Kevin G. Smith
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kevin G. Smith.
Ecology and Society | 2014
Emma G. E. Brooks; Kevin G. Smith; Robert A. Holland; Guy M. Poppy; Felix Eigenbrod
Contingent valuation is one of the most commonly used methodologies utilized in ecosystem service valuation, thereby including a participatory approach to many such assessments. However, inclusion of nonmonetary stakeholder priorities is still uncommon in ecosystem service valuations and disaggregation of stakeholders is all but absent from practice. We look at four site-scale wetland ecosystem service valuations from Asia that used nonmonetary participatory stated preference techniques from a range of stakeholders, and compare these prioritizations to those obtained from the largest monetary assessments available globally, the Ecosystem Service Value Database (ESVD). Stakeholder assessment suggests very different priorities to those from monetary assessments, yet priorities between different sites remained broadly consistent. Disaggregation of beneficiaries in one site showed marked differences in values between stakeholders. Monetary values correlate positively with values held by government officers and business owners, but negatively with fishermen and women who are relying most directly on the wetland ecosystem services. Our findings emphasize that ecosystem service assessment, monetary or otherwise, must capture the diversity of values present across stakeholder groups to incorporate site scale management issues, particularly in relation to poverty alleviation.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Sammy De Grave; Kevin G. Smith; Nils A. Adeler; Dave J. Allen; Fernando Alvarez; Arthur Anker; Yixiong Cai; Savrina F. Carrizo; Werner Klotz; Fernando L. Mantelatto; Timothy J. Page; Jhy-Yun Shy; José Luis Villalobos; Daisy Wowor
We present the first global assessment of extinction risk for a major group of freshwater invertebrates, caridean shrimps. The risk of extinction for all 763 species was assessed using the IUCN Red List criteria that include geographic ranges, habitats, ecology and past and present threats. The Indo-Malayan region holds over half of global species diversity, with a peak in Indo-China and southern China. Shrimps primarily inhabit flowing water; however, a significant subterranean component is present, which is more threatened than the surface fauna. Two species are extinct with a further 10 possibly extinct, and almost one third of species are either threatened or Near Threatened (NT). Threats to freshwater shrimps include agricultural and urban pollution impact over two-thirds of threatened and NT species. Invasive species and climate change have the greatest overall impact of all threats (based on combined timing, scope and severity of threats).
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability | 2015
Stuart W. Bunting; Rajeshwar Mishra; Kevin G. Smith; Dhananjay Ray
Potential impacts of sustainable intensification and diversification options for agriculture-based livelihoods in Buxa, West Bengal, India, were evaluated using bioeconomic modelling. The baseline scenario involved multiple cropping seasons and a combination of crops on 0.9 ha land-holdings, livestock husbandry, and exploitation of common property resources. With capital costs of Rs.128,180 (US
Conservation Letters | 2011
William Darwall; Robert A. Holland; Kevin G. Smith; David J. Allen; Emma G. E. Brooks; Vineet Katarya; Caroline Pollock; Yichuan Shi; Viola Clausnitzer; Neil Cumberlidge; Annabelle Cuttelod; Klaas-Douwe B. Dijkstra; Mame D. Diop; Nieves García; Mary Seddon; Paul H. Skelton; Jos Snoeks; Denis Tweddle; Jean-Christophe Vié
2293) and annual operating costs of Rs.37,290 (US
The diversity of life in African freshwaters: underwater, under threat. An analysis of the status and distribution of freshwater species throughout mainland Africa. | 2011
William Darwall; Kevin G. Smith; David J. Allen; Robert A. Holland; Ian Harrison; Emma G. E. Brooks
667), the net benefit generated (excluding depreciation) was Rs.70,250 (US
Biological Conservation | 2012
Robert A. Holland; William Darwall; Kevin G. Smith
1257) annually. The pay-back period was 1.8 years, and the internal rate of return (IRR) was 53.7% over 10 years. Allocation of 20 days annually to fishing increased the net benefit to Rs.75,030 (US
Global Ecology and Conservation | 2015
David M. P. Jacoby; John M. Casselman; Vicki Crook; Mari-Beth DeLucia; Hyojin Ahn; Kenzo Kaifu; Tagried Kurwie; Pierre Sasal; Anders M.C. Silfvergrip; Kevin G. Smith; Kazuo Uchida; Alan M. Walker; Matthew Gollock
1342) and IRR to 56.5% with minimal added costs and risks. Adopting the system of rice intensification (SRI) for paddy cultivation on 0.35 ha increased the IRR to 61.1%, while reducing agrochemical and inorganic fertilizer use. Including small-scale fish culture in a 0.1 ha pond integrated in the irrigation scheme for SRI cultivation resulted in an IRR of 77.3% and reduced the pay-back period to 1.3 years. Some risks to biodiversity are apparent with each scenario; however, with appropriate safeguards, sustainable agricultural intensification and livelihoods diversification could bolster agrobiodiversity and social-ecological resilience of highland communities, while alleviating pressure on biodiversity.
International Zoo Yearbook | 2013
Savrina F. Carrizo; Kevin G. Smith; William Darwall
Aquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems | 2016
Diego Juffe-Bignoli; Ian Harrison; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Rebecca L. Flitcroft; Virgilio Hermoso; Harry Jonas; Anna Lukasiewicz; Michele Thieme; Eren Turak; Heather Bingham; James Dalton; William Darwall; Marine Deguignet; Nigel Dudley; Royal C. Gardner; Jonathan V. Higgins; Ritesh Kumar; Simon Linke; G. Randy Milton; Jamie Pittock; Kevin G. Smith; Arnout Van Soesbergen
Archive | 2014
Emma G. E. Brooks; Kevin G. Smith; Robert A. Holland; Guy M. Poppy; Felix Eigenbrod
Collaboration
Dive into the Kevin G. Smith's collaboration.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
View shared research outputsInternational Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
View shared research outputsInternational Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
View shared research outputsInternational Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
View shared research outputsInternational Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
View shared research outputs