Kimberly T. Goetz
University of California, Santa Cruz
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kimberly T. Goetz.
PLOS ONE | 2012
Patrick W. Robinson; Daniel P. Costa; Daniel E. Crocker; Juan Pablo Gallo-Reynoso; Cory D. Champagne; Melinda A. Fowler; Chandra Goetsch; Kimberly T. Goetz; Jason L. Hassrick; Luis A. Hückstädt; Carey E. Kuhn; Jennifer L. Maresh; Sara M. Maxwell; Birgitte I. McDonald; Sarah H. Peterson; Samantha E. Simmons; Nicole M. Teutschel; Stella Villegas-Amtmann; Ken Yoda
The mesopelagic zone of the northeast Pacific Ocean is an important foraging habitat for many predators, yet few studies have addressed the factors driving basin-scale predator distributions or inter-annual variability in foraging and breeding success. Understanding these processes is critical to reveal how conditions at sea cascade to population-level effects. To begin addressing these challenging questions, we collected diving, tracking, foraging success, and natality data for 297 adult female northern elephant seal migrations from 2004 to 2010. During the longer post-molting migration, individual energy gain rates were significant predictors of pregnancy. At sea, seals focused their foraging effort along a narrow band corresponding to the boundary between the sub-arctic and sub-tropical gyres. In contrast to shallow-diving predators, elephant seals target the gyre-gyre boundary throughout the year rather than follow the southward winter migration of surface features, such as the Transition Zone Chlorophyll Front. We also assessed the impact of added transit costs by studying seals at a colony near the southern extent of the species’ range, 1,150 km to the south. A much larger proportion of seals foraged locally, implying plasticity in foraging strategies and possibly prey type. While these findings are derived from a single species, the results may provide insight to the foraging patterns of many other meso-pelagic predators in the northeast Pacific Ocean.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2013
Fabien Roquet; Carl Wunsch; Gael Forget; Patrick Heimbach; Christophe Guinet; Gilles Reverdin; Jean-Benoit Charrassin; Frédéric Bailleul; Daniel P. Costa; Luis A. Hückstädt; Kimberly T. Goetz; Kit M. Kovacs; Christian Lydersen; Martin Biuw; Ole Anders Nøst; Horst Bornemann; Joachim Ploetz; Marthan Nieuwoudt Bester; Trevor McIntyre; Mark A. Hindell; Clive R. McMahon; Gd Williams; Robert G. Harcourt; Iain C. Field; Léon Chafik; Keith W. Nicholls; Lars Boehme; Michael A. Fedak
Over the last decade, several hundred seals have been equipped with conductivity-temperature-depth sensors in the Southern Ocean for both biological and physical oceanographic studies. A calibrated collection of seal-derived hydrographic data is now available, consisting of more than 165,000 profiles. The value of these hydrographic data within the existing Southern Ocean observing system is demonstrated herein by conducting two state estimation experiments, differing only in the use or not of seal data to constrain the system. Including seal-derived data substantially modifies the estimated surface mixed-layer properties and circulation patterns within and south of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Agreement with independent satellite observations of sea ice concentration is improved, especially along the East Antarctic shelf. Instrumented animals efficiently reduce a critical observational gap, and their contribution to monitoring polar climate variability will continue to grow as data accuracy and spatial coverage increase.
American Biology Teacher | 2016
Caleb M. Bryce; Vikram B. Baliga; Kristin L. de Nesnera; Duran Fiack; Kimberly T. Goetz; L. Maxine Tarjan; Catherine E. Wade; Veronica Yovovich; Sarah Baumgart; Donald G. Bard; Doris Ash; Ingrid M. Parker; Gregory S. Gilbert
Abstract Models are simplified representations of more complex systems that help scientists structure the knowledge they acquire. As such, they are ubiquitous and invaluable in scientific research and communication. Because science education strives to make classroom activities more closely reflect science in practice, models have become integral teaching and learning tools woven throughout the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Although model-based learning and curriculum are not novel in educational theory, only recently has modeling taken center stage in K-12 national standards for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classes. We present a variety of examples to outline the importance of various types of models and the practice of modeling in biological research, as well as the emphasis of NGSS on their use in both classroom learning and assessment. We then suggest best practices for creating and modifying models in the context of student-driven inquiry and demonstrate that even subtle incorporation of modeling into existing science curricula can help achieve student learning outcomes, particularly for English-language learners. In closing, we express the value of models and modeling in life beyond the classroom and research laboratory, and highlight the critical importance of “model literacy” for the next generation of scientists, engineers, and problem-solvers.
Oceanography | 2014
Walker O. Smith; Kimberly T. Goetz; Daniel E. Kaufman; Bastien Y. Queste; Vernon L. Asper; Daniel P. Costa; Michael S. Dinniman; Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs; Eileen E. Hofmann; Karen J. Heywood; John M. Klinck; Josh Kohut; Craig M. Lee
Geophysical Research Letters | 2013
Fabien Roquet; Carl Wunsch; Gael Forget; Patrick Heimbach; Christophe Guinet; Gilles Reverdin; Jean-Benoit Charrassin; Frédéric Bailleul; Daniel P. Costa; Luis A. Hückstädt; Kimberly T. Goetz; Kit M. Kovacs; Christian Lydersen; Martin Biuw; Ole Anders Nøst; Horst Bornemann; Joachim Ploetz; Marthan Nieuwoudt Bester; Trevor McIntyre; Mark A. Hindell; Clive R. McMahon; Gd Williams; Robert G. Harcourt; Iain C. Field; Léon Chafik; Keith W. Nicholls; Lars Boehme; Michael A. Fedak
Deep-sea Research Part Ii-topical Studies in Oceanography | 2017
Kimberly T. Goetz; Jennifer M. Burns; Luis A. Hückstӓdt; Michelle R. Shero; Daniel P. Costa
Marine Mammal Science | 2012
Frank E. Fish; Kimberly T. Goetz; David J. Rugh; Linda Vate Brattström
Marine Fisheries Review | 2016
Kim E. W. Shelden; Kimberly T. Goetz; David J. Rugh; Donald G. Calkins; Barbara A. Mahoney; Roderick C. Hobbs
Animal Biotelemetry | 2015
Gerald L. Kooyman; Birgitte I. McDonald; Kimberly T. Goetz
Marine Fisheries Review | 2018
Kim E. W. Shelden; Julie A. Mocklin; Kimberly T. Goetz; David J. Rugh; Linda Vate Brattström; Nancy Friday