Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kenneth H. Goodrich is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kenneth H. Goodrich.


11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference | 2011

Haptic-Multimodal Flight Control System Update

Kenneth H. Goodrich; Paul C. Schutte; Ralph A. Williams

The rapidly advancing capabilities of autonomous aircraft suggest a future where many of the responsibilities of today s pilot transition to the vehicle, transforming the pilot s job into something akin to driving a car or simply being a passenger. Notionally, this transition will reduce the specialized skills, training, and attention required of the human user while improving safety and performance. However, our experience with highly automated aircraft highlights many challenges to this transition including: lack of automation resilience; adverse human-automation interaction under stress; and the difficulty of developing certification standards and methods of compliance for complex systems performing critical functions traditionally performed by the pilot (e.g., sense and avoid vs. see and avoid). Recognizing these opportunities and realities, researchers at NASA Langley are developing a haptic-multimodal flight control (HFC) system concept that can serve as a bridge between today s state of the art aircraft that are highly automated but have little autonomy and can only be operated safely by highly trained experts (i.e., pilots) to a future in which non-experts (e.g., drivers) can safely and reliably use autonomous aircraft to perform a variety of missions. This paper reviews the motivation and theoretical basis of the HFC system, describes its current state of development, and presents results from two pilot-in-the-loop simulation studies. These preliminary studies suggest the HFC reshapes human-automation interaction in a way well-suited to revolutionary ease-of-use.


17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference | 2017

Exploring Concepts of Operations for On-Demand Passenger Air Transportation

Victoria C. Nneji; Alexander J. Stimpson; Mary L. Cummings; Kenneth H. Goodrich

In recent years, a surge of interest in “flying cars” for city commutes has led to rapid development of new technologies to help make them and similar on-demand mobility platforms a reality. To this end, this paper provides analyses of the stakeholders involved, their proposed operational concepts, and the hazards and regulations that must be addressed. Three system architectures emerged from the analyses, ranging from conventional air taxi to revolutionary fully autonomous aircraft operations, each with vehicle safety functions allocated differently between humans and machines. Advancements for enabling technologies such as distributed electric propulsion and artificial intelligence have had major investments and initial experimental success, but may be some years away from being deployed for on-demand passenger air transportation at scale.


Archive | 2016

Synergistic Allocation of Flight Expertise on the Flight Deck (SAFEdeck): A Design Concept to Combat Mode Confusion, Complacency, and Skill Loss in the Flight Deck

Paul C. Schutte; Kenneth H. Goodrich; Ralph A. Williams

This paper presents a new design and function allocation philosophy between pilots and automation that seeks to support the human in mitigating innate weaknesses (e.g., memory, vigilance) while enhancing their strengths (e.g., adaptability, resourcefulness). In this new allocation strategy, called Synergistic Allocation of Flight Expertise in the Flight Deck (SAFEdeck), the automation and the human provide complementary support and backup for each other. Automation is designed to be compliant with the practices of Crew Resource Management. The human takes a more active role in the normal operation of the aircraft without adversely increasing workload over the current automation paradigm. This designed involvement encourages the pilot to be engaged and ready to respond to unexpected situations. As such, the human may be less prone to error than the current automation paradigm.


2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference | 2018

Urban Air Mobility Airspace Integration Concepts and Considerations [STUB]

David P. Thipphavong; Rafael Apaza; Kenneth H. Goodrich; Jeffrey Homola; Husni R. Idris; Parimal Kopardekar; Joel Lachter; Natasha A. Neogi; Hokkwan Ng; Rosa M. Oseguera-Lohr; Michael D. Patterson; Savita Verma; Bryan E. Barmore; Vernol Battiste; Christine M. Belcastro; Barbara K. Burian; Quang V. Dao; Michael Feary; Susie Go

Urban Air Mobility—defined as safe and efficient air traffic operations in a metropolitan area for manned aircraft and unmanned aircraft systems—is being researched and developed by industry, academia, and government. Significant resources have been invested toward cultivating an ecosystem for Urban Air Mobility that includes manufacturers of electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, builders of takeoff and landing areas, and researchers of the airspace integration concepts, technologies, and procedures needed to conduct Urban Air Mobility operations safely and efficiently alongside other airspace users. This paper provides high-level descriptions of both emergent and early expanded operational concepts for Urban Air Mobility that NASA is developing. The scope of this work is defined in terms of missions, aircraft, airspace, and hazards. Past and current Urban Air Mobility operations are also reviewed, and the considerations for the data exchange architecture and communication, navigation, and surveillance requirements are also discussed. This paper will serve as a starting point to develop a framework for NASA’s Urban Air Mobility airspace integration research and development efforts with partners and stakeholders that could include fast-time simulations, human-in-the-loop simulations, and flight demonstrations.


2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting | 2018

Functional Requirements for Remotely Managing Fleets of On-Demand Passenger Aircraft

Victoria C. Nneji; Mary L. Cummings; Alexander J. Stimpson; Kenneth H. Goodrich

The concept of On-Demand Mobility (ODM) in aviation has gained popularity in recent years, with several manufacturers proposing vehicles for high-speed intra-city air taxis. However, less attention has been placed on how these fleets would be operationally controlled and managed. Through the development of concepts of operations for remote management of vehicles with differing levels of autonomy, this paper presents preliminary requirements for ODM air operations control centers. The centers would interface with air traffic control and be responsible for ensuring safe, efficient, and effective operations of fleets within subareas of the National Airspace System. Our effort identified key functional requirements related to vehicle safety, customer experience, and airspace integration for these futuristic concepts. Further, this work introduces a novel Remote Operations Center (ROC) concept with highly integrated human-machine systems for efficient operations with limited staffing. The ROC would support the transition from providing dispatcher-like support to supervisory control of autonomous ODM systems, including managing emergencies, which will be crucial for operational success as vehicle autonomy evolves.


The International Journal of Aviation Psychology | 2010

Effects of a Velocity-Vector-Based Command Augmentation System and Synthetic Vision System Terrain Portrayal and Guidance Symbology Concepts on Single-Pilot Performance

Dahai Liu; Kenneth H. Goodrich; Bob Peak

This study investigated the effects of synthetic vision system (SVS) concepts and advanced flight controls on the performance of pilots flying a light, single-engine general-aviation airplane. We evaluated the effects and interactions of 2 levels of terrain portrayal, guidance symbology, and flight control response type on pilot performance during the conduct of a relatively complex instrument approach procedure. The terrain and guidance presentations were evaluated as elements of an integrated primary flight display system. The approach procedure used in the study included a steeply descending, curved segment as might be encountered in emerging, required-navigation-performance-based procedures. Pilot performance measures consisted of flight technical performance, perceived workload, perceived situational awareness, and subjective preference. The results revealed that an elevation-based generic terrain portrayal significantly improved perceived situation awareness without adversely affecting flight technical performance or workload. Other factors (pilot instrument rating, control response type, and guidance symbology) were not found to significantly affect the performance measures.


ieee/aiaa digital avionics systems conference | 2006

Application of the H-Mode, A Design and Interaction Concept for Highly Automated Vehicles, to Aircraft

Kenneth H. Goodrich; Paul C. Schutte; Frank Flemisch; Ralph A. Williams


AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit | 2008

Piloted Evaluation of the H-Mode, a Variable Autonomy Control System, in Motion-Based Simulation

Kenneth H. Goodrich; Paul C. Schutte; Ralph A. Williams


Archive | 2007

The Naturalistic Flight Deck System: An Integrated System Concept for Improved Single-Pilot Operations

Paul C. Schutte; Kenneth H. Goodrich; David E. Cox; Bruce Jackson; Michael T. Palmer; Alan T. Pope; Robin W. Schlecht; Ken K. Tedjojuwono; Anna C. Trujillo; Ralph A. Williams; J. Bryan Kinney; John S. Barry


Archive | 2012

Towards an Improved Pilot-Vehicle Interface for Highly Automated Aircraft: Evaluation of the Haptic Flight Control System

Paul C. Schutte; Kenneth H. Goodrich; Ralph A. Williams

Collaboration


Dive into the Kenneth H. Goodrich's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alexander J. Stimpson

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge