Kevin C. Seavey

Continuous cellulose fiber-reinforced cellulose ester composites. II. Fiber surface modification and consolidation conditions

We prepared thermoplastic composite panels using solution impregnation of continuous lyocell (regenerated cellulose) fibers with a cellulose mixed-ester (cellulose acetate butyrate) matrix. We examined both fiber-matrix adhesion and melt consolidation in an effort to produce uniform panels having low void content and high mechanical strength. We characterized the effect of surface modification by acetylation on interfacial adhesion between the cellulose fiber and cellulose ester. Whereas wood fiber acetylation had previously been observed to result in significant strength gains in (discontinuous) wood fiber- reinforced composites (with the same matrix material), we did not observe a similar increase in strength in the continuous lyocell cellulose fiber system. This suggests that interfacial stress transfer is not a limitation in this system. This was confirmed by microscopic examination of the fracture surfaces, which indicated that fiber-matrix adhesion was considerable in the absence of fiber surface modification. We then systematically varied melt consolidation conditions (temperature, pressure and time) in an attempt to define optimum consolidation parameters by using design of experiments (DOE) methodology. We measured both interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) and composite void volume. We found that a minimal void content (ca. 2.83 vol. %) occurred at moderate temperatures (200°C), low consolidation pressures (81.4kPa) and long press times (13min). This was also where we maximized the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) at a value of 16.3MPa. This agrees with the regression model predictions. We observed the highest tensile properties at the ILSS and void-volume optimal-consolidation condition: a tensile modulus of 22GPa and tensile strength of 246MPa were obtained.

Continuous cellulose fiber-reinforced cellulose ester composites. I. Manufacturing options

Thermoplastic fiber composites were prepared using high modulus lyocell (regenerated cellulose) fibers for reinforcement and cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) as matrix. Choices were made with regard to fiber options (fabric versus continuous tow) and method of matrix deposition (prepregging by powder coating, film stacking, or solution impregnating). The results suggest that solution-prepregged fiber tow consolidated at circa 200°C produced unidirectional consolidated panels with tensile strength, modulus, and strain at failure values of approximately 250MPa,>20GPa and 3–4%, respectively, at fiber volume contents of approximately 60%. Modulus and ultimate tensile strength increased with fiber content, and modulus followed rule-of-mixture behavior. Adequate surface wetting and matrix-fiber adhesion were found with solution-prepregged composites. The unexpectedly low strain at failure (2 to <4%) was attributed to brittle matrix failure, and failure surfaces revealed that the fibers, for the most part, remained intact after the matrix had failed.

Continuous cellulose fiber-reinforced cellulose ester composites III. Commercial matrix and fiber options

Thermoplastic composites were prepared using two continuous regenerated cellulose fiber types, rayon and lyocell, and with several different commercially-available thermoplastic cellulose esters as matrix. Matrix options included cellulose acetate propionate (CAP), and several cellulose acetate butyrates (CAB) with different butyryl content, having different molecular weights and different methods of plasticization (adipates and very low molecular weight cellulose ester fractions). Choice of cellulose ester type was generally found to have little or no effect on mechanical properties. A significant effect, however, was revealed for fiber type. The lyocell-based composites thereby were reflective of the greater stiffness of a fiber produced from anisotropic solution state. Their modulus consistently exceeded 20GPa whereas the rayon fiber-based composites had moduli between 6 and 8GPa. The latter, however, possessed failure strains that were 3 to 4 times greater than their stiffer counterparts.