Kierstin K. Catlett
Arizona State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kierstin K. Catlett.
Nature | 2016
Alistair R. Evans; E. Susanne Daly; Kierstin K. Catlett; Kathleen S. Paul; Stephen J. King; Matthew M. Skinner; Hans P. Nesse; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Grant Townsend; Gary T. Schwartz; Jukka Jernvall
The variation in molar tooth size in humans and our closest relatives (hominins) has strongly influenced our view of human evolution. The reduction in overall size and disproportionate decrease in third molar size have been noted for over a century, and have been attributed to reduced selection for large dentitions owing to changes in diet or the acquisition of cooking. The systematic pattern of size variation along the tooth row has been described as a ‘morphogenetic gradient’ in mammal, and more specifically hominin, teeth since Butler and Dahlberg. However, the underlying controls of tooth size have not been well understood, with hypotheses ranging from morphogenetic fields to the clone theory. In this study we address the following question: are there rules that govern how hominin tooth size evolves? Here we propose that the inhibitory cascade, an activator–inhibitor mechanism that affects relative tooth size in mammals, produces the default pattern of tooth sizes for all lower primary postcanine teeth (deciduous premolars and permanent molars) in hominins. This configuration is also equivalent to a morphogenetic gradient, finally pointing to a mechanism that can generate this gradient. The pattern of tooth size remains constant with absolute size in australopiths (including Ardipithecus, Australopithecus and Paranthropus). However, in species of Homo, including modern humans, there is a tight link between tooth proportions and absolute size such that a single developmental parameter can explain both the relative and absolute sizes of primary postcanine teeth. On the basis of the relationship of inhibitory cascade patterning with size, we can use the size at one tooth position to predict the sizes of the remaining four primary postcanine teeth in the row for hominins. Our study provides a development-based expectation to examine the evolution of the unique proportions of human teeth.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 2012
M. Teague O'Mara; Adam D. Gordon; Kierstin K. Catlett; Carl J. Terranova; Gary T. Schwartz
Three fundamental ontogenetic pathways lead to the development of size differences between males and females. Males and females may grow at the same rate for different durations (bimaturism), grow for the same duration at different rates, or grow at a mix of rate and duration differences. While patterns of growth and the development of adult body size are well established for many haplorhines, the extent to which rate and duration differences affect strepsirrhine growth trajectories remains unclear. Here, we present iterative piecewise regression models that describe the ontogeny of adult body mass for males and females of five lorisoid species (i.e., lorises and galagos) from the Duke Lemur Center. We test the hypotheses that, like most haplorhines, sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is a result of bimaturism, and males and females of monomorphic species grow at the same rate for a similar duration. We confirm that the galagos in this sample (Galago moholi and Otolemur garnettii) show significant SSD that is achieved through bimaturism. Unlike monomorphic lemurids, the lorises in this sample show a diversity of ontogenetic patterns. Loris tardigradus does follow a lemur-like trajectory to monomorphism but Nycticebuscoucang and Nycticebus pygmaeus achieve larger adult female body sizes through a mixture of rate and duration differences. We show that contrary to previous assumptions, there are patterns of both similarity and difference in growth trajectories of comparably sized lorises and galagos. Furthermore, when ontogenetic profiles of lorisoid and lemurid growth are compared, it is evident that lorisoids grow faster for a shorter period of time.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 2016
Halszka Glowacka; Shannon C. McFarlin; Kierstin K. Catlett; Antoine Mudakikwa; Timothy G. Bromage; Michael R. Cranfield; Tara S. Stoinski; Gary T. Schwartz
OBJECTIVES Great ape teeth must remain functional over long lifespans. The molars of the most folivorous apes, the mountain gorillas, must maintain shearing function for 40+ years while the animals consume large quantities of mechanically challenging foods. While other folivorous primates experience dental senescence, which compromises their occlusal surfaces and affects their reproductive success as they age, it is unknown whether dental senescence also occurs in mountain gorillas. In this article, we quantified and evaluated how mountain gorilla molars change throughout their long lifespans. MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected high-resolution replicas of M(1)s (n = 15), M(2)s (n = 13), and M(3)s (n = 11) from a cross-sectional sample of wild mountain gorilla skeletons from the Virunga Volcanoes, ranging in age from 4 to 43 years. We employed dental topographic analyses to track how aspects of occlusal slope, angularity, relief index, and orientation patch count rotated change with age. In addition, we measured the relative length of shearing crests in two- and three-dimensions. RESULTS Occlusal topography was found to decrease, while 2D relative shearing crest length increased, and 3D relative crest lengths were maintained with age. DISCUSSION Our findings indicate that shearing function is maintained throughout the long lifetimes of mountain gorillas. Unlike the dental senescence experienced by other folivorous primates, mountain gorillas do not appear to possess senesced molars despite their long lifetimes, mechanically challenging diets, and decreases in occlusal topography with age.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 2010
Kierstin K. Catlett; Gary T. Schwartz; Laurie R. Godfrey; William L. Jungers
Evolutionary Anthropology | 2006
Laurie R. Godfrey; Gary T. Schwartz; Karen E. Samonds; William L. Jungers; Kierstin K. Catlett
The 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Knoxville, Tennessee | 2013
Halszka Glowacka; Kierstin K. Catlett; Gary T. Schwartz; Antoine Mudakikwa; Timothy G. Bromage; Michael R. Cranfield; Kathryn A Fawcett; Shannon C. McFarlin
Archive | 2012
Laurie R. Godfrey; Gary T. Schwartz; William L. Jungers; Kierstin K. Catlett; Karen E. Samonds; Stephen J. King; Kathleen M. Muldoon; Mitchell T. Irwin; David A. Burney
The 86th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, New Orleans | 2017
Kierstin K. Catlett; Laurie R. Godfrey; Karen E. Samonds; E. Susanne Daly; Gary T. Schwartz; Alistair R. Evans
The 86th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, New Orleans | 2017
E. Susanne Daly; Kierstin K. Catlett; Stephen J. King; Karen E. Samonds; Laurie R. Godfrey; Gary T. Schwartz; Alistair R. Evans
The 84th Annual Meeting of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, St. Louis, MO | 2015
E. Susanne Daly; Kierstin K. Catlett; Kathleen S. Paul; Hans P. Nesse