Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kenneth J. Harwood is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kenneth J. Harwood.


Cancer | 2012

A prospective model of care for breast cancer rehabilitation: Function

Kristin L. Campbell; Andrea L. Pusic; David S. Zucker; Margaret L. McNeely; Jill M. Binkley; Andrea L. Cheville; Kenneth J. Harwood

A significant proportion of adult breast cancer survivors experience deficits in function and restriction in participation in life roles that may remain many years after diagnosis. Function is a complex construct that takes into account the interactions between an individual, their health condition, and the social and personal context in which they live. Research to date on limitations in activities of daily living, upper extremity function, and functional capacity in breast cancer survivors illustrates the need for prospective measurement of function using measures that are sensitive to the unique issues of breast cancer survivors and the need for the development of effective rehabilitation interventions to improve function. Limitations in function have a significant impact on quality of life, but less is known about the implications on return to work and survival, as well as the impact of other comorbidities and aging on the function limitations in breast cancer survivors. This review provides a rationale for the integration of measures of function into breast cancer care to more fully appreciate the functional limitations associated with breast cancer diagnosis and treatment and to aid in the development of better rehabilitation care for breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2012;.


Rehabilitation Nursing | 2008

Myths and Facts About Safe Patient Handling in Rehabilitation

Audrey Nelson; Kenneth J. Harwood; Catherine A. Tracey; Kathleen L. Dunn

&NA; As the incidence of injuries associated with patient‐handling tasks remains high in the rehabilitation community, interdisciplinary discussions on optimal methods for preventing injuries and ensuring good care continue. A national task force consisting of representatives from the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses, the American Physical Therapy Association, and the Veterans Health Administration identified myths that have been promulgated on both sides of the discussion, focusing especially on rehabilitation practices. The purpose of this article is to dispel these myths by using evidence‐based methods. Evidence should be applied in discussions of safe patient handling, and although concern about patient outcomes is critical, there is no evidence that the use of patient‐handling technology undermines rehabilitation goals and strong evidence that these practices enhance the safety of rehabilitation care providers. Further research on the impact of safe patient‐handling practices on rehabilitation goals and continued communication between rehabilitation providers are recommended.


Medical Education Online | 2018

Design for success: Identifying a process for transitioning to an intensive online course delivery model in health professions education

Paige L. McDonald; Kenneth J. Harwood; Joan T. Butler; Karen S. Schlumpf; Carson W. Eschmann; Daniela Drago

ABSTRACT Intensive courses (ICs), or accelerated courses, are gaining popularity in medical and health professions education, particularly as programs adopt e-learning models to negotiate challenges of flexibility, space, cost, and time. In 2014, the Department of Clinical Research and Leadership (CRL) at the George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences began the process of transitioning two online 15-week graduate programs to an IC model. Within a year, a third program also transitioned to this model. A literature review yielded little guidance on the process of transitioning from 15-week, traditional models of delivery to IC models, particularly in online learning environments. Correspondingly, this paper describes the process by which CRL transitioned three online graduate programs to an IC model and details best practices for course design and facilitation resulting from our iterative redesign process. Finally, we present lessons-learned for the benefit of other medical and health professionsʼ programs contemplating similar transitions. Abbreviations: CRL: Department of Clinical Research and Leadership; HSCI: Health Sciences; IC: Intensive course; PD: Program director; QM: Quality Matters


journal of Physical Therapy Education | 2015

A case-based reasoning (CBR) model for the integration of insurance policy and regulations in professional physical therapist education

Rhea Cohn; Kenneth J. Harwood; Heather Richards; Karen S. Schlumpf

Background and Purpose. The evolving health care environment brought about by health care reform and constantly changing insurance and regulatory requirements poses a great challenge for todays physical therapists (PTs). Because professional level PT students are expected to integrate these requirements into patient management, educational programs should explore ways to enhance student learning in these areas. The purpose of this manuscript was to describe a case‐based reasoning (CBR) approach to integrating insurance, regulations, and documentation content into a professional level PT education program, assess the outcome on students’ clinical performance, and report faculty perceptions of the curricular changes. Method/Model Description and Evaluation. Faculty in a professional level PT education program developed a CBR instructional method to integrate insurance, regulatory, and documentation content throughout the curriculum. The goals for the curriculum change were to have thirdyear students begin their internships with the ability to analyze and apply appropriate insurance and regulatory policies to all patient cases, appreciate how policies affect patient management and access, and effectively document in the medical record. In addition to adding didactic material and interactive learning experiences, faculty modified existing cases used in clinical management courses. This modification resulted in students experiencing progressively more complex clinical cases layered with insurance and regulatory challenges. Outcomes. To determine the effectiveness of the CBR method, student performance was measured using 2 domains (financial management, documentation) of the Clinical Performance Instrument (CPI) during the student terminal clinical internship for 2 cohorts of students. The first cohort included all PT students for the 2 years prior to the implementation of CBR experiences, while the second cohort included 2 years of PT students who participated in CBR learning. Significant statistical differences between cohorts were demonstrated in student self‐assessment of documentation performance at midterm (P = .011) and financial resources performance at the midterm and final rating periods (P = .022 and P = .012, respectively). For clinical instructor (CI) ratings, there was a statistically significantly difference between cohorts at the final rating for financial resources performance (P = .044), indicating a higher CI rating for those students that participated in the CBR instruction. Participating faculty survey results demonstrated that the CBR approach benefitted student learning, was not difficult to integrate into existing course learning experiences, and enhanced faculty learning. However, participating faculty had concerns regarding their own comfort level with the material and whether it was replacing more clinically oriented content. Discussion and Conclusion. The outcomes generally support the effectiveness of the CBR approach for integrating insurance policy, regulations, and documentation in a professional level PT education program. Students learn to use regulation and insurance policy information when making clinical decisions and participating faculty did not feel unduly burdened by the integration of this content into established case studies. Although the results are encouraging, further research is recommended.


BMC Medical Education | 2018

Comparing student outcomes in traditional vs intensive, online graduate programs in health professional education

Kenneth J. Harwood; Paige L. McDonald; Joan T. Butler; Daniela Drago; Karen S. Schlumpf

BackgroundHealth professions’ education programs are undergoing enormous changes, including increasing use of online and intensive, or time reduced, courses. Although evidence is mounting for online and intensive course formats as separate designs, literature investigating online and intensive formats in health professional education is lacking. The purpose of the study was to compare student outcomes (final grades and course evaluation ratings) for equivalent courses in semester long (15-week) versus intensive (7-week) online formats in graduate health sciences courses.MethodsThis retrospective, observational study compared satisfaction and performance scores of students enrolled in three graduate health sciences programs in a large, urban US university. Descriptive statistics, chi square analysis, and independent t-tests were used to describe student samples and determine differences in student satisfaction and performance.ResultsThe results demonstrated no significant differences for four applicable items on the final student course evaluations (p values range from 0.127 to 1.00) between semester long and intensive course formats. Similarly, student performance scores for final assignment and final grades showed no significant differences (p = 0.35 and 0.690 respectively) between semester long and intensive course formats.ConclusionFindings from this study suggest that 7-week and 15-week online courses can be equally effective with regard to student satisfaction and performance outcomes. While further study is recommended, academic programs should consider intensive online course formats as an alternative to semester long online course formats.


International journal of MS care | 2017

Validation of the 2-Minute Walk Test with the 6-Minute Walk Test and Other Functional Measures in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis

David A. Scalzitti; Kenneth J. Harwood; Joyce R. Maring; Susan J. Leach; Elizabeth Ruckert; Ellen Costello

Background Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) commonly have difficulty walking. The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) assesses functional capacity but may be considered burdensome for persons with MS, especially those with higher disability levels. The 2-Minute Walk Test (2MWT) may be an alternative measure to the 6MWT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the 2MWT in persons with MS. Methods Twenty-eight ambulatory persons with MS aged 18 to 64 years participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants completed five measures of walking performance (2MWT, 6MWT, usual and fast gait speed, and Timed Up and Go test) and two functional measures (Berg Balance Scale and five-times sit-to-stand test) during a testing session. Participants were classified into two subgroups based on Disease Steps scale classification. Results The 2MWT was significantly correlated with the 6MWT (r = 0.947), usual gait speed (r = 0.920), fast gait speed (r = 0.942), the Timed Up and Go test (r = -0.911), and other functional measures. The 2MWT explained 89% of the variance seen during the 6MWT. The distances completed on the 2MWT and 6MWT accurately distinguished the subgroups. Conclusions This study demonstrated good construct and discriminant validity of the 2MWT in persons with MS, providing an efficient and practical alternative to the 6MWT. Validation of the 2MWT with other functional measures further supports these findings.


PsycTESTS Dataset | 2016

Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log

Andrew A. Guccione; Thelma J. Mielenz; Robert F. DeVellis; Marc S. Goldstein; Janet K. Frehurger; Ricardo Pietrobon; Sarah C. Miller; Leigh F. Callahan; Kenneth J. Harwood; Timothy S. Carey

The use of the OPTIMAL form, and other functional assessment tools, is in response to changes in the Medicare outpatient therapy cap exceptions process and documentation requirements for 2007 and further changes resulting from the 2014 Middle Class Income Tax Relief Act. As a result, physical therapists are required to do Functional Limitation Reporting for Physical Therapy Services under Medicare Part B. OPTIMALs 22 items help us to map the functional assessments and impairment limitation restriction reporting that CMS is requiring on all Medicare patients


Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain | 1997

Early Predictors of Delayed Return to Work in Patients with Low Back Pain

Margareta Nordin; Mary Louise Skovron; Rudi Hiebert; Sherri Weiser; Paul M. Brisson; Marco Campello; Kenneth J. Harwood; Michael Crane; Lewis S


Physical Therapy | 2005

Development and Testing of a Self-report Instrument to Measure Actions: Outpatient Physical Therapy Improvement in Movement Assessment Log (OPTIMAL)

Andrew A. Guccione; Thelma J. Mielenz; Robert F. DeVellis; Marc S. Goldstein; Janet K. Freburger; Ricardo Pietrobon; Sarah C. Miller; Leigh F. Callahan; Kenneth J. Harwood; Timothy S. Carey


Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development | 1997

Low back pain assessment training of industry-based physicians

Kenneth J. Harwood; Margareta Nordin; Heibert R; Sherri Weiser; Brisson Pm; Mary Louise Skovron; Lewis S

Collaboration


Dive into the Kenneth J. Harwood's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen S. Schlumpf

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David A. Scalzitti

American Physical Therapy Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc S. Goldstein

American Physical Therapy Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paige L. McDonald

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah C. Miller

American Physical Therapy Association

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge