Kimberly A. Lochner

Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, United States, 2010.

Introduction The increase in chronic health conditions among Medicare beneficiaries has implications for the Medicare system. The objective of this study was to use the US Department of Health and Human Services Strategic Framework on multiple chronic conditions as a basis to examine the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries. Methods We analyzed Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services administrative claims data for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in the fee-for-service program in 2010. We included approximately 31 million Medicare beneficiaries and examined 15 chronic conditions. A beneficiary was considered to have a chronic condition if a Medicare claim indicated that the beneficiary received a service or treatment for the condition. We defined the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions as having 2 or more chronic conditions. Results Overall, 68.4% of Medicare beneficiaries had 2 or more chronic conditions and 36.4% had 4 or more chronic conditions. The prevalence of multiple chronic conditions increased with age and was more prevalent among women than men across all age groups. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women had the highest prevalence of 4 or more chronic conditions, whereas Asian or Pacific Islander men and women, in general, had the lowest. Conclusion The prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among the Medicare fee-for-service population varies across demographic groups. Multiple chronic conditions appear to be more prevalent among women, particularly non-Hispanic black and Hispanic women, and among beneficiaries eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid benefits. Our findings can help public health researchers target prevention and management strategies to improve care and reduce costs for people with multiple chronic conditions.

The Public-Use National Health Interview Survey Linked Mortality Files: Methods of Reidentification Risk Avoidance and Comparative Analysis

The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) conducts mortality follow-up for its major population-based surveys. In 2004, NCHS updated the mortality follow-up for the 1986-2000 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) years, which because of confidentiality protections was made available only through the NCHS Research Data Center. In 2007, NCHS released a public-use version of the NHIS Linked Mortality Files that includes a limited amount of perturbed information for decedents. The modification of the public-use version included conducting a reidentification risk scenario to determine records at risk for reidentification and then imputing values for either date or cause of death for a select sample of records. To demonstrate the comparability between the public-use and restricted-use versions of the linked mortality files, the authors estimated relative hazards for all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk using a Cox proportional hazards model. The pooled 1986-2000 NHIS Linked Mortality Files contain 1,576,171 records and 120,765 deaths. The sample for the comparative analyses included 897,232 records and 114,264 deaths. The comparative analyses show that the two data files yield very similar results for both all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Analytical considerations when examining cause-specific analyses of numerically small demographic subgroups are addressed.

County-level variation in prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, 2012.

Preventing chronic conditions and controlling costs associated with the care for people with chronic conditions are public health and health care priorities.

Medicare Claims Versus Beneficiary Self-Report for Influenza Vaccination Surveillance

BACKGROUND Although self-reported influenza vaccination status is routinely used in surveillance to estimate influenza vaccine coverage, Medicare data are becoming a promising resource for influenza surveillance to inform vaccination program management and planning. PURPOSE To evaluate the concordance between self-reported influenza vaccination and influenza vaccination claims among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS This study compared influenza vaccination based upon Medicare claims and self-report among a sample of Medicare beneficiaries (N=9,378) from the 2011 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, which was the most recent year of data at the time of analysis (summer 2013). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated using self-reported data as the referent standard. Logistic regression was used to compute the marginal mean proportions for whether a Medicare influenza vaccination claim was present among beneficiaries who reported receiving the vaccination. RESULTS Influenza vaccination was higher for self-report (69.4%) than Medicare claims (48.3%). For Medicare claims, sensitivity=67.5%, specificity=96.3%, positive predictive value=97.6%, and negative predictive value=56.7%. Among beneficiaries reporting receiving an influenza vaccination, the percentage of beneficiaries with a vaccination claim was lower for beneficiaries who were aged <65 years, male, non-Hispanic black or Hispanic, and had less than a college education. CONCLUSIONS The classification of influenza vaccination status for Medicare beneficiaries can differ based upon survey and claims. To improve Medicare claims-based surveillance studies, further research is needed to determine the sources of discordance in self-reported and Medicare claims data, specifically for sensitivity and negative predictive value.