Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kevin W. King is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kevin W. King.


Journal of Environmental Quality | 2015

Phosphorus transport in agricultural subsurface drainage: a review.

Kevin W. King; Mark R. Williams; Merrin L. Macrae; Norman R. Fausey; Jane Frankenberger; Douglas R. Smith; Peter J. A. Kleinman; Larry C. Brown

Phosphorus (P) loss from agricultural fields and watersheds has been an important water quality issue for decades because of the critical role P plays in eutrophication. Historically, most research has focused on P losses by surface runoff and erosion because subsurface P losses were often deemed to be negligible. Perceptions of subsurface P transport, however, have evolved, and considerable work has been conducted to better understand the magnitude and importance of subsurface P transport and to identify practices and treatments that decrease subsurface P loads to surface waters. The objectives of this paper were (i) to critically review research on P transport in subsurface drainage, (ii) to determine factors that control P losses, and (iii) to identify gaps in the current scientific understanding of the role of subsurface drainage in P transport. Factors that affect subsurface P transport are discussed within the framework of intensively drained agricultural settings. These factors include soil characteristics (e.g., preferential flow, P sorption capacity, and redox conditions), drainage design (e.g., tile spacing, tile depth, and the installation of surface inlets), prevailing conditions and management (e.g., soil-test P levels, tillage, cropping system, and the source, rate, placement, and timing of P application), and hydrologic and climatic variables (e.g., baseflow, event flow, and seasonal differences). Structural, treatment, and management approaches to mitigate subsurface P transport-such as practices that disconnect flow pathways between surface soils and tile drains, drainage water management, in-stream or end-of-tile treatments, and ditch design and management-are also discussed. The review concludes by identifying gaps in the current understanding of P transport in subsurface drains and suggesting areas where future research is needed.


Journal of Environmental Quality | 2015

Surface Runoff and Tile Drainage Transport of Phosphorus in the Midwestern United States

Douglas R. Smith; Kevin W. King; Laura T. Johnson; Wendy Francesconi; Pete Richards; Dave Baker; Andrew N. Sharpley

The midwestern United States offers some of the most productive agricultural soils in the world. Given the cool humid climate, much of the region would not be able to support agriculture without subsurface (tile) drainage because high water tables may damage crops and prevent machinery usage in fields at critical times. Although drainage is designed to remove excess soil water as quickly as possible, it can also rapidly transport agrochemicals, including phosphorus (P). This paper illustrates the potential importance of tile drainage for P transport throughout the midwestern United States. Surface runoff and tile drainage from fields in the St. Joseph River Watershed in northeastern Indiana have been monitored since 2008. Although the traditional concept of tile drainage has been that it slowly removes soil matrix flow, peak tile discharge occurred at the same time as peak surface runoff, which demonstrates a strong surface connection through macropore flow. On our research fields, 49% of soluble P and 48% of total P losses occurred via tile discharge. Edge-of-field soluble P and total P areal loads often exceeded watershed-scale areal loadings from the Maumee River, the primary source of nutrients to the western basin of Lake Erie, where algal blooms have been a pervasive problem for the last 10 yr. As farmers, researchers, and policymakers search for treatments to reduce P loading to surface waters, the present work demonstrates that treating only surface runoff may not be sufficient to reach the goal of 41% reduction in P loading for the Lake Erie Basin.


Environmental Modelling and Software | 2009

Estimating storm discharge and water quality data uncertainty: A software tool for monitoring and modeling applications

R. D. Harmel; D.R. Smith; Kevin W. King; R.M. Slade

Uncertainty estimates corresponding to measured hydrologic and water quality data can contribute to improved monitoring design, decision-making, model application, and regulatory formulation. With these benefits in mind, the Data Uncertainty Estimation Tool for Hydrology and Water Quality (DUET-H/WQ) was developed from an existing uncertainty estimation framework for small watershed discharge, sediment, and N and P data. Both the software and its framework-basis utilize the root mean square error propagation methodology to provide uncertainty estimates instead of more rigorous approaches requiring detailed statistical information, which is rarely available. DUET-H/WQ lists published uncertainty information for data collection procedures to assist the user in assigning appropriate data-specific uncertainty estimates and then calculates the uncertainty for individual discharge, concentration, and load values. Results of DUET-H/WQ application in several studies indicated that substantial uncertainty can be contributed by each procedural category (discharge measurement, sample collection, sample preservation/storage, laboratory analysis, and data processing and management). For storm loads, the uncertainty was typically least for discharge (+/-7-23%), greater for sediment (+/-16-27%) and dissolved N and P (+/-14-31%) loads, and greater yet for total N and P (+/-18-36%). When these uncertainty estimates for individual values were aggregated within study periods (i.e. total discharge, average concentration, and total load), uncertainties followed the same pattern (Q < TSS < dissolved N and P < total N and P). This rigorous demonstration of uncertainty in discharge and water quality data illustrates the importance of uncertainty analysis and the need for appropriate tools. It is our hope that DUET-H/WQ contributes to making uncertainty estimation a routine data collection and reporting procedure and thus enhances environmental monitoring, modeling, and decision-making. Hydrologic and water quality data are too important for scientists to continue to ignore the inherent uncertainty.


Journal of Environmental Quality | 2015

Contributions of systematic tile drainage to watershed-scale phosphorus transport.

Kevin W. King; Mark R. Williams; Norman R. Fausey

Phosphorus (P) transport from agricultural fields continues to be a focal point for addressing harmful algal blooms and nuisance algae in freshwater systems throughout the world. In humid, poorly drained regions, attention has turned to P delivery through subsurface tile drainage. However, research on the contributions of tile drainage to watershed-scale P losses is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term P movement through tile drainage and its manifestation at the watershed outlet. Discharge data and associated P concentrations were collected for 8 yr (2005-2012) from six tile drains and from the watershed outlet of a headwater watershed within the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed in central Ohio. Results showed that tile drainage accounted for 47% of the discharge, 48% of the dissolved P, and 40% of the total P exported from the watershed. Average annual total P loss from the watershed was 0.98 kg ha, and annual total P loss from the six tile drains was 0.48 kg ha. Phosphorus loads in tile and watershed discharge tended to be greater in the winter, spring, and fall, whereas P concentrations were greatest in the summer. Over the 8-yr study, P transported in tile drains represented <2% of typical application rates in this watershed, but >90% of all measured concentrations exceeded recommended levels (0.03 mg L) for minimizing harmful algal blooms and nuisance algae. Thus, the results of this study show that in systematically tile-drained headwater watersheds, the amount of P delivered to surface waters via tile drains cannot be dismissed. Given the amount of P loss relative to typical application rates, development and implementation of best management practices (BMPs) must jointly consider economic and environmental benefits. Specifically, implementation of BMPs should focus on late fall, winter, and early spring seasons when most P loading occurs.


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2015

What is causing the harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie

Douglas R. Smith; Kevin W. King; Mark R. Williams

In the early to mid-1990s, Lake Erie was regarded as one of the great water quality success stories stemming from the Clean Water Act. Annual total phosphorus (TP) loading to the lake decreased from nearly 30,000 t (33,069 tn) in the late-1960s to less than 11,000 t (12,125 tn) by 1990 (Richards and Baker 1993). These reductions in TP loading were achieved through permitting of point sources and through conservation efforts to decrease sediment loss from agricultural fields. While TP loads to Lake Erie have remained relatively stable since the mid-1990s, soluble phosphorus (SP) loads have been steadily increasing. The harmful and nuisance algal blooms (HNABs) that paralyzed regional tourism and fishing industries decades ago have reappeared and have been linked with the amount of SP transported to the lake (Davis et al. 2009). In August of 2014, HNABs in Lake Erie became a national headline when microcystin toxin produced by cyanobacteria was discovered and approximately 400,000 residents in Ohio were left without drinking water. There has been much debate among researchers, conservationists, and industry representatives on the specific causes of the increased HNABs in Lake Erie. Our objective here is to document many of the recently suggested theories that…


Applied Engineering in Agriculture | 2003

Automated storm water sampling on small watersheds

R. D. Harmel; Kevin W. King; R.M. Slade

Few guidelines are currently available to assist in designing appropriate automated storm water sampling strategies for small watersheds. Therefore, guidance is needed to develop strategies that achieve an appropriate balance between accurate characterization of storm water quality and loads and limitations of budget, equipment, and personnel. In this article, we explore the important sampling strategy components (minimum flow threshold, sampling interval, and discrete versus composite sampling) and project -specific considerations (sampling goal, sampling and analysis resources, and watershed characteristics) based on personal experiences and pertinent field and analytical studies. These components and considerations are important in achieving the balance between sampling goals and limitations because they determine how and when samples are taken and the potential sampling error. Several general recommendations are made, including: setting low minimum flow thresholds, using flow-interval or variable time-interval sampling, and using composite sampling to limit the number of samples collected. Guidelines are presented to aid in selection of an appropriate sampling strategy based on user’s project -specific considerations. Our experiences suggest these recommendations should allow implementation of a successful sampling strategy for most small watershed sampling projects with common sampling goals.


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2010

Drainage water management for water quality protection

Jeffrey S. Strock; Peter J. A. Kleinman; Kevin W. King; Jorge A. Delgado

L and drainage has been central to the development of North America since colonial times, with the first organized drainage efforts occurring as early as the 1600s (Evans et al. 1996). Drainage has been encouraged to improve public highways, reduce public health risks, promote increased crop yield and reduced yield variability, reduce surface runoff and erosion, and increase land value. Agricultural drainage includes artificial subsurface drainage and surface drainage. Most agricultural producers improve the drainage on their land for better trafficability, to enhance field conditions, to facilitate timely planting and harvesting operations, and to help decrease crop damage from saturated soil and standing water during the growing season. Agricultural drainage improvement also decreases year-to-year variability in crop yield, ensuring consistent production. Increasingly, agricultural drainage is being targeted as a conduit for pollution, particularly nutrient pollution (Needelman et al. 2007). Considerable resistance exists in some regions to the expansion of drainage systems despite their importance to food production, with up to 50% of the cropland in some states under artificial drainage. However, because drainage ditches and subsurface drainage systems convert diffuse flows from the landscape into concentrated flows, they also provide opportunities for precision conservation, the targeting of specific practices to…


Journal of Soil and Water Conservation | 2008

Validation of paired watersheds for assessing conservation practices in the Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio

Kevin W. King; Peter C. Smiley; B.J. Baker; Norman R. Fausey

Impacts of watershed scale conservation practice adoption on sediment, nutrient, and pesticide losses and adjacent stream biota are not well understood. The objective of this study was to examine the suitability of selected paired watersheds to quantify hydrology, chemical, and ecology effects of conservation practice implementation for channelized and unchannelized watersheds in Upper Big Walnut Creek watershed, Ohio. Channelized watersheds were more similar in watershed characteristics than the unchannelized watersheds. One hydrology, eight water chemistry, and five fish community response variables were measured. Most response variables in both watershed pairs were moderately correlated (r > 0.6), but the minimum percent change required to detect a response difference was greater for the unchannelized watersheds. Detectable temporal trends in the difference between like response variables for the channelized and unchannelized watershed pairs were minimal. These results validate the paired watershed design and suggest that conservation practice induced changes in hydrology, water quality, and fish communities can be quantified.


Journal of Environmental Quality | 2015

Applicability of models to predict phosphorus losses in drained fields: a review.

David E. Radcliffe; D. Keith Reid; Karin Blombäck; Carl H. Bolster; Amy S. Collick; Zachary M. Easton; Wendy Francesconi; Daniel R. Fuka; Holger Johnsson; Kevin W. King; Mats Larsbo; Mohamed A. Youssef; Alisha S. Mulkey; Nathan O. Nelson; Kristian Persson; John J. Ramirez-Avila; Frank Schmieder; Douglas R. Smith

Most phosphorus (P) modeling studies of water quality have focused on surface runoff loses. However, a growing number of experimental studies have shown that P losses can occur in drainage water from artificially drained fields. In this review, we assess the applicability of nine models to predict this type of P loss. A model of P movement in artificially drained systems will likely need to account for the partitioning of water and P into runoff, macropore flow, and matrix flow. Within the soil profile, sorption and desorption of dissolved P and filtering of particulate P will be important. Eight models are reviewed (ADAPT, APEX, DRAINMOD, HSPF, HYDRUS, ICECREAMDB, PLEASE, and SWAT) along with P Indexes. Few of the models are designed to address P loss in drainage waters. Although the SWAT model has been used extensively for modeling P loss in runoff and includes tile drain flow, P losses are not simulated in tile drain flow. ADAPT, HSPF, and most P Indexes do not simulate flow to tiles or drains. DRAINMOD simulates drains but does not simulate P. The ICECREAMDB model from Sweden is an exception in that it is designed specifically for P losses in drainage water. This model seems to be a promising, parsimonious approach in simulating critical processes, but it needs to be tested. Field experiments using a nested, paired research design are needed to improve P models for artificially drained fields. Regardless of the model used, it is imperative that uncertainty in model predictions be assessed.


Science of The Total Environment | 2013

Downstream approaches to phosphorus management in agricultural landscapes: Regional applicability and use

Robert Kröger; E. J. Dunne; Jeff M. Novak; Kevin W. King; E. McLellan; D. R. Smith; Jeffrey S. Strock; K. Boomer; Mark D. Tomer; Gregory B. Noe

This review provides a critical overview of conservation practices that are aimed at improving water quality by retaining phosphorus (P) downstream of runoff genesis. The review is structured around specific downstream practices that are prevalent in various parts of the United States. Specific practices that we discuss include the use of controlled drainage, chemical treatment of waters and soils, receiving ditch management, and wetlands. The review also focuses on the specific hydrology and biogeochemistry associated with each of those practices. The practices are structured sequentially along flowpaths as you move through the landscape, from the edge-of-field, to adjacent aquatic systems, and ultimately to downstream P retention. Often practices are region specific based on geology, cropping practices, and specific P related problems and thus require a right practice, and right place mentality to management. Each practice has fundamental P transport and retention processes by systems that can be optimized by management with the goal of reducing downstream P loading after P has left agricultural fields. The management of P requires a system-wide assessment of the stability of P in different biogeochemical forms (particulate vs. dissolved, organic vs. inorganic), in different storage pools (soil, sediment, streams etc.), and under varying biogeochemical and hydrological conditions that act to convert P from one form to another and promote its retention in or transport out of different landscape components. There is significant potential of hierarchically placing practices in the agricultural landscape and enhancing the associated P mitigation. But an understanding is needed of short- and long-term P retention mechanisms within a certain practice and incorporating maintenance schedules if necessary to improve P retention times and minimize exceeding retention capacity.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kevin W. King's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark R. Williams

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Norman R. Fausey

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter C. Smiley

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas R. Smith

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. Daren Harmel

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. D. Harmel

Agricultural Research Service

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge