or left ventricular function. If 10 METs truly exerts a protective effect that obviates any survival benefit from coronary artery bypass surgery, this has enormous implications for cost containment and medical care. It is nonetheless important to remember that this level of exercise capacity does not imply the absence of either coronary disease or triple-vessel coronary disease. Exercise capacity is related to more than just cardiovascular fitness and integrity. It is dependent upon a combination of other physiologic components as well, including pulmonary function, health status of other organ systems, nitrogen balance, nutritional status, medications, orthopedic limitations, and others.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nomogram based on metabolic equivalents and age for assessing aerobic exercise capacity in men

OBJECTIVESnThe goal of this study was to create a nomogram, based on maximal exercise capacity (in metabolic equivalents [METs]) and age, for assessing a patients ability to perform dynamic exercise to quantify the level of physical disability or relative capacity for physical activity.nnnBACKGROUNDnProviding an estimation of exercise capacity relative to age is clinically useful. Such an estimate can be derived from measured or estimated maximal oxygen uptake (in METs) from treadmill exercise testing and age. It is an effective means of communicating to patients their cardiopulmonary status, encouraging improvement in exercise capacity and quantifying disability.nnnMETHODSnExercise test results of 1,388 male patients (mean age 57 years, range 21 to 89) free of apparent heart disease who were referred for exercise testing for clinical reasons were retrospectively reviewed. This referral group as well as subgroups of active (n = 346) and sedentary (n = 253) patients were analyzed to determine norms for age and for age by decades for exercise test responses, including METs, maximal heart rate and maximal systolic blood pressure. Regression equations were calculated from this information, and a nomogram for calculating degree of exercise capacity from age and MET level achieved by a patient was created. A similar analysis was performed in a separate group of 244 apparently healthy, normal male volunteers (mean age 45 +/- 14 years, range 18 to 72) who underwent exercise testing with direct measurement of expired gases.nnnRESULTSnEquations for predicted METs for age were derived for the entire clinical referral group (METs = 18.0-0.15[Age]) and for the subgroups of active (METs = 18.7-0.15[Age]) and sedentary (METs = 16.6-0.16[Age]) patients. All results achieved statistical significance, with p values < 0.001. In the volunteer group of normal men who performed exercise testing with ventilatory gas exchange, the decline in maximal heart rate and METs with age was not as steep as in the referral group. Although the normal group confirmed nomograms published previously among similar subjects, the equations derived from the patients differed from those previously reported; in contrast to previous studies using healthy volunteers, the equations and nomograms for the referral group are more appropriate for patients typically referred for testing in a hospital or office-based internal medicine practice.nnnCONCLUSIONSnNorms for METs based on age are presented as well as population-specific nomograms that enable physicians to assess patients exercise capacity relative to their age group.

Influence of right coronary artery stenosis on exercise test responses and survival in patients with left main or left main equivalent disease

Forty-two patients with angiographically documented left main coronary artery (LM) disease (luminal occlusion > or = 50%) and 30 patients with left main equivalent (LMEQ) disease (> or = 70% luminal occlusion of both the proximal left anterior descending artery and proximal left circumflex artery) were studied to determine the role of right coronary artery (RCA) involvement on exercise test responses and survival. Significant (> or = 70%) RCA stenosis was present in 30 (72%) of the 42 LM patients and 16 (53%) of the 30 LMEQ patients. No significant differences were observed between LM and LMEQ patients in any clinical or exercise variables or survival. Thus both groups were combined for analysis of the influence of RCA involvement (i.e., LM/LMEQ with RCA versus LM/LMEQ without RCA disease). Greater ischemic responses were observed in the LM/LMEQ group with significant stenosis of the RCA. The presence of RCA stenosis was associated with significantly greater horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression during exercise (2.4 +/- 1.2 mm vs 1.3 +/- 1.4 mm; p < 0.001), and prolonged recovery time until normalization of the ST segment (3.2 +/- 1.4 min vs 2.0 +/- 1.9 min; p < 0.01). The LM/LMEQ without RCA disease group behaved like the subgroup with two-vessel disease, and responses of the LM/LMEQ group with RCA disease were similar to the group with three-vessel disease. The annual survival in LM/LMEQ with RCA disease was worse than that in LM/LMEQ without RCA disease (average annual mortality rates = 7.5% vs 1.0%, respectively; p = 0.05). Infarct-free survival in LM/LMEQ with RCA disease was also lower than that in LM/LMEQ without RCA disease. Thus although patients with LM and LMEQ were similar in terms of survival and exercise responses, the presence of RCA stenosis was associated with significantly greater ST-segment depression, a prolonged recovery time until normalization of the ST segment, a fivefold increase in the death rate, and higher morbidity from myocardial infarction over a 5-year period of follow-up. Involvement of the RCA should be considered when making decisions concerning medical-surgical management of patients with severe coronary artery disease.