Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kirstin M. Small is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kirstin M. Small.


Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences | 2017

High-Resolution 3T MR Imaging of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex

Donald von Borstel; Michael Wang; Kirstin M. Small; Taiki Nozaki; Hiroshi Yoshioka

This study is intended as a review of 3Tesla (T) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). The recent advances in MR imaging, which includes high field strength magnets, multi-channel coils, and isotropic 3-dimensional (3D) sequences have enabled the visualization of precise TFCC anatomy with high spatial and contrast resolution. In addition to the routine wrist protocol, there are specific techniques used to optimize 3T imaging of the wrist; including driven equilibrium sequence (DRIVE), parallel imaging, and 3D imaging. The coil choice for 3T imaging of the wrist depends on a number of variables, and the proper coil design selection is critical for high-resolution wrist imaging with high signal and contrast-to-noise ratio. The TFCC is a complex structure and is composed of the articular disc (disc proper), the triangular ligament, the dorsal and volar radioulnar ligaments, the meniscus homologue, the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon sheath, and the ulnolunate and ulnotriquetral ligaments. The Palmer classification categorizes TFCC lesions as traumatic (type 1) or degenerative (type 2). In this review article, we present clinical high-resolution MR images of normal TFCC anatomy and TFCC injuries with this classification system.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2014

Imaging characteristics of lesser tuberosity osteotomy after total shoulder replacement: a study of 220 patients

Kirstin M. Small; Elana J. Siegel; Lindsay R. Miller; Laurence D. Higgins

BACKGROUND The lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) has been gaining popularity as a method of exposing the glenohumeral joint during total shoulder replacement, whereby a small fragment of bone is removed from the lesser tuberosity, thus preserving the subscapularis tendon. To date, no large, randomized studies have reported evaluations of LTO healing and healing rates. METHODS We reviewed the radiographs and available computed tomography images of 362 patients who underwent a total shoulder arthroplasty by the same surgeon between 2006 and 2012. The integrity of the LTO site was graded as not seen, bony union, nondisplaced nonunion, and displaced nonunion. The smoking status of patients was also assessed. RESULTS Of 362 patients investigated, 220 had a minimum of 6 months of radiographic follow-up. The LTO site was not seen in 37 patients; of the remaining 183, 159 patients (86.89%) demonstrated bony union, 8.80% of whom were smokers; 16 patients (8.74%) demonstrated nondisplaced nonunion, 6.3% of whom were smokers; and 8 patients (4.3%) demonstrated displaced nonunion, 25.0% of whom were smokers. Overall, 19 of the 24 nonunions were in male patients (79.1%) and 5 were in female patients (20.8%). CONCLUSIONS This is the first large-scale study to report the healing rate of LTOs. LTO healing is best assessed on radiographs; if nondisplaced or displaced nonunions are suspected, computed tomography can be a helpful additional examination. The number of radiographs where there is a lack of adequate visualization of the LTO site raises important questions about definitive radiographic evaluation using current techniques.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America | 2015

MR Imaging of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex.

Michael E. Cody; David T. Nakamura; Kirstin M. Small; Hiroshi Yoshioka

MR imaging has emerged as the mainstay in imaging internal derangement of the soft tissues of the musculoskeletal system largely because of superior contrast resolution. The complex geometry and diminutive size of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) and its constituent structures can make optimal imaging of the TFCC challenging; therefore, production of clinically useful images requires careful optimization of image acquisition parameters. This article provides a foundation for advanced TFCC imaging including factors to optimize magnetic resonance images, arthrography, detailed anatomy, and classification of injury. In addition, clinical presentations and treatments for TFCC injury are briefly considered.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2016

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Osteonecrosis of the Hip

Mark D. Murphey; Catherine C. Roberts; Jenny T. Bencardino; Marc Appel; Erin Arnold; Eric Y. Chang; Molly Dempsey; Michael G. Fox; Ian Blair Fries; Bennett S. Greenspan; Mary G. Hochman; Jon A. Jacobson; Douglas N. Mintz; Joel S. Newman; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; David A. Rubin; Kirstin M. Small; Barbara N. Weissman

Osteonecrosis of the hip (Legg-Calvé-Perthes) is a common disease, with 10,000-20,000 symptomatic cases annually in the United States. The disorder affects both adults and children and is most frequently associated with trauma and corticosteroid usage. The initial imaging evaluation of suspected hip osteonecrosis is done using radiography. MRI is the most sensitive and specific imaging modality for diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the hip. The clinical significance of hip osteonecrosis is dependent on its potential for articular collapse. The likelihood of articular collapse is significantly increased with involvement of greater than 30%-50% of the femoral head area, which is optimally evaluated by MRI, often in the sagittal plane. Contrast-enhanced MRI may be needed to detect early osteonecrosis of the hip in pediatric patients, revealing hypoperfusion. In patients with a contraindication for MRI, use of either CT or bone scintigraphy with SPECT (single-photon emission CT) are alternative radiologic methods of assessment. Imaging helps guide treatment, which may include core decompression, osteotomy, and ultimately, need for joint replacement. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2017

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density

Robert Ward; Catherine C. Roberts; Jenny T. Bencardino; Erin Arnold; Steven J. Baccei; R. Carter Cassidy; Eric Y. Chang; Michael G. Fox; Bennett S. Greenspan; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Mary G. Hochman; Douglas N. Mintz; Joel S. Newman; Charles Reitman; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Nehal A. Shah; Kirstin M. Small; Barbara N. Weissman

Osteoporosis is a considerable public health risk, with 50% of women and 20% of men >50 years of age experiencing fracture, with mortality rates of 20% within the first year. Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the primary diagnostic modality by which to screen women >65 years of age and men >70 years of age for osteoporosis. In postmenopausal women <65 years of age with additional risk factors for fracture, DXA is recommended. Some patients with bone mineral density above the threshold for treatment may qualify for treatment on the basis of vertebral body fractures detected through a vertebral fracture assessment scan, a lateral spine equivalent generated from a commercial DXA machine. Quantitative CT is useful in patients with advanced degenerative bony changes in their spines. New technologies such as trabecular bone score represent an emerging role for qualitative assessment of bone in clinical practice. It is critical that both radiologists and referring providers consider osteoporosis in their patients, thereby reducing substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost to the health care system. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2016

ACR Appropriateness Criteria Imaging After Shoulder Arthroplasty

Soterios Gyftopoulos; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Catherine C. Roberts; Jenny T. Bencardino; Marc Appel; Steven J. Baccei; R. Carter Cassidy; Eric Y. Chang; Michael G. Fox; Bennett S. Greenspan; Mary G. Hochman; Jon A. Jacobson; Douglas N. Mintz; Joel S. Newman; Nehal A. Shah; Kirstin M. Small; Barbara N. Weissman

There has been a rapid increase in the number of shoulder arthroplasties, including partial or complete humeral head resurfacing, hemiarthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, performed in the United States over the past two decades. Imaging can play an important role in diagnosing the complications that can occur in the setting of these shoulder arthroplasties. This review is divided into two parts. The first part provides a general discussion of various imaging modalities, comprising radiography, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine, and their role in providing useful, treatment-guiding information. The second part focuses on the most appropriate imaging algorithms for shoulder arthroplasty complications such as aseptic loosening, infection, fracture, rotator cuff tendon tear, and nerve injury. The evidence-based ACR Appropriateness Criteria guidelines offered in this report were reached via an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) for rating the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. Further analysis and review of the guidelines were performed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. In those instances in which there was insufficient or equivocal data for recommending the appropriate imaging algorithm, expert opinion may have supplemented the available evidence.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2017

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Extremity Joint Pain—Suspected Inflammatory Arthritis

Jon A. Jacobson; Catherine C. Roberts; Jenny T. Bencardino; Marc Appel; Erin Arnold; Steven J. Baccei; R. Carter Cassidy; Eric Y. Chang; Michael G. Fox; Bennett S. Greenspan; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Mary G. Hochman; Douglas N. Mintz; Joel S. Newman; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Nehal A. Shah; Kirstin M. Small; Barbara N. Weissman

Evaluation for suspected inflammatory arthritis as a cause for chronic extremity joint pain often relies on imaging. This review first discusses the characteristic osseous and soft tissue abnormalities seen with inflammatory arthritis and how they may be imaged. It is essential that imaging results are interpreted in the context of clinical and serologic results to add specificity as there is significant overlap of imaging findings among the various types of arthritis. This review provides recommendations for imaging evaluation of specific types of inflammatory arthritis, including rheumatoid arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, gout, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate disease (or pseudogout), and erosive osteoarthritis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.


American Journal of Roentgenology | 2017

Imaging Evaluation of Nonacute Shoulder Pain

Michael J. Tuite; Kirstin M. Small

OBJECTIVE A variety of radiographic views have been described in the literature for the initial imaging of nonacute shoulder pain. Multiple articles have also discussed the best next imaging test if radiographs do not show the diagnosis, especially the use of unenhanced MRI, MR arthrography, CT arthrography, and ultrasound. The purpose of this article is to examine the evidence for the most helpful radiographic views and the best imaging test after radiographs for different clinical presentations of chronic shoulder pain. CONCLUSION The recommended radiographic views and best next imaging test after the radiograph depends on the clinical diagnosis. Ultrasound is generally preferred over MRI for evaluating chronic rotator cuff pain, whereas MR arthrography, preferably with abducted and externally rotated images, is most accurate for imaging chronic symptoms from a suspected labral tear or instability.


Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery | 2018

Coracoid graft union: a quantitative assessment by computed tomography in primary and revision Latarjet procedure

Mohammad Samim; Kirstin M. Small; Laurence D. Higgins

BACKGROUND The goal of the Latarjet procedure is restoration of shoulder stability enabled by accurate graft positioning and union. This study aimed to establish a reproducible method of quantitatively assessing coracoid graft osseous union percentage (OUP) using computed tomography (CT) scans and to determine the effect of other factors on the OUP. MATERIALS AND METHODS Postoperative CT scans of 41 consecutive patients treated with the open Latarjet procedure (37% primary, 63% revision) for anterior glenohumeral instability were analyzed for the OUP, position of the graft, and screw type and angle. Two musculoskeletal radiologists independently examined the images 2 times, and intraobserver and interobserver reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS Mean OUP was 66% (range, 0%-94%) using quantitate methods, with good intraobserver reliability (ICC = 0.795) and interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.797). Nonunion and significant graft resorption was found in 2 patients. No significant difference was found in the mean OUP in the primary (63%) vs. revision Latarjet procedure (67%). Grafts were flush in 39%, medial in 36%, and lateral in 8%. The medial and neutral graft position was associated with slightly higher OUP (72% and 69%) compared with lateral (65%). OUP was higher when the superior screw angle was less than 17° and the inferior screw angle was less than 24°. This difference did not reach statistical significance. Screw type was not associated with significant difference in OUP. CONCLUSION Quantitative assessment of osseous union of the graft using a reproducible method that we introduced showed similar OUP in the primary and revision Latarjet procedure.


Archive | 2017

Musculoskeletal 3D Printing

Satheesh Krishna; Kirstin M. Small; Troy Maetani; Leonid L. Chepelev; Betty Anne Schwarz; Adnan Sheikh

The optimal management of musculoskeletal disease is dependent on the preservation of anatomic structures and maintenance of biomechanical and kinetic function. 3D printing is being used for presurgical planning of bone lesion resection, joint repair and replacement, congenital deformity correction, and posttraumatic fixation. It has also been utilized for therapeutic purposes through creation of patient personalized prosthetics, drug delivery systems, fixation devices, and other musculoskeletal implants.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kirstin M. Small's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara N. Weissman

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas N. Mintz

Hospital for Special Surgery

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric Y. Chang

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nehal A. Shah

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joel S. Newman

New England Baptist Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge