Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kevin P. Cross is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kevin P. Cross.


Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences | 2000

LeadScope: software for exploring large sets of screening data.

Gulsevin Roberts; Glenn J. Myatt; Wayne P. Johnson; Kevin P. Cross; Paul E. Blower

Modern approaches to drug discovery have dramatically increased the speed and quantity of compounds that are made and tested for potential potency. The task of collecting, organizing, and assimilating this information is a major bottleneck in the discovery of new drugs. We have developed LeadScope a novel, interactive computer program for visualizing, browsing, and interpreting chemical and biological screening data that can assist pharmaceutical scientists in finding promising drug candidates. The software organizes the chemical data by structural features familiar to medicinal chemists. Graphs are used to summarize the data, and structural classes are highlighted that are statistically correlated with biological activity.


Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences | 1992

Similarity searching on CAS Registry substances. 1. Global molecular property and generic atom triangle geometric searching

William Fisanick; Kevin P. Cross; Andrew Rusinko

Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) is exploring approaches for searching on 3D and related molecular property data for CAS Registry substances. This searching includes “fuzzy-match” similarity searching. As the first part of this effort, sample files have been created which contain 2D and 3D structure data and molecular property data. The 3D structure data are derived from the 3D coordinates that have been generated by the CONCORD program. The molecular property data such as partial atom charges, ionization potentials, and van der Waals volumes have been derived from the corresponding 2D and/or 3D data via computational chemistry programs. Experimental software is being developed to identify, analyze, and search various characteristics of 2D, 3D, and molecular property data for portions of the substance and/or the entire substance. This paper will discuss the general design of the test system and the analysis and searching of several data characteristics. Preliminary results indicate that fuzzy-match searching on global molecular property features appears to detect chemical or isosteric similarity and that fuzzy-match searching on generic atom triangle geometric features provides a significant amount of shape and size similarity.


Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology | 2016

Principles and procedures for implementation of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.

Alexander Amberg; Lisa Beilke; Joel P. Bercu; Dave Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Kevin P. Cross; Laura Custer; Krista L. Dobo; Eric Dowdy; Kevin A. Ford; Susanne Glowienke; Jacky Van Gompel; James Harvey; Catrin Hasselgren; Masamitsu Honma; Robert A. Jolly; Raymond Kemper; Michelle O. Kenyon; Naomi L. Kruhlak; Penny Leavitt; Scott Miller; Wolfgang Muster; John Nicolette; Andreja Plaper; Mark W. Powley; Donald P. Quigley; M. Vijayaraj Reddy; Hans-Peter Spirkl; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Andrew Teasdale

The ICH M7 guideline describes a consistent approach to identify, categorize, and control DNA reactive, mutagenic, impurities in pharmaceutical products to limit the potential carcinogenic risk related to such impurities. This paper outlines a series of principles and procedures to consider when generating (Q)SAR assessments aligned with the ICH M7 guideline to be included in a regulatory submission. In the absence of adequate experimental data, the results from two complementary (Q)SAR methodologies may be combined to support an initial hazard classification. This may be followed by an assessment of additional information that serves as the basis for an expert review to support or refute the predictions. This paper elucidates scenarios where additional expert knowledge may be beneficial, what such an expert review may contain, and how the results and accompanying considerations may be documented. Furthermore, the use of these principles and procedures to yield a consistent and robust (Q)SAR-based argument to support impurity qualification for regulatory purposes is described in this manuscript.


Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry | 2006

Decision Tree Methods in Pharmaceutical Research

Paul E. Blower; Kevin P. Cross

Decision trees are among the most popular of the new statistical learning methods being used in the pharmaceutical industry for predicting quantitative structure-activity relationships. This article reviews applications of decision trees in drug discovery research and extensions to the basic algorithm using hybrid or ensemble methods that improve prediction accuracy.


Current Drug Discovery Technologies | 2004

Systematic Analysis of Large Screening Sets in Drug Discovery

Paul E. Blower; Kevin P. Cross; Michael A. Fligner; Glenn J. Myatt; Joseph S. Verducci; Chihae Yang

Each year large pharmaceutical companies produce massive amounts of primary screening data for lead discovery. To make better use of the vast amount of information in pharmaceutical databases, companies have begun to scrutinize the lead generation stage to ensure that more and better qualified lead series enter the downstream optimization and development stages. This article describes computational techniques for end to end analysis of large drug discovery screening sets. The analysis proceeds in three stages: In stage 1 the initial screening set is filtered to remove compounds that are unsuitable as lead compounds. In stage 2 local structural neighborhoods around active compound classes are identified, including similar but inactive compounds. In stage 3 the structure-activity relationships within local structural neighborhoods are analyzed. These processes are illustrated by analyzing two large, publicly available databases.


Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology | 2016

Extending (Q)SARs to incorporate proprietary knowledge for regulatory purposes: A case study using aromatic amine mutagenicity

Ernst Ahlberg; Alexander Amberg; Lisa Beilke; David Bower; Kevin P. Cross; Laura Custer; Kevin A. Ford; Jacky Van Gompel; James Harvey; Masamitsu Honma; Robert A. Jolly; Elisabeth Joossens; Raymond Kemper; Michelle O. Kenyon; Naomi L. Kruhlak; Lara Kuhnke; Penny Leavitt; Russell T. Naven; Claire L. Neilan; Donald P. Quigley; Dana Shuey; Hans-Peter Spirkl; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Andrew Teasdale; Angela White; Joerg Wichard; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J. Myatt

Statistical-based and expert rule-based models built using public domain mutagenicity knowledge and data are routinely used for computational (Q)SAR assessments of pharmaceutical impurities in line with the approach recommended in the ICH M7 guideline. Knowledge from proprietary corporate mutagenicity databases could be used to increase the predictive performance for selected chemical classes as well as expand the applicability domain of these (Q)SAR models. This paper outlines a mechanism for sharing knowledge without the release of proprietary data. Primary aromatic amine mutagenicity was selected as a case study because this chemical class is often encountered in pharmaceutical impurity analysis and mutagenicity of aromatic amines is currently difficult to predict. As part of this analysis, a series of aromatic amine substructures were defined and the number of mutagenic and non-mutagenic examples for each chemical substructure calculated across a series of public and proprietary mutagenicity databases. This information was pooled across all sources to identify structural classes that activate or deactivate aromatic amine mutagenicity. This structure activity knowledge, in combination with newly released primary aromatic amine data, was incorporated into Leadscopes expert rule-based and statistical-based (Q)SAR models where increased predictive performance was demonstrated.


Tetrahedron Computer Methodology | 1990

Characteristics of computer-generated 3D and related molecular property data for CAS registry substances☆

William Fisanick; Kevin P. Cross; Andrew Rusinko

Abstract Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) is exploring approaches for searching on 3D and related molecular property data for CAS Registry substances. This searching includes “fuzzy-match” similarity searching. As the first part of this effort, the 3D coordinates have been generated by the CONCORD program for sample files of Registry substances, including a file of ring system, “framework” substances. In addition, molecular property data such as partial atom charges and ionization potentials have been derived from the corresponding 2D and/or 3D data via computational chemistry programs. Experimental software is being developed to identify, analyze and search various characteristics of 3D and molecular property data. These characteristics include 3D structural, flexibility, shape and molecular property features for portions of a substance and/or the entire substance. This paper will discuss some preliminary results of the analysis and searching of these data characteristics.


Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening | 2006

Comparison of Methods for Sequential Screening of Large Compound Sets

Paul E. Blower; Kevin P. Cross; Gabriel S. Eichler; Glenn J. Myatt; John N. Weinstein; Chihae Yang

Sequential screening is an iterative procedure that can greatly increase hit rates over random screening or non-iterative procedures. We studied the effects of three factors on enrichment rates: the method used to rank compounds, the molecular descriptor set and the selection of initial training set. The primary factor influencing recovery rates was the method of selecting the initial training set. Rates for recovering active compounds were substantially lower with the diverse training sets than they were with training sets selected by other methods. Because structure-activity information is incrementally enhanced in intermediate training sets, sequential screening provides significant improvement in the average rate of recovery of active compounds when compared with non-iterative selection procedures.


Mutagenesis | 2018

Improvement of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project

Masamitsu Honma; Airi Kitazawa; Alex Cayley; Richard V. Williams; Chris Barber; Thierry Hanser; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman K. Chakravarti; Glenn J. Myatt; Kevin P. Cross; Emilio Benfenati; Giuseppa Raitano; Ovanes Mekenyan; Petko I. Petkov; Cecilia Bossa; Romualdo Benigni; Chiara Laura Battistelli; Olga Tcheremenskaia; Christine DeMeo; Ulf Norinder; Hiromi Koga; Ciloy Jose; Nina Jeliazkova; Nikolay Kochev; Vesselina Paskaleva; Chihae Yang; Pankaj R Daga; Robert D. Clark; James F. Rathman

Abstract The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) M7 guideline allows the use of in silico approaches for predicting Ames mutagenicity for the initial assessment of impurities in pharmaceuticals. This is the first international guideline that addresses the use of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models in lieu of actual toxicological studies for human health assessment. Therefore, QSAR models for Ames mutagenicity now require higher predictive power for identifying mutagenic chemicals. To increase the predictive power of QSAR models, larger experimental datasets from reliable sources are required. The Division of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences (DGM/NIHS) of Japan recently established a unique proprietary Ames mutagenicity database containing 12140 new chemicals that have not been previously used for developing QSAR models. The DGM/NIHS provided this Ames database to QSAR vendors to validate and improve their QSAR tools. The Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project was initiated in 2014 with 12 QSAR vendors testing 17 QSAR tools against these compounds in three phases. We now present the final results. All tools were considerably improved by participation in this project. Most tools achieved >50% sensitivity (positive prediction among all Ames positives) and predictive power (accuracy) was as high as 80%, almost equivalent to the inter-laboratory reproducibility of Ames tests. To further increase the predictive power of QSAR tools, accumulation of additional Ames test data is required as well as re-evaluation of some previous Ames test results. Indeed, some Ames-positive or Ames-negative chemicals may have previously been incorrectly classified because of methodological weakness, resulting in false-positive or false-negative predictions by QSAR tools. These incorrect data hamper prediction and are a source of noise in the development of QSAR models. It is thus essential to establish a large benchmark database consisting only of well-validated Ames test results to build more accurate QSAR models.


Mutagenesis | 2018

Extending (Q)SARs to incorporate proprietary knowledge for regulatory purposes: is aromatic N-oxide a structural alert for predicting DNA-reactive mutagenicity?*

Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Joel P. Bercu; David Bower; Kevin P. Cross; Laura Custer; James Harvey; Catrin Hasselgren; Masamitsu Honma; Candice Johnson; Robert A. Jolly; Michelle O. Kenyon; Naomi L. Kruhlak; Penny Leavitt; Donald P. Quigley; Scott Miller; David Snodin; Lidiya Stavitskaya; Andrew Teasdale; Alejandra Trejo-Martin; Angela White; Joerg Wichard; Glenn J. Myatt

(Quantitative) structure-activity relationship or (Q)SAR predictions of DNA-reactive mutagenicity are important to support both the design of new chemicals and the assessment of impurities, degradants, metabolites, extractables and leachables, as well as existing chemicals. Aromatic N-oxides represent a class of compounds that are often considered alerting for mutagenicity yet the scientific rationale of this structural alert is not clear and has been questioned. Because aromatic N-oxide-containing compounds may be encountered as impurities, degradants and metabolites, it is important to accurately predict mutagenicity of this chemical class. This article analysed a series of publicly available aromatic N-oxide data in search of supporting information. The article also used a previously developed structure-activity relationship (SAR) fingerprint methodology where a series of aromatic N-oxide substructures was generated and matched against public and proprietary databases, including pharmaceutical data. An assessment of the number of mutagenic and non-mutagenic compounds matching each substructure across all sources was used to understand whether the general class or any specific subclasses appear to lead to mutagenicity. This analysis resulted in a downgrade of the general aromatic N-oxide alert. However, it was determined there were enough public and proprietary data to assign the quindioxin and related chemicals as well as benzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole 1-oxide subclasses as alerts. The overall results of this analysis were incorporated into Leadscopes expert-rule-based model to enhance its predictive accuracy.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kevin P. Cross's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chihae Yang

Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Masamitsu Honma

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Rusinko

Chemical Abstracts Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William Fisanick

Chemical Abstracts Service

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge