Kenneth Thorsen

Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: Age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality

AIM To investigate the epidemiological trends in incidence and mortality of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) in a well-defined Norwegian population. METHODS A retrospective, population-based, single-center, consecutive cohort study of all patients diagnosed with benign perforated peptic ulcer. Included were both gastric and duodenal ulcer patients admitted to Stavanger University Hospital between January 2001 and December 2010. Ulcers with a malignant neoplasia diagnosis, verified by histology after biopsy or resection, were excluded. Patients were identified from the hospitals administrative electronic database using pertinent ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes (K25.1, K25.2, K25.5, K25.6, K26.1, K26.2, K26.5, K26.6). Additional searches using appropriate codes for relevant laparoscopic and open surgical procedures (e.g., JDA 60, JDA 61, JDH 70 and JDH 71) were performed to enable a complete identification of all patients. Patient demographics, presentation patterns and clinical data were retrieved from hospital records and surgical notes. Crude and adjusted incidence and mortality rates were estimated by using national population demographics data. RESULTS In the study period, a total of 172 patients with PPU were identified. The adjusted incidence rate for the overall 10-year period was 6.5 per 100 000 per year (95%CI: 5.6-7.6) and the adjusted mortality rate for the overall 10-year period was 1.1 per 100 000 per year (95%CI: 0.7-1.6). A non-significant decline in adjusted incidence rate from 9.7 to 5.6 occurred during the decade. The standardized mortality ratio for the whole study period was 5.7 (95%CI: 3.9-8.2), while the total 30-d mortality was 16.3%. No difference in incidence or mortality was found between genders. However, for patients ≥ 60 years, the incidence increased over 10-fold, and mortality more than 50-fold, compared to younger ages. The admission rates outside office hours were high with almost two out of three (63%) admissions seen at evening/night time shifts and/or during weekends. The observed seasonal variations in admissions were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The adjusted incidence rate, seasonal distribution and mortality rate was stable. PPU frequently presents outside regular work-hours. Increase in incidence and mortality occurs with older age.

Strategies to improve the outcome of emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer.

Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a common surgical emergency that carries high mortality and morbidity rates. Globally, one‐quarter of a million people die from peptic ulcer disease each year. Strategies to improve outcomes are needed.

Clinical and cellular effects of hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy in major injury

Hypothermia, acidosis and coagulopathy have long been considered critical combinations after severe injury. The aim of this review was to give a clinical update on this triad in severely injured patients.

Perforated peptic ulcer

Summary Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a frequent emergency condition worldwide with associated mortality up to 30%. A paucity of studies on PPU limits the knowledge base for clinical decision-making, but a few randomised trials are available. While Helicobacter pylori and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are frequent causes of PPU, demographic differences in age, gender, perforation location and aetiology exist between countries, as do mortality rates. Clinical prediction rules are used, but accuracy varies with study population. Early surgery, either by laparoscopic or open repair, and proper sepsis management are essential for good outcome. Selected patients can perhaps be managed non-operatively or with novel endoscopic approaches, but validation in trials is needed. Quality of care, sepsis care-bundles and postoperative monitoring need further evaluation. Adequate trials with low risk of bias are urgently needed for better evidence. Here we summarize the evidence for PPU management and identify directions for future clinical research.

Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer

BackgroundPatients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) often present with acute, severe illness that carries a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Mortality ranges from 3-40% and several prognostic scoring systems have been suggested. The aim of this study was to review the available scoring systems for PPU patients, and to assert if there is evidence to prefer one to the other.Material and methodsWe searched PubMed for the mesh terms “perforated peptic ulcer”, “scoring systems”, “risk factors”, ”outcome prediction”, “mortality”, ”morbidity” and the combinations of these terms. In addition to relevant scores introduced in the past (e.g. Boey score), we included recent studies published between January 2000 and December 2012) that reported on scoring systems for prediction of morbidity and mortality in PPU patients.ResultsA total of ten different scoring systems used to predict outcome in PPU patients were identified; the Boey score, the Hacettepe score, the Jabalpur score the peptic ulcer perforation (PULP) score, the ASA score, the Charlson comorbidity index, the sepsis score, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), the Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), the simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), the Mortality probability models II (MPM II), the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity physical sub-score (POSSUM-phys score). Only four of the scores were specifically constructed for PPU patients. In five studies the accuracy of outcome prediction of different scoring systems was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis, and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) among studies compared. Considerable variation in performance both between different scores and between different studies was found, with the lowest and highest AUC reported between 0.63 and 0.98, respectively.ConclusionWhile the Boey score and the ASA score are most commonly used to predict outcome for PPU patients, considerable variations in accuracy for outcome prediction were shown. Other scoring systems are hampered by a lack of validation or by their complexity that precludes routine clinical use. While the PULP score seems promising it needs external validation before widespread use.

Endoscopy, morphology, morphometry and molecular markers: predicting cancer risk in colorectal adenoma

The evaluation of short- and long-term risk for developing cancer in patients with colorectal adenomas is controversial. Good, reliable predictors of cancer risk in any adenoma are currently lacking and are limited to adenoma size, number and histologic type. In fact, the evaluation of any adenoma or precancer lesion (e.g., hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenoma or aberrant crypt foci) within the colorectum may be assessed by a number of techniques ranging from direct visualization through the endoscope, to microscopic assessment, and to evaluation at the molecular level. Emerging techniques may yield improved methods of adenoma risk-assessment in the near future. For one, newer endoscopy technologies include chromoendoscopy or endocytoscopy, which now render endoscopists able to resolve the surface and subsurface mucosa at cellular resolution in vivo and in real time – thus, bringing the microscope to the patient’s bedside. This new era in endoscopic imaging is dubbed ‘histoendoscopy’. Further, while traditional views of classifying protruding and sessile lesions include those of Haggitt, the sm-classification, the Japanese and the so-called Vienna classifications to evaluate neoplasia, the development of new molecular techniques may give way to new methods of classifying preneoplasia and precancerous lesions. This review discusses some pros and cons of risk evaluation technologies in the colorectal tract by endoscopy, microscopy, and quantitative and molecular features. The morphometry-based studies performed over the past decades for the quantitative assessment of cellular and nuclear features within adenomas have failed to yield results amenable for clinical translation and are unlikely to improve further and gain widespread use with current technology. Rather, emerging knowledge of pathway-specific markers through the outlining of a molecular classification will likely be the basis for improved detection and diagnosis. The emerging genomic and proteomic technologies allowing for noninvasive tests to detect (asymptomatic) cancer and neoplasia are discussed. Lastly, the importance of recognizing bias and pitfalls and the adherence to guidelines for biomarker research are addressed.

Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains a formidable health burden worldwide and one of the most frequent emergency conditions requiring surgery. Sudden onset of acute, severe pain in the upper abdomen is a classical presentation of PPU in most patients. However, clinical presentation and lack of frank peritonitis should be noted in populations of age extremes, particularly the elderly patient. Availability of CT scanners has led to a shift in diagnostic work-up due to a very high sensitivity of CT scans (>95 %) compared to abdominal X-ray (about 75 %). CT also allows for a more precise and rapid diagnosis, as well as detection of potential differential diagnoses. Numerous scores for prognostication have been suggested, but reliable and robust universal predictors are not available. Surgery is performed by closing the defect with simple, interrupted sutures, usually with an omental patch. Both laparotomy and laparoscopy may be used, and there is no evidence in favor of either method. Mortality is not influenced by the choice of repair. Broad-spectrum antibiotics should be continued after surgery. Acid-reducing therapy with PPI should be given intravenously and a nasogastric tube kept in place as long as the patient is not well. The level of care should be considered according to the preoperative and postoperative state, but a considerable number of patients may require care in a high-dependency unit or intensive care if on a ventilator.