Khara M. Sauro

The Stress and Migraine Interaction

There are several ways in which stress may interact with migraine in those predisposed to migraine attacks. These interactions may result from biochemical changes related to the physiological stress response, as, for example, the release of corticotrophin releasing hormone, or from changes induced by the psychological response to stressors. Stress is the factor listed most often by migraine sufferers as a trigger for their attacks, but in addition there is evidence that stress can help initiate migraine in those predisposed to the disorder, and may also contribute to migraine chronification. Migraine attacks themselves can act as a stressor, thereby potentially leading to a vicious circle of increasing migraine frequency. Since the important factor in the stress–migraine interaction is likely the individuals responses to stressors, rather than the stressors themselves, the acquisition of effective stress management skills has the potential to reduce the impact of stressors on those with migraine.

Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy A systematic review and meta-analysis of international studies

Objective: To review population-based studies of the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy worldwide and use meta-analytic techniques to explore factors that may explain heterogeneity between estimates. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards were followed. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles published on the prevalence or incidence of epilepsy since 1985. Abstract, full-text review, and data abstraction were conducted in duplicate. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to explore the association between prevalence or incidence, age group, sex, country level income, and study quality. Results: A total of 222 studies were included (197 on prevalence, 48 on incidence). The point prevalence of active epilepsy was 6.38 per 1,000 persons (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 5.57–7.30), while the lifetime prevalence was 7.60 per 1,000 persons (95% CI 6.17–9.38). The annual cumulative incidence of epilepsy was 67.77 per 100,000 persons (95% CI 56.69–81.03) while the incidence rate was 61.44 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI 50.75–74.38). The prevalence of epilepsy did not differ by age group, sex, or study quality. The active annual period prevalence, lifetime prevalence, and incidence rate of epilepsy were higher in low to middle income countries. Epilepsies of unknown etiology and those with generalized seizures had the highest prevalence. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the prevalence and incidence of epilepsy from published international studies and offers insight into factors that contribute to heterogeneity between estimates. Significant gaps (e.g., lack of incidence studies, stratification by age groups) were identified. Standardized reporting of future epidemiologic studies of epilepsy is needed.

HIT‐6 and MIDAS as Measures of Headache Disability in a Headache Referral Population

(Headache 2010;50:383‐395)

Neurologists' knowledge of and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery A national survey

Objectives: In the current study, we aim to assess potential neurologist-related barriers to epilepsy surgery among Canadian neurologists. Methods: A 29-item, pilot-tested questionnaire was mailed to all neurologists registered to practice in Canada. Survey items included the following: (1) type of medical practice, (2) perceptions of surgical risks and benefits, (3) knowledge of existing practice guidelines, and (4) barriers to surgery for patients with epilepsy. Neurologists who did not complete the questionnaire after the initial mailing were contacted a second time by e-mail, fax, or telephone. After this reminder, the survey was mailed a second time to any remaining nonresponders. Results: In total, 425 of 796 neurologists returned the questionnaire (response rate 53.5%). Respondents included 327 neurologists who followed patients with epilepsy in their practice. More than half (56.6%) of neurologists required patients to be drug-resistant and to have at least one seizure per year before considering surgery, and nearly half (48.6%) failed to correctly define drug-resistant epilepsy. More than 75% of neurologists identified inadequate health care resources as the greatest barrier to surgery for patients with epilepsy. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of Canadian neurologists are unaware of recommended standards of practice for epilepsy surgery. Access also appears to be a significant barrier to epilepsy surgery and surgical evaluation. As a result, we are concerned that patients with epilepsy are receiving inadequate care. A greater emphasis must be placed on knowledge dissemination and ensuring that the infrastructure and personnel are in place to allow patients to have timely access to this evidence-based treatment.

The current state of epilepsy guidelines: A systematic review.

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Epilepsy Guidelines Task Force, composed of 14 international members, was established in 2011 to identify, using systematic review methodology, international epilepsy clinical care guidelines, assess their quality, and determine gaps in areas of need of development.

Quality indicators in an epilepsy monitoring unit

Examining and improving the quality of care in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs) is essential to delivering the best possible care and to mitigating undesirable outcomes. Epilepsy monitoring units are unique in that an admission to an EMU often involves the induction of symptoms (seizures) rather than minimizing and/or treating symptoms, which can lead to an increased risk to patient safety. Very little research has addressed the quality of care and safety in EMUs. The objective of this study was to examine quality indicators in a large population of patients admitted to an EMU in a large health region. Data were collected prospectively on 396 consecutive patients admitted to the EMU for scalp EEG recording from 2008 to 2011 using a standardized data abstraction form. Variables examined included the following: patient demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, EMU admission statistics, and EMU quality indicators. We found that an admission to the EMU was a safe and effective tool in the management of patients with epilepsy and seizure-like events. The number of adverse events during the study period was low at 4.9%. The admission question was answered in 78.8% of cases, and it was partially answered in 6.6%. The need for systematically developed and validated quality indicators in EMUs is emphasized. The research in this area is sparse, and thus these data aid in supporting the utility of EMUs in the management and care of those with seizures and seizure-like events.

Multidisciplinary treatment for headache in the Canadian healthcare setting.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Multidisciplinary treatment programs are seen as an effective way to treat patients with chronic illness. The purpose of this study was to describe a multidisciplinary headache program which was developed in the Canadian public healthcare setting, and to report on patient perceptions of the program and patient treatment outcomes. METHODS The Calgary Headache Assessment and Management Program (CHAMP) was developed with initial funding from Alberta Health, and continued with function from the Calgary Health Region. Patient perceptions of the program were obtained with questionnaires. Outcome measures for a cohort of patients who completed the Self-Management Workshop were obtained using standard headache related disability measures. RESULTS Patient perceptions of the education session, the Lifestyle Assessment, and the Self-Management Workshop were very positive. Headache Disability Inventory scores fell from 56.2 to 46.3 from baseline to three months post Self-Management Workshop (p < .001). Corresponding scores for the HIT-6 were 63.6 and 58.2 (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Multidisciplinary headache treatment programs can be developed in the Canadian public healthcare system. The program described here was well accepted by many patients and perceived to be useful by them. Headache related disability as measured by standard measures was significantly reduced after participation in the program.

Medical vs invasive therapy in AVM-related epilepsy Systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: To compare invasive arteriovenous malformation (AVM) therapy to conservative management using only antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for achieving seizure freedom in patients with AVM-related epilepsy. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central up to June 2015 using epilepsy and AVM Medical Subject Headings and keywords. We included original research involving controlled observational cohort studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing seizure outcomes between invasive AVM treatments vs AED management alone, and uncontrolled case series of invasive AVM therapy for seizures that contained ≥20 patients. The estimates of seizure freedom were pooled using meta-analysis for the controlled trials, while the estimates for the case series were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results: Of 2,166 identified abstracts, 98 were reviewed in full text, of which 31 were included in the final dataset. We identified 2 controlled observational studies (n = 106 patients) and 29 uncontrolled case series. We identified 1 RCT but it did not report seizure outcomes. The pooled risk ratio for seizure freedom in controlled studies (0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69, 1.43) did not indicate superiority to either approach. Seizure freedom in case series varied from 19% (95% CI 11, 30%) to 95% (95% CI 76, 99%) at last follow-up. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence available to determine if invasive AVM management is superior to AED only for controlling seizures. An RCT of interventional vs medical management using standardized epilepsy-specific presurgical protocols is warranted.

The association between dementia and epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dementia is among the top 15 conditions with the most substantial increase in burden of disease in the past decade, and along with epilepsy, among the top 25 causes of years lived with disability worldwide. The epidemiology of dementia in persons with epilepsy, and vice versa, is not well characterized. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the prevalence, incidence, and reported risk factors for dementia in epilepsy and epilepsy in dementia.

Feasibility of using an online tool to assess appropriateness for an epilepsy surgery evaluation

Objectives: To examine the applicability of applying an online tool to determine the appropriateness of referral for an epilepsy surgical evaluation and to determine whether appropriateness scores are concordant with the clinical judgment of epilepsy specialists. Methods: We prospectively applied the tool in 107 consecutive patients with focal epilepsy seen in an epilepsy outpatient clinic. Variables collected included seizure type, epilepsy duration, seizure frequency, seizure severity, number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tried, AED-related side effects, and the results of investigations. Appropriateness ratings were then compared with retrospectively collected information concerning whether a surgical evaluation had been considered. Results: Thirty-nine patients (36.4%) were rated as appropriate for an epilepsy surgical evaluation, all of whom had adequately tried 2 or more appropriate AEDs. The majority of patients (84.6%) rated as appropriate had previously been considered or referred for an epilepsy surgical evaluation. Tool feasibility of use was high, with the exception of assessing whether previous AED trials had been adequate and discrepancies between physician and patient reports of AED side effects. Conclusions: Our evidence-based, online clinical decision tool is easily applied and able to determine whether patients with focal epilepsy are appropriate for a surgical evaluation. Future validation of this tool will require application in clinical practice and assessment of potential improvements in patient outcomes.