Kerstin P. Blankenburg
Baylor College of Medicine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kerstin P. Blankenburg.
Nature | 2012
Trudy F. C. Mackay; Stephen Richards; Eric A. Stone; Antonio Barbadilla; Julien F. Ayroles; Dianhui Zhu; Sònia Casillas; Yi Han; Michael M. Magwire; Julie M. Cridland; Mark F. Richardson; Robert R. H. Anholt; Maite Barrón; Crystal Bess; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; David Castellano; Lesley S. Chaboub; Laura H. Duncan; Zeke Harris; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Shalini N. Jhangiani; Katherine W. Jordan; Fremiet Lara; Faye Lawrence; Sandra L. Lee; Pablo Librado; Raquel S. Linheiro; Richard F. Lyman
A major challenge of biology is understanding the relationship between molecular genetic variation and variation in quantitative traits, including fitness. This relationship determines our ability to predict phenotypes from genotypes and to understand how evolutionary forces shape variation within and between species. Previous efforts to dissect the genotype–phenotype map were based on incomplete genotypic information. Here, we describe the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP), a community resource for analysis of population genomics and quantitative traits. The DGRP consists of fully sequenced inbred lines derived from a natural population. Population genomic analyses reveal reduced polymorphism in centromeric autosomal regions and the X chromosome, evidence for positive and negative selection, and rapid evolution of the X chromosome. Many variants in novel genes, most at low frequency, are associated with quantitative traits and explain a large fraction of the phenotypic variance. The DGRP facilitates genotype–phenotype mapping using the power of Drosophila genetics.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012
Wen Huang; Stephen Richards; Mary Anna Carbone; Dianhui Zhu; Robert R. H. Anholt; Julien F. Ayroles; Laura H. Duncan; Katherine W. Jordan; Faye Lawrence; Michael M. Magwire; Crystal B. Warner; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Yi Han; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Shalini N. Jhangiani; Donna M. Muzny; Fiona Ongeri; Lora Perales; Yuan Qing Wu; Yiqing Zhang; Xiaoyan Zou; Eric A. Stone; Richard A. Gibbs; Trudy F. C. Mackay
Epistasis—nonlinear genetic interactions between polymorphic loci—is the genetic basis of canalization and speciation, and epistatic interactions can be used to infer genetic networks affecting quantitative traits. However, the role that epistasis plays in the genetic architecture of quantitative traits is controversial. Here, we compared the genetic architecture of three Drosophila life history traits in the sequenced inbred lines of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) and a large outbred, advanced intercross population derived from 40 DGRP lines (Flyland). We assessed allele frequency changes between pools of individuals at the extremes of the distribution for each trait in the Flyland population by deep DNA sequencing. The genetic architecture of all traits was highly polygenic in both analyses. Surprisingly, none of the SNPs associated with the traits in Flyland replicated in the DGRP and vice versa. However, the majority of these SNPs participated in at least one epistatic interaction in the DGRP. Despite apparent additive effects at largely distinct loci in the two populations, the epistatic interactions perturbed common, biologically plausible, and highly connected genetic networks. Our analysis underscores the importance of epistasis as a principal factor that determines variation for quantitative traits and provides a means to uncover genetic networks affecting these traits. Knowledge of epistatic networks will contribute to our understanding of the genetic basis of evolutionarily and clinically important traits and enhance predictive ability at an individualized level in medicine and agriculture.
Genome Research | 2014
Wen Huang; Andreas Massouras; Yutaka Inoue; Jason A. Peiffer; Miquel Ràmia; Aaron M. Tarone; Lavanya Turlapati; Thomas Zichner; Dianhui Zhu; Richard F. Lyman; Michael M. Magwire; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; Kyle Chang; Lisa L. Ellis; Sonia Fernandez; Yi Han; Gareth Highnam; Carl E. Hjelmen; John Jack; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Divya Kalra; Sandy Lee; Lora Lewis; Mala Munidasa; Fiona Ongeri; Shohba Patel; Lora Perales; Agapito Perez
The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) is a community resource of 205 sequenced inbred lines, derived to improve our understanding of the effects of naturally occurring genetic variation on molecular and organismal phenotypes. We used an integrated genotyping strategy to identify 4,853,802 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 1,296,080 non-SNP variants. Our molecular population genomic analyses show higher deletion than insertion mutation rates and stronger purifying selection on deletions. Weaker selection on insertions than deletions is consistent with our observed distribution of genome size determined by flow cytometry, which is skewed toward larger genomes. Insertion/deletion and single nucleotide polymorphisms are positively correlated with each other and with local recombination, suggesting that their nonrandom distributions are due to hitchhiking and background selection. Our cytogenetic analysis identified 16 polymorphic inversions in the DGRP. Common inverted and standard karyotypes are genetically divergent and account for most of the variation in relatedness among the DGRP lines. Intriguingly, variation in genome size and many quantitative traits are significantly associated with inversions. Approximately 50% of the DGRP lines are infected with Wolbachia, and four lines have germline insertions of Wolbachia sequences, but effects of Wolbachia infection on quantitative traits are rarely significant. The DGRP complements ongoing efforts to functionally annotate the Drosophila genome. Indeed, 15% of all D. melanogaster genes segregate for potentially damaged proteins in the DGRP, and genome-wide analyses of quantitative traits identify novel candidate genes. The DGRP lines, sequence data, genotypes, quality scores, phenotypes, and analysis and visualization tools are publicly available.
Current Biology | 2015
Chaoyang Zhao; Lucio Navarro Escalante; Hang Chen; Thiago R. Benatti; Jiaxin Qu; Sanjay Chellapilla; Robert M. Waterhouse; David Wheeler; Martin Andersson; Riyue Bao; Matthew Batterton; Susanta K. Behura; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Doina Caragea; James C. Carolan; Marcus Coyle; Mustapha El-Bouhssini; Liezl Francisco; Markus Friedrich; Navdeep Gill; Tony Grace; Cornelis J. P. Grimmelikhuijzen; Yi Han; Frank Hauser; Nicolae Herndon; Michael Holder; Panagiotis Ioannidis; LaRonda Jackson; Mehwish Javaid; Shalini N. Jhangiani
Gall-forming arthropods are highly specialized herbivores that, in combination with their hosts, produce extended phenotypes with unique morphologies [1]. Many are economically important, and others have improved our understanding of ecology and adaptive radiation [2]. However, the mechanisms that these arthropods use to induce plant galls are poorly understood. We sequenced the genome of the Hessian fly (Mayetiola destructor; Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a plant parasitic gall midge and a pest of wheat (Triticum spp.), with the aim of identifying genic modifications that contribute to its plant-parasitic lifestyle. Among several adaptive modifications, we discovered an expansive reservoir of potential effector proteins. Nearly 5% of the 20,163 predicted gene models matched putative effector gene transcripts present in the M. destructor larval salivary gland. Another 466 putative effectors were discovered among the genes that have no sequence similarities in other organisms. The largest known arthropod gene family (family SSGP-71) was also discovered within the effector reservoir. SSGP-71 proteins lack sequence homologies to other proteins, but their structures resemble both ubiquitin E3 ligases in plants and E3-ligase-mimicking effectors in plant pathogenic bacteria. SSGP-71 proteins and wheat Skp proteins interact in vivo. Mutations in different SSGP-71 genes avoid the effector-triggered immunity that is directed by the wheat resistance genes H6 and H9. Results point to effectors as the agents responsible for arthropod-induced plant gall formation.
Genome Research | 2014
Zhen Xia Chen; David Sturgill; Jiaxin Qu; Huaiyang Jiang; Soo Park; Nathan Boley; Ana Maria Suzuki; Anthony R. Fletcher; David C. Plachetzki; Peter C. FitzGerald; Carlo G. Artieri; Joel Atallah; Olga Barmina; James B. Brown; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Emily Clough; Abhijit Dasgupta; Sai Gubbala; Yi Han; Joy Jayaseelan; Divya Kalra; Yoo-Ah Kim; Christie Kovar; Sandra L. Lee; Mingmei Li; James D. Malley; John H. Malone; Tittu Mathew; Nicolas R Mattiuzzo; Mala Munidasa
Accurate gene model annotation of reference genomes is critical for making them useful. The modENCODE project has improved the D. melanogaster genome annotation by using deep and diverse high-throughput data. Since transcriptional activity that has been evolutionarily conserved is likely to have an advantageous function, we have performed large-scale interspecific comparisons to increase confidence in predicted annotations. To support comparative genomics, we filled in divergence gaps in the Drosophila phylogeny by generating draft genomes for eight new species. For comparative transcriptome analysis, we generated mRNA expression profiles on 81 samples from multiple tissues and developmental stages of 15 Drosophila species, and we performed cap analysis of gene expression in D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura. We also describe conservation of four distinct core promoter structures composed of combinations of elements at three positions. Overall, each type of genomic feature shows a characteristic divergence rate relative to neutral models, highlighting the value of multispecies alignment in annotating a target genome that should prove useful in the annotation of other high priority genomes, especially human and other mammalian genomes that are rich in noncoding sequences. We report that the vast majority of elements in the annotation are evolutionarily conserved, indicating that the annotation will be an important springboard for functional genetic testing by the Drosophila community.
Developmental Biology | 2011
Dan E. Wells; Laura Gutierrez; Zhenkang Xu; Vladimir Krylov; Jaroslav Macha; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Matthew Hitchens; Larry J. Bellot; Mary Spivey; Derek L. Stemple; Andria Kowis; Yuan Ye; Shiran Pasternak; Jenetta Owen; Thu Tran; Renata Slavíková; Lucie Tumova; Tereza Tlapakova; Eva Seifertova; Steven E. Scherer; Amy K. Sater
We present a genetic map for Xenopus tropicalis, consisting of 2886 Simple Sequence Length Polymorphism (SSLP) markers. Using a bioinformatics-based strategy, we identified unique SSLPs within the X. tropicalis genome. Scaffolds from X. tropicalis genome assembly 2.0 (JGI) were scanned for Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs); unique SSRs were then tested for amplification and polymorphisms using DNA from inbred Nigerian and Ivory Coast individuals. Thus identified, the SSLPs were genotyped against a mapping cross panel of DNA samples from 190 F2 individuals. Nearly 4000 SSLPs were genotyped, yielding a 2886-marker genetic map consisting of 10 major linkage groups between 73 and 132 cM in length, and 4 smaller linkage groups between 7 and 40 cM. The total effective size of the map is 1658 cM, and the average intermarker distance for each linkage group ranged from 0.27 to 0.75 cM. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) was carried out using probes for genes located on mapped scaffolds to assign linkage groups to chromosomes. Comparisons of this map with the X. tropicalis genome Assembly 4.1 (JGI) indicate that the map provides representation of a minimum of 66% of the X. tropicalis genome, incorporating 758 of the approximately 1300 scaffolds over 100,000 bp. The genetic map and SSLP marker database constitute an essential resource for genetic and genomic analyses in X. tropicalis.