Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kitty Stewart is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kitty Stewart.


LSE Research Online Documents on Economics | 2002

Measuring Well-Being and Exclusion in Europe's Regions

Kitty Stewart

The Lisbon summit of the European Council in March 2000 declared the number of people living in poverty and social exclusion in the European Union to be unacceptable, and called for steps to tackle the issue, beginning with the setting of targets for particular indicators. The targets suggested have been broad in nature but have largely concentrated on national averages. This paper seeks to marry this approach with the EU?s traditional focus on regional cohesion, by developing regional indicators of well-being and exclusion for EU countries. It draws on a range of sources to put together indicators in five dimensions of well-being: material well-being, health, education and participation in two spheres ? productive and social. It explores, first, how far national indicators disguise geographical inequalities in these different dimensions; and second, the extent to which regional performance differs according to which dimension is being examined. At the same time, the paper draws attention to the limits of currently available data, in light of the fact that one key aspect of the Lisbon summit conclusions was a commitment to the collection of better data on poverty and social exclusion in the EU.


Journal of European Social Policy | 2003

Monitoring Social Inclusion in Europe's Regions

Kitty Stewart

The European Council recently adopted a list of target indicators for EU member states in the fields of poverty and social exclusion, with likely implications for social policies across Europe. The targets chosen are largely national average figures. This paper argues that if regional disparities are to be taken seriously, all key indicators should instead be measured at regional as well as at national level. Using a variety of data sources, it examines regional indicators of poverty, unemployment, education and health, and shows, first, that the degree of dispersion depends on the indicator under scrutiny; and second, that it is not always the same regions within each country which do best and worst in each case. It follows that a single dispersion measure will only be misleading, while the choice of disparity in regional unemployment rates in particular has additional problems which are also discussed. Finally, the paper draws attention to the limits of currently available data at regional level, in light of the fact that one key aspect of the Lisbon 2000 European Council summit conclusions was a commitment to the collection of better data on poverty and social exclusion in the EU.


Journal of European Social Policy | 2009

A share of new growth for children? Policies for the very young in non-EU Europe and the CIS

Kitty Stewart; Maria Carmen Huerta

Economic collapse in the former communist bloc saw the erosion of financial support and services for young children. Since 1998 even the poorer countries of the bloc have seen a return to economic growth. But have the benefits been felt by children? Drawing on administrative and household survey data, this article examines three aspects of government support for young children — maternity benefit, child allowances and preschool provision — in four countries in different parts of the region: Bulgaria, Albania, Moldova and Tajikistan. The article concludes that these services remain vastly inadequate. In some countries child allowances are well targeted towards poorer households, but are too small in size to have an impact. Preschool overwhelmingly benefits urban families and the better-off, while paid maternity leave is increasingly rare. Given what is known about the long-term impact of both early education and early childhood poverty, the findings are of considerable concern.


The Journal of Poverty and Social Justice | 2013

100 Questions: identifying research priorities for poverty prevention and reduction

William J. Sutherland; Chris Goulden; Kate Bell; Fran Bennett; Simon Burall; Marc Bush; Samantha Callan; Kim Catcheside; Julian Corner; Conor T. D'arcy; Matt Dickson; James A. Dolan; Robert Doubleday; Bethany J. Eckley; Esther T. Foreman; Rowan Foster; Louisa Gilhooly; Ann Marie Gray; Amanda Hall; Mike Harmer; Annette Hastings; Chris Johnes; Martin Johnstone; Peter Kelly; Peter Kenway; Neil Lee; Rhys Moore; Jackie Ouchikh; James Plunkett; Karen Rowlingson

Reducing poverty is important for those affected, for society and the economy. Poverty remains entrenched in the UK, despite considerable research efforts to understand its causes and possible solutions. The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, with the Centre for Science and Policy at the University of Cambridge, ran a democratic, transparent, consensual exercise involving 45 participants from government, non-governmental organisations, academia and research to identify 100 important research questions that, if answered, would help to reduce or prevent poverty. The list includes questions across a number of important themes, including attitudes, education, family, employment, heath, wellbeing, inclusion, markets, housing, taxes, inequality and power.


Journal of Social Policy | 2014

Employment Trajectories and Later Employment Outcomes for Mothers in the British Household Panel Survey: An Analysis by Skill Level

Kitty Stewart

This article explores the association between mothers’ involvement in paid employment when their children are young and their later employment prospects. Using 17 waves of the British Household Panel Survey (1997–2007), it examines the employment trajectories of 954 women for the decade after the birth of their youngest child, asking two main questions. Do mothers who enter or return to work tend to remain in employment? And do wages and job satisfaction further down the line (when the youngest child reaches ten years old) reflect the pathway taken? The article focuses in particular on differences between women with higher- and lower-level qualifications. Mothers are found to be following a variety of employment pathways, with instability relatively common: more than one in three move in and out of work over the period, and this movement is just as common among mothers with higher levels of qualifications as among those with only GCSE-level qualifications or none at all. A stable – and longer – work history is associated with increased wages later on, but the benefits are greater for women with higher levels of qualifications, as might be predicted by human capital theory. Women who were more highly qualified and who moved in and out of work over the decade had an hourly wage when their youngest child was ten which was 31 per cent lower than similar women with a stable work history; for women with few or no qualifications the corresponding figure was 10 per cent and statistically insignificant. For both groups, job satisfaction at the end of the decade was unrelated to the pathway taken.


Archive | 2005

A more equal society? New Labour, poverty, inequality and exclusion

John Hills; Kitty Stewart


Archive | 2009

Towards a more equal society? : poverty, inequality and policy since 1997

John Hills; Tom Sefton; Kitty Stewart


Social Indicators Research | 2005

Dimensions Of Well-Being In Eu Regions: Do GDP And Unemployment Tell us All We Need To Know?

Kitty Stewart


Archive | 2000

Child well-being in the EU - and enlargement to the east

John Micklewright; Kitty Stewart


Social Policy & Administration | 2009

Employment and Wage Trajectories for Mothers Entering Low-skilled Work: Evidence from the British Lone Parent Cohort

Kitty Stewart

Collaboration


Dive into the Kitty Stewart's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ludovica Gambaro

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Hills

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ruth Lupton

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Polly Vizard

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Francesca Bastagli

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kerris Cooper

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tania Burchardt

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Micklewright

European University Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Polina Obolenskaya

London School of Economics and Political Science

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge