Kevin J. Walker
Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kevin J. Walker.
Nature Communications | 2017
Hanno Seebens; Tim M. Blackburn; Ellie E. Dyer; Piero Genovesi; Philip E. Hulme; Jonathan M. Jeschke; Shyama Pagad; Petr Pyšek; Marten Winter; Margarita Arianoutsou; Sven Bacher; Bernd Blasius; Giuseppe Brundu; César Capinha; Laura Celesti-Grapow; Wayne Dawson; Stefan Dullinger; Nicol Fuentes; Heinke Jäger; John Kartesz; Marc Kenis; Holger Kreft; Ingolf Kühn; Bernd Lenzner; Andrew M. Liebhold; Alexander Mosena; Dietmar Moser; Misako Nishino; David A. Pearman; Jan Pergl
Although research on human-mediated exchanges of species has substantially intensified during the last centuries, we know surprisingly little about temporal dynamics of alien species accumulations across regions and taxa. Using a novel database of 45,813 first records of 16,926 established alien species, we show that the annual rate of first records worldwide has increased during the last 200 years, with 37% of all first records reported most recently (1970–2014). Inter-continental and inter-taxonomic variation can be largely attributed to the diaspora of European settlers in the nineteenth century and to the acceleration in trade in the twentieth century. For all taxonomic groups, the increase in numbers of alien species does not show any sign of saturation and most taxa even show increases in the rate of first records over time. This highlights that past efforts to mitigate invasions have not been effective enough to keep up with increasing globalization.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012
Chris D. Thomas; Phillipa K. Gillingham; Richard B. Bradbury; David B. Roy; Barbara J. Anderson; John M. Baxter; Nigel A. D. Bourn; Humphrey Q. P. Crick; Richard A. Findon; Richard Fox; Jenny A. Hodgson; Alison R. Holt; Michael D. Morecroft; Nina J. O’Hanlon; Tom H. Oliver; James W. Pearce-Higgins; Deborah A. Procter; Jeremy A. Thomas; Kevin J. Walker; Clive A. Walmsley; Robert J. Wilson; Jane K. Hill
The benefits of protected areas (PAs) for biodiversity have been questioned in the context of climate change because PAs are static, whereas the distributions of species are dynamic. Current PAs may, however, continue to be important if they provide suitable locations for species to colonize at their leading-edge range boundaries, thereby enabling spread into new regions. Here, we present an empirical assessment of the role of PAs as targets for colonization during recent range expansions. Records from intensive surveys revealed that seven bird and butterfly species have colonized PAs 4.2 (median) times more frequently than expected from the availability of PAs in the landscapes colonized. Records of an additional 256 invertebrate species with less-intensive surveys supported these findings and showed that 98% of species are disproportionately associated with PAs in newly colonized parts of their ranges. Although colonizing species favor PAs in general, species vary greatly in their reliance on PAs, reflecting differences in the dependence of individual species on particular habitats and other conditions that are available only in PAs. These findings highlight the importance of current PAs for facilitating range expansions and show that a small subset of the landscape receives a high proportion of colonizations by range-expanding species.
Global Change Biology | 2014
Helen E. Roy; Jodey Peyton; David C. Aldridge; Tristan Bantock; Tim M. Blackburn; Robert Britton; Paul F. Clark; Elizabeth Cook; Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz; Trevor Dines; Michael Dobson; Francois Edwards; Colin Harrower; Martin Harvey; Dan Minchin; David G. Noble; Dave Parrott; Michael J. O. Pocock; Christopher D. Preston; Sugoto Roy; Andrew Salisbury; Karsten Schönrogge; Jack Sewell; Richard Shaw; Paul Stebbing; Alan J. A. Stewart; Kevin J. Walker
Invasive alien species (IAS) are considered one of the greatest threats to biodiversity, particularly through their interactions with other drivers of change. Horizon scanning, the systematic examination of future potential threats and opportunities, leading to prioritization of IAS threats is seen as an essential component of IAS management. Our aim was to consider IAS that were likely to impact on native biodiversity but were not yet established in the wild in Great Britain. To achieve this, we developed an approach which coupled consensus methods (which have previously been used for collaboratively identifying priorities in other contexts) with rapid risk assessment. The process involved two distinct phases: Preliminary consultation with experts within five groups (plants, terrestrial invertebrates, freshwater invertebrates, vertebrates and marine species) to derive ranked lists of potential IAS. Consensus-building across expert groups to compile and rank the entire list of potential IAS. Five hundred and ninety-one species not native to Great Britain were considered. Ninety-three of these species were agreed to constitute at least a medium risk (based on score and consensus) with respect to them arriving, establishing and posing a threat to native biodiversity. The quagga mussel, Dreissena rostriformis bugensis, received maximum scores for risk of arrival, establishment and impact; following discussions the unanimous consensus was to rank it in the top position. A further 29 species were considered to constitute a high risk and were grouped according to their ranked risk. The remaining 63 species were considered as medium risk, and included in an unranked long list. The information collated through this novel extension of the consensus method for horizon scanning provides evidence for underpinning and prioritizing management both for the species and, perhaps more importantly, their pathways of arrival. Although our study focused on Great Britain, we suggest that the methods adopted are applicable globally.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Natasha de Vere; Tim C. G. Rich; Col R. Ford; Sarah A. Trinder; Charlotte Long; Christopher Moore; Danielle Satterthwaite; Helena Davies; Joel Allainguillaume; Sandra Ronca; Tatiana V. Tatarinova; Hannah Garbett; Kevin J. Walker; Mike J. Wilkinson
We present the first national DNA barcode resource that covers the native flowering plants and conifers for the nation of Wales (1143 species). Using the plant DNA barcode markers rbcL and matK, we have assembled 97.7% coverage for rbcL, 90.2% for matK, and a dual-locus barcode for 89.7% of the native Welsh flora. We have sampled multiple individuals for each species, resulting in 3304 rbcL and 2419 matK sequences. The majority of our samples (85%) are from DNA extracted from herbarium specimens. Recoverability of DNA barcodes is lower using herbarium specimens, compared to freshly collected material, mostly due to lower amplification success, but this is balanced by the increased efficiency of sampling species that have already been collected, identified, and verified by taxonomic experts. The effectiveness of the DNA barcodes for identification (level of discrimination) is assessed using four approaches: the presence of a barcode gap (using pairwise and multiple alignments), formation of monophyletic groups using Neighbour-Joining trees, and sequence similarity in BLASTn searches. These approaches yield similar results, providing relative discrimination levels of 69.4 to 74.9% of all species and 98.6 to 99.8% of genera using both markers. Species discrimination can be further improved using spatially explicit sampling. Mean species discrimination using barcode gap analysis (with a multiple alignment) is 81.6% within 10×10 km squares and 93.3% for 2×2 km squares. Our database of DNA barcodes for Welsh native flowering plants and conifers represents the most complete coverage of any national flora, and offers a valuable platform for a wide range of applications that require accurate species identification.
Biology Letters | 2012
Richard F. Pywell; Matthew S. Heard; Richard B. Bradbury; Shelley A. Hinsley; Marek Nowakowski; Kevin J. Walker; James M. Bullock
Agricultural intensification is a leading cause of global biodiversity loss, especially for threatened and near-threatened species. One widely implemented response is ‘wildlife-friendly farming’, involving the close integration of conservation and extensive farming practices within agricultural landscapes. However, the putative benefits from this controversial policy are currently either unknown or thought unlikely to extend to rare and declining species. Here, we show that new, evidence-based approaches to habitat creation on intensively managed farmland in England can achieve large increases in plant, bee and bird species. In particular, we found that habitat enhancement methods designed to provide the requirements of sensitive target biota consistently increased the richness and abundance of both rare and common species, with 10-fold to greater than 100-fold more rare species per sample area than generalized conventional conservation measures. Furthermore, targeting landscapes of high species richness amplified beneficial effects on the least mobile taxa: plants and bees. Our results provide the first unequivocal support for a national wildlife-friendly farming policy and suggest that this approach should be implemented much more extensively to address global biodiversity loss. However, to be effective, these conservation measures must be evidence-based, and developed using sound knowledge of the ecological requirements of key species.
Biological Conservation | 2002
Richard F. Pywell; Robin J. Pakeman; E.A Allchin; Nigel A. D. Bourn; E.A. Warman; Kevin J. Walker
Historical records show that large areas of lowland heath have been planted with coniferous woodland. Such sites will increasingly be targeted for heathland restoration in order to achieve the objectives set by current conservation policy. Therefore information on management to achieve effective restoration is a priority for research. In this study we examined the size, composition and distribution of the seed bank beneath conifer plantations of different ages at two important heathland sites in Britain. Changes in the physical and chemical properties of heathland soil under the plantations were also described. There were significant, exponential declines in the mean density of viable heather seeds with plantation age at both sites. However, relatively large seed banks survived for 40 years and under some circumstances for more than 70 years, suggesting that restoration on first rotation sites is unlikely to be seed limited. There were small, but significant differences in the soil nutrient status under the plantations compared to the adjacent heaths. It was concluded that the main constraint on heathland regeneration is likely to be the burial of the seed bank by a thick layer of conifer leaf litter. The mechanical removal of this layer has been shown to be practically feasible.
Biological Conservation | 2004
Kevin J. Walker; Richard F. Pywell; E.A. Warman; J.A. Fowbert; Anne Bhogal; B. J. Chambers
In order to reverse losses of lowland heathland substantial areas of former agricultural and forestry land are currently being targeted for restoration. In this study we assessed the success of heathland re-creation on 37 former arable, improved grassland and conifer plantation sites in southern England, UK. The similarity between the vegetation and seed banks of the re-creation sites and undisturbed heathland controls were examined in relation to former land use, soil properties and re-creation management. Former land use was found to be the most important determinant of re-creation success. On former arable, and to a lesser extent improved grassland, antecedent management had caused significant changes to seed bank and soil properties. As a result, regeneration of Calluna heath had been minimal, even on sites where appropriate management (e.g. cropping, addition of pH amendments) had been undertaken and heathland species introduced. In contrast, former plantation seed banks and soils were similar to heathland controls, and, as a result, rapid regeneration of Calluna heath had taken place. It was concluded that conifer removal provides the most practical and cost-effective means of re-creating Calluna heath on former heathland, although further research is required to assess the effect of litter removal and the rate at which heather seed banks decline following conversion to forestry. In contrast, re-creation on former agricultural sites will require effective management to reduce soil pH, fertility and the abundance of competitive species as well as the introduction of heathland propagules. Given limited resources a more realistic objective for these sites is likely to be reversion to an acid grassland or grass-heath.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Giovanni Rapacciuolo; David B. Roy; Simon Gillings; Richard Fox; Kevin J. Walker; Andy Purvis
Conservation planners often wish to predict how species distributions will change in response to environmental changes. Species distribution models (SDMs) are the primary tool for making such predictions. Many methods are widely used; however, they all make simplifying assumptions, and predictions can therefore be subject to high uncertainty. With global change well underway, field records of observed range shifts are increasingly being used for testing SDM transferability. We used an unprecedented distribution dataset documenting recent range changes of British vascular plants, birds, and butterflies to test whether correlative SDMs based on climate change provide useful approximations of potential distribution shifts. We modelled past species distributions from climate using nine single techniques and a consensus approach, and projected the geographical extent of these models to a more recent time period based on climate change; we then compared model predictions with recent observed distributions in order to estimate the temporal transferability and prediction accuracy of our models. We also evaluated the relative effect of methodological and taxonomic variation on the performance of SDMs. Models showed good transferability in time when assessed using widespread metrics of accuracy. However, models had low accuracy to predict where occupancy status changed between time periods, especially for declining species. Model performance varied greatly among species within major taxa, but there was also considerable variation among modelling frameworks. Past climatic associations of British species distributions retain a high explanatory power when transferred to recent time – due to their accuracy to predict large areas retained by species – but fail to capture relevant predictors of change. We strongly emphasize the need for caution when using SDMs to predict shifts in species distributions: high explanatory power on temporally-independent records – as assessed using widespread metrics – need not indicate a model’s ability to predict the future.
Biological Conservation | 2002
P. D. Carey; C.L. Barnett; P.D Greenslade; S. E. Hulmes; R.A Garbutt; E.A Warman; D Myhill; R. J. Scott; Simon M. Smart; S.J Manchester; J Robinson; Kevin J. Walker; D.C. Howard; L. G. Firbank
Abstract A survey of 451 Countryside Stewardship Scheme (CSS) agreements was carried out across England in 1998–1999 to characterise the ecological quality of the land. The land within the agreements was mapped using the UK Biodiversity Action Plan Broad and Priority Habitats and the vegetation of the agreements was sampled using random quadrats. By far the most widespread Broad Habitat was Improved Grassland, accounting for around 50% of all agreement land. Of this, the majority was semi-improved. Priority Habitats accounted for 15% of all agreement land (equivalent to around 18,500 ha). In addition to the 15%, there was also land within habitat mosaics containing one or more Priority Habitat. The analysis of vegetation revealed that 53% of all randomly-placed quadrats were categorised as Infertile Grassland and 24% as Fertile Grassland. Survey data were compared with results from the Countryside Survey 2000, a national assessment of vegetation undertaken in 1998. In the lowland areas of England, CSS land had a much higher proportion of grassland habitats and was much more likely to be typical of low fertility situations than the countryside as a whole. In the marginal uplands and uplands, CSS agreement land contained a greater proportion of grassland, but with a reduced proportion of important upland Broad Habitats, such as Dwarf Shrub Heath and Bog, although these do tend to be found more in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas. The differences between the CSS and the countryside as a whole clearly reflect the priorities of the CSS, especially the high proportion of grassland. The CSS has targeted Broad and Priority Habitats and in this respect has been successful.
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2009
Kevin J. Walker; Christopher D. Preston; Christopher R. Boon
We re-surveyed 107 vegetation plots recorded between 1949 and 1951 in Bedfordshire, England, UK to assess (1) the extent of habitat change, (2) quantify overall species trends, (3) relate trends to plant traits in order to identify the main causes of floristic change, and (4) assess the effectiveness of conservation protection. Many more species declined (66%) than increased (34%) indicating an overall decline in species diversity. Vegetation changes were greatest on arable, waste and neutral and acid grassland plots. The composition of woodlands, calcareous grasslands and marshes remained remarkably stable. The main causes were agricultural improvement and succession; other factors, including the spread of invasive alien species, only had very localised impacts. Shifts in plant traits were related to rarity, habitat specificity and nutrient availability with tall nutrient-demanding species increasing at the expense of small habitat specialists. These changes mirror national trends caused by the eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The increase of tall species may also reflect the cessation of woodland and grassland management. Greater regenerative abilities did not buffer species from extinction, and rather unexpectedly conservation designation had little effect in reducing habitat change in most cases. Effective conservation of habitat specialists will therefore depend on reduced nutrient enrichment of lowland habitats as well as more effective control of extrinsic factors on designated sites.