Kimberly Perez

Complete Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: The Brown University Oncology Group CONTRE Study.

Purpose: Following preoperative chemoradiation and surgery, many patients with stage II to III rectal cancer are unable to tolerate full-dose adjuvant chemotherapy. BrUOG R-224 was designed to assess the impact of COmplete Neoadjuvant Treatment for REctal cancer (CONTRE), primary chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and surgery, on treatment delivery, toxicities, and pathologic response at surgery. Methods: Patients with clinical stage II to III (T3 to T4 and/or N1 to N2) rectal cancer received 8 cycles of modified FOLFOX6 followed by capecitabine 825 mg/m2 bid concurrent with 50.4 Gy intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Surgery was performed 6 to 10 weeks after chemoradiation. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled between August 2010 and June 2013. Median age was 61 years (30 to 79 y); 7 patients (18%) were clinical stage II and 32 (82%) stage III. Thirty-six patients (92%) received all 8 cycles of mFOLFOX6, of whom 35 completed subsequent chemoradiation; thus 89% of patients received CONTRE as planned. No unexpected toxicities were reported. All patients had resolution of bleeding and improvement of obstructive symptoms, with no complications requiring surgical intervention. Pathologic complete response (ypT0N0) was demonstrated in 13 patients (33%; 95% CI, 18.24%-47.76%). Conclusions: CONTRE seems to be a well-tolerated alternative to the current standard treatment sequence. Evaluating its impact on long-term outcomes would require a large randomized trial, but using pathologic response as an endpoint, it could serve as a platform for assessing the addition of novel agents to preoperative treatment in stage II to III rectal cancer.

Weekly paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and external irradiation followed by randomized farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Purpose The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) multi-institutional Phase II study 98-12, evaluating paclitaxel and concurrent radiation (RT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer, demonstrated a median survival of 11.3 months and a 1-year survival of 43%. The purpose of the randomized Phase II study by RTOG 0020 was to evaluate the addition of weekly low- dose gemcitabine with concurrent paclitaxel/RT and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 following chemoradiation. Patients and methods Patients with unresectable, nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were eligible. Patients in Arm 1 received gemcitabine, 75 mg/m2/week, and paclitaxel, 40 mg/m2/week, for 6 weeks, with 50.4 Gy radiation (CXRT). Patients in Arm 2 received an identical chemoradiation regimen but then received maintenance R115777, 300 mg twice a day for 21 days every 28 days (CXRT+R115777), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results One hundred ninety-five patients were entered into this study, and 184 were analyzable. Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities occurred in less than 5% of CXRT patients. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity from R115777 was myelosuppression; however, grade 3/4 hepatic, metabolic, musculoskeletal, and neurologic toxicities were also reported. The median survival time was 11.5 months and 8.9 months for the CXRT and CXRT+R115777 arms, respectively. Conclusions The CXRT arm achieved a median survival of almost 1-year, supporting chemoradiation as an important therapeutic modality for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Maintenance R115777 is not effective and is associated with a broad range of toxicities. These findings provide clinical evidence that inhibition of farnesylation affects many metabolic pathways, underscoring the challenge of developing an effective K-ras inhibitor.

Real-time Genomic Characterization of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer to Enable Precision Medicine

Clinically relevant subtypes exist for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but molecular characterization is not yet standard in clinical care. We implemented a biopsy protocol to perform time-sensitive whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing for patients with advanced PDAC. Therapeutically relevant genomic alterations were identified in 48% (34/71) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline alterations in 18% (13/71) of patients. Overall, 30% (21/71) of enrolled patients experienced a change in clinical management as a result of genomic data. Twenty-six patients had germline and/or somatic alterations in DNA-damage repair genes, and 5 additional patients had mutational signatures of homologous recombination deficiency but no identified causal genomic alteration. Two patients had oncogenic in-frame BRAF deletions, and we report the first clinical evidence that this alteration confers sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibition. Moreover, we identified tumor/stroma gene expression signatures with clinical relevance. Collectively, these data demonstrate the feasibility and value of real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC.Significance: Molecular analyses of metastatic PDAC tumors are challenging due to the heterogeneous cellular composition of biopsy specimens and rapid progression of the disease. Using an integrated multidisciplinary biopsy program, we demonstrate that real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC can identify clinically relevant alterations that inform management of this difficult disease. Cancer Discov; 8(9); 1096-111. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Collisson, p. 1062This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1047.

Clinical Trial Accrual Targeting Genomic Alterations After Next-Generation Sequencing at a Non-National Cancer Institute–Designated Cancer Program

PURPOSEnSuccessful clinical trial accrual targeting uncommon genomic alterations will require broad national participation from both National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer centers and community cancer programs. This report describes the initial experience with clinical trial accrual after next-generation sequencing (NGS) from three affiliated non-NCI-designated cancer programs.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnClinical trial participation was reviewed after enrollment of the first 200 patients undergoing comprehensive genomic profiling by NGS as part of an institutional intuitional review board-approved protocol at three affiliated hospitals in Rhode Island and was compared with published experience from NCI-designated cancer centers.nnnRESULTSnPatient characteristics included a median age of 64 years, a median of two lines of prior therapy, and a predominance of GI carcinomas (58%). One hundred sixty-four of 200 patients (82%) had adequate tumor for NGS, 95% had genomic alterations identified, and 100% had variants of unknown significance. Fifteen of 164 patients (9.2%) enrolled in genotype-directed clinical trials, and three patients (1.8%) received commercially available targeted agents off clinical trials. The reasons for nonreceipt of NGS-directed therapy were no locally available matching trial (48.6%), ineligibility (33.6%) because of comorbidities or interim clinical deterioration, physicians choice of a different therapy (6.8%), or stable disease (11%).nnnCONCLUSIONnThis experience demonstrates that a program enrolling patients in specific targeted agent clinical trials after NGS can be implemented successfully outside of the NCI-designated cancer program network, with comparable accrual rates. This is important because targetable genes have rare mutation rates and clinical trial accrual after NGS is low.

FOLFOX+Nab-Paclitaxel (FOLFOX-A) for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Brown University Oncology Research Group Phase I Study.

Background:The Brown University Oncology Research Group performed a phase I study to remove irinotecan from FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) and substitute nab-paclitaxel. Methods:Patients with newly diagnosed advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were eligible. Patients received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 with 3 dose levels of nab-paclitaxel (125, 150, and 175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities were assessed in the first 2 cycles of treatment. The final dose level was expanded to assess cumulative neurotoxicity. Results:Thirty-five patients were entered; 24 with metastatic and 11 with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The maximum tolerated dose of nab-paclitaxel was 150 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with FOLFOX. Cumulative neuropathy was the most important toxicity. Grade 3 neuropathy developed in 2 of the first 6 patients at 10 and 11 cycles of FOLFOX-A. Following an amendment to reduce oxaliplatin to 65 mg/m2 if grade 2 neuropathy developed, no additional patients developed grade 3 neurotoxicity. Twenty-one of 35 patients (60%) had a partial response. The median survival for patients with metastatic disease was 15 months. Conclusions:The maximum tolerated dose of nab-paclitaxel is 150 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with FOLFOX. The regimen of FOLFOX-A represents a promising treatment for pancreatic cancer.

When, What, and Why of Perioperative Treatment of Potentially Curable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 64-year-old woman with a history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes had been in her usual state of health until she developed symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal bloating, and discomfort in the midepigastrium. Evaluation with a contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a mass in the pancreatic body that was approximately 3.1 cm × 2 cm × 2.1 cm in size with abutment of the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein confluence for less than 180°. The confluence was narrowed but without thrombosis. No tumor-vessel interface was noted at the superior mesenteric artery, celiac artery, or common hepatic artery. Several peripancreatic lymph nodes were observed that measured up to 11 mm × 5 mm. No evidence for distant spread of disease was identified. An upper endoscopy with endoscopic ultrasound was performed and fine-needle aspirates of the pancreas mass were positive for malignant cells that were consistent with adenocarcinoma. Chest CT scan without intravenous contrast demonstrated no evidence of metastatic disease. The patient came to the clinic to discuss management of her newly diagnosed malignancy.

Germline cancer susceptibility gene variants, somatic second hits, and survival outcomes in patients with resected pancreatic cancer

PurposeGermline variants in double-strand DNA damage repair (dsDDR) genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) predispose to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and may predict sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and poly(ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We sought to determine the prevalence and significance of germline cancer susceptibility gene variants in PDAC with paired somatic and survival analyses.MethodsUsing a customized next-generation sequencing panel, germline/somatic DNA was analyzed from 289 patients with resected PDAC ascertained without preselection for high-risk features (e.g., young age, personal/family history). All identified variants were assessed for pathogenicity. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression.ResultsWe found that 28/289 (9.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5–13.7%) patients carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants, including 21 (7.3%) dsDDR gene variants (3 BRCA1, 4 BRCA2, 14 other dsDDR genes [ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51C]), 3 Lynch syndrome, and 4 other genes (APC p.I1307K, CDKN2A, TP53). Somatic sequencing and immunohistochemistry identified second hits in the tumor in 12/27 (44.4%) patients with germline variants (1 failed sequencing). Compared with noncarriers, patients with germline dsDDR gene variants had superior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54; 95% CI 0.30–0.99; Pu2009=u20090.05).ConclusionNearly 10% of PDAC patients harbor germline variants, although the majority lack somatic second hits, the therapeutic significance of which warrants further study.

Aurora A Functional Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Correlates With Clinical Outcome in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Treated With Alisertib, an Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor

Background Alisertib (MLN8237) is an investigational, oral, selective Aurora A kinase inhibitor. Aurora A contains two functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; codon 31 [F/I] and codon 57 [V/I]) that lead to functional changes. This study investigated the prognostic and predictive significance of these SNPs. Methods This study evaluated associations between Aurora A SNPs and overall survival (OS) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The Aurora A SNPs were also evaluated as predictive biomarkers for clinical outcomes to alisertib in two phase 2 studies (NCT01045421 and NCT01091428). Aurora A SNP genotyping was obtained from 85 patients with advanced solid tumors receiving single-agent alisertib and 122 patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer treated with alisertib plus weekly paclitaxel (n = 62) or paclitaxel alone (n = 60). Whole blood was collected prior to treatment and genotypes were analyzed by PCR. Findings TCGA data suggested prognostic significance for codon 57 SNP; solid tumor patients with VV and VI alleles had significantly reduced OS versus those with II alleles (HR 1.9 [VI] and 1.8 [VV]; p < 0.0001). In NCT01045421, patients carrying the VV alleles at codon 57 (n = 53, 62%) had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than patients carrying IV or II alleles (n = 32, 38%; HR 0.5; p = 0.0195). In NCT01091428, patients with the VV alleles at codon 57 who received alisertib plus paclitaxel (n = 47, 39%) had a trend towards improved PFS (7.5 months) vs paclitaxel alone (n = 32, 26%; 3.8 months; HR 0.618; p = 0.0593). In the paclitaxel alone arm, patients with the VV alleles had reduced PFS vs modified intent-to-treat (mITT) patients (3.8 vs 5.1 months), consistent with the TCGA study identifying the VV alleles as a poor prognostic biomarker. No significant associations were identified for codon 31 SNP from the same data set. Interpretation These findings suggest that Aurora A SNP at codon 57 may predict disease outcome and response to alisertib in patients with solid tumors. Further investigation is warranted.

Pitfalls of Personalizing Cancer Treatment.

To the Editor: I would like to bring to attention the inherent confusion that may result in the detection of mutation in genes associated with hereditary genes, as a result raising the question of an unsuspected hereditary cancer syndrome. This issue is important and timely as large National Cancer Institute cooperative group studies such as the Lung-MAP and the National Cancer Institute Match trials are opening. These trials plan to profile tumor DNA from each patient, and then assign him or her to the arm of the study that is testing a drug designed to target those specific genetic changes. Tumor profiling is an analysis of tumor genes that may have been acquired, aka, somatic mutations. The Rhode Island Hospital Comprehensive Cancer center, under an IRB-approved protocol, has utilized Foundation Medicine, the central laboratory for the Lung-MAP study to profile 68 patients’ tumor DNA. Only one of these patients had a previously defined familial cancer syndrome. Tumor types tested included colorectal (n = 26), pancreatic (n = 11), lung (n = 4), breast (n = 3), sarcoma (n = 2), prostate (n = 1), bladder (n = 1), renal (n = 1), esophageal (n = 5), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 5), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 3), and other (n = 6). Fifty of 68 patients (73.5%) had a somatic gene mutation known to be associated with a familial cancer syndromes including BRCA2, STK11, VHL, APC, PiK3CA, ATM, P53, SMAD4, CDKN2a, PTEN, and CDH1. There are data to support that patients without a suggestive familial cancer history who have tumors with a p53 mutation, a colon cancer with an APC mutation, or a renal cancer with a VHL mutation, do not require additional testing for a germline mutations. However, there were insufficient data for many of the other mutations detected in our series; such as a patient with an STK11 mutation without clinical or family history suggesting Peutz Jeghers Syndrome and a patient with biliary cancer and a BRCA2 mutation without family history of cancer. With the advent of multigene profiling Next Generation Sequencing technology, there have been significant clinical benefits in treatment; however, it has also raised questions regarding hereditary cancer predisposition. At this time the efficiency and capability of Next Generation Sequencing technology is outpacing clinical practice and has also raised issues related to insurance reimbursement. Until national guidelines are established to reflect the current clinical situation, clinicians will need to underscore the need for obtaining family history as recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network and recognize the necessity of collaboration with medical genetics to ensure quality care. It is ironic, in this era of highly sophisticated next-generation sequencing, that the most important indicator for genetic testing remains a well-taken family history.

The role of nursing in obtaining a three-generation familial cancer history intake tool (FCHT) and the care of patients with hereditary gastrointestinal syndromes.

216 Background: Of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 5-10% of all cancers are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Since hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes convey a markedly increased risk for developing cancer, identification of affected families is important. Studies have found that clinicians are unlikely to adequately or routinely collect family history information on their patients. This study assessed the implementation of a validated three-generation family history intake tool by an advanced practiced nurse practitioner (APNP) and the impact on clinical practice at a mid-size academic affiliated Medical Oncology practice.nnnMETHODSnFrom September 2013 to January 2014, 100 patients with the diagnosis of colorectal cancer were assessed after a clinic session with a physician by an APNP. The APNP utilized a validated 3 - generation family history tool. Information regarding age, sex, education, annual income, family ethnicity, diet, exercise and previous genetic testing was also collected. Data collected was then analyzed to assess risk of hereditary syndrome. A chart review of the patients was performed to analyze microsatellite instability testing and prior genetic counseling referrals.nnnRESULTSnOf the 100 screened, 93 patients were evaluable. There were 52 males: 39 female participants with a median age of 60.71 years (range 28-90). The implementation of FCHT was associated with an increase in identification of individuals at risk; 16 (17.2%) patients reported a diagnosis of CRC at age less than 50. The rate of referrals for genetic evaluation tripled after the implementation of the FCHT (6.5% to 16.3%). Of the 17 referred, five had been referred prior to implementation of the FCHT.nnnCONCLUSIONSnInstitution of a separate session with an APNP to assess family history resulted in a 3-fold increase in rates of detection of patients with high risk for hereditary cancer syndromes associated with colorectal cancer.This study demonstrates that APNPs are well positioned to promote preventative health by engaging in family history intake and genetic assessment referral.