Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kenneth Kist is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kenneth Kist.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2012

Clinical Feasibility Study of Combined Optoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging Modality Providing Coregistered Functional and Anatomical Maps of Breast Tumors

Jason Zalev; Donald G. Herzog; Bryan Clingman; Tom Miller; Kenneth Kist; N. Carol Dornbluth; B. Michelle McCorvey; Pamela M Otto; Sergey A. Ermilov; Vyacheslav Nadvoretsky; André Conjusteau; Richard Su; Dmitri A. Tsyboulski; Alexander A. Oraevsky

We report on findings from the clinical feasibility study of the ImagioTM. Breast Imaging System, which acquires two-dimensional opto-acoustic (OA) images co-registered with conventional ultrasound using a specialized duplex hand-held probe. Dual-wavelength opto-acoustic technology is used to generate parametric maps based upon total hemoglobin and its oxygen saturation in breast tissues. This may provide functional diagnostic information pertaining to tumor metabolism and microvasculature, which is complementary to morphological information obtained with conventional gray-scale ultrasound. We present co-registered opto-acoustic and ultrasonic images of malignant and benign tumors from a recent clinical feasibility study. The clinical results illustrate that the technology may have the capability to improve the efficacy of breast tumor diagnosis. In doing so, it may have the potential to reduce biopsies and to characterize cancers that were not seen well with conventional gray-scale ultrasound alone.


Radiology | 2017

A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists

Erin Neuschler; Reni Butler; Catherine A. Young; Lora D. Barke; Margaret L. Bertrand; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Stamatia Destounis; Pamela Donlan; Stephen R. Grobmyer; Janine Katzen; Kenneth Kist; Philip T. Lavin; Erini Makariou; Tchaiko M. Parris; Kathy J. Schilling; F. Lee Tucker; Basak E. Dogan

Purpose To compare the diagnostic utility of an investigational optoacoustic imaging device that fuses laser optical imaging (OA) with grayscale ultrasonography (US) to grayscale US alone in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. Materials and Methods This prospective, 16-site study of 2105 women (study period: 12/21/2012 to 9/9/2015) compared Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories assigned by seven blinded independent readers to benign and malignant breast masses using OA/US versus US alone. BI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 masses assessed at diagnostic US with biopsy-proven histologic findings and BI-RADS 3 masses stable at 12 months were eligible. Independent readers reviewed US images obtained with the OA/US device, assigned a probability of malignancy (POM) and BI-RADS category, and locked results. The same independent readers then reviewed OA/US images, scored OA features, and assigned OA/US POM and a BI-RADS category. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated for US and OA/US. Benign and malignant mass upgrade and downgrade rates, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were compared. Results Of 2105 consented subjects with 2191 masses, 100 subjects (103 masses) were analyzed separately as a training population and excluded. An additional 202 subjects (210 masses) were excluded due to technical failures or incomplete imaging, 72 subjects (78 masses) due to protocol deviations, and 41 subjects (43 masses) due to high-risk histologic results. Of 1690 subjects with 1757 masses (1079 [61.4%] benign and 678 [38.6%] malignant masses), OA/US downgraded 40.8% (3078/7535) of benign mass reads, with a specificity of 43.0% (3242/7538, 99% confidence interval [CI]: 40.4%, 45.7%) for OA/US versus 28.1% (2120/7543, 99% CI: 25.8%, 30.5%) for the internal US of the OA/US device. OA/US exceeded US in specificity by 14.9% (P < .0001; 99% CI: 12.9, 16.9%). Sensitivity for biopsied malignant masses was 96.0% (4553/4745, 99% CI: 94.5%, 97.0%) for OA/US and 98.6% (4680/4746, 99% CI: 97.8%, 99.1%) for US (P < .0001). The negative likelihood ratio of 0.094 for OA/US indicates a negative examination can reduce a maximum US-assigned pretest probability of 17.8% (low BI-RADS 4B) to a posttest probability of 2% (BI-RADS 3). Conclusion OA/US increases the specificity of breast mass assessment compared with the device internal grayscale US alone. Online supplemental material is available for this article.


Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine | 2013

A Novel Technique for Teaching Challenging Ultrasound-Guided Breast Procedures to Radiology Residents

Joseph Sutcliffe; Rulon L. Hardman; Nella Dornbluth; Kenneth Kist

Ultrasound‐guided breast interventions (core biopsies, needle‐wire localizations, and fine‐needle cyst aspirations) are common procedures performed by radiologists. Residents must gain competency in these interventions during training. Phantoms and simulations have been advocated for teaching interventions, and various systems are available for standard breast interventions. However, simulations for difficult/high‐risk interventions are not readily available. We describe an inexpensive method for simulating difficult ultrasound‐guided breast procedures, including masses over breast implants, deep masses along the chest wall, and lymph nodes adjacent to axillary vessels.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

Opto-acoustic breast imaging with co-registered ultrasound

Jason Zalev; Bryan Clingman; Donald G. Herzog; Tom Miller; A. Thomas Stavros; Alexander A. Oraevsky; Kenneth Kist; N. Carol Dornbluth; Pamela M Otto

We present results from a recent study involving the ImagioTM breast imaging system, which produces fused real-time two-dimensional color-coded opto-acoustic (OA) images that are co-registered and temporally inter- leaved with real-time gray scale ultrasound using a specialized duplex handheld probe. The use of dual optical wavelengths provides functional blood map images of breast tissue and tumors displayed with high contrast based on total hemoglobin and oxygen saturation of the blood. This provides functional diagnostic information pertaining to tumor metabolism. OA also shows morphologic information about tumor neo-vascularity that is complementary to the morphological information obtained with conventional gray scale ultrasound. This fusion technology conveniently enables real-time analysis of the functional opto-acoustic features of lesions detected by readers familiar with anatomical gray scale ultrasound. We demonstrate co-registered opto-acoustic and ultrasonic images of malignant and benign tumors from a recent clinical study that provide new insight into the function of tumors in-vivo. Results from the Feasibility Study show preliminary evidence that the technology may have the capability to improve characterization of benign and malignant breast masses over conventional diagnostic breast ultrasound alone and to improve overall accuracy of breast mass diagnosis. In particular, OA improved speci city over that of conventional diagnostic ultrasound, which could potentially reduce the number of negative biopsies performed without missing cancers.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2015

Opto-acoustic image fusion technology for diagnostic breast imaging in a feasibility study

Jason Zalev; Bryan Clingman; Donald G. Herzog; Tom Miller; Michael Ulissey; Anthony Thomas Stavros; Alexander A. Oraevsky; Philip T. Lavin; Kenneth Kist; N. C. Dornbluth; Pamela M Otto

Functional opto-acoustic (OA) imaging was fused with gray-scale ultrasound acquired using a specialized duplex handheld probe. Feasibility Study findings indicated the potential to more accurately characterize breast masses for cancer than conventional diagnostic ultrasound (CDU). The Feasibility Study included OA imagery of 74 breast masses that were collected using the investigational Imagio® breast imaging system. Superior specificity and equal sensitivity to CDU was demonstrated, suggesting that OA fusion imaging may potentially obviate the need for negative biopsies without missing cancers in a certain percentage of breast masses. Preliminary results from a 100 subject Pilot Study are also discussed. A larger Pivotal Study (n=2,097 subjects) is underway to confirm the Feasibility Study and Pilot Study findings.


Radiographics | 2018

Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Manifestations at Multimodality Imaging and Pitfalls

Cedric W. Pluguez-Turull; Jennifer E. Nanyes; Cristina J. Quintero; Hamza Alizai; Daniel D. Mais; Kenneth Kist; Nella Dornbluth

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare benign inflammatory breast entity characterized by lobulocentric granulomas. IGM has a persistent or recurrent disease course and affects parous premenopausal women with a history of lactation. It has also been associated with hyperprolactinemia. The most common clinical sign is a palpable tender mass. However, the nonspecific manifestations and varied demographic features of this condition, as well as the other similar-appearing and superimposed breast entities, pose substantial diagnostic challenges. Entities with similar manifestations include inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), infective mastitis, foreign body injection granulomas, mammary duct ectasia, diabetic fibrous mastopathy, and systemic granulomatous processes. The strategy for imaging IGM depends on patient age, clinical manifestations, and risk factors. Targeted ultrasonography, mammography, and less commonly, magnetic resonance imaging have proven to be useful for imaging evaluation. Core-needle biopsy, with or without fine-needle aspiration for cytopathologic examination, and culture analysis are usually required to exclude IBC and other benign inflammatory breast processes. Patients with IGM have an excellent prognosis when they are appropriately treated with oral steroids or second-line immunosuppressive and prolactin-lowering medications. However, surgical excision may be an option for patients in whom medication therapy is unsuccessful. Imaging surveillance can be offered to patients with incidentally encountered IGM or mild symptoms. Clinical suspicion for this rare disease and the breast imagers prompt diagnosis can lead to an improved patient outcome. The purpose of this article is to review the imaging manifestations of IGM in a multimodality case-based format and to describe relevant clinical and imaging-based differential diagnoses. The associated pitfalls, epidemiologic and histopathologic factors, clinical manifestations, natural course, and management of IGM also are discussed. ©RSNA, 2018.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2018

Optoacoustic Breast Imaging: Imaging-Pathology Correlation of Optoacoustic Features in Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

Reni Butler; Philip T. Lavin; F. Lee Tucker; Lora D. Barke; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Stamatia Destounis; Stephen R. Grobmyer; Janine Katzen; Kenneth Kist; Erini Makariou; Kathy J. Schilling; Catherine A. Young; Basak E. Dogan; Erin Neuschler

OBJECTIVE Optoacoustic ultrasound breast imaging is a fused anatomic and functional modality that shows morphologic features, as well as hemoglobin amount and relative oxygenation within and around breast masses. The purpose of this study is to investigate the positive predictive value (PPV) of optoacoustic ultrasound features in benign and malignant masses. SUBJECTS AND METHODS In this study, 92 masses assessed as BI-RADS category 3, 4, or 5 in 94 subjects were imaged with optoacoustic ultrasound. Each mass was scored by seven blinded independent readers according to three internal features in the tumor interior and two external features in its boundary zone and periphery. Mean and median optoacoustic ultrasound scores were compared with histologic findings for biopsied masses and nonbiopsied BI-RADS category 3 masses, which were considered benign if they were stable at 12-month follow-up. Statistical significance was analyzed using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test with a 0.05 significance level. RESULTS Mean and median optoacoustic ultrasound scores for all individual internal and external features, as well as summed scores, were higher for malignant masses than for benign masses (p < 0.0001). High external scores, indicating increased hemoglobin and deoxygenation and abnormal vessel morphologic features in the tumor boundary zone and periphery, better distinguished benign from malignant masses than did high internal scores reflecting increased hemoglobin and deoxygenation within the tumor interior. CONCLUSION High optoacoustic ultrasound scores, particularly those based on external features in the boundary zone and periphery of breast masses, have high PPVs for malignancy and, conversely, low optoacoustic ultrasound scores have low PPV for malignancy. The functional component of optoacoustic ultrasound may help to overcome some of the limitations of morphologic overlap in the distinction of benign and malignant masses.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2018

Downgrading and Upgrading Gray-Scale Ultrasound BI-RADS Categories of Benign and Malignant Masses With Optoacoustics: A Pilot Study

Erin Neuschler; Philip T. Lavin; F. Lee Tucker; Lora D. Barke; Margaret L. Bertrand; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Stamatia Destounis; Basak E. Dogan; Stephen R. Grobmyer; Janine Katzen; Kenneth Kist; Erini Makariou; Tchaiko M. Parris; Catherine A. Young; Reni Butler

OBJECTIVE False-positive findings remain challenging in breast imaging. This study investigates the incremental value of optoacoustic imaging in improving BI-RADS categorization of breast masses at ultrasound. SUBJECTS AND METHODS The study device is an optoacoustic breast imaging device with a handheld duplex laser and internal gray-scale ultrasound probe, fusing functional and morphologic information (optoacoustic ultrasound). In this prospective multisite study, breast masses assessed as BI-RADS category 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, or 5 by site radiologists underwent both gray-scale ultrasound and optoacoustic imaging with the study device. Independent reader radiologists assessed internal gray-scale ultrasound and optoacoustic ultrasound features for each mass and assigned a BI-RADS category. The percentage of mass reads for which optoacoustic ultrasound resulted in a downgrade or upgrade of BI-RADS category relative to internal gray-scale ultrasound was determined. RESULTS Of 94 total masses, 39 were biopsy-proven malignant, 44 were biopsy-proven benign, and 11 BI-RADS category 3 masses were stable at 12-month follow-up. The sensitivity of both optoacoustic ultrasound and internal gray-scale ultrasound was 97.1%. The specificity was 44.3% for optoacoustic ultrasound and 36.4% for internal gray-scale ultrasound. Using optoacoustic ultrasound, 41.7% of benign masses or BI-RADS category 3 masses that were stable at 12-month follow-up were downgraded to BI-RADS category 2 by independent readers; 36.6% of masses assigned BI-RADS category 4A were downgraded to BI-RADS category 3 or 2, and 10.1% assigned BI-RADS category 4B were downgraded to BI-RADS category 3 or 2. Using optoacoustic ultrasound, independent readers upgraded 75.0% of the malignant masses classified as category 4A, 4B, 4C, or 5, and 49.4% of the malignant masses were classified as category 4B, 4C, or 5. CONCLUSION Optoacoustic ultrasound resulted in BI-RADS category downgrading of benign masses and upgrading of malignant masses compared with gray-scale ultrasound.


Medical Physics | 2007

SU‐FF‐I‐80: Comparison of Artifact Size Caused by Metallic Tissue Marking Clips at 1.5T and 3T Breast MRI: A Phantom Study

Q. Peng; Carol Dornbluth; Kenneth Kist; Pamela M Otto

Purpose: To compare the signal void artifact size caused by metallic tissue marking clips at 1.5T and 3T and to test the impact of different readout bandwidth and TE on the artifact size. Methods and Materials: The signal void size of three commercially available metallic tissue marking clips were assessed at both 1.5T and 3T scanners. The clips studied were immersed in a gel phantom with enough distance (>25mm) to avoid field interference between them. An RF‐spoiled T1‐weighted gradient echo (SPGR) sequence commonly used in DCE breast imaging was used on both scanners with TR/TE/FA=32/4.6/25°, FOV=160mm, spatial resolution of 1×1×4mm3, and water fat shift of 1.534 pixels (i.e., readout bandwidth = 22.6 kHz for 1.5T, and 45.3 kHz for 3T). Same sequence was repeated with higher readout bandwidth of 139 kHz (1.5T) and 198 kHz (3T). In addition, TE=1.16ms was also tested with partial Fourier readout and high readout bandwidth to study change of TE on the effect of signal void artifact size on both scanners.Results: At TE=4.6ms, both scanners showed signal void artifacts 2∼8 times larger than the clips themselves. Importantly, the signal void size was 15%∼30% larger at 3T compared to that of 1.5T. Increasing readout bandwidth had little impact on signal void artifact size on both scanners. However, decreasing TE from 4.6 ms to 1.16 ms reduced the average artifact size at both 1.5T (27%) and 3T (31%). Conclusion: Signal void artifact size is larger at 3T for all three metallic tissue marking clips studied at the current experimental settings. This could be a disadvantage of 3T scanners when used to detect and follow‐up breast cancer adjacent to metallic tissue marking clips after biopsy. Short TE can be used to effectively reduce signal void artifacts at both 1.5T and 3T.


Applied Radiology | 2015

MR imaging of breast implants: Useful information for the interpreting radiologist

James F. Wiedenhoefer; Hassan Shahid; Carol Dornbluth; Pamela M Otto; Kenneth Kist

Collaboration


Dive into the Kenneth Kist's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pamela M Otto

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carol Dornbluth

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Basak E. Dogan

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Catherine A. Young

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hassan Shahid

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James F. Wiedenhoefer

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge