Kenneth S Opiela

Performance Evaluation of Low-Tension Three-Strand Cable Median Barriers

The primary purpose of longitudinal safety barriers, such as cable barriers, is to contain or redirect errant vehicles that depart the roadway and thereby keep them from entering opposing travel lanes or encountering terrain features and roadside objects that may cause severe impacts. In this study, finite element analysis, vehicle dynamics analysis, and full-scale crash testing were performed to study the effects of sloped terrain on the safety performance of cable median barriers. A detailed finite element model of a three-strand cable barrier was developed and validated against a previously conducted full-scale crash test. The full-scale crash test and simulation were set up for an impact of the cable barrier with a 2,000-kg (4,400-lb) pickup truck at an angle of 25° and an initial velocity of 100 km/h (62 mph). This setup is in accordance with NCHRP Report 350 guidelines for Test Level 3 safety performance. With this model, computer simulations were performed to assess the performance of the barrier under different impact scenarios and with different terrain profiles. Vehicle dynamics analyses were also conducted to compute the trajectory and dynamics of the vehicle as it crossed the sloped terrain and struck the cable median barrier. On completion of the computer simulation analyses, full-scale crash testing was performed to validate the results.

Relative luminance of retroreflective raised pavement markers and pavement marking stripes on simulated rural two-lane roads

The FHWA Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center is undertaking a research program to study the visibility of retroreflective raised pavement markers (RRPMs). The focus of the initial effort is to determine the relative luminance of RRPMs and pavement markings (PMs) needed to produce adequate guidance on rural two-lane roadways at night. A driving simulator was used to test 36 research participants as they drove simulated roadways containing various combinations of RRPMs and PMs. The luminance of the simulated roadway delineation ranged from 0.07 to 4.1 cd/m2. The primary driver performance measure was curve-recognition distance. For the various RRPM and PM luminance conditions, mean curve-recognition distances ranged from 19.0 m (62.3 ft) to 68.4 m (224 ft), with a grand mean of 43.0 m (141 ft). Regression analyses produced predictive equations to estimate the mean curve-recognition distance from the luminance of RRPMs acting alone or of PMs acting alone. Trading ratios were computed for PM luminance with and without RRPMs present on the road. A conservative empirical estimate of 0.52 was computed for such a trading ratio based on the data from the current experiment. This value compared favorably with independent estimates of 0.54 and 0.55 based on an earlier analytical approach. Thus, the current experiment confirmed, with empirical data, earlier estimates that it might be possible to reduce the luminance of PMs on rural two-lane roads by about 45% when appropriate RRPMs are installed.

DEVELOPING UPDATED MINIMUM IN-SERVICE RETROREFLECTIVITY LEVELS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNS

Background and current status of the development of updated minimum in-service retroreflectivity levels for traffic signs in the United States are described. A summary of the earlier work, conducted from the late 1980s to the mid-1990s, is provided along with descriptions of the relevant validation work. Related events that occurred in the late 1990s are described, and it is shown how, when combined with the assumptions and limitations of the earlier minimum retroreflectivity research, they resulted in a need for updated minimum retroreflectivity levels. The research related to the updated minimum retroreflectivity levels is summarized. A brief description of a second round of national minimum retroreflectivity workshops is also provided. The most recent set of recommended minimum retroreflectivity levels for traffic signs is presented along with a list of suggested research topics based on the limitations associated with the recommendations.

Roadside safety analysis program as a tool for economic evaluation of roadside safety projects

Highway agencies are continually called upon to make decisions about roadside safety projects by considering their relative benefits and costs. ROADSIDE software is a tool developed in the late 1980s for costeffectiveness analysis of safety features and has been used by different highway agencies. As a part of the continuing effort to improve such costeffectiveness procedures, the Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) has recently been developed at the Texas Transportation Institute. RSAP uses a simulation technique to replicate single-vehicle accidents on a highway facility and can test the effectiveness of the various countermeasures that are used to reduce the severities of these accidents. The application of RSAP to actual case study sites and the outcome of a study recently conducted at Wayne State University are described. Various median treatments on freeways were tested, and their respective benefit-cost ratios, as estimated by RSAP output, were examined. A set of sensitivity analyses of the RSAP output to various input parameters was also conducted. It is found that RSAP is user-friendly software and is fully operational on a personal computer with a Pentium processor in the Windows 95 environment. RSAP provides a summary of the accidents predicted for each scenario tested, and those are segregated by each feature coded along with its respective severity and cost. The economic analysis procedure is based on strong analytic principles, and the results are sensitive to accident cost, cost of construction, and interest rate. The software output is generally sensitive to the input parameters, and the trends appear to be logical. Additional research to calibrate the accident prediction model with historic accident data at the project site will be highly desirable.