Kimberly M. Moore
Harvard University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kimberly M. Moore.
Journal of Biological Chemistry | 2004
Akiko Mammoto; Sui Huang; Kimberly M. Moore; Philmo Oh; Donald E. Ingber
Cell shape-dependent control of cell-cycle progression underlies the spatial differentials of growth that drive tissue morphogenesis, yet little is known about how cell distortion impacts the biochemical signaling machinery that is responsible for growth control. Here we show that the Rho family GTPase, RhoA, conveys the “cell shape signal” to the cell-cycle machinery in human capillary endothelial cells. Cells accumulating p27kip1 and arrested in mid G1 phase when spreading were inhibited by restricted extracellular matrix adhesion, whereas constitutively active RhoA increased expression of the F-box protein Skp2 required for ubiquitination-dependent degradation of p27kip1 and restored G1 progression in these cells. Studies with dominant-negative and constitutively active forms of mDia1, a downstream effector of RhoA, and with a pharmacological inhibitor of ROCK, another RhoA target, revealed that RhoA promoted G1 progression by altering the balance of activities between these two downstream effectors. These data indicate that signaling proteins such as mDia1 and ROCK, which are thought to be involved primarily in cytoskeletal remodeling, also mediate cell growth regulation by coupling cell shape to the cell-cycle machinery at the level of signal transduction.
Applied Physics Letters | 2011
Christopher N. Layman; Theodore P. Martin; Kimberly M. Moore; David C. Calvo; Gregory J. Orris
The design of devices using finite embedded coordinate transformations presents an unique approach to control acoustic waves. Though combining the use of conformal mappings may provide a pathway to more realizable material properties, many device geometries still require combinations of density and sound speed which are unavailable in isotropic materials. Here, we present a design strategy based on a multiple scattering homogenization method to approximate the unique values required within such a device. We apply the method, using full-wave simulations, to the design of an aqueous cylindrical-to-plane wave lens, which can be constructed from simple materials.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2018
J. E. P. Connerney; Stavros Kotsiaros; Ronald J. Oliversen; J. R. Espley; J. L. Joergensen; P. S. Joergensen; Jose M. G. Merayo; Matija Herceg; Jeremy Bloxham; Kimberly M. Moore; S. J. Bolton; Steven M. Levin
A spherical harmonic model of the magnetic field of Jupiter is obtained from vector magnetic field observations acquired by the Juno spacecraft during its first nine polar orbits about the planet. Observations acquired during eight of these orbits provide the first truly global coverage of Jupiter’s magnetic field with a coarse longitudinal separation of ~45° between perijoves. The magnetic field is represented with a degree 20 spherical harmonic model for the planetary (“internal”) field, combined with a simple model of the magnetodisc for the field (“external”) due to distributed magnetospheric currents. Partial solution of the underdetermined inverse problem using generalized inverse techniques yields a model (“Juno Reference Model through Perijove 9”) of the planetary magnetic field with spherical harmonic coefficients well determined through degree and order 10, providing the first detailed view of a planetary dynamo beyond Earth. Plain Language Summary Characterizing the planetary magnetic field of Jupiter is one of the primary science objectives of the Juno Mission. The Juno spacecraft was launched on 5 August 2011 and was inserted into polar orbit about Jupiter on 4 July 2016. While only one fourth of the way through its baselinemission of 34 orbits, designed to characterize the planetarymagnetic field with resolution exceeding what is possible at Earth, a detailed representation of the field has emerged. The Jovian magnetic field is unlike anything previously imagined, evidencing a complexity that portends great insight into dynamo processes in general and the dynamics of Jupiter’s interior in particular.
Nature | 2018
Kimberly M. Moore; Rakesh K. Yadav; Laura Kulowski; Hao Cao; Jeremy Bloxham; J. E. P. Connerney; Stavros Kotsiaros; John Leif Jørgensen; Jose M. G. Merayo; David J. Stevenson; S. J. Bolton; Steven M. Levin
The Juno spacecraft, which is in a polar orbit around Jupiter, is providing direct measurements of the planet’s magnetic field close to its surface1. A recent analysis of observations of Jupiter’s magnetic field from eight (of the first nine) Juno orbits has provided a spherical-harmonic reference model (JRM09)2 of Jupiter’s magnetic field outside the planet. This model is of particular interest for understanding processes in Jupiter’s magnetosphere, but to study the field within the planet and thus the dynamo mechanism that is responsible for generating Jupiter’s main magnetic field, alternative models are preferred. Here we report maps of the magnetic field at a range of depths within Jupiter. We find that Jupiter’s magnetic field is different from all other known planetary magnetic fields. Within Jupiter, most of the flux emerges from the dynamo region in a narrow band in the northern hemisphere, some of which returns through an intense, isolated flux patch near the equator. Elsewhere, the field is much weaker. The non-dipolar part of the field is confined almost entirely to the northern hemisphere, so there the field is strongly non-dipolar and in the southern hemisphere it is predominantly dipolar. We suggest that Jupiter’s dynamo, unlike Earth’s, does not operate in a thick, homogeneous shell, and we propose that this unexpected field morphology arises from radial variations, possibly including layering, in density or electrical conductivity, or both.Maps of Jupiter’s internal magnetic field at a range of depths reveal an unusual morphology, suggesting that Jupiter’s dynamo, unlike Earth’s, does not operate in a thick, homogeneous shell.
Physical Review B | 2012
Theodore P. Martin; Christopher N. Layman; Kimberly M. Moore; Gregory J. Orris
Geophysical Research Letters | 2017
Kimberly M. Moore; Jeremy Bloxham; J. E. P. Connerney; John Leif Jørgensen; Jose M. G. Merayo
Gold Bulletin | 2015
Jingbei Liu; Yanhui Liu; Pan Gong; Yanglin Li; Kimberly M. Moore; Ellen Scanley; Fred Walker; Christine Broadbridge; Jan Schroers
Archive | 2004
Eben Alsberg; Kimberly M. Moore; Sui Huang; Tom Polte; Donald E. Ingber
Icarus | 2017
Kimberly M. Moore; N.-H. Chan; A. Daradich; Jerry X. Mitrovica
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017
Kimberly M. Moore; Jeremy Bloxham