Khalil Sultanem

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the UCSF experience

PURPOSE To update our experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between April 1995 and October 2000, 67 patients underwent IMRT for NPC at the University of California-San Francisco (UCSF). There were 20 females and 47 males, with a mean age of 49 (range 17-82). The disease was Stage I in 8 (12%), Stage II in 12 (18%), Stage III in 22 (33%), and Stage IV in 25 (37%). IMRT was delivered using three different techniques: 1) manually cut partial transmission blocks, 2) computer-controlled auto-sequencing segmental multileaf collimator (SMLC), and 3) sequential tomotherapy using a dynamic multivane intensity modulating collimator (MIMiC). Fifty patients received concomitant cisplatinum and adjuvant cisplatinum and 5-FU chemotherapy according to the Intergroup 0099 trial. Twenty-six patients had fractionated high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy boost and 1 patient had gamma knife radiosurgery boost after external beam radiotherapy. The prescribed dose was 65-70 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and positive neck nodes, 60 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), 50-60 Gy to the clinically negative neck, and 5-7 Gy in 2 fractions for the intracavitary brachytherapy boost. Acute and late normal tissue effects were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. The local progression-free, local-regional progression-free, distant metastasis-free rates, and the overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 31 months (range 7 to 72 months), there has been one local recurrence at the primary site. One patient failed in the neck. Seventeen patients developed distant metastases; 5 of these patients have died. The 4-year estimates of local progression-free, local-regional progression-free, and distant metastases-free rates were 97%, 98%, and 66% respectively. The 4-year estimate of overall survival was 88%. The worst acute toxicity documented was as follows: Grade 1 or 2 in 51 patients, Grade 3 in 15 patients, and Grade 4 in 1 patient. The worst late toxicity was Grade 1 in 20 patients, Grade 2 in 15 patients, Grade 3 in 7 patients, and Grade 4 in 1 patient. At 3 months after IMRT, 64% of the patients had Grade 2, 28% had Grade 1, and 8% had Grade 0 xerostomia. Xerostomia decreased with time. At 24 months, only one of the 41 evaluable patients had Grade 2, 32% had Grade 1, and 66% had Grade 0 or no xerostomia. Analysis of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) showed that the average maximum, mean, and minimum dose delivered were 79.3 Gy, 74.5 Gy, and 49.4 Gy to the GTV, and 78.9 Gy, 68.7 Gy, and 36.8 Gy to the CTV. An average of only 3% of the GTV and 3% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. CONCLUSION Excellent local-regional control for NPC was achieved with IMRT. IMRT provided excellent tumor target coverage and allowed the delivery of a high dose to the target with significant sparing of the salivary glands and other nearby critical normal tissues.

Three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the University of California–San Francisco experience

PURPOSE To review our experience with three-dimensional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed the records of 35 patients who underwent 3D IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma at the University of California-San Francisco between April 1995 and March 1998. According to the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification, 4 (12%) patients had Stage I disease, 6 (17%) had Stage II, 11 (32%) had Stage III, and 14 (40%) had Stage IV disease. IMRT of the primary tumor was delivered using one of the following three techniques: (1) manually cut partial transmission blocks, (2) computer-controlled autosequencing static multileaf collimator (MLC), and (3) Peacock system using a dynamic multivane intensity-modulating collimator (MIMiC). A forward 3D treatment-planning system was used for the first two methods, and an inverse treatment planning system was used for the third method. The neck was irradiated with a conventional technique using lateral opposed fields to the upper neck and an anterior field to the lower neck and supraclavicular fossae. The prescribed dose was 65-70 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and positive neck nodes, 60 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), and 50-60 Gy to the clinically negative neck. Eleven (32%) patients had fractionated high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy boost to the primary tumor 1-2 weeks following external beam radiotherapy. Thirty-two (91%) patients also received cisplatin during, and cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil after, radiotherapy. Acute and late normal tissue effects were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Local-regional progression-free, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, 5-49 months), the local-regional progression-free rate was 100%. The 4-year overall survival was 94%, and the distant metastasis-free rate was 57%. The worst acute toxicity was Grade 2 in 16 (46%) patients, Grade 3 in 18 (51%) patients and Grade 4 in 1 (3%) patient. The worst late toxicity was Grade 1 in 15 (43%), Grade 2 in 13 (37%), and Grade 3 in 5 (14%) patients. Only 1 patient had a transient Grade 4 soft-tissue necrosis. At 24 months after treatment, 50% of the evaluated patients had Grade 0, 50% had Grade 1, and none had Grade 2 xerostomia. Analysis of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) showed that the average maximum, mean, and minimum dose delivered were 79.5 Gy, 75.8 Gy, and 56.5 Gy to the GTV, and 78.9 Gy, 71.2 Gy, and 45.4 Gy to the CTV, respectively. An average of only 3% of the GTV and 2% of the CTV received less than 95% of the prescribed dose. The average dose to 5% of the brain stem, optic chiasm, and right and left optic nerves was 48.3 Gy, 23.9 Gy, 15.0 Gy, and 14.9 Gy, respectively. The average dose to 1 cc of the cervical spinal cord was 41.7 Gy. The doses delivered were within the tolerance of these critical normal structures. The average dose to 50% of the right and left parotids, pituitary, right and left T-M joints, and ears was 43. 2 Gy, 41.0 Gy, 46.3 Gy, 60.5 Gy, 58.3 Gy, 52.0 Gy, and 52.2 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION 3D intensity-modulated radiotherapy provided improved target volume coverage and increased dose to the gross tumor with significant sparing of the salivary glands and other critical normal structures. Local-regional control rate with combined IMRT and chemotherapy was excellent, although distant metastasis remained unabated.

THE USE OF HYPOFRACTIONATED INTENSITY-MODULATED IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL

PURPOSE Despite major advances in treatment modalities, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains poor. Exploring hypofractionated regimens to replace the standard 6-week radiotherapy schedule is an attractive strategy as an attempt to prevent accelerated tumor cell repopulation. There is equally interest in dose escalation to the gross tumor volume where the majority of failures occur. We report our preliminary results using hypofractionated intensity-modulated accelerated radiotherapy regimen in the treatment of patients with GBM. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between July 1998 and December 2001, 25 patients with histologically proven diagnosis of GBM, Karnofsky performance status > or =60, and a postoperative tumor volume < or =110 cm3 were treated with a hypofractionated accelerated course of radiotherapy. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the contrast-enhancing lesion on the postoperative MRI T1-weighted images with the latter fused with computed tomography images for treatment planning. The planning target volume was defined as GTV + 1.5-cm margin. Using forward-planning intensity modulation (step-and-shoot technique), 60 Gy in 20 daily fractions of 3 Gy each were given to the GTV, whereas the planning target volume received a minimum of 40 Gy in 20 fractions of 2 Gy each at its periphery. Treatments were delivered over a 4-week period using 5 daily fractions per week. Dose was prescribed at the isocenter (ICRU point). Three beam angles were used in all of the cases. RESULTS Treatments were well tolerated. Acute toxicity was limited to increased brain edema during radiotherapy in 2 patients who were on tapering doses of corticosteroids. This was corrected by increasing the steroid dose. At a median follow-up of 8.8 months, no late toxicity was observed. One patient experienced visual loss at 9 months after completion of treatment. MRI suggested nonspecific changes to the optic chiasm. On review of the treatment plan, the total dose to the optic chiasm was confirmed to be equal to or less than 40 Gy in 20 fractions. When Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis was used, 10 patients were class III-IV, and 15 patients were class V-VI. To date, 21 patients have had clinical and/or radiologic evidence of disease progression, and 16 patients have died. The median survival was 9.5 months (range: 2.8-22.9 months), the 1-year survival rate was 40%, and the median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (range: 1.9-12.8 months). CONCLUSION This hypofractionated accelerated irradiation schedule using forward planning (step-and-shoot) hypofractionated, intensity-modulated accelerated radiotherapy is feasible and seems to be a safe treatment for patients with GBM. A 2-week reduction in the treatment time may be of valuable benefit for this group of patients. However, despite this accelerated regimen, no survival advantage has been observed.

Phase III randomized study: Oral pilocarpine versus submandibular salivary gland transfer protocol for the management of radiation-induced xerostomia

Xerostomia is a serious morbidity of radiation treatment in head and neck cancer.

METASTATIC CARCINOMA TO THE CERVICAL NODES FROM AN UNKNOWN HEAD AND NECK PRIMARY SITE: IS THERE A NEED FOR NECK DISSECTION?

The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes and patterns of failure in patients with metastatic carcinoma to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown head and neck primary origin, who were treated curatively with radiotherapy, with or without neck dissection.

COMPARISON OF REPOSITIONING ACCURACY OF TWO COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE IMMOBILIZATION SYSTEMS FOR TREATMENT OF HEAD-AND-NECK TUMORS USING SIMULATION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING

PURPOSE To compare the setup accuracy, comfort level, and setup time of two immobilization systems used in head-and-neck radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between February 2004 and January 2005, 21 patients undergoing radiotherapy for head-and-neck tumors were assigned to one of two immobilization devices: a standard thermoplastic head-and-shoulder mask fixed to a carbon fiber base (Type S) or a thermoplastic head mask fixed to the Accufix cantilever board equipped with the shoulder depression system. All patients underwent planning computed tomography (CT) followed by repeated control CT under simulation conditions during the course of therapy. The CT images were subsequently co-registered and setup accuracy was examined by recording displacement in the three cartesian planes at six anatomic landmarks and calculating the three-dimensional vector errors. In addition, the setup time and comfort of the two systems were compared. RESULTS A total of 64 CT data sets were analyzed. No difference was found in the cartesian total displacement errors or total vector displacement errors between the two populations at any landmark considered. A trend was noted toward a smaller mean systemic error for the upper landmarks favoring the Accufix system. No difference was noted in the setup time or comfort level between the two systems. CONCLUSION No significant difference in the three-dimensional setup accuracy was identified between the two immobilization systems compared. The data from this study reassure us that our technique provides accurate patient immobilization, allowing us to limit our planning target volume to <4 mm when treating head-and-neck tumors.

Para-aortic irradiation only appears to be adequate treatment for patients with stage I seminoma of the testis

PURPOSE Results of treatment of patients with Stage I seminoma with orchiectomy and radiotherapy are excellent. Even without adjuvant radiotherapy, the relapse rate is only 15-20%; most of the patients fail in the retroperitoneum, with rare failures observed in the pelvis (0.5-2%). In 1991, we began a prospective study evaluating para-aortic lymph node radiation as the only adjuvant treatment for such patients. This paper reports our preliminary results. MATERIALS & METHODS Between March 1991 and January 1996, 35 patients with histologically proven Stage I seminoma were entered in the study. Median age was 37.9 years (range: 27-65 years). A radical inguinal orchiectomy was performed in all patients. Staging workup consisted of a chest X-ray; B-HCG, alpha-fetoprotein, and CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis in all patients. Lymphangiogram was done in 23 (66%) of 35 patients for further evaluation of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Radiotherapy consisted of treatment to the para-aortic region only. Parallel opposed fields extending from the top of T11 to the bottom of L5 were used. The median field size was 8.7 x 21.8 cm (range: 7-11 x 18-26 cm). The median total dose, prescribed at midpoint, was 25 Gy given in 15 daily fractions of 1.66 Gy. Follow-up was performed every 3 months for the first year, every 4-5 months for the second and third years, and every 6 months thereafter. Chest X-ray, tumor markers, and CT scan of the pelvis were performed routinely as part of the follow-up investigation. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 39.7 months (range: 16-74 months), 34 (97.1%) of 35 patients are alive with no evidence of disease for an overall actuarial survival rate of 97.1% at 5 years and a cause-specific actuarial survival rate of 100%. Treatment morbidity was limited to Grade I-II acute side effects in 18 (51.4%) of 35 patients. No late side effects were seen. CONCLUSION From our preliminary results, adjuvant radiation treatment limited to the para-aortic lymph node region, without ipsilateral pelvic irradiation, appears to be adequate treatment for Stage I seminoma. Such an approach in our patients resulted in minimal toxicity and excellent disease-free survival.

Descriptive Study of Patients Receiving Excision and Radiotherapy for Keloids

PURPOSE To review and describe our institutions outcomes in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy after keloid excision. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a retrospective study. Patients who received radiotherapy between July 1994 and January 2004 after keloid excision were identified. A questionnaire was mailed regarding sociodemographic factors, early and late radiation toxicities, the need for additional therapy, and satisfaction level. All patients had received a total of 15 Gy in three daily 5-Gy fractions. Treatment started within 24 h after surgery and was delivered on a Siemens orthovoltage machine. The data were analyzed using the STATA statistical package. RESULTS A total of 234 patients were approached. The response rate was 41%, and 75% were female. The mean age was 36.5 years (range, 16-69 years). The patients were mainly of European (53.1%) or African (19.8%) descent. For early toxicity outcomes, 54.2% reported skin redness and 24% reported skin peeling. For late toxicity outcomes, 27% reported telangiectasia and 62% reported permanent skin color changes. No association was found with gender, skin color, or age for the late toxicity outcomes. Of the patients responding, 14.6% required adjuvant treatment. On a visual scale of 1-10 for the satisfaction level, 60% reported a satisfaction level of > or =8. Telangiectasia was the most significant predictor of a low satisfaction level (< or =3, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION The results of our study have shown that orthovoltage-based radiotherapy after surgical excision for keloids is a good method for the prevention of relapse. It is well tolerated, causes little toxicity, and leads to a high patient satisfaction level.

Radiomics strategies for risk assessment of tumour failure in head-and-neck cancer

Quantitative extraction of high-dimensional mineable data from medical images is a process known as radiomics. Radiomics is foreseen as an essential prognostic tool for cancer risk assessment and the quantification of intratumoural heterogeneity. In this work, 1615 radiomic features (quantifying tumour image intensity, shape, texture) extracted from pre-treatment FDG-PET and CT images of 300 patients from four different cohorts were analyzed for the risk assessment of locoregional recurrences (LR) and distant metastases (DM) in head-and-neck cancer. Prediction models combining radiomic and clinical variables were constructed via random forests and imbalance-adjustment strategies using two of the four cohorts. Independent validation of the prediction and prognostic performance of the models was carried out on the other two cohorts (LR: AUC = 0.69 and CI = 0.67; DM: AUC = 0.86 and CI = 0.88). Furthermore, the results obtained via Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the potential of radiomics for assessing the risk of specific tumour outcomes using multiple stratification groups. This could have important clinical impact, notably by allowing for a better personalization of chemo-radiation treatments for head-and-neck cancer patients from different risk groups.

Dosimetric evolution of the breast electron boost target using 3D ultrasound imaging.

PURPOSE To investigate the effect of treatment planning, patient setup, and interfraction motion errors on the delivered dose for external beam electron boosts for postoperative early stage breast cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS For 5 patients, 10-15 Gy was prescribed and administered via a conventionally defined electron boost treatment field - no dose distribution was calculated. Two computed tomography (CT) data sets were acquired on an average of 47 days apart. Using Monte Carlo techniques the clinically defined electron beams were reconstructed on CT1 and CT2, and a dosimetric comparison between the two data sets was made. Additionally, 3D ultrasound (US) imaging was performed to monitor interfraction motion. 3D US images were acquired concurrently with the CT images, as well as prior to each boost fraction in the treatment room. Taking into account interfraction motion, the dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) was calculated. RESULTS Based on conventionally determined treatment fields the CT1-based CTV D95 averaged 49% (range 12-89%) of the prescribed dose. Representing setup errors, the CT2-based CTV D95 averaged 47% (range 16-91%) of the prescribed dose. Considering interfraction motion, the average radial displacement was 11 mm, and the resulting CTV D95 was further reduced in 2/5 patients. CONCLUSIONS Poor initial coverage at the time of planning is exacerbated by breast mobility and interfraction tumour bed motion, increasing the uncertainty in the delivered dose.