Khalid Al-Kofahi

Fast tagging of medical terms in legal text

Medical terms occur across a wide variety of legal, medical, and news corpora. Documents containing these terms are of particular interest to legal professionals operating in such fields as medical malpractice, personal injury, and product liability. This paper describes a novel method of tagging medical terms in legal, medical, and news text that is very fast and also has high recall and precision. To date, most research in medical term spotting has been confined to medical text and has approached the problem by extracting noun phrases from sentences and mapping them to a list of medical concepts via a fuzzy lookup. The medical term tagging described in this paper relies on a fast finite state machine that finds within sentences the longest contiguous sets of words associated with medical terms in a medical term authority file, converts word sets into medical term hash keys, and looks up medical concept ids associated with the hash keys. Additionally our system relies on a probabilistic term classifier that uses local context to disambiguate terms being used in a medical sense from terms being used in a non-medical sense. Our method is two orders of magnitude faster than an approach based on noun phrase extraction and has better precision and recall for terms pertaining to injuries, diseases, drugs, medical procedures, and medical devices. The methods presented here have been implemented and are the core engines for a Thomson West product called the Medical Litigator. Thus far, the Medical Litigator has processed over 100 million documents and generated over 165 million tags representing approximately 164,000 unique medical concepts. The resulting system is very fast and posted a recall from 0.79 to 0.93 and precision between 0.94 and 0.97, depending on the document type.

Anaphora resolution in the extraction of treatment history language from court opinions by partial parsing

This paper describes an information extraction system that identifies and analyzes statements in court opinions regarding the value of cited cases as precedents. The system employs partial parsing techniques in conjunction with a semantic grammar to identify the language associated with such rulings. The most novel aspect of the system lies in its anaphora resolution module that combines syntactic, semantic, and domain-specific inference rules with local discourse information to link such language to case references.