Kiho Itakura

Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiac Arrest? Rapid-Response Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Intra-Arrest Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P =0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P =0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P =0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-28}Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P=0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P=0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P=0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed.

Presentations of acute coronary syndrome related to coronary lesion morphologies as assessed by intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography

BACKGROUND Pathologically, the lesions responsible for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are ruptures of vulnerable plaques (and occasionally fibrous-cap erosions or calcified nodules) with a superimposed thrombosis. We aimed to clarify the clinical presentations related to the morphologies of coronary lesions of ACS using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS AND RESULTS Seventy-five culprit lesions of ACS patients were clearly assessed with IVUS and OCT. Patients were classified into two groups based on the presence or absence of a rupture of a culprit plaque as identified by OCT. Clinical characteristics and lesion morphologies were compared between the two groups. Waist circumference was significantly greater (p<0.02) and prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MS) higher (p=0.0011) in the rupture group. The prevalence of prodromal angina was higher in patients without plaque ruptures (p<0.0001). Using multivariate analysis, the MS and prodromal angina were independent predictors of rupture of a culprit coronary plaque (odds ratio (OR): 27.30, p<0.003 and OR: 0.04, p=0.0004, respectively). Among the components of the MS, the prevalence of abdominal obesity was a significant independent predictor of rupture of a culprit plaque (OR: 4.24, p<0.02). CONCLUSIONS There are two presentations related to the coronary lesion morphologies of ACS: we should understand these aspects of ACS.

Usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide for predicting left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with unanticoagulated nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation.

The CHADS2 scoring system is simple and widely accepted for predicting thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Although congestive heart failure (CHF) is a component of the CHADS2 score, the definition of CHF remains unclear. We previously reported that the presence of CHF was a strong predictor of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus. Therefore, the present study aimed to elucidate the relationship between LAA thrombus and the brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level in patients with unanticoagulated NVAF.

Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiac Arrest?Clinical Perspective

Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P =0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P =0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P =0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-28}Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P=0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P=0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P=0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed.

Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiac Arrest

Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P =0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P =0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P =0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-28}Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P=0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P=0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P=0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed.

Mitral systolic velocity at peak exercise predicts impaired exercise capacity in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Nearly half of patients with heart failure have normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but their prognosis is no better than those with reduced LVEF. Although peak oxygen consumption (VO2) is an independent predictor of mortality in heart failure, it is unclear how cardiac function during exercise contributes to peak VO2. Therefore, we explored the useful parameters measured by exercise stress echocardiography to predict peak VO2 in patients with heart failure with preserved LVEF (HFpEF).

Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiac Arrest?Clinical Perspective: Rapid-Response Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Intra-Arrest Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P =0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P =0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P =0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-28}Background— Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be useful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, little is known about the combination of ECMO and intra-arrest PCI. This study investigated the efficacy of rapid-response ECMO and intra-arrest PCI in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods and Results— This multicenter cohort study was conducted with the use of the database of ECMO in Hiroshima City, Japan. Between January 2004 and May 2011, rapid-response ECMO was performed in 86 patients with acute coronary syndrome who were unresponsive to conventional CPR. The median age of the study patients was 63 years, and 81% were male. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 81 patients (94%), and intra-arrest PCI was performed in 61 patients (71%). The rates of return of spontaneous heartbeat, 30-day survival, and favorable neurological outcomes were 88%, 29%, and 24%, respectively. All of the patients who received intra-arrest PCI achieved return of spontaneous heartbeat. In patients who survived up to day 30, the rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lower (58% versus 28%; P=0.01), the intra-arrest PCI was higher (88% versus 70%; P=0.04), and the time interval from collapse to the initiation of ECMO was shorter (40 [25–51] versus 54 minutes [34–74 minutes]; P=0.002). Conclusions— Rapid-response ECMO plus intra-arrest PCI is feasible and associated with improved outcomes in patients who are unresponsive to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On the basis of these findings, randomized studies of intra-arrest PCI are needed.

Reducing Number of Hospitalization from Increment of Congestive Heart Failure by an Implanted Intrathoracic Impedance Monitoring System, Optivol

Case Report: The patient was a 73-year-old male with dilated phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. He was frequently hospitalized for fluid overload and implantated cardiac resynchronization therapy plus defibrillation (Consulta, Medtronic, Inc.) and Carelink (remote monitoring system) in June 2010. He was hospitalized for congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation in October 2010. OptiVol Fluid Index (OFI) which calculated from a intrathoracic impedance was 40, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) was 1236 pg/ml by blood sample. We confirmed alert of OptiVol by Carelink in December 2010 and January 2011, which had similar data on OFI and BNP to the last hospitalization. In each event, OFI and BNP were around 35 and 800 pg/ml right after the alert and then they decreased to 0 and 400 pg/ml after the diuretic remedy which result to avoid hospitalization. Conclusion: We could reduce hospitalization rates from increment of CHF by OptiVol and Carelink system. It has possibility to cause false alert depending on the programmed threshold and reference impedance which may be able to prevent by using the data of first hospitalization.