Kerri A. Schoedel

Nicotine metabolite ratio as an index of cytochrome P450 2A6 metabolic activity

Nicotine and a variety of other drugs and toxins are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6. Our objective was to evaluate the use of oral nicotine with measurement of the trans‐3′‐hydroxycotinine (3HC)/cotinine (COT) metabolite ratio as a noninvasive probe of CYP2A6 activity.

Ethnic variation in CYP2A6 and association of genetically slow nicotine metabolism and smoking in adult Caucasians.

Genetically variable CYP2A6 is the primary enzyme that inactivates nicotine to cotinine. Our objective was to investigate allele frequencies among five ethnic groups and to investigate the relationship between genetically slow nicotine metabolic inactivation and smoking status, cigarette consumption, age of first smoking and duration of smoking. Chinese, Japanese, Canadian Native Indian, African-North American and Caucasian DNA samples were assessed for CYP2A6 allelic frequencies (CYP2A6*1B-*12,*1x2). Adult Caucasian non-smokers (n = 224) (1-99 cigarettes/lifetime) and smokers (n = 375) (> or = 100 cigarettes/lifetime) were assessed for demographics, tobacco/drug use history and DSM-IV dependence and genotyped for CYP2A6 alleles associated with decreased nicotine metabolism (CYP2A6*2, CYP2A6*4, CYP2A6*9, CYP2A6*12). CYP2A6 allele frequencies varied substantially among the ethnic groups. The proportion of Caucasian slow nicotine inactivators was significantly lower in current, DSM-IV dependent smokers compared to non-smokers [7.0% and 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.03, odds ratio (OR) = 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29-0.95]; non-dependent smokers showed similar results. Daily cigarette consumption (cigarettes/day) was significantly (P = 0.003) lower for slow (21.3; 95% CI 17.4-25.2) compared to normal inactivators (28.2; 95% CI 26.4-29.9); this was observed only in DSM-IV dependent smokers. Slow inactivators had a significantly (P = 0.03) lower age of first smoking compared to normal inactivators (13.0 years of age; 95% CI 12.1-14.0 versus 14.2; 95% CI 13.8-14.6), and a trend towards smoking for a shorter duration. This study demonstrates that slow nicotine inactivators are less likely to be adult smokers (dependent or non-dependent). Slow inactivators also smoked fewer cigarettes per day and had an earlier age of first smoking (only dependent smokers).

A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover study to evaluate the subjective abuse potential and cognitive effects of nabiximols oromucosal spray in subjects with a history of recreational cannabis use

This study aimed to evaluate the abuse potential and cognitive effects of nabiximols (Sativex®, GW Pharma Ltd. Salisbury, UK), an oromucosal spray primarily containing delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD).

Update on tamper-resistant drug formulations

An expert panel convened in 2005 by the College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD) to consider strategies to reduce the risk of prescription medication abuse concluded that drug formulation plays a significant role in determining risk of abuse. Efforts on the part of the pharmaceutical industry to develop drugs that deter abuse have focused primarily on opioid formulations resistant to common forms of tampering, most notably crushing or dissolving the tablet to accelerate release. Several opioid formulations developed to be tamper resistant have been approved, but the US Food and Drug Administration has not approved explicit label claims of abuse deterrence and has stated that any such claim will require substantial postmarketing data. Drug development efforts in this area raise questions about the relative impact of abuse-deterrent formulations, not only on individuals who might abuse a medication, but also on patients who are compliant with therapy. This review discusses progress since the 2005 CPDD meeting with an emphasis on opioids. Articles cited in the review were identified via a PubMed search covering the period between January 1, 2000, and October 5, 2011. Scientific work presented by the authors and their colleagues at meetings held through May 2012 also was included. Published literature suggests that development of abuse-deterrent products will require broad public health support and continued encouragement from regulatory authorities so that such products will become the expected standard of care for certain drug classes.

Subjective and Objective Effects of the Novel Triple Reuptake Inhibitor Tesofensine in Recreational Stimulant Users

Tesofensine is a (triple) reuptake inhibitor of noradrenaline, dopamine, and serotonin that is in development for the treatment of obesity. The abuse potential of triple reuptake inhibitors is not yet known, and so this study was undertaken to evaluate the potential abuse‐related effects of tesofensine in humans. It was designed as a single‐dose, randomized, double‐blind, crossover study involving tesofensine vs. placebo, D‐amphetamine (positive control for dopaminergic/stimulant effects), bupropion, and atomoxetine (negative/unscheduled controls) in recreational stimulant users (N = 52). Subjective and objective measures were assessed for 48 h after drug administration. The study results show that the effects of D‐amphetamine were significantly greater than those of placebo on all primary and secondary subjective measures. The effects of tesofensine were not significantly different from those of placebo and were lower than those of D‐amphetamine 30 mg on all primary and most secondary measures. The effects of tesofensine were either lower than or not different from those of bupropion or atomoxetine. These results demonstrate that the abuse potential for tesofensine is no greater than that of bupropion or atomoxetine, and tesofensine is therefore unlikely to be recreationally abused.

Evaluation of the Abuse Potential of Lorcaserin, a Serotonin 2C (5-HT2C) Receptor Agonist, in Recreational Polydrug Users

Lorcaserin is a selective and potent serotonin 2C receptor subtype (5‐HT2C) agonist under development for the treatment of obesity. This study assessed the drugs abuse potential on the basis of its pharmacological profile. For this purpose, a double‐blind, double‐dummy, placebo‐controlled, randomized seven‐way crossover study with single oral doses of lorcaserin (20, 40, and 60 mg), zolpidem (15 and 30 mg), ketamine (100 mg), and placebo was conducted in recreational polydrug users (N = 35). Subjective and objective measures were assessed up to 24 h after the dose. We found that zolpidem and ketamine had significantly higher peak scores relative to placebo on the primary measures as well as on most of the secondary measures. The subjective effects of a 20‐mg dose of lorcaserin were similar to those of placebo, whereas supratherapeutic doses of lorcaserin were associated with significant levels of dislike by users as compared with placebo, zolpidem, and ketamine. Perceptual effects were minimal after administration of lorcaserin and significantly lower than after administration of either ketamine or zolpidem. The findings suggest that, at supratherapeutic doses, lorcaserin is associated with distinct, primarily negative, subjective effects and has low abuse potential.

Differences in Pharmacogenetics of Nicotine and Alcohol Metabolism: Review and Recommendations for Future Research

Genetic variations in the enzymes involved in alcohol and nicotine metabolism can profoundly affect the rates of metabolism of these drugs, which in turn can influence drug-taking behaviors. The frequency of these genetic variants differs substantially among ethnic groups, resulting in differing genetic influences, or degrees of risk, among different populations. For many of these enzymatic pathways, the genetic variations that affect the rates of metabolism are very different in Asians and Caucasians and may contribute to population differences in alcohol- and tobacco-related behaviors and diseases. Understanding how variations in alcohol- and nicotine-metabolizing enzymes alter these drug responses and behaviors, with special focus on genetic variations, is the subject of this review. Each section describes genetic variations in a particular enzymatic pathway and reviews what is known about population variation and the resulting impact on alcohol- and/or nicotine-related disorders. Each section concludes with some thoughts on future research priorities. Sections 1 and 2 review the primary alcohol- and acetaldehyde-metabolizing enzymes and provide a working model for how the genetic variations in these enzymes may affect alcohol consumption and related disorders. Section 1 focuses on the alcohol and acetaldehyde dehydrogenases, while section 2 focuses on CYP2E1 and its possible role in alcohol and tobacco dependence. Sections 3 and 4 describe enzymes involved in nicotine metabolism, with section 3 focusing on the major nicotine-to-cotinine metabolizing enzyme, CYP2A6, and how genetically differing rates of metabolic inactivation of nicotine alter smoking. Section 4 describes data on the many additional enzymes involved in the metabolism of nicotine and its metabolites and summarizes our current understanding of the influence these enzymes may have on metabolism and addiction in this relatively new research area.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of dextromethorphan/quinidine in the treatment of pseudobulbar affect

Pseudobulbar affect (PBA) is a common manifestation of brain pathology associated with many neurological diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and traumatic brain injury. PBA is defined by involuntary and uncontrollable expressed emotion that is exaggerated and inappropriate, and also incongruent with the underlying emotional state. Dextromethorphan/quinidine (DM/Q) is a combination product indicated for the treatment of PBA. The quinidine component of DM/Q inhibits the cytochrome P450 2D6-mediated metabolic conversion of dextromethorphan to its active metabolite dextrorphan, thereby increasing dextromethorphan systemic bioavailability and driving the pharmacology toward that of the parent drug and away from adverse effects of the dextrorphan metabolite. Three published efficacy and safety studies support the use of DM/Q in the treatment of PBA; significant effects were seen on the primary end point, the Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale, as well as secondary efficacy end points and quality of life. While concentration–effect relationships appear relatively weak for efficacy parameters, concentrations of DM/Q may have an impact on safety. Some special safety concerns exist with DM/Q, primarily because of the drug interaction and QT prolongation potential of the quinidine component. However, because concentrations of dextrorphan (which is responsible for many of the parent drug’s side effects) and quinidine are lower than those observed in clinical practice with these drugs administered alone, some of the perceived safety issues may not be as relevant with this low dose combination product. However, since patients with PBA have a variety of other medical problems and are on numerous other medications, they may not tolerate DM/Q adverse effects, or may be at risk for drug interactions. Some caution is warranted when initiating DM/Q treatment, particularly in patients with underlying risk factors for torsade de pointes and in those receiving medications that may interact with DM/Q.

The role of adverse events and related safety data in the pre-market evaluation of drug abuse potential.

The scientific and regulatory assessment of abuse and dependence potential of drugs involves a multi-layered evaluation of its properties related to chemistry, formulation, pharmacology, animal behavior and clinical response. In addition to the primary laboratory-based assessment in experienced drug users, data are also reviewed from studies in healthy volunteers and in the patient population. Much of the emphasis in these latter studies is placed on adverse events that are reported by the subject or observed by the investigator. Unlike other aspects of abuse potential assessment, the evaluation of abuse- and dependence-related events has not been the subject of scholarly research. The present commentary presents recommendations for several areas that would benefit from a consensus review to result in greater standardization for the analysis and presentation of abuse- and dependence-related data from clinical trials. These include special investigator training, a system of weighted primary and secondary terms, adjudication of individual events, case report management, organization of integrated safety data, and protocols for drug accountability. Such an effort would aid in implementing the evolving efforts of health authorities to guide drug developers in the collection and presentation of data needed for the regulation of drugs with the potential for abuse and dependence.

Randomized open-label drug-drug interaction trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.

AbstractBackground and Objective: The novel combination of dextromethorphan (DM) and quinidine (Q) [DMQ] has been extensively studied in well controlled clinical trials as treatment for pseudobulbar affect (PBA), and is the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for this indication. The approved dosage of DMQ is DM 20 mg and Q 10 mg twice daily. DM is metabolized via cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6); Q is a CYP2D6 inhibitor used to increase DM plasma concentrations. Paroxetine is both a substrate and inhibitor of CYP2D6. This trial evaluated the effect of DMQ at a dose of DM 30 mg and Q 30 mg twice daily on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of paroxetine 20 mg daily and the effects of paroxetine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of DMQ in healthy volunteers. Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, parallel-group, 20-day trial. Drug plasma concentrations were analysed following monotherapy and concomitant (DMQ + paroxetine) therapy. Participants were 27 healthy adults who were randomized in a 1: 1 fashion to one of two groups. Group 1 received paroxetine 20 mg once daily for 12 days to attain steady state, at which point DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily was added for 8 days. Group 2 received DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily for 8 days to attain steady state, at which point paroxetine 20 mg once daily was added for 12 days. The primary endpoints were the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) during concomitant therapy versus monotherapy. Safety and tolerability measures including adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. Results: The 90% CIs of the AUCs were outside of the predefined range [0.80, 1.25] for all analytes, indicating a drug-drug interaction. In group 1 (n= 14), addition of DMQ to paroxetine resulted in a 30% increase in mean plasma exposure of paroxetine (AUC up to 24 hours). In group 2 (n= 13), addition of paroxetine to DMQ resulted in increases in mean plasma exposure (AUC up to 12 hours) of 50% for DM and 40% for Q, and a decrease of 12.3% for dextrorphan, the metabolite of DM. The incidence of AEs was higher with paroxetine monotherapy and combination therapy, compared with DMQ given alone (30.8% with DMQ alone vs 83.3% following addition of paroxetine, and 78.6% with paroxetine alone vs 64.3% following addition of DMQ). Three subjects discontinued due to AEs, and no serious AEs were reported. Conclusion: The addition of DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily to paroxetine increased steady-state paroxetine plasma concentrations and addition of paroxetine to DMQ 30 mg/30 mg twice daily increased steady-state plasma concentrations of DM and Q, indicating a potential interaction. Thus, patients should be monitored for AEs and dosage adjustment considered when combining these two agents.