Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kenneth R. Hogstrom is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kenneth R. Hogstrom.


Medical Physics | 1992

Verification data for electron beam dose algorithms

Almon S. Shiu; Samuel Tung; Kenneth R. Hogstrom; John W. Wong; Russell L. Gerber; William B. Harms; James A. Purdy; Randall K. Ten Haken; Daniel L. McShan; Benedick A. Fraass

The Collaborative Working Group (CWG) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) electron beam treatment planning contract has performed a set of 14 experiments that measured dose distributions for 28 unique beam-phantom configurations that simulated various patient anatomic structures and beam geometries. Multiple dose distributions were measured with film or diode detectors for each configuration, resulting in 78, 2-D planar dose distributions and one, 1-D depth-dose distribution. Measurements were made for 9- and 20-MeV electron beams, using primarily 6 x 6- and 15 x 15-cm applicators at several SSDs. Dose distributions were measured for shaped fields, irregular surfaces, and inhomogeneities (1-D, 2-D, and 3-D), which were designed to simulate many clinical electron treatments. The data were corrected for asymmetries, and normalized in an absolute manner. This set of measured data can be used for verification of electron beam dose algorithms and is available to others for that purpose.


Medical Physics | 2004

Dosimetry of a prototype retractable eMLC for fixed-beam electron therapy

Kenneth R. Hogstrom; Robert A. Boyd; John A. Antolak; Michelle Marie Svatos; B Faddegon; Julian G. Rosenman

An electron multileaf collimator (eMLC) has been designed that is unique in that it retracts to 37 cm from the isocenter [63-cm source-to-collimator distance (SCD)] and can be deployed to distances of 20 and 10 cm from the isocenter (80 and 90 cm SCD, respectively). It is expected to be capable of arc therapy at 63 cm SCD; isocentric, fixed-beam therapy at 80 cm SCD; and source-to-surface distance (SSD), fixed-beam therapy at 90 cm SCD. In all positions, its leaves could be used for unmodulated or intensity-modulated therapy. Our goal in the present work is to describe the general characteristics of the eMLC and to demonstrate that its leakage characteristics and dosimetry are adequate for SSD, fixed-beam therapy as an alternative to Cerrobend cutouts with applicators once the prototypes leaves are motorized. Our eMLC data showed interleaf electron leakage at 15 MeV to be less than 0.1% based on a 0.0025 cm manufacturing tolerance, and lateral electron leakage at 5 and 15 MeV to be less than 2%. X-ray leakage through the leaves was 1.6% at 15 MeV. Our data showed that beam penumbra was independent of direction and leaf position. The dosimetric properties of square fields formed by the eMLC were very consistent with those formed by Cerrobend inserts in the 20 x 20 cm2 applicator. Output factors exhibited similar field-size dependence. Airgap factors exhibited almost identical field-size dependence at two SSDs (105 and 110 cm), consistent with the common assumption that airgap factors are applicator independent. Percent depth-dose curves were similar, but showed variations up to 3% in the buildup region. The pencil-beam algorithm (PBA) fit measured data from the eMLC and applicator-cutout systems equally well, and the resulting two-dimensional (2-D) dose distributions, as predicted by the PBA, agreed well at common airgap distance. Simulating patient setups for breast and head and neck treatments showed that almost all fields could be treated using similar SSDs as when using applicators, although head and neck treatments require placing the patients head on a head-holder treatment table extension. The results of this work confirmed our design goals and support the potential use of the eMLC design in the clinical setting. The eMLC should allow the same treatments as are typically delivered with the electron applicator-cutout system currently used for fixed-beam therapy.


Medical Physics | 1991

Pencil beam redefinition algorithm for electron dose distributions

Almon S. Shiu; Kenneth R. Hogstrom

A pencil-beam redefinition algorithm has been developed for the calculation of electron-beam dose distributions on a three-dimensional grid utilizing 3-D inhomogeneity correction. The concept of redefinition was first used for both fixed and arced electron beams by Hogstrom et al. but was limited to a single redefinition. The success of those works stimulated the development of the pencil-beam redefinition algorithm, the aim of which is to solve the dosimetry problems presented by deep inhomogeneities through development of a model that redefines the pencil beams continuously with depth. This type of algorithm was developed independently by Storchi and Huizenga who termed it the moments method. Such a pencil beam within the patient is characterized by a complex angular distribution, which is approximated by a Gaussian distribution having the same first three moments as the actual distribution. Three physical quantities required for dose calculation and subsequent radiation transport--namely planar fluence, mean direction, and root-mean-square spread about the mean direction--are obtained from these moments. The primary difference between the moments method and the redefinition algorithm is that the latter subdivides the pencil beams into multiple energy bins. The algorithm then becomes a macroscopic method for transporting the complete phase space of the beam and allows the calculation of physical quantities such as fluence, dose, and energy distribution. Comparison of calculated dose distributions with measured dose distributions for a homogeneous water phantom, and for phantoms with inhomogeneities deep relative to the surface, show agreement superior to that achieved with the pencil-beam algorithm of Hogstrom et al. in the penumbral region and beneath the edges of air and bone inhomogeneities. The accuracy of the redefinition algorithm is within 4% and appears sufficient for clinical use, and the algorithm is structured for further expansion of the physical model if required for site-specific treatment planning problems.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2001

A custom three-dimensional electron bolus technique for optimization of postmastectomy irradiation

George H. Perkins; Marsha D. McNeese; John A. Antolak; Thomas A. Buchholz; Eric A. Strom; Kenneth R. Hogstrom

PURPOSEnPostmastectomy irradiation (PMI) is a technically complex treatment requiring consideration of the primary tumor location, possible risk of internal mammary node involvement, varying chest wall thicknesses secondary to surgical defects or body habitus, and risk of damaging normal underlying structures. In this report, we describe the application of a customized three-dimensional (3D) electron bolus technique for delivering PMI.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnA customized electron bolus was designed using a 3D planning system. Computed tomography (CT) images of each patient were obtained in treatment position and the volume to be treated was identified. The distal surface of the wax bolus matched the skin surface, and the proximal surface was designed to conform to the 90% isodose surface to the distal surface of the planning target volume (PTV). Dose was calculated with a pencil-beam algorithm correcting for patient heterogeneity. The bolus was then fabricated from modeling wax using a computer-controlled milling device. To aid in quality assurance, CT images with the bolus in place were generated and the dose distribution was computed using these images.nnnRESULTSnThis technique optimized the dose distribution while minimizing irradiation of normal tissues. The use of a single anterior field eliminated field junction sites. Two patients who benefited from this option are described: one with altered chest wall geometry (congenital pectus excavatum), and one with recurrent disease in the medial chest wall and internal mammary chain (IMC) area.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe use of custom 3D electron bolus for PMI is an effective method for optimizing dose delivery. The radiation dose distribution is highly conformal, dose heterogeneity is reduced compared to standard techniques in certain suboptimal settings, and excellent immediate outcome is obtained.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1984

Dosimetric evaluation of a pencil-beam algorithm for electrons employing a two-dimensional heterogeneity correction

Kenneth R. Hogstrom; Michael D. Mills; Jeff A. Eyer; Jatinder R. Palta; David E. Mellenberg; Raul Meoz; Robert S. Fields

The accuracy of a pencil-beam algorithm for electrons employing a two-dimensional heterogeneity correction is demonstrated by comparing calculation with measurement. Ionization measurements have been made in a water phantom for a variety of non-standard geometries. Geometries to demonstrate the effect of an extended treatment distance, a sloping skin surface, and an irregular skin surface have been selected. Additionally, thermoluminescent dosimeters have been used to measure distributions in tissue-substitute phantoms, which were designed from individual patient computerized tomographic scans. Three patient scans have been selected: (1) diffuse hystiocytic lymphoma of the left buccal mucosa and retromolar trigone; (2) squamous cell carcinoma of the nose at the columnella ; and (3) carcinoma of the maxillary antrum. Results demonstrate the algorithms ability to simultaneously account for the isodose shifting as a result of internal heterogeneities and for sidescatter non-equilibrium caused by lateral discontinuities of the skin surface and internal anatomy. The algorithm is shown to generally be accurate to within +/- 4% in the treatment volume or +/- 4 mm in regions of sharp dose gradients as found in the penumbra and distal edge of the beam. Examples of greater disagreement are shown and their physical interpretation discussed.


Medical Physics | 1992

Electron bolus design for radiotherapy treatment planning: Bolus design algorithms

D. A. Low; George Starkschall; S. W. Bujnowski; Lilie L. W. Wang; Kenneth R. Hogstrom

Computer algorithms to design bolus for electron beam radiotherapy treatment planning were investigated. Because of the significant electron multiple scatter, there is no unique solution to the problem of bolus design. However, using a sequence of operators, a bolus can be designed that attempts to meet three important criteria: adequate dose delivery to the target volume, avoidance of critical structures, and dose homogeneity within the target volume. Initial calculation of bolus shape was based upon creation operators forcing either the physical or the effective depths of the distal surface of the target volume to a specified value. Modification operators were then applied to the bolus to alter the shape to better meet the design criteria. Because the operators each address a single dosimetric issue, they can often adversely affect some other attribute of the dose distribution. In addition, an extension operator is used to design the bolus thickness outside the target volume. Application of these operators is therefore carried out in certain sequences and each may be used more than once in the design of a particular bolus. The effects of these operators on both the bolus and the resulting dose distribution are investigated for test geometries and patient geometries in the nose, parotid, and paraspinal region.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1993

Dosimetric evaluation of total scalp irradiation using a lateral electron-photon technique☆

Samuel S. Tung; Almon S. Shiu; George Starkschall; William H. Morrison; Kenneth R. Hogstrom

PURPOSEnTo evaluate the radiation dosimetry of a new technique for total scalp irradiation.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnA treatment technique described by Akazawa (1989) has been studied. During each fraction, two electron and two photon fields are treated. While most of the lateral scalp is treated with the electron fields, a rind of scalp close to the midsagittal plane is irradiated by parallel-opposed lateral photon fields. A wax bolus is used to build up skin dose and to protect the brain from electron dose. The dose distribution and dose-volume histograms were evaluated for different field arrangements using a 3-dimensional treatment planning system. After modifying the technique, in-vivo thermoluminescent dosimetry were used to evaluate the dose distributions for the first two patients.nnnRESULTSnTo compensate for the lack of dose from the opposed photon field at the junction, the technique was modified using overlapped fields instead of abutting fields. A field overlap of 3 to 4 mm between the electron and photon fields was found optimal. When used with the field junction shift of 1 cm midway through the treatment, this scheme resulted in a dose uniformity of -5% to +15% of the prescribed dose in the region of abutment. Results of the 3-dimensional dose calculation were supported by in-vivo thermoluminescent dosimetry on two patients.nnnCONCLUSIONnOn the basis of computer dose calculations and in-vivo dosimetry. Akazawas technique for scalp irradiation can be improved by using a 3 to 4 mm overlap of electron and photon fields. This modified technique is practical and produces clinically acceptable dosimetry.


Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | 2003

Utilization of custom electron bolus in head and neck radiotherapy

Rajat J. Kudchadker; John A. Antolak; William H. Morrison; Pei Fong Wong; Kenneth R. Hogstrom

Conventional methods of treating superficial head and neck tumors, such as the wedge pair technique or the use of multiple electron fields of varying energies, can result in excellent tumor control. However, in some cases, these techniques irradiate healthy tissue unnecessarily and/or create hot and cold spots injunction regions, particularly in patients with complex surface contour modification or varying planning target volume (PTV) thickness. The objective of this work is to demonstrate how bolus electron conformal therapy can be used for these patients. Two patients treated using this technique are presented. The first patient was diagnosed with malignant fibrous histiocytoma involving the right ear concha and was treated with 12‐MeV electrons. The second patient was diagnosed with acinic cell carcinoma of the left parotid gland and was treated with 20‐MeV electrons after having undergone a complete parotidectomy. Each patients bolus was designed using bolus design tools implemented in an in‐house treatment‐planning system (TPS). The bolus was fabricated using a computer‐controlled milling machine. As part of the quality assurance process to ensure proper fabrication and placement of the bolus, the patients underwent a second computed tomography (CT) scan with the bolus in place. Using that data, the final dose distribution was computed using the Philips Pinnacle 3 TPS (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA). Results showed that the 90% isodose surface conformed well to the PTV and that the dose to critical structures such as cord, brain, and lung was well below tolerance limits. Both patients showed no evidence of disease six months post‐radiotherapy. In conclusion, electron bolus conformal therapy is a viable option for treating head and neck tumors, particularly patients having a variable thickness PTV or surface anatomy with surgical defects. PACS number(s): 87.53.Kn


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2002

Electron conformal radiotherapy using bolus and intensity modulation

Rajat J. Kudchadker; Kenneth R. Hogstrom; Adam S. Garden; Marsha D. McNeese; Robert A. Boyd; John A. Antolak

PURPOSEnConformal electron beam therapy can be delivered using shaped bolus, which varies the penetration of the electrons across the incident beam so that the 90% isodose surface conforms to the distal surface of the planning target volume (PTV). Previous use of this modality has shown that the irregular proximal surface of the bolus causes the dose heterogeneity in the PTV to increase from 10%, the typical dose spread of a flat-water surface to approximately 20%. The present work evaluates the ability to restore dose homogeneity by varying the incident electron intensity.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnThree patients, one each with chest wall, thorax, and head-and-neck cancer, were planned using electron conformal therapy with bolus, with and without intensity modulation. Resulting dose distributions and dose-volume histograms were compared with non-intensity-modulated bolus plans.nnnRESULTSnIn all cases, the DeltaD(90%-10%) for the PTV was reduced; for example, for the head-and-neck case, the DeltaD(90%-10%) for the PTV was reduced from 14.9% to 9.2%. This reduction in dose spread is a direct result of intensity modulation.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe results showed that intensity-modulated electron beams could significantly improve the dose homogeneity in the PTV for patients treated with electron conformal therapy using shaped bolus.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1995

Computer-aided design and fabrication of an electron bolus for treatment of the paraspinal muscles

Daniel A. Low; George Starkschall; Neil E. Sherman; Stanley W. Bujnowski; James R. Ewton; Kenneth R. Hogstrom

PURPOSEnDemonstrate the technology for the design, fabrication, and verification of an electron bolus used in the preoperative irradiation of a mesenchymal chondrosarcoma in the paraspinal muscle region (T8-T12), in which the target volume overlay a portion of the spinal cord, both lungs, and the right kidney.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnAn electron-bolus design algorithm implemented on a three dimensional (3D) radiotherapy treatment planning system designed the bolus to yield a dose distribution that met physician-specified clinical criteria. Electron doses were calculated using a 3D electron pencil-beam dose algorithm. A computer-driven milling machine fabricated the bolus from modeling wax, machining both the patient surface and the beam surface of the bolus. Verification of the bolus fabrication was achieved by repeating the patients computed tomography (CT) scan with the fabricated bolus in place (directly on the posterior surface of the prone patient) and then recalculating the patients dose distribution using the 3D radiotherapy treatment planning system.nnnRESULTSnA treatment plan using a 17-MeV posterior electron field with a bolus delivered a superior dose distribution to the patient than did the same plan without a bolus. The bolus plan delivered a slightly increased dose to the target volume as a result of a slightly broader range of doses. There were significant reductions in dose to critical structures (cord, lungs, and kidney) in the bolus plan, as evidenced by dose-volume histograms (DVHs). The patient dose distribution, calculated using CT scan data with the fabricated bolus, showed no significant differences from the planned dose distribution.nnnCONCLUSIONSnA bolus can provide considerable sparing of normal tissues when using a posterior electron beam to irradiate the paraspinal muscles. Bolus design and fabrication using the tools described in this paper are adequate for patient treatment. CT imaging of the patient with the bolus in place followed by calculation of the patients dose distribution demonstrated a useful method for verification of the bolus design and fabrication process.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kenneth R. Hogstrom's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Almon S. Shiu

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George Starkschall

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert A. Boyd

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert S. Fields

Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter R. Almond

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carl E. Nyerick

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles Bloch

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marsha D. McNeese

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael D. Mills

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge