Kilian Wegmann

The treatment of simple elbow dislocation in adults.

BACKGROUND Simple elbow dislocation is a complex soft-tissue injury that can cause permanent symptoms. Its incidence is 5 to 6 cases per 100 000 persons per year. Its proper treatment is debated; options range from immobilization in a cast to surgical intervention. METHODS We systematically reviewed the literature on the treatment of simple elbow dislocation and performed a meta-analysis, primarily on the basis of clinical scores and secondarily with respect to pain, range of motion, and return to work. RESULTS A randomized controlled trial (RCT) showed that clinical results at short-term follow-up were superior for early functional treatment compared to immobilization in a cast. Brief immobilization, however, reduced pain initially, and the long-term results of early mobilization and immobilization in a cast were the same. Our meta-analysis showed that early mobilization enables patients to return to work earlier (difference of mean values -2.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.18 to -2.64), and that the extent of soft-tissue injury is correlated with the clinical outcome (inverse relationship; difference of mean values -12.07, 95% CI -23.88 to -0.26). Surgical and conservative treatment were compared in a single RCT, which revealed no significant difference in outcomes. A meta-analysis of two retrospective comparative studies showed no advantage of immediate ligament repair over delayed surgery. CONCLUSION Early functional treatment is the evidence-based therapeutic standard for simple elbow dislocation. The past few years have seen further developments in surgery for simple elbow dislocation. Further study is needed to determine whether surgery for elbow dislocation with high-grade instability can prevent persistent pain, limitation of motion, and chronic instability.

The Essex-Lopresti lesion

The Essex-Lopresti lesion represents a severe injury of the forearm unit. In the 1940s, it’s pathology and consequences have already been mentioned by several authors. Over the course of time, the pathophysiology of the lesion was displayed in more detail. Therefore, an intensive analysis of the involved anatomic structures was done. The interosseous membrane was shown to play a major role in stabilising the forearm unit, in the situation of a fractured radial head, which is the primary stabiliser of the longitudinal forearm stability. Moreover, biomechanical analyses showed a relevant attribution of the distal radio-ulnar joint to the forearm stability. If, in the case of a full-blown Essex-Lopresti lesion, the radial head, the interosseous membrane and the distal radio-ulnar joint are injured, proximalisation of the radius will take place and will come along with secondary symptoms at the elbow joint and the wrist. According to actual studies, the lesion seems to occur more often than realised up to now. Thus, to avoid missing the complex injury, subtle clinical diagnosis combined with adequate imaging has to be undertaken. If the lesion is confirmed, several operative treatment options are available, yet not proofed to be sufficient.

Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signs of Posterolateral Rotatory Instability of the Elbow

PURPOSE To evaluate radiographic signs of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The goal was to establish objective radiographic criteria to aid in the diagnosis of PLRI. METHODS The MRI scans of 60 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Two study groups were compared. Group 1 (n = 30) consisted of unstable elbows in which PLRI was confirmed by clinical examination and arthroscopy. Group 2 (stable; n = 30) served as the control group. Patients in group 2 had transient epicondylitis without clinical suspicion of instability. Joint incongruity was analyzed for sagittal views through the radial head and the coronoid tip and for coronal and axial views. Interobserver and intra-observer reliability were evaluated. RESULTS In the sagittal view through the radial head, average radiocapitellar incongruity differed significantly between groups 1 and 2. In addition, mean ulnohumeral incongruity in an axial view through the motion axis of the distal humerus showed significant differences between groups. Sagittal views through the tip of the coronoid and coronal views did not reveal significant differences in patients with unstable elbows compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS The current study provides useful MRI criteria indicative of PLRI when combined with physical examination. Cutoff points of 1.2 mm for radiocapitellar incongruity (sagittal view) and 0.7 mm for axial ulnohumeral incongruity (axial view) are suitable to screen for PLRI. Radiocapitellar incongruity greater than 2 mm and axial ulnohumeral incongruity greater than 1 mm are highly suspicious of elbow instability. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic IV.

The course of the posterior interosseous nerve in relation to the proximal radius: Is there a reliable landmark?

PURPOSE The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is closely related to the proximal radius, and it is at risk when approaching the proximal forearm from the ventral and lateral side. This anatomic study analyzes the location of the PIN in relation to the proximal radius depending on forearm rotation by means of a novel investigation design. The purpose of this study is to define landmarks to locate the PIN intraoperatively in order to avoid neurological complications. METHODS We dissected six upper extremities of fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. The mean donor age at the time of death was 81.2 years. The PIN was dissected and marked on its course along the proximal forearm with a 0.3-mm flexible radiopaque thread. Three-dimensional (3D) X-ray scans were performed, and the location of the nerve was analyzed in neutral rotation, supination, and pronation. RESULTS In the coronal view, the PIN crosses the radial neck/shaft at a mean of 33.4 (±5.9)mm below the radial head surface (RHS) in pronation and 16.9 (±5.0)mm in supination. It crosses 4.9 (±2.2)mm distal of the most prominent point of the radial tuberosity (RT) in pronation and 9.6 (±5.2)mm proximal in supination. In the sagittal view, the PIN crosses the proximal radius 61.8 (±2.9)mm below the RHS in pronation and 41.1 (±3.6)mm in supination. The nerve crosses 29.2 (±6.2)mm distal of the RT in pronation and 11.0 (±2.8)mm in supination. CONCLUSION With this novel design, the RT could be defined as a useful landmark for intraoperative orientation. On a ventral approach, the PIN courses 10mm proximal of it in supination and 5mm distal of it in pronation. Laterally, pronation increases the distance of the PIN to the RT to approximately 3cm.

Elbow Positioning and Joint Insufflation Substantially Influence Median and Radial Nerve Locations.

BackgroundThe median and radial nerves are at risk of iatrogenic injury when performing arthroscopic arthrolysis with anterior capsulectomy. Although prior anatomic studies have identified the position of these nerves, little is known about how elbow positioning and joint insufflation might influence nerve locations.Questions/purposesIn a cadaver model, we sought to determine whether (1) the locations of the median and radial nerves change with variation of elbow positioning; and whether (2) flexion and joint insufflation increase the distance of the median and radial nerves to osseous landmarks after correcting for differences in size of the cadaveric specimens.MethodsThe median and radial nerves were marked with a radiopaque thread in 11 fresh-frozen elbow specimens. Three-dimensional radiographic scans were performed in extension, in 90° flexion, and after joint insufflations in neutral rotation, pronation, and supination. Trochlear and capitellar widths were analyzed. The distances of the median nerve to the medial and anterior edge of the trochlea and to the coronoid were measured. The distances of the radial nerve to the lateral and anterior edge of the capitulum and to the anterior edge of the radial head were measured. We analyzed the mediolateral nerve locations as a percentage function of the trochlear and capitellar widths to control for differences regarding the size of the specimens.ResultsThe mean distance of the radial nerve to the lateral edge of the capitulum as a percentage function of the capitellar width increased from 68% ± 17% in extension to 91% ± 23% in flexion (mean difference = 23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5%–41%; p = 0.01). With the numbers available, no such difference was observed regarding the location of the median nerve in relation to the medial border of the trochlea (mean difference = 5%; 95% CI, −13% to 22%; p = 0.309). Flexion and joint insufflation increased the distance of the nerves to osseous landmarks. The mean distance of the median nerve to the coronoid tip was 5.4 ± 1.3 mm in extension, 9.1 ± 2.3 mm in flexion (mean difference = 3.7 mm; 95% CI, 2.04–5.36 mm; p < 0.001), and 12.6 ± 3.6 mm in flexion and insufflation (mean difference = 3.5 mm; 95% CI, 0.81–6.19 mm; p = 0.008). The mean distance of the radial nerve to the anterior edge of the radial head increased from 4.7 ± 1.8 mm in extension to 7.7 ± 2.7 mm in flexion (mean difference = 3.0 mm; 95% CI, 0.96–5.04 mm; p = 0.005) and to 11.9 ± 3.0 mm in flexion with additional joint insufflation (mean difference = 4.2 mm; 95% CI, 1.66–6.74 mm; p = 0.002).ConclusionsThe radial nerve shifts medially during flexion from the lateral to the medial border of the inner third of the capitulum. The median nerve is located at the medial quarter of the joint. The distance of the median and radial nerves to osseous landmarks doubles from extension to 90° flexion and triples after joint insufflation.Clinical RelevanceElbow arthroscopy with anterior capsulectomy should be performed cautiously at the medial aspect of the joint to avoid median nerve lesions. Performing arthroscopic anterior capsulectomy in flexion at the lateral aspect of the joint and in slight extension at the medial edge of the capitulum could enhance safety of this procedure.

From radial head to radiocapitellar to total elbow replacement: A case report

Highlights • Overstuffing is a serious yet avoidable complication of radial head arthroplasty.• Overstuffing severely alters elbow joint kinematics and leads to capitellar erosion.• Radiocapitellar arthroplasty can be a salvage procedure in such cases.• Limited clinical data is available thus far regarding radiocapitellar arthroplasty.• The possibility for early failure due to ulnohumeral erosion has to be considered.

Fractures of the Radial Head.

Radial head fractures are the most common fractures around the elbow. Because they are often accompanied by ligamentous injuries, we recommend considering them to be osteoligamentous injuries rather than simple fractures, even in undisplaced or minimally displaced fractures. Surgeons should always suspect and actively exclude concomitant ligament tears. The incidence of these associated injuries increases with greater severity of the radial head fracture. However, the standard Mason classification system does not adequately address this problem, and all attempts to establish a new classification system that provides concise treatment algorithms have failed. This article discusses the current treatment options and the current controversies in nonsurgical therapy, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and radial head replacement.

The circumferential graft technique for treatment of multidirectional elbow instability: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.

BACKGROUND Ligament reconstruction with a circumferential graft represents an innovative technique for treatment of multidirectional elbow instability. This biomechanical study compared the stability of the intact elbow joint with the circumferential graft technique and the conventional technique. METHODS Seven fresh frozen cadaveric elbows were evaluated for stability against valgus and varus/posterolateral rotatory forces (3 Nm) over the full range of motion. Primary stability was determined for intact specimens, after sectioning of the collateral ligaments, after applying the circumferential graft technique (box-loop), and after conventional collateral ligament reconstruction. Cyclic loading (1000 cycles) was performed to assess joint stability and stiffness of the native ligaments and the tendon grafts. RESULTS Primary stability of both reconstruction techniques was equal to the native specimens (P = .17-.91). Sectioning of the collateral ligaments significantly increased joint instability (P < .001). The reconstruction techniques provided equal stability after 1000 cycles (P = .78). Both were inferior to the intact specimens (P = .02). Cyclic loading caused a significantly lower increase in stiffness of the native ligaments compared with the tendon grafts of either reconstruction technique (P = .001-.008). Significantly better graft stiffness was retained with the circumferential graft technique compared with conventional reconstruction (P = .04). CONCLUSION Neither reconstruction technique fully reproduces the biomechanical profile of the native collateral ligaments. The circumferential graft technique seems to resist cyclic loading slightly better than the conventional reconstruction technique, yet both reconstruction techniques provide comparable stability.

Sequence of the Essex-Lopresti lesion—a high-speed video documentation and kinematic analysis

Background and purpose — The pathomechanics of the Essex-Lopresti lesion are not fully understood. We used human cadavers and documented the genesis of the injury with high-speed cameras. Methods — 4 formalin-fixed cadaveric specimens of human upper extremities were tested in a prototype, custom-made, drop-weight test bench. An axial high-energy impulse was applied and the development of the lesion was documented with 3 high-speed cameras. Results — The high-speed images showed a transversal movement of the radius and ulna, which moved away from each other in the transversal plane during the impact. This resulted into a transversal rupture of the interosseous membrane, starting in its central portion, and only then did the radius migrate proximally and fracture. The lesion proceeded to the dislocation of the distal radio-ulnar joint and then to a full-blown Essex-Lopresti lesion. Interpretation — Our findings indicate that fracture of the radial head may be preceded by at least partial lesions of the interosseous membrane in the course of high-energy axial trauma.

Do the radial head prosthesis components fit with the anatomical structures of the proximal radioulnar joint

PurposeThe fitting accuracy of radial head components has been investigated in the capitulo-radial joint, and reduced contact after prosthetic replacement of the radial head has been observed. The kinematics of the proximal radioulnar joint (PRUJ) are affected by radial head arthroplasty as well, but have not yet been investigated in this regard.MethodsThe elbow joints of 60 upper extremities of formalin-fixed body donors were disarticulated to obtain a good view of the PRUJ. Each specimen was mounted on the examining table and radial head position in the native PRUJ was assessed in neutral position, full pronation, and full supination. Measurements were repeated after implantation of mono- and bi-polar prostheses.ResultsAnalysis of the distribution of the joint contacts in the compartments showed significant differences after radial head replacement. In comparison to the native joint, after bipolar and monopolar radial head replacement, the physiological shift of the proximal radius was altered.DiscussionThe physiological shift of the joint contact of the radial head from anterior to posterior during forearm rotation that was found in the native joint in our cadaver model was not observed after prosthetic replacement. With higher conformity and physiological kinematic of radial head prostheses, possibly lower shear forces and lower contact pressures would be generated.Clinical relevanceThe tested radial head prostheses do not replicate the physiological kinematics of the radial head. Further development in the prosthesis design has to be made. The meticulous reconstruction of the annular ligament seems to be of importance to increase joint contact.