Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kimmo Silvo is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kimmo Silvo.


International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | 2004

Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems a new method for calculating the potential contributions of nitrogen and phosphorus

Jyri Seppälä; Seppo Knuuttila; Kimmo Silvo

Aim, Scope and BackgroundAquatic eutrophication is a widespread problem in inland and coastal waters around the world and it should therefore be one of the impact categories to be considered in LCA studies of products and services. In LCAs there are several impact assessment methods to determine characterisation factors for eutrophying nutrients, but few methods have been developed to model fate and spatial aspects. One such method was developed as part of an LCA application of the Finnish forest industry. The aim of this study was to present this characterisation method in which the potential contributions of nitrogen and phosphorus to eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems are calculated. The use of the method was demonstrated by producing site/sector-specific characterisation factors and by constructing a reference value of aquatic eutrophication for Finland. A discussion of sensitivity and uncertainty aspects related to input data is also presented.MethodsThe potential contribution to eutrophication from a product system is calculated as a result of the nutrient inputs causing increased production of biomass within aquatic systems. Accordingly, direct nitrogen and phosphorus emissions as well as nitrogen and phosphorus deposition into the watercourses can be included. In the method, characterisation factors for nitrogen and phosphorus emissions are generated by multiplying commonly used equivalency factors by transport and effect factors. Transport and effect factors of the nutrient sources are case-specific and can be determined for each substance individually on the basis of scientific models, empirical data or expert judgements. In this paper, transport and effect factors are determined for different sectors (forest industry, field cultivation, fish farming, etc.) in Finland. In addition, temporal aspects can be taken account of in the model by coefficients representing the proportion of nutrient load in the productive period of the total annual load. The model uncertainty was studied by using three different scenarios based on different input data and assumptions. Uncertainties within the input data were assessed as ranges and the effects of input data uncertainty on the results were studied by varying maximum and minimum values of each input variable in the same time.Results and DiscussionThe characterisation method developed was applied to provide characterisation factors of aquatic eutrophication for different sectors in Finland. The magnitude of these sector-specific characterisation factors varied greatly. For this reason, the method results were easily differentiated from those commonly used, site-generic characterisation factors produced in LCIAs. Furthermore, reference values of aquatic eutrophication for normalisation purposes in LCIA were gener-ated on the basis of sector-specific nutrient emissions and characterisation factors. Different scenarios produce alternative pictures of the contributions of various sectors to aquatic eutrophication. By examining the scores of different sectors, it can be concluded that uncertainties in the emission estimates of field cultivation and fate of nitrogen originating from deposition have the greatest effect on the results. In the average scenario, the uncertainty range for the reference value was estimated to be ± 40% due to all uncertainties in input variables.ConclusionsThe results of the work reveal the importance of site-specific characterisation approach in the context of aquatic eutrophication. Furthermore, differentiation of nutrient forms in various sectors means that the question of determination of characterisation factors is also related to sector-specific issues. The method demonstrated is flexible, and it can be applied to geographical areas rather than to Finland as a whole. The use of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis is recommended for the interpretation of results, because there is no empirical test applicable for evaluation of the validity of results. In order to reduce uncertainty in results, further research is needed, in particular on the roles of different nutrient forms as sources for aquatic biota, on spatial differentiation of nitrogen and phosphorus as production-limiting factors, and on fate of nitrogen in catchments.OutlookThe weakness of the method is related to the accessibility of input data, restricting to construct the characterisation model of aquatic eutrophication, for example, on the European level. However, it seems that legislative requirements of the European Union to study ‘target nutrient loads’ of aquatic eutrophication in the catchments of each Member State can improve the situation of the accessibility of input data in the near future.


Resources Conservation and Recycling | 2002

Integrated pollution prevention and control - the Finnish approach

Kimmo Silvo; Matti Melanen; Antero Honkasalo; Seppo Ruonala; Marianne Lindström

Abstract The Finnish environmental policy concerning industrial activities rests to a large extent on the following three principles, (1) participation of industry and other stakeholders in the preparation of new legislation and in the setting up of environmental targets; (2) strict but practical and cost-effective implementation of regulations, standards and permit provisions, in which operators themselves can choose appropriate technical measures to meet the requirements; (3) transparency and easy access to environmental information. Participation of industry in the preparatory process of regulations and other policy instruments is aimed at increasing the commitment of operators to the decisions made. On the other hand, this has given room for some flexibility, such as self-monitoring of permit conditions, in enforcement. Clearly, the main emphasis is placed on prevention rather than on detailed enforcement programmes. Finland adopted the Directive on integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) of the European union (EU) by introducing a new Environmental Protection Act that came into force on 1 March 2000. The Act puts new focus on the principle of best available techniques (BAT), holistic and integrated approach, high level of environmental protection by cost-effective measures, energy efficiency and risk management. Furthermore, an important new feature to be tackled is the supplementing of permitting with voluntary environmental management systems, particularly ISO 14 001 and EMAS, and with energy conservation agreements. Substantial supporting activities have been established in Finland in order to strengthen and enhance the application of BAT and an integrated approach. National Industry Branch Groups (IBGs) have been, and will be set up, for the major BAT reference document (BREF) categories of the EU. The IBGs consist of permitting and enforcement authorities and experts of the industries concerned. Several R&D projects have also been launched in order to provide a good knowledge base and supportive methods for improving integrated pollution prevention. A systems approach to integrated environmental permitting is elaborated and discussed in this article.


Journal of Cleaner Production | 2009

Implications of regulation based on the IPPC directive - a review on the Finnish pulp and paper industry.

Kimmo Silvo; Timo Jouttijärvi; Matti Melanen


Archive | 2005

Report on the implementation of the Nitrates Directive in Finland 2004

Sari Mitikka; Ritva Britschgi; Kirsti Granlund; Juha Grönroos; Pirkko Kauppila; Risto Mäkinen; Jorma Niemi; Sonja Pyykkönen; Arjen Raateland; Kimmo Silvo


European Environment | 2005

Best available techniques (BAT) in the Finnish pulp and paper industry – a critical review

Kimmo Silvo; Timo Jouttijärvi; Matti Melanen; Seppo Ruonala


Archive | 2001

Kirjolohen tuotanto ja ympäristö

Jyri Seppälä; Frans Silvenius; Juha Grönroos; Timo Mäkinen; Kimmo Silvo; Esa Storhammar


Archive | 2006

Vesiensuojelun suuntaviivat vuoteen 2015: Taustaselvityksen lähtökohdat ja yhteenveto tuloksista

Hannele Nyroos; Marjut Partanen-Hertell; Kimmo Silvo; Pauli Kleemola


Archive | 2015

Päästökattodirektiiviehdotuksen ja keskisuurten polttolaitosten direktiiviehdotuksen toimeenpanon vaikutukset Suomessa

Pirke Suoheimo; Juha Grönroos; Niko Karvosenoja; Jouko Petäjä; Kristina Saarinen; Mikko Savolahti; Kimmo Silvo


Archive | 2006

Rehevöittävän kuormituksen vähentäminen. Taustaselvitys osa I: Vesiensuojelun suuntaviivat vuoteen 2015

Seppo Rekolainen; Heidi Vuoristo; Lea Kauppi; Saara Bäck; Marjaana Eerola; Timo Jouttijärvi; Erkki Kaukoranta; Kaarle Kenttämies; Sari Mitikka; Heikki Pitkänen; Anne Polso; Markku Puustinen; Liisa Maria Rautio; Antti Räike; Johanna Räsänen; Erkki Santala; Kimmo Silvo; Sirkka Tattari


Archive | 2001

Assessment of environmental impacts: A case study of an integrated approach at the plant level

Matti Melanen; Kimmo Silvo; Lea Gynther

Collaboration


Dive into the Kimmo Silvo's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Timo Jouttijärvi

Finnish Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matti Melanen

Finnish Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juha Grönroos

Finnish Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jyri Seppälä

Finnish Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Seija Tuulentie

Finnish Forest Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna Luomaranta

Finnish Meteorological Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Heidi Vuoristo

Finnish Environment Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge