Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kinta Beaver is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kinta Beaver.


Cancer Nursing | 1996

Treatment decision making in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.

Kinta Beaver; Karen A. Luker; R. Glynn Owens; Sj Leinster; Lesley F. Degner; Jeff A. Sloan

The purpose of this study was to explore the hypothesis that women with breast cancer had specific preferences about the degree of control they wanted over treatment decision making. One hundred fifty women, newly diagnosed with breast cancer, were interviewed and their preferences for participation in treatment decision making were established using a measurement tool designed to elicit decision-making preferences (Degner LF, Sloan JF. Decision making during serious illness: What role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:944-50). Two hundred women with benign breast disease served as a descriptive comparison group. Unfolding theory (Coombs CH. A theory of data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1964) provided a means of analyzing the data so that the degree of control preferred by each woman could be established. The majority of the newly diagnosed women preferred to play a passive role in treatment decision making, leaving the decision-making responsibility to their physician, whereas the benign control group preferred a collaborative role in which joint decisions could be made between the patient and the physician. The implications of the results for patient participation are discussed.


Health Expectations | 1999

Decision‐making role preferences and information needs: a comparison of colorectal and breast cancer

Kinta Beaver; Janet Bogg; Karen A. Luker

Objective An exploratory study has been carried out to examine decision‐making role preferences and information needs for a sample of people with colorectal cancer (n=48). The work replicated a larger study carried out for women with breast cancer (n=150), and this paper compares and contrasts findings for both disease groups.


BMJ | 2009

Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial

Kinta Beaver; Debbie Tysver-Robinson; Malcolm Campbell; Mary Twomey; Susan Williamson; Andrew C. Hindley; Shabbir Susnerwala; Graham Dunn; Karen A. Luker

Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer. Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months. Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in the north west of England Participants 374 women treated for breast cancer who were at low to moderate risk of recurrence. Interventions Participants were randomised to traditional hospital follow-up (consultation, clinical examination, and mammography as per hospital policy) or telephone follow-up by specialist nurses (consultation with structured intervention and mammography according to hospital policy). Main outcome measures Psychological morbidity (state-trait anxiety inventory, general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)), participants’ needs for information, participants’ satisfaction, clinical investigations ordered, and time to detection of recurrent disease. Results The 95% confidence interval for difference in mean state-trait scores adjusted for treatment received (−3.33 to 2.07) was within the predefined equivalence region (−3.5 to 3.5). The women in the telephone group were no more anxious as a result of foregoing clinic examinations and face-to-face consultations and reported higher levels of satisfaction than those attending hospital clinics (intention to treat P<0.001). The numbers of clinical investigations ordered did not differ between groups. Recurrences were few (4.5%), with no differences between groups for time to detection (median 60.5 (range 37-131) days in hospital group v 39.0 (10-152) days in telephone group; P=0.228). Conclusions Telephone follow-up was well received by participants, with no physical or psychological disadvantage. It is suitable for women at low to moderate risk of recurrence and those with long travelling distances or mobility problems and decreases the burden on busy hospital clinics. Trial registration National Cancer Research Institute 1477.


Thorax | 2005

Involvement in treatment decisions: what do adults with asthma want and what do they get? Results of a cross sectional survey

Ann-Louise Caress; Kinta Beaver; Karen A. Luker; Campbell Mg; Ashley Woodcock

Background: Current healthcare policy advocates patient participation in treatment decision making. However, in asthma there is little evidence regarding patients’ views on such involvement. This study explored the preferred and perceived level of involvement in treatment decisions, rationales for role preference, perceived facilitators of/barriers to involvement, and the interrelationship of role preference and demographic variables in a sample of patients with asthma. Methods: A cross sectional survey was performed of 230 adults with clinician diagnosed asthma from 10 primary care sites and one specialist respiratory centre in north-west England. Preferred role in treatment decisions was assessed using the Control Preferences Scale. Results: Fifty five (23.9%) preferred an active role, 82 (35.7%) a collaborative role, and 93 (40.4%) a passive role; 19 (8.2%) perceived their role as active compared with 45 (19.6%) collaborative and 166 (72.2%) passive. Only 33.5% (n = 77) of respondents attained their most preferred role; 55.2% (n = 127) were less involved than they preferred. Patient related, professional related, and organisational factors, especially quality and duration of consultations, facilitated or hampered involvement. Role preferences were not strongly associated with demographic variables or asthma severity. Conclusions: This study in patients with asthma highlights the fact that there is a need for professional and patient education regarding partnership working, skilful communication, and innovative approaches to service delivery.


Health Expectations | 2005

Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer

Kinta Beaver; David R. Jones; Shabbir Susnerwala; Olive Craven; Mary Tomlinson; Gary Witham; Karen A. Luker

Objectives  To explore patient views on participation in treatment, physical care and psychological care decisions and factors that facilitate and hinder patients from making decisions.


Patient Education and Counseling | 1997

Readability Of Patient Information Booklets For Women With Breast Cancer

Kinta Beaver; Karen A. Luker

Providing accurate information, in both verbal and written formats, is seen as an important component of patient care. For individuals diagnosed with cancer, acquiring information may be a particularly pertinent issue in terms of coping with the disease. Numerous information booklets are available for people with cancer which aim to provide information on various aspects of care and treatment. This British study examined the readability of 50 information booklets available to women with breast cancer using the SMOG and Flesch reading tests. Generally the information booklets were found to have a high reading age, arguably not suitable for the majority of the United Kingdom (UK) population. This study has implications for health care professionals who provide written information as a supplement or substitute for verbal information.


Health Expectations | 2002

A qualitative exploration of treatment decision‐making role preference in adult asthma patients

Ann-Louise Caress; Karen A. Luker; Ashley Woodcock; Kinta Beaver

Objectives  To explore preferred treatment decision‐making roles, and rationales for role preference, and to identify perceived facilitators to and barriers from attaining preferred role.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2011

Survival Benefits from Follow-Up of Patients with Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lynn Calman; Kinta Beaver; Daniel Hind; Paul Lorigan; Chris Roberts; Myfanwy Lloyd-Jones

Introduction: The burden of lung cancer is high for patients and carers. Care after treatment may have the potential to impact on this. We reviewed the published literature on follow-up strategies intended to improve survival and quality of life. Methods: We systematically reviewed studies comparing follow-up regimes in lung cancer. Primary outcomes were overall survival (comparing more intensive versus less intensive follow-up) and survival comparing symptomatic with asymptomatic recurrence. Quality of life was identified as a secondary outcome measure. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals from eligible studies were synthesized. Results: Nine studies that examined the role of more intensive follow-up for patients with lung cancer were included (eight observational studies and one randomized controlled trial). The studies of curative resection included patients with non-small cell lung cancer Stages I to III disease, and studies of palliative treatment follow-up included limited and extensive stage patients with small cell lung cancer. A total of 1669 patients were included in the studies. Follow-up programs were heterogeneous and multifaceted. A nonsignificant trend for intensive follow-up to improve survival was identified, for the curative intent treatment subgroup (HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.66–1.05). Asymptomatic recurrence was associated with increased survival, which was statistically significant HR: 0.61 (0.50–0.74) (p < 0.01); quality of life was only assessed in one study. Conclusions: This meta-analysis must be interpreted with caution due to the potential for bias in the included studies: observed benefit may be due to systematic differences in outcomes rather than intervention effects. Some benefit was noted from intensive follow-up strategies. More robust data, in the form of randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these findings as the review is based primarily on observational studies. Future research should also include patient-centered outcomes to investigate the impact of follow-up regimes on living with lung cancer and psychosocial well-being.


Cancer Nursing | 2005

A comparison of the information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer in Malaysia and the United Kingdom

Raja Lexshimi Raja Gopal; Kinta Beaver; Tony Barnett; Nik Safiah Nik Ismail

Little is known about the information needs of women with breast cancer in non-Western societies. This study examined the priority information needs of 100 women with breast cancer in Malaysia and compared the findings to previous work involving 150 women diagnosed with breast cancer in the United Kingdom. The study used a valid and reliable measure, the Information Needs Questionnaire (INQ). The INQ contained 9 items of information related to physical, psychological, and social care, used successfully in Canada and the United Kingdom. The INQ was shown to have cross-cultural relevance and sensitivity. For Malaysian women, information about likelihood of cure, sexual attractiveness, and spread of disease were the most important information needs. For UK women, similar priorities were evident, apart from the item on sexual attractiveness, which was ranked much lower by women in the United Kingdom. The cultural similarities and differences that emerged from this study have implications for nurses in the cancer field caring for people from a diversity of cultural backgrounds. Breast care nurses are not a feature of the Malaysian healthcare system, although the findings from this study support the view that specialist nurses have a vital role to play in meeting the psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer in non-Western societies.


Colorectal Disease | 2012

An exploratory randomized controlled trial comparing telephone and hospital follow-up after treatment for colorectal cancer.

Kinta Beaver; Malcolm Campbell; Susan Williamson; D. Procter; J. Sheridan; J. Heath; S. Susnerwala

Aim Following treatment for colorectal cancer it is common practice for patients to attend hospital clinics at regular intervals for routine monitoring, although debate persists on the benefits of this approach. Nurse‐led telephone follow‐up is effective in meeting information and psycho‐social needs in other patient groups. We explored the potential benefits of nurse‐led telephone follow‐up for colorectal cancer patients.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kinta Beaver's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Karen A. Luker

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan Williamson

University of Central Lancashire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lynn Calman

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sj Leinster

University of East Anglia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Roberts

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gary Witham

Manchester Metropolitan University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge