Kim Kenton

A Midurethral Sling to Reduce Incontinence after Vaginal Prolapse Repair

BACKGROUND Women without stress urinary incontinence undergoing vaginal surgery for pelvic-organ prolapse are at risk for postoperative urinary incontinence. A midurethral sling may be placed at the time of prolapse repair to reduce this risk. METHODS We performed a multicenter trial involving women without symptoms of stress incontinence and with anterior prolapse (of stage 2 or higher on a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system examination) who were planning to undergo vaginal prolapse surgery. Women were randomly assigned to receive either a midurethral sling or sham incisions during surgery. One primary end point was urinary incontinence or treatment for this condition at 3 months. The second primary end point was the presence of incontinence at 12 months, allowing for subsequent treatment for incontinence. RESULTS Of the 337 women who underwent randomization, 327 (97%) completed follow-up at 1 year. At 3 months, the rate of urinary incontinence (or treatment) was 23.6% in the sling group and 49.4% in the sham group (P<0.001). At 12 months, urinary incontinence (allowing for subsequent treatment of incontinence) was present in 27.3% and 43.0% of patients in the sling and sham groups, respectively (P=0.002). The number needed to treat with a sling to prevent one case of urinary incontinence at 12 months was 6.3. The rate of bladder perforation was higher in the sling group than in the sham group (6.7% vs. 0%), as were rates of urinary tract infection (31.0% vs. 18.3%), major bleeding complications (3.1% vs. 0%), and incomplete bladder emptying 6 weeks after surgery (3.7% vs. 0%) (P≤0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS A prophylactic midurethral sling inserted during vaginal prolapse surgery resulted in a lower rate of urinary incontinence at 3 and 12 months but higher rates of adverse events. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Womens Health; OPUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00460434.).

Baseline urodynamic predictors of treatment failure 1 year after mid urethral sling surgery

PURPOSE We determined whether baseline urodynamic study variables predict failure after mid urethral sling surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preoperative urodynamic study variables and postoperative continence status were analyzed in women participating in a randomized trial comparing retropubic to transobturator mid urethral sling. Objective failure was defined by positive standardized stress test, 15 ml or greater on 24-hour pad test, or re-treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Subjective failure criteria were self-reported stress symptoms, leakage on 3-day diary or re-treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between covariates and failure controlling for treatment group and clinical variables. Receiver operator curves were constructed for relationships between objective failure and measures of urethral function. RESULTS Objective continence outcomes were available at 12 months for 565 of 597 (95%) women. Treatment failed in 260 women (245 by subjective criteria, 124 by objective criteria). No urodynamic variable was significantly associated with subjective failure on multivariate analysis. Valsalva leak point pressure, maximum urethral closure pressure and urodynamic stress incontinence were the only urodynamic variables consistently associated with objective failure on multivariate analysis. No specific cut point was determined for predicting failure for Valsalva leak point pressure or maximum urethral closure pressure by ROC. The lowest quartile (Valsalva leak point pressure less than 86 cm H2O, maximum urethral closure pressure less than 45 cm H2O) conferred an almost 2-fold increased odds of objective failure regardless of sling route (OR 2.23, 1.20-4.14 for Valsalva leak point pressure and OR 1.88, 1.04-3.41 for maximum urethral closure pressure). CONCLUSIONS Women with a Valsalva leak point pressure or maximum urethral closure pressure in the lowest quartile are nearly 2-fold more likely to experience stress urinary incontinence 1 year after transobturator or retropubic mid urethral sling.

The Effect of Age on Short-Term Outcomes After Abdominal Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

OBJECTIVES: To compare perioperative morbidity and 1‐year outcomes of older and younger women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity

Determine whether urodynamic measures of urethral function [(valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP), maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP), functional urethral length (FUL)] and the results of the supine empty bladder stress test (SEBST) correlate with each other and with subjective and objective measures of urinary incontinence (UI).

The Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation vs. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment: ROSETTA Trial,

We present the rationale for and design of a randomized, open-label, active-control trial comparing the effectiveness of 200 units of onabotulinum toxin A (Botox A®) versus sacral neuromodulation (InterStim®) therapy for refractory urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). The Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation vs. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA) trial compares changes in urgency urinary incontinence episodes over 6 months, as well as other lower urinary tract symptoms, adverse events and cost effectiveness in women receiving these two therapies. Eligible participants had previously attempted treatment with at least 2 medications and behavioral therapy. We discuss the importance of evaluating two very different interventions, the challenges related to recruitment, ethical considerations for two treatments with significantly different costs, follow-up assessments and cost effectiveness. The ROSETTA trial will provide information to healthcare providers regarding the technical attributes of these interventions as well as the efficacy and safety of these two interventions on other lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms. Enrollment began in March, 2012 with anticipated end to recruitment in mid 2014.

Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies (ACCESS)☆

INTRODUCTION Robotic assistance during laparoscopic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse rapidly disseminated across the United States without level I data to support its benefit over traditional open and laparoscopic approaches [1]. This manuscript describes design and methodology of the Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies (ACCESS) Trial. METHODS ACCESS is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial enrolling patients at two academic teaching facilities, UCLA (Los Angeles, CA) and Loyola University (Chicago, IL). The primary aim is to compare costs of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy (RASC vs LASC). Following a clinical decision for minimally-invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) and research consent, participants with symptomatic stage≥II pelvic organ prolapse are randomized to LASC or RASC on the day of surgery. Costs of care are based on each patients billing record and equipment costs at each hospital. All costs associated with surgical procedure including costs for robot and initial hospitalization and any re-hospitalization in the first 6weeks are compared between groups. Secondary outcomes include post-operative pain, anatomic outcomes, symptom severity and quality of life, and adverse events. Power calculation determined that 32 women in each arm would provide 95% power to detect a

Validation of the activities assessment scale in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

2500 difference in total charges, using a two-sided two sample t-test with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS Enrollment was completed in May 2011. The 12-month follow-up was completed in May 2012. CONCLUSIONS This is a multi-center study to assess cost as a primary outcome in a comparative effectiveness trial of LASC versus RASC.

Factors Associated With Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Objective The Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) is a 13-item postoperative functional activity scale validated in men who underwent hernia surgery. We evaluated the psychometric characteristics of the AAS in women who underwent vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods Participants included 163 women with POP and SUI enrolled in a randomized trial comparing sacrospinous ligament fixation to uterosacral vault suspension with and without perioperative pelvic floor muscle training. Participants completed the AAS and SF-36 at baseline and 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Internal reliability of the AAS was evaluated using Cronbach &agr;. Construct validity and responsiveness were examined in cross-sectional and longitudinal data using Pearson correlation coefficient and analysis of variance. The AAS is scored from zero to 100 (higher scores = better function). Results Mean (SD) baseline AAS score was 87 (17.3) (range, 25–100). Functional activity declined from baseline to 2 weeks postoperatively (mean change, −4.5; 95% confidence interval, −7.6 to −1.42) but improved above baseline at 6 months (mean change, +10.9; 95% confidence interval, 7.8–14.0). Internal reliability of the AAS was excellent (Cronbach &agr; = 0.93). Construct validity was demonstrated by a correlation of 0.59 to 0.60 between the AAS and SF-36 physical functioning scale (P < 0.0001) and lower correlations between the AAS and other SF-36 scales. Patients who improved in physical functioning based on the SF-36 between 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively showed an effect size of 0.86 for change in the AAS over the same period. Conclusions The AAS is a valid, reliable, and responsive measure for evaluation of physical function in women after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Association of baseline urodynamic measures of urethral function with clinical, demographic, and other urodynamic variables in women prior to undergoing midurethral sling surgery.

PURPOSE We determined the association of clinicodemographic factors with urinary incontinence related quality of life in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence, and compared the incontinence specific Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the contributions of incontinence severity and sexual function on quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used baseline data on 597 women in the Trial of Mid-Urethral Slings. Tested quality of life correlates included health status and history, sexual function, and urinary incontinence type, severity and bother. RESULTS On each questionnaire lower quality of life was associated with younger age, higher body mass index, more stress urinary incontinence symptoms, and more severe and bothersome urinary incontinence symptoms. Each measure identified factors associated with lower quality of life that were not identified by the other, including Hispanic ethnicity, poor health status and more urge urinary incontinence symptoms on the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, and prior urinary incontinence treatment and more urinary incontinence episodes daily on the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. Sexually active women had similar quality of life as well as increased incontinence episodes on each questionnaire and more sexual dysfunction on the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire only. CONCLUSIONS In women planning stress urinary incontinence surgery quality of life is associated with nonurinary incontinence factors, and with the type, severity and degree of urinary incontinence symptom bother. Many factors are associated with quality of life as measured by the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire. However, more nonurinary incontinence factors were associated with quality of life when measured by the former than by the latter. More than 1 scale may be needed to evaluate quality of life after treatment for stress urinary incontinence.

Validation of the surgical pain scales in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery

To explore how baseline demographic, clinical, and urodynamic (UDS) variables correlate with measures of urethral function in women planning midurethral sling surgery.