Kent R. Zettel

Selective roles for toll-like receptors 2, 4, and 9 in systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction following peripheral tissue injury.

BACKGROUND Toll-like receptors (TLRs) detect endogenous ligands released after trauma and contribute to the proinflammatory response to injury. Posttraumatic mortality correlates with the extent of the immunoinflammatory response to injury that is composed of a complex regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. Although TLRs are known to modulate innate immune responses, their role in the suppression of lymphocyte responses following traumatic tissue injury is unclear. METHODS This study used a murine model of severe peripheral tissue injury, involving muscle crush injury and injection of fracture components, to evaluate the roles of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 in the early and delayed immunoinflammatory phenotype. Posttraumatic immune dysfunction was measured in our trauma model using the following parameters: ex vivo splenocyte proliferation, TH1 cytokine release, and iNOS (inducible nitric oxide synthase) induction within splenic myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Systemic inflammation and liver damage were determined by circulating interleukin 6 levels and hepatocellular injury. RESULTS Suppression of splenocyte responses after injury was dependent on TLR4 and TLR9 signaling as was posttraumatic iNOS upregulation in splenic myeloid-derived suppressor cells. TLR2 was found to have only a partial role through contribution to inhibition of splenocyte proliferation. This study also reveals the involvement of TLR2 and TLR4 in the initial systemic inflammatory response to traumatic tissue injury; however, this response was found to be TLR9 independent. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate the previously unidentified role of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 in the T cell–associated immune dysfunction following traumatic tissue injury. Importantly, this study also illustrates that TLRs play differing and selective roles in both the initial proinflammatory response and adaptive immune response after trauma. Furthermore, results in TLR9-deficient mice establish that the upregulation of early proinflammatory markers do not always correlate with the extent of sustained immune dysfunction. This suggests potential for targeted therapies that could limit immune dysfunction through selective inhibition of receptor function following injury.

Toll-like Receptor 4 Signaling on Dendritic Cells Suppresses Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte CXCR2 Expression and Trafficking via Interleukin 10 During Intra-abdominal Sepsis.

BACKGROUND Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is a critical receptor involved in the sensing of gram-negative bacterial infection. However, the roles of TLR4 in sepsis are cell-type specific. Dendritic cells (DCs) are known to play a central role in microbial detection, alerting the immune system to the presence of infection and coordinating adaptive immune response. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of DC-specific TLR4 signaling on host defense against intra-abdominal polymicrobial sepsis. METHODS C57BL/6, global Tlr4 knockout, cell-specific knockout control, and CD11c-specific Tlr4(-/-) mice underwent cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). RESULTS Specific deletion of TLR4 on DCs in mice improved survival and enhanced bacterial clearance. Deletion of TLR4 on DCs was associated with lower levels of circulating interleukin 10 (IL-10), higher polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) accumulation in the peritoneal cavity, and higher expression of chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 (CXCR2) on PMNs after CLP. In vitro studies of DC and neutrophil cocultures confirmed that TLR4-dependent secretion of IL-10 from DCs regulated neutrophil CXCR2 expression. CONCLUSIONS Our data shed light on a previously unrecognized role for TLR4 signaling on DCs in driving IL-10 secretion during sepsis and, through this pathway, regulates PMN recruitment via suppression of CXCR2 expression.

Aged Human Stored Red Blood Cell Supernatant Inhibits Macrophage Phagocytosis in an HMGB1 Dependent Manner After Trauma in a Murine Model.

ABSTRACT Red blood cell transfusions in the setting of trauma are a double-edged sword, as it is a necessary component for life-sustaining treatment in massive hemorrhagic shock, but also associated with increased risk for nosocomial infections and immune suppression. The mechanisms surrounding this immune suppression are unclear. Using supernatant from human packed red blood cell (RBC), we demonstrate that clearance of Escherichia coli by macrophages is inhibited both in vitro and in vivo using a murine model of trauma and hemorrhagic shock. We further explore the mechanism of this inhibition by demonstrating that human-stored RBCs contain soluble high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) that increases throughout storage. HMGB1 derived from the supernatant of human-stored RBCs was shown to inhibit bacterial clearance, as neutralizing antibodies to HMGB1 restored the ability of macrophages to clear bacteria. These findings demonstrate that extracellular HMGB1 within stored RBCs could be one factor leading to immune suppression following transfusion in the trauma setting.

Toll-Like Receptor 4 on both Myeloid Cells and Dendritic Cells Is Required for Systemic Inflammation and Organ Damage after Hemorrhagic Shock with Tissue Trauma in Mice

Trauma combined with hemorrhagic shock (HS/T) leads to systemic inflammation, which results in organ injury. Toll-like Receptor 4 (TLR4)-signaling activation contributes to the initiation of inflammatory pathways following HS/T but its cell-specific roles in this setting are not known. We assessed the importance of TLR4 on leukocytes of myeloid lineage and dendritic cells (DCs) to the early systemic inflammatory response following HS/T. Mice were subjected to HS/T and 20 inflammatory mediators were measured in plasma followed by Dynamic Bayesian Network (DBN) Analysis. Organ damage was assessed by histology and plasma ALT levels. The role of TLR4 was determined using TLR4−/−, MyD88−/−, and Trif−/− C57BL/6 (B6) mice, and by in vivo administration of a TLR4-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb). The contribution of TLR4 expressed by myeloid leukocytes and DC was determined by generating cell-specific TLR4−/− B6 mice, including Lyz-Cre × TLR4loxP/loxP, and CD11c-Cre × TLR4loxP/loxP B6 mice. Adoptive transfer of bone marrow-derived TLR4+/+ or TLR4−/− DC into TLR4−/− mice confirmed the contribution of TLR4 on DC to the systemic inflammatory response after HS/T. Using both global knockout mice and the TLR4-blocking mAb 1A6 we established a central role for TLR4 in driving systemic inflammation. Using cell-selective TLR4−/− B6 mice, we found that TLR4 expression on both myeloid cells and CD11chigh DC is required for increases in systemic cytokine levels and organ damage after HS/T. We confirmed the capacity of TLR4 on CD11chigh DC to promote inflammation and liver damage using adoptive transfer of TLR4+/+ conventional (CD11chigh) DC into TLR4−/− mice. DBN inference identified CXC chemokines as proximal drivers of dynamic changes in the circulating levels of cytokines/chemokines after HS/T. TLR4 on DC was found to contribute selectively to the elevations in these proximal drivers. TLR4 on both myeloid cells and conventional DC is required for the initial systemic inflammation and organ damage in a mouse model of HS/T. This includes a role for TLR4 on DC in promoting increases in the early inflammatory networks identified in HS/T. These data establish DC along with macrophages as essential to the recognition of tissue damage and stress following tissue trauma with HS.

Disorder of Systemic Inflammation in Sepsis and Trauma: A Systems Perspective

The inflammatory response is highly integrated and involves regulatory elements released from the cells of the immune system, humoral factors, the endothelium, and endogenous danger signals. Once activated, the goal of the inflammatory response is to activate the cellular immune response to ward off penetrating pathogens and to initiate tissue repair mechanisms. The magnitude of the systemic response is proportional to the severity of the initial insult on the background of the genetic milieu of the individual. The inflammatory response is closely regulated and a counter anti-inflammatory response keeps it in check. When excessive or sustained, this immuno-inflammatory response gives way to prolonged immune suppression, leaving the individual susceptible to nosocomial infections and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Only by understanding how the immune–inflammatory response becomes disordered can we devise strategies to limit the deleterious consequences.