Kevin J. McHale

Outcomes of Lisfranc Injuries in the National Football League

Objectives: Tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joint injuries commonly occur in American professional football competition; however, the career impact of these injuries is unknown. This study aims to define the time to return to competition for professional football players who sustained Lisfranc injuries and to quantify their effect on athletic performance. Methods: Data on National Football League (NFL) players who sustained a Lisfranc injury during a ten-year time period (2000-2010) were collected for analysis. Recorded demographic variables included age, experience, position, and operative vs. non-operative management. Outcomes data collected for offensive players (running backs, wide receivers, tight ends) included time to return to competition and yearly total yards and touchdowns. Outcomes data collected for defensive players (defensive linemen, linebackers, defensive backs) included time to return to competition and yearly total tackles, sacks, and interceptions. Offensive power ratings (OPR=total yards/10 + total touchdowns x6) and defensive power ratings (DPR=total tackles + total sacks x2 + total interceptions x2) were calculated for the injury season and for 3 seasons before and after the injury season. Offensive and defensive control groups consisted of all players of similar positions without an identified Lisfranc injury that competed in the 2005 season. Results: Lisfranc injuries were identified in 28 NFL athletes in the study period, including 11 offensive players and 17 defensive players. While 2 of 28 (7.1%) players never returned to the NFL, the remaining 26 (92.9%) athletes returned to competition at a median 11.1 (interquartile range: 10.3-12.5) months from time of injury and missed a median 8.5 (6.3-13.0) NFL regular season games. Players treated non-operatively were noted to have an earlier return to play with a median absence from play of 6.2 (1.9-10.7) months and 7.0 (4.5-8.0) games compared to those treated operatively who returned after a median 11.6 (10.7-12.6) months (p=0.02) and 10.0 (7.0-13.3) games missed (p=0.09). Analysis of pre- and post-injury athletic performance revealed no statistically significant changes following return to sport after Lisfranc injury. The magnitude of change in median OPR for 3 seasons prior to index season compared to 3 seasons after index season observed in the Lisfranc-injured offensive study group, -34.8 (-64.4-1.4), was greater than that observed in the offensive control group, -18.8 (-52.9-31.5); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.33). Similarly, the magnitude of change observed in the Lisfranc-injured defensive study group, -13.5 (-30.9-4.3), was greater than that observed in the defensive control group, -5.0 (-22.0-14.0); however, these differences also did not reach statistical significance (p=0.21). Conclusion: Greater than 90% of NFL athletes who sustained Lisfranc injuries returned to play in the NFL at a median 11.1 months from time of injury. Operative treatment was associated with a longer time to return; however, this is a potential surrogate for greater injury severity. Offensive and defensive players experienced a decrease in performance after return from injury that did not reach statistical significance when compared to their respective control groups over a similar time period.

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Lisfranc Injuries Identified at the National Football League Scouting Combine

Background: Lisfranc injuries are challenging to treat and may have a detrimental effect on athletic performance. Purpose: (1) Determine the epidemiological characteristics of Lisfranc injuries at the annual National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine, (2) define player positions at risk for these injuries, and (3) evaluate the impact that these injuries and radiographic findings have on NFL draft position and performance. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All players who sustained a Lisfranc injury prior to Combine evaluation between 2009 and 2015 were evaluated. The epidemiological characteristics, player positions affected, treatment methods, and number of missed collegiate games were recorded. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed via Combine radiograph findings, while NFL performance outcomes were assessed for all Lisfranc injuries (2009-2013) compared with matched controls in the first 2 years of play. Results: A total of 41 of 2162 (1.8%) Combine participants were identified with Lisfranc injuries, of whom 26 of 41 (63.4%) were managed operatively. Players who underwent surgery were more likely to go undrafted compared with players managed nonoperatively (38.5% vs 13.3%, operative vs nonoperative management, respectively; P = .04) and featured a worse NFL draft pick position (155.6 vs 109; P = .03). Lisfranc-injured players when compared with controls were noted to have worse outcomes in terms of NFL draft position (142 vs 111.3, Lisfranc-injured players vs controls, respectively; P = .04), NFL career length 2 years or longer (62.5% vs 69.6%; P = .23), and number of games played (16.9 vs 23.3; P = .001) and started (6.8 vs 10.5; P = .08) within the first 2 years of their NFL career. Radiographs demonstrated that 17 of 41 (41.5%) athletes had residual Lisfranc joint displacement greater than 2 mm compared with the contralateral foot. Lisfranc-injured athletes with greater than 2 mm residual displacement, when compared with matched controls, had worse draft position (156.9 vs 111.2 for Lisfranc-injured players vs controls, respectively; P = .009) and fewer games played (14.4 vs 23.3; P = .001) and started (3.1 vs 10.5; P = .03). Moreover, athletes with greater than 2 mm residual displacement featured worse outcomes across all assessed NFL variables versus athletes with residual displacement of 2 mm or less. Conclusion: Lisfranc injuries identified at the NFL Combine have an adverse effect on an NFL athlete’s draft status, draft position, and overall play during initial NFL seasons. In particular, residual displacement of the Lisfranc joint has a detrimental effect on the first 2 seasons of NFL play and may lead to long-lasting negative effects on the athlete’s career.

Epidemiology of Navicular Injury at the NFL Combine and Their Impact on an Athlete’s Prospective NFL Career

Background: Navicular injuries can result in persistent pain, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and diminished performance and function. Purpose: To determine the epidemiology of navicular fracture in players participating in the National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine and evaluate the impact of a navicular injury on the NFL draft position and NFL game play compared with matched controls. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data were collected on players who previously sustained a navicular injury and participated in the NFL Combine between 2009 and 2015. The epidemiology of navicular injury was determined through an evaluation of the number of injuries, surgeries, and collegiate games missed as well as the position played, a physical examination, the surgical technique, and imaging findings. Players with a previous navicular injury (2009-2013) were compared with a set of matched controls. NFL performance outcomes included the draft position, career length ≥2 years, and number of games played and started within the first 2 years. Results: Between 2009 and 2015, 14 of 2285 (0.6%) players were identified as having sustained a navicular injury. A total of 11 of 14 (79%) athletes had sustained an overt navicular fracture, while 3 of 14 (21%) were diagnosed with stress reactions on magnetic resonance imaging. Eight patients who sustained a navicular fracture underwent surgery. There was evidence of ipsilateral talonavicular arthritis in 75% of players with a navicular fracture versus only 60% in the uninjured foot (odds ratio, 1.3; P = .04). Fifty-seven percent of players with navicular injury (72.7% of fractures) were undrafted versus 30.9% in the control group (P = .001). Overall, 28.6% of players with navicular fracture played ≥2 years in the NFL compared with 69.6% in the control group (P = .02). Conclusion: A previous navicular fracture results in a greater risk of developing posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Although only a low prevalence of navicular injury in prospective NFL players was noted, players with these injuries had a greater probability of not being drafted and not competing in at least 2 NFL seasons when compared with matched controls without an injury history to the NFL Combine.

Epidemiology of Injuries Identified at the NFL Scouting Combine and Their Impact on Performance in the National Football League: Evaluation of 2203 Athletes From 2009 to 2015:

Background: At the annual National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine, the medical staff of each NFL franchise performs a comprehensive medical evaluation of all athletes potentially entering the NFL. Currently, little is known regarding the overall epidemiology of injuries identified at the combine and their impact on NFL performance. Purpose: To determine the epidemiology of injuries identified at the combine and their impact on initial NFL performance. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All previous musculoskeletal injuries identified at the NFL Combine from 2009 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Medical records and imaging reports were examined. Game statistics for the first 2 seasons of NFL play were obtained for all players from 2009 to 2013. Analysis of injury prevalence and overall impact on the draft status and position-specific performance metrics of each injury was performed and compared with a position-matched control group with no history of injury or surgery. Results: A total of 2203 athletes over 7 years were evaluated, including 1490 (67.6%) drafted athletes and 1040 (47.2%) who ultimately played at least 2 years in the NFL. The most common sites of injury were the ankle (1160, 52.7%), shoulder (1143, 51.9%), knee (1128, 51.2%), spine (785, 35.6%), and hand (739, 33.5%). Odds ratios (ORs) demonstrated that quarterbacks were most at risk of shoulder injury (OR, 2.78; P = .001), while running backs most commonly sustained ankle (OR, 1.39; P = .040) and shoulder injuries (OR, 1.55; P = .020) when compared with all other players. Ultimately, defensive players demonstrated a greater negative impact due to injury than offensive players, with multiple performance metrics significantly affected for each defensive position analyzed, whereas skilled offensive players (eg, quarterbacks, running backs) demonstrated only 1 metric significantly affected at each position. Conclusion: The most common sites of injury identified at the combine were (1) ankle, (2) shoulder, (3) knee, (4) spine, and (5) hand. Overall, performance in the NFL tended to worsen with injury history, with a direct correlation found between injury at a certain anatomic location and position of play. Defensive players tended to perform worse compared with offensive players if injury history was present.

The Epidemiology of Injuries Identified at the National Football League Scouting Combine and their Impact on Professional Sport Performance: 2203 athletes, 2009-2015

Objectives: Normal At the annual National Football League (NFL) Scouting Combine, the medical staff of each NFL franchise performs a comprehensive medical evaluation of all athletes potentially entering the NFL. Currently, little is known regarding the overall epidemiology of injuries identified at the Combine and their impact on NFL performance. The purpose of this study is to determine the epidemiology of injuries identified at the Combine and their impact on future NFL performance. Methods: All previous musculoskeletal injuries identified at the NFL combine (2009-2015) were retrospectively reviewed. Medical records and imaging reports were examined. Game statistics for the first two seasons of NFL play were obtained for all players from 2009 to 2013. Analysis of injury prevalence and overall impact on draft status and position-specific performance metrics of each injury was performed and compared versus a position-matched control group with no history of injury and surgery. Results: A total of 2,203 athletes over seven years were evaluated, including 1,490 (67.6%) drafted athletes and 1,040 (47.2%) who ultimately played at least two years in the NFL. The most common sites of injury were the ankle (1160, 52.7%), shoulder (1143, 51.9%), knee (1128, 51.2%), spine (785, 35.6%), and hand (739, 33.5%). Odds ratios (OR) demonstrated quarterbacks were most at risk of shoulder injury (OR 2.78, p=0.001) while running backs most commonly sustained ankle (OR 1.49, p=0.038) and shoulder injuries (OR 1.55, p=0.022). Ultimately, defensive players demonstrated a more negative impact than offensive players following injury with multiple performance metrics impacted for each defensive position analyzed whereas skilled offensive players (i.e. quarterbacks, running backs) demonstrated only one metric affected at each position. Conclusion: The most common sites of injury identified at the Combine were: (1) ankle, (2) shoulder, (3) knee, (4) spine, and (5) hand. Overall, performance in the NFL was significantly impacted by previous injuries. NFL performance was directly dependent on position played as well as anatomic location of injury. Defensive players were more negatively impacted than offensive players. Additional work is necessary to determine longer-term impact of these injuries on NFL career and post-NFL quality of life.

The Epidemiology of Lisfranc Injuries at the National Football League Combine and its Impact on an Athlete’s National Football League Career

Objectives: Lisfranc injuries may have a detrimental effect on athletic performance and an athlete’s career. Understanding the epidemiology of these injuries in collegiate football players and their impact on future performance may assist team physicians in counseling injured athletes and determining optimal treatment. The purposes of this study are to 1) determine the epidemiology of navicular fractures in players participating in the NFL Combine, 2) define positions and demographics that might be at higher risk for sustaining this injury, and 3) evaluate the radiographic healing and eventual impact the injury and radiographic findings has on Lisfranc injuries on NFL draft position and NFL game play compared to matched controls. Methods: All players who sustained a Lisfranc injury prior to Combine evaluation between 2009 and 2015 were evaluated. The prevalence, positions affected, treatment methods, and number of missed collegiate games were recorded. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed via Combine radiograph findings, while NFL performance outcomes were assessed for all Lisfranc injuries (2009-13) compared to matched controls in first two years of play. Results: A total of 41/2162 (1.8%) Combine participants were identified with Lisfranc injuries, of which 26/41 (63.4%) were managed operatively. When compared to players managed nonoperatively, those who underwent surgery were more likely to go undrafted (38.5% vs. 13.3%, p=0.04) and featured a worse NFL draft pick position (155.6 vs. 109, p=0.03). Lisfranc-injured players were noted to have a worse NFL draft position (142 vs. 111.3, p=0.04), NFL career length ≥2 years (62.5% vs. 69.6%, p=0.23) and fewer games played (16.9 vs. 23.3, p=0.001) and started (6.8 vs. 10.5, p=0.08) within the first two years of NFL career versus controls. Radiographs demonstrated 17/41 (41.5%) athletes with residual Lisfranc joint displacement >2mm compared to the contralateral foot. Lisfranc-injured athletes with >2mm residual displacement had lower draft position (111.2 vs. 156.9, p=0.009), and fewer games played (23.3 vs. 14.4, p=0.001) and started (10.5 vs. 3,1, p=0.03) versus matched controls. Moreover, athletes with >2mm residual displacement featured worse outcomes across all assessed NFL variables versus athletes with ≤2mm residual displacement. Conclusion: Lisfranc injuries identified at the NFL Combine have an adverse effect on an NFL athlete’s draft status, draft position and overall play during initial NFL seasons. In particular, residual displacement of the Lisfranc joint has a detrimental impact on the first two seasons of NFL play and may lead to long lasting negative effects on career.

Mini-Open Posterior Compartment Release for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome of the Leg

Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is a well-recognized cause of leg pain in endurance athletes. Surgical fasciotomy for posterior leg CECS historically has inferior clinical results compared with anterior and lateral compartment release. Poor surgical technique with inadequate release may contribute to less reliable outcomes. In this Technical Note with accompanying video, we describe a mini-open approach for posterior CECS of the leg.

The Epidemiology of Navicular Injuries at the NFL Combine

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: Navicular injuries are documented to have the potential for significant impairment of foot function. Regardless of treatment choice, these injuries can result in persistent pain, advanced osteoarthritis, and chronic dysfunction. A clearer understanding of their prevalence in collegiate athletes as well as their impact on their NFL career would help team physicians better counsel players and their teams, and perhaps also aid in defining optimal treatment. The purpose of this study was to 1) determine the epidemiology of navicular fractures in players participating in the NFL combine, 2) define positions that might be at higher risk for sustaining this injury, and 3) evaluate the impact of navicular injuries on NFL draft position and NFL game play compared to matched controls. Methods: Data was collected from the NFL combine website on all participating players who had sustained a navicular injury before entering the NFL between 2009 and 2015. Medical records, imaging, and treatments were reviewed on all individuals who met these criteria. The epidemiology of navicular injuries was determined by evaluating the number of injuries, surgeries, games missed, position played and draft position of each player. Available exam and imaging findings were reviewed for each player. Players from 2009 to 2013 with a navicular injury were compared to matched controls. Control groups consisted of players who missed less than 2 games in college, played the same position, and did not have a previous surgery. NFL performance outcomes were evaluated through analysis of draft position, career length ≥2 years, and number of games played and games started within their first 2 years. All NFL performance data was obtained from STATS.com. Odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression to assess the risk of sustaining a navicular injury by position. Two-sample, two-tailed T-tests were computed to assess games missed in college and draft position in players with a navicular injury and NFL career consisting of games played, and started in the NFL in the first 2 years of their career versus control players. Results: A total of 2285 foot players participated in the NFL combine between 2009 – 2015. There were 15 navicular injuries (14 players) with an incidence of 0.6% of NFL football players participating in the combine during this time frame. Defensive backs had a statistically significant increased odds ratio (Odds ratio = 3.0, p=0.03) of sustaining a navicular injury, however only 3 defensive backs had a navicular injury. Three players had nonunions or a refracture and 2 players required a revision surgery. Fifty-seven percent of players with navicular injuries (72.7% of fractures) were undrafted versus 30.9% in the control group (P< 0.001). Twenty-nine percent of players with navicular fractures played 2 years in the NFL compared to 69.6% in the control group (P< 0.01). Conclusion: While only a small percentage of players at the NFL combine had a navicular injury, there was a significant increase in percentage of players undrafted and a decreased percent of players who played two years in the NFL when compared to controls. This demonstrates the detrimental effect this injury may have to a player’s career.

The Epidemiology of Lisfranc Injuries at the NFL Combine

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: Lisfranc injuries can have detrimental consequences to an athlete’s career. If left inadequately treated, these injuries can result in persistent pain and lead to advanced osteoarthritis. Understanding the prevalence of these injuries in collegiate athletes and their effect on NFL draft position can help team physicians counsel future players and determine optimal treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiology of Lisfranc injuries in players participating in the NFL combine and to determine the positions that are at higher risk for sustaining these injuries. Methods: Data was collected from the NFL combine website on all players who participated in the combine and had sustained a Lisfranc injury before entering the NFL from 2009 to 2015. Medical records, imaging, and treatments were reviewed on players who were identified with these injuries. The epidemiology of Lisfranc injuries was determined by evaluating the number of injuries, surgeries, games missed, position played and draft position of each player. Odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression to assess the risk of sustaining each injury by position. Two-sample, two-tailed T-tests were computed to assess games missed and draft position in players with operative versus non-operative management. Players with a Lisfranc injury as well a second primary midfoot injury (n=3) were excluded from analysis. Results: Thirty-nine(1.7%) players at the NFL combine had an isolated Lisfranc injury during their collegiate football career. Of these players, 27(69.2%) required surgical intervention. The average number of collegiate football games missed for this injury was 3.0±5.0. The average number of games missed for players requiring operative fixation was statistically greater(4.2±5.7) than those in the non-operative group (0.3 ±0.9, p=0.02). The average NFL draft position was 141.7±69.4, and 13(33.3%) went undrafted. There was no statistical difference in the average draft position(p=0.84) and number of undrafted players(p=0.15) between the operative and non-operative groups. No position was found to be at increased risk for Lisfranc injury; however, as a whole, offensive players had a significantly increased risk(Odds ratio=2.7, p = 0.01) of having a Lisfranc injury when compared to all other players. Overall, 24(61.5%) of the players with a Lisfranc injury played on offense. Conclusion: The majority of players who reported a Lisfranc injury required operative intervention, and offensive players were at a higher risk for this injury. Lisfranc requiring operative management did not significantly change a player’s draft position or chance of being drafted.