Kenneth C. Jackson
University of Utah
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kenneth C. Jackson.
The Clinical Journal of Pain | 2007
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Keela Herr; Dennis C. Turk; Perry G. Fine; Robert H. Dworkin; Robert D. Helme; Kenneth C. Jackson; Patricia A. Parmelee; Thomas E. Rudy; B. Lynn Beattie; John T. Chibnall; Kenneth D. Craig; Betty Ferrell; Bruce A. Ferrell; Roger B. Fillingim; Lucia Gagliese; Romayne Gallagher; Stephen J. Gibson; Elizabeth L. Harrison; Benny Katz; Francis J. Keefe; Susan J. Lieber; David Lussier; Kenneth E. Schmader; Raymond C. Tait; Debra K. Weiner; Jaime Williams
This paper represents an expert-based consensus statement on pain assessment among older adults. It is intended to provide recommendations that will be useful for both researchers and clinicians. Contributors were identified based on literature prominence and with the aim of achieving a broad representation of disciplines. Recommendations are provided regarding the physical examination and the assessment of pain using self-report and observational methods (suitable for seniors with dementia). In addition, recommendations are provided regarding the assessment of the physical and emotional functioning of older adults experiencing pain. The literature underlying the consensus recommendations is reviewed. Multiple revisions led to final reviews of 2 complete drafts before consensus was reached.
Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2007
Gary M. Oderda; Qayyim Said; R. Scott Evans; Gregory J. Stoddard; James F. Lloyd; Kenneth C. Jackson; Dale Rublee; Matthew H. Samore
Background: Opioid analgesics remain a mainstay in the treatment of pain associated with surgical procedures. Such use is associated with adverse drug events (ADEs). Objective: To investigate the impact of opioid-related ADEs on total hospital costs and length of stay (LOS) in adult surgical patients. Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort study using data from computerized medical records. ADE cases were prospectively detected using computerized surveillance and verified by pharmacists. Surgical patients treated at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake City from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2003, were included. The primary outcomes were costs and hospital LOS associated with opioid-related ADEs and the relationship of opioid dose to ADE events. Results: Patients experiencing opioid-related ADEs had significantly increased median total hospital costs (7.4% increase; 95% CI 3.83 to 10.96; p < 0.001) and increased median LOS (10.3% increase; 95% CI 6.5 to 14.2; p < 0.001) compared with matched non-ADE contrals. The increased costs attributable to ADEs, by surgery type, were general surgery (
Current Medical Research and Opinion | 2008
Diana I. Brixner; Kenneth C. Jackson; Xiaoming Sheng; Richard E. Nelson; Abdulkadir Keskinaslan
676.51; 95% CI 351.50 to 1001.50), orthopedics (
Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy | 2007
Allen Shih; Kenneth C. Jackson
861.50; 95% CI 448.20 to 1274.80), and obstetrics/gynecology (
Pain Practice | 2006
Kenneth C. Jackson
540.90; 95% CI 281.40 to 800.40). Similarly, increased LOS attributable to ADEs, by surgery type, were general surgery (0.64 days; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.88), orthopedics (0.52 days; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.71), and obstetrics/gynecology (0.53 days; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.72). Higher doses of opioids were associated with increased risk of experiencing ADEs (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.60; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Opioid-related ADEs following surgery were associated with significantly increased LOS and hospitalization costs. These ADEs occurred more frequently in patients receiving higher doses of opioids.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2007
Kenneth C. Jackson; Robert Nahoopii; Qayyim Said; Riad Dirani; Diana I. Brixner
ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess medication adherence, persistence, and costs between cohorts of patients in managed care settings using a fixed-dose combination (FDC) or individual components (IC) of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in an insurance claims database. Methods: Medical and prescription claims for hypertensive patients using a combination of valsartan and HCTZ were identified from the IHCIS National Managed Care Benchmark Database via a retrospective cohort analysis. Study subjects had at least 110 days prior to start of study medications during which no other antihypertensive medications were prescribed, and were followed for 12 months. Claims for 8711 adult patients were analyzed for adherence, persistence and costs. General linear regression was conducted to detect differences in adherence among groups. Covariates included age, gender, persistence, number on concomitant cardiovascular drugs, and number of cardiovascular diagnoses. Results: Most subjects used an FDC product (N = 8150, 93.6%) vs. the IC (N = 561, 6.4%). The FDC group had a larger portion of males and less concomitant cardiovascular medications or disease. A random sample of 1628 of the FDC subjects had improved values for medication adherence compared to the IC group (62.1 vs. 53.0%, p < 0.001) and persistence values were improved at both 180 days (73 vs. 28%, p < 0.001) and 365 days (54 vs. 19%, p < 0.001). Both prescription drug costs (
Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy | 2006
Kenneth C. Jackson; Paul Wohlt; Perry G. Fine
1587 vs.
The American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education | 2011
Eric F. Schneider; Melissa C. Jones; Karen B. Farris; Dawn E. Havrda; Kenneth C. Jackson; Terri S. Hamrick
2050, p < 0.001) and medical costs (
Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy | 2007
Ron Neyens; Kenneth C. Jackson
3343 vs.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Care in Pain & Symptom Control | 2000
Kenneth C. Jackson; Arthur G. Lipman
3817, p < 0.001) were lower in the FDC cohorts. Conclusions: The use of fixed-dose therapy in hypertension may lead to increased adherence and persistence with a positive financial impact on both prescription and total medical costs. As with any retrospective claims database analysis, unobserved systematic differences between the two medication groups may exist.